Drew Dowdell

I've seen that Bonneville before. It is usually stationed at the police office over in the strip district.

You apparently haven't met the same kinda men I've met.

It's the end of the N-body.

t-mobile isnt' bad. They have some decent plans that work well for some people. Their network coverage isn't terrible in metro areas either. There just isn't any point paying extra money for a Quad-band phone on the T-mobile network. Most, if not all, quad-band phones are extra cost. If you want T-mobile, just go with the nicest, cheapest phone that has the features you want.

Black to match my car. Same as my old Motorola MPx200

Uhm.... 4 valves per cylinder, 4 speed auto, dual exhaust. :P

Ya know what, I'm still getting this even after walking away from my PC for a while. I'll come back, hit "View New Posts" and it tells me to wait at least 10 seconds... even though I just had to wiggle the mouse to kill the screensaver.

Funny. I have features of both of my parents. As a kid, I looked a lot like my mother. These days I look a lot like my father and paternal grandfather.

About damn time.

Damn.... as loaded as I can make it and it's still cheaper MSRP then my CTS with Lux package

I'm a Quiznos kinda guy myself.

A friend of mine had a beautiful pearl white 98 Riviera S/C. Even in a car that big the 3800SC did really well. It felt equally as fast as my CTS overall. My CTS is faster on the top end of the speedometer, but the Riv felt like it could take me on the lower end. My biggest complaint was the suspension... going from a CTS to a Riv in curvy western PA was scary for someone who drives as hard as I do. They are two very different style of cars. The CTS is great for carving up mountains and gets impatient with around town driving or turnpike cruising. It doen't like to be driven softly at all. It can be tiring on the PA Turnpike because of the stiffer suspension and the poor quality of the road. The Riv is great for long distance, high speed driving because of the soft suspension and is suprisingly good at around town because of it's loads of low end torque. If I had the budget, I'd have a Riv for my daily driver/long distance cruiser and a CTS-v for my weekend fun car.

Also, much like car dealerships, I pretty much assume that anything told to me by a cellular rep is a lie.

I got a Razr too. I like it cause it's small, I don't need another large bulge in my pants. :P :lol: The unfortunate thing about T-mobile RAZRs is they are locked to only one band. They are a quad band phone, yet you can't get any of the benefits of quad band. The best network to use the RAZR on is Cingular.

Regarless of whether or not gay is in fact genetic, there is no reason genetically for it to cease to exist. I am the offspring of two brown haired, brown eyed heterosexual parents. Yet I am blond haired, blue eyed, and homosexual. Recessive genes can be passed on.

The 5.7 litre LT1 was in the Impala SS, Roadmaster, Fleetwood, and upper trim Caprice from 1993-1996. The specs were: 260 hp 330 ft/lbs torque 17/26 city/highway

This thread is just not going to end well. Every one is different. Every family is different. There is no such thing as the "traditional family". The "traditional family" is offen described as the Clevers in T.V. land and is about as realistic.

The 4.3 wasn't the LT-1. You're looking for the specs on the 5.7

Not diggin it... inside or out. I liked the old one better what ARE they thinking with those taillights?

Have you been sheltered for 48 years also?

6 3

The Northstar has substantially more torque and by virtue of being an 8 v. 6, I'd also say that the torque comes on sooner.

Uh... not really. The Avalon is FWD, the LS is RWD

Well, if sipping gas is a criteria for the Lucerne, I'm afraid to say that the 3.6vvt isn't the answer. I'm lucky to see 28 highway, I get 18 around town.

Well that is silly! I'm a power C&Ger. I have to be able to dash through these forums praising GM and bashing Toyonda quickly now! snap snap snap... let's get moving!