Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    56,001
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    547

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. That's... exactly what happened. Numbers rounded for simplicity: They got $50 billion of TARP money $40 billion was converted to equity that the government owned. The remaining $10 billion was considered a loan that GM would have to pay back. About $7 billion of that $10 billion balance was held in escrow to be used only if GM really needed it. GM paid back a couple billion from their earnings. GM decided they didn't need the rest of the loan, so returned the remaining TARP money back to the government, thus paying off the loan part of the TARP.
  2. Well, I still disagree with your assertion that what GM did in this case was "a bad thing". It wasn't... if it was a shrewd financial move, then why shouldn't they take it? They did not take an additional loan to pay off an original loan. They had cash from the original loan left over and returned that to the government. Even if GM did refinance a loan through the government, why would that be a bad thing as long as the loans get paid off? People refinance credit cards, houses, cars, all sorts of things all the time. I just don't understand this talking point. It makes it look like you are trying to smear GM for doing something that just makes good financial sense.
  3. I've seen the test and it wasn't really valid because they didn't follow the same paths..they each took different routes to get up the mountain. It is one of the reasons I hate Clarkson and Top Gear in general.... he sets up the "tests" to have the desired outcome.
  4. SMK hates any technology or process that Mercedes doesn't use, until they use it... then it's the best evar. He'll ignore every single performance stat that might beat is beloved brand and then moves the goal posts to favor them. But what works for Cadillac isn't working for Lincoln. The F150 sits on the market too long before getting chassis updates, and is the F150 chassis what you want to use as the basis of your BMW X7, Merc GL, Maserati Levante, and Jag-LR products. Lincoln isn't a tier one brand, making a Navigator off the Explorer platform gives them 380 hp/460 lb-ft turbo V6 in a 5,000 lb vehicle for $55k. That matches up extremely well against top end Tahoes, Enclaves, MDX, undercuts the Escalade a lot in price while offering better acceleration and fuel economy. It gives Lincoln a chance. Lincoln doing a half assed job turning and F150 into an Escalade competitor hasn't worked since like 2006 when the previous generation Escalade stepped it up. The F-150 just got a chassis update and the Navigator is moving to it.
  5. 400hp in an AWD car.. and it's supposed to be running through the fancy AWD system of the Focus RS so it should still be able to get the power down(all 400hp) pretty easily. I don't doubt that the car will be competent. What I doubt very much is Lincoln's ability to make a production version that will distinguish itself. I already mentioned that this is nearly identical to the XTS-VSport in concept. And look how it turned out. Drew mentioned that the pricing should be competitive with the Koreans in he segment-ouch for prestige. And wings shot himself in the foot once again with his failed diss of the CT6's styling. I am glad to be in a place where I can criticize without being accused of being a troll. I harbour no ill will towards Lincoln. But by the same token, I'm not going to blow sunshine up their tuckus over a concept car that is a rehash of a failed product strategy. They. Must. Do. Better. I think they should price against the Genesis because the Continental is a new-comer (Return-comer?) to this segment and they need to build cred before they can go around demanding $75k. It's not that I think the Genesis is that fantastic of a car, but the Genesis 5.0 is roughly similar in size and stated output though only RWD. All the Continental needs to do is beat the Genesis on luxury (which is a fairly low bar) and it should do fine because there is more prestige to the Continental name. In short, the Genesis is the lowest common denominator in price. I don't see any rehash of a product strategy here. Lincoln hasn't put out a Continental level Continental since at least 1987... but that has nothing to do with the driving wheels. You seem to want to hang the entire strategy on the drive wheels, all 4, without seeing what they do with the interior. If they MKS the interior, I will be first in line to bash it. I am willing to wait until I see the car until I declare Lincoln's strategy a success or failure.
  6. Everything and anything can fly. Chevy actually had to put an airborne mode in track mode of the ZL-1. They had the problem where when the car went airborne, the traction control would kick in and slow the wheels down... which you don't want when you're on the track. That's great for a military operation. I don't see doing such repairs in the Saks Fifth Ave parking lot.
  7. I admit, I really like the Rebel. I'd probably not buy it myself, but I like the look and the idea.
  8. they should match the Genesis 5.0 for base price. $51k. The CT6 will be a 2.0T with RWD at the base price, thus my guess. The 3.0TT with AWD and all the extra tech will be in the range you are citing.
  9. You are harping against a particular technology for no particular reason.... just like your rants about pushrods.... you ignore the performance focusing entirely on the "How".
  10. A new Journey would be nice. It's been ignored by the media lately, but it goes right on selling in great numbers.
  11. I don't buy the off-road thing on the Escalade as it wasn't meant for that... but at the same some none of the G buyers are doing off-roading either unless the valet jumps the curb at Bergdor Goodman. What doesn't work for me is the poor poor material quality and level of build of the G.. if they were charging Wrangler level prices, that would be one thing... even double the price of a Wrangler just to get the badge.. I might not raise an eyebrow....... but they aren't.. they are charging 5 times the price of a Wrangler.
  12. ?? That's not really accurate and I don't see how it is relevant. They paid back part of the loan with loaned funds they weren't using.... there is nothing wrong with that. Can you both just go back to your corners?
  13. I happen to like both. I think the base price of the CT6 will be lower than $80k though. I'm guessing it will be mid to high $60k range.
  14. Totally agree on the Wrangler pickup, but I still think Ram needs something in this field besides a promaster based one. I can already hear the reviews now about it being a FWD full size pickup if they did a Promaster pickup.
  15. Cite. I don't see any livery MKSes and only rarely see livery XTSes. Neither have much presence in the rental fleets and I rent all over the country on almost a weekly basis. Even if 2/3s of the XTS sales are fleet and livery (highly unlikely), the XTS is still selling at the same or better rate as the RWD cars in that list. What's your excuse for the GS... or the Q70? Why hasn't the holy god of RWD descended to save them? The GS is still selling worse than the old RWD STS did and it is a recent redesign. Is there going to be a Ford model in the $