Drew Dowdell

The other issue was that apparently airbags have always had a percentage that do not deploy in an accident and the percentage of non-deployments in these cars was not outside of the statistical norm, thus no statistical anomaly to detect.

You're safer in the SMART than the Venture.

I need a pair of binoculars that are high quality yet nicely compact. Suggestions?

It's such a strange series of events that has to happen to cause a fatal crash that it was nearly impossible to foresee it.

The NHTSA is still needed, but their methods and policies need to be overhauled

CAFE doesn't apply to trucks this large I believe.

CUE will continue in Cadillacs, but I have it on excellent authority that it will be getting a substantial upgrade and revision very very soon. (I'm actually expecting the announcement in the next 2 weeks)

You keep repeating this nonsense as if it’s true. Lincoln is not creating some one-off ultra-expensive magical platform that will sweep in and save the day for Lincoln. That does sound like Cadillac’s failed plan, based on sales and the topic of this thread, but it is NOT Lincolns.No, what Ford is creating via improvements in flexible manufacturing, is a platform that is FLEXIBLE to any direction they want to go in, for both brands, to accommodate FWD or RWD. At least that is the Rumor and leave it at that. And that would only be small fraction of the monies allocated for their Phase II development that will propagate over the next 5-6 years. Phase I completed recently with the rollout of the new MKX. Otherwise, believe WTF you want. Let's see if I got this right: -The platform is not "magical" but will apparently support RWD, AWD, and FWD applications. Uh... Sounds vaguely Gandalf-ish to me -Ford is NOT emulating Cadillac's supposed "failed strategy" of trickle-down chassis tech, but this platform will support both Lincoln and Ford products. Golly :/ -Ford is NOT emulating Cadillac's supposed strategy, and you know this based on what you then say "at least that is the rumor and leave it at that." Well, THAT has the ring of authority, right there. -Then, after blowing your whole argument out of the water ALL BY YOURSELF with that "rumor" disclaimer you go on to describe all the (Monopoly?) money Ford is going to spend on PHASE II of the project. Holy. Freaking. Crap. You write some incredibly stupid things. But this may well be the capper. Ford doesn't do it. Yet. :D They don't? You mean to tell me the first EcoBoost was a 1.0l in the Fiesta? or was it in their largest, "fanciest"(I don't consider it fancy but you know it was the top of the line vehicle at the time) Ford Taurus SHO? Then their most popular trucks and now they have the 3.5eb in anything they can cram it in. It is just how every automaker works. Not just GM. I think he was saying it didn't trickle from Lincoln to Ford. At best Lincoln got the 3.5EB at the same time when the MKS Ecoboost came out. GM has been introducing technology in Cadillac first for a while now (and previously also Oldsmobile as it was more of an experimental tech division). The 3.6 V6 started at Cadillac. The Northstar started at Cadillac. Magnetic ride control started at Cadillac. Navigation started at Oldsmobile. Onstar started with Cadillac and Buick.

Fair enough. But let's also look at the flimsiness of his counterargument. There is a huge difference between discussion and semantics. Attack arguments all you want. Back it up with facts and links. That's what we're here for. Personal attacks are off limits.

Don't use the shortened links. It has to be the full youtube.com Either method will work. It looked like you were either using mobile links or using the share links button from inside youtube. To just paste the link, make sure it is the full youtube.com address and not the youtu.be address

This is a topic worthy of discussion and I was going to bring it up myself as well. There is no need for personal attacks just because a member who is a fan of another brand brought it up. Let's move forward keeping this in mind please.

I'm not sure what the Escalade has to do with the 7-Series or CT6's CAFE scores.What I DO know is that GM was producing half-ton pickups that were producing 25mpg highway with port-injected smallblocks and (if memory serves) four-speed automatics. And that was two truck generations ago. They have the tech in hand, it's just that the customers at the time didn't demand it. Overall corporate CAFE score. The Escalade sells really well and that is actually hurting their score. Not like it is going anywhere but they just need to make the big girl drink a little less. Or, make it bigger! No way was GM making a v8 half ton TWO generations ago that was getting 25mpg. With the bragging rights that they would tout in their commercials there is no way they wouldn't utilize it. When gas was $4/gallon down here(US) the consumer didn't want a truck that got 25mpg???? The Avalanche could do 21 - 22 on the highway back with a 6-speed, so I imagine a fairly basic Silverado 1500 V8 could do at least that and probably better. I probably should have clarified that the Silverado/Sierra in question was a hybrid. And it was the second-generation of GM's hybrid tech (they actually kicked things off with a mild hybrid version of the truck previous to that one). Point being: making a 5500-pound Escalade meet CAFE standards is going to be difficult, but quite doable. The Escalade needs to do no such thing. It is a Corporate average.. not per model average. Escalade can go right on being a gas guzzler as long as they sell 3 Volts, a Bolt, and a Sonic or 3 for every one Escalade they sell (the ratios are made up, but you get my point). But even still.. BMW and Mercedes just paid the fine for years and built it into their pricing. With transaction prices on the Escalade up $20,000 or so, GM could add a $500 per vehicle fine to the sticker price and buyers wouldn't even blink.

Don't use the shortened links. It has to be the full youtube.com I try that... but i'm mostly just tired. I tried that approach for years, working hard through college and grad school, the first decade of my career...stayed hungry and strived to achieve. At some point, burnout and exhaustion set in along w cynicism and self loathing and the realization that corporate life is all $h!, just varying degrees of effed up ness at each dysfunctional organization. The challenge is to stay conscious through each day amidst the mind numbing tedium and then knock myself out with powerful meds at night... Well thanks for brightening my day you little ray of sunshine you!

XTSes depreciate rapidly. you can get a certified pre owned one cheap

I'm not sure what the Escalade has to do with the 7-Series or CT6's CAFE scores.What I DO know is that GM was producing half-ton pickups that were producing 25mpg highway with port-injected smallblocks and (if memory serves) four-speed automatics. And that was two truck generations ago. They have the tech in hand, it's just that the customers at the time didn't demand it. Overall corporate CAFE score. The Escalade sells really well and that is actually hurting their score. Not like it is going anywhere but they just need to make the big girl drink a little less. Or, make it bigger! No way was GM making a v8 half ton TWO generations ago that was getting 25mpg. With the bragging rights that they would tout in their commercials there is no way they wouldn't utilize it. When gas was $4/gallon down here(US) the consumer didn't want a truck that got 25mpg???? The Avalanche could do 21 - 22 on the highway back with a 6-speed, so I imagine a fairly basic Silverado 1500 V8 could do at least that and probably better. So you're saying they just went away from fuel economy because people didn't want it when gas was(and still is) $3-$4/a gallon? I know some don't care about gas prices but to think they would have went away from it starting 2 generations ago.. is extremely tough to believe. Also 21-22mpg with a 6 spd isn't quite the same as a 4 spd. Those older 4spds, which were so common for such a long time before 6 was the next 'norm', were all torque converter slip and lot a lot of power through them. And having only 4 forward gears.. no way were those churning out 25mpg at anything above 55mph(not sure when it gots to 4th gear but most seem to be around this point). I didn't say it was rated that way.... GMs and Chryslers tend to beat their EPA ratings pretty easily.

I try that... but i'm mostly just tired.

How much longer can you wait... there is a new Lacrosse coming and that either means 1. Cheap closeouts on the existing model 2. The wife likes the new model even better. I like the Impala.. a lot... I think it is one of the best cars in the segment, but I like the Lacrosse a little bit more. It has a bit more luxury feel in the intangibles... it just seems to roll down the highway better and smoother (GM is using better wheel bearing in higher end models now, don't know if that applies to LaX though). But the question I have back is this: If it's going to be primarily your wife's car, why not let her pick it out? You'll hear about it a lot less over the years and it sound like no matter which way it goes, you're going to get a great car. Edit: I just turned a rental LaCrosse in about an hour ago after a week and I really enjoyed it.

It's usually the hybrids for us commoners that don't drive well because they're geared entirely for fuel economy with low rolling resistance narrow tires and sluggish throttle response. As you get into the higher end stuff, the hybrid tech turns more into a replacement for displacement. Torque from electric motors is fantastic to drive with when it is applied properly (read: Not the Pruis)

I'm not sure what the Escalade has to do with the 7-Series or CT6's CAFE scores.What I DO know is that GM was producing half-ton pickups that were producing 25mpg highway with port-injected smallblocks and (if memory serves) four-speed automatics. And that was two truck generations ago. They have the tech in hand, it's just that the customers at the time didn't demand it. Overall corporate CAFE score. The Escalade sells really well and that is actually hurting their score. Not like it is going anywhere but they just need to make the big girl drink a little less. Or, make it bigger! No way was GM making a v8 half ton TWO generations ago that was getting 25mpg. With the bragging rights that they would tout in their commercials there is no way they wouldn't utilize it. When gas was $4/gallon down here(US) the consumer didn't want a truck that got 25mpg???? Hence the reason why U will be seeing a great deal of electrification coming into the Cadillac division over the next few years. I bet by 2018 .. at least half of their vehicles existing and new will have an electric/hybrid option. We already kno that the CT6 will.. I have read that the upcoming XT5 will as well I think Johan said they were basically doing the entire lineup with diesels or plug-ins or both for each model.

This, I can not, for the life of me see what the hoopla is over the S-Class outside of the S63AMG and the coupe. The vehicle really does nothing to WOW me. Of the cars below.. the S-Class and the CT6 stand out more as Flagships than any of the rest.. and that's without the CT6 supposedly being a flagship. Again.. and now with the updated 7series: In appearance, the CT6 definetly holds its own in that crowd. I am one of the ones that does like the S-Class, and I would pick it over the 7-series or A8.... however, I like it for the really floaty ride. The CT6 is in a different price bracket, so that makes comparing a potential purchase difficult.... is the floaty ride of the S-Class worth the $25k price premium? .... na, I'd survive without it.

I'm not sure what the Escalade has to do with the 7-Series or CT6's CAFE scores.What I DO know is that GM was producing half-ton pickups that were producing 25mpg highway with port-injected smallblocks and (if memory serves) four-speed automatics. And that was two truck generations ago. They have the tech in hand, it's just that the customers at the time didn't demand it. Overall corporate CAFE score. The Escalade sells really well and that is actually hurting their score. Not like it is going anywhere but they just need to make the big girl drink a little less. Or, make it bigger! No way was GM making a v8 half ton TWO generations ago that was getting 25mpg. With the bragging rights that they would tout in their commercials there is no way they wouldn't utilize it. When gas was $4/gallon down here(US) the consumer didn't want a truck that got 25mpg???? The Avalanche could do 21 - 22 on the highway back with a 6-speed, so I imagine a fairly basic Silverado 1500 V8 could do at least that and probably better.

There is, but I don't think it will appear until the next en Ram/LX replacements. okay, I thought I had heard the next Grand Cherokee.

The exterior of the Avenir could easily go into production.. The interior would need to be realistic though, the concept is too far out there.

The CT6 has succeeded in one primary way... It is a Cadillac that is being mentioned in the same breath as the 7-series and S-Class even though it will likely not compete directly in price.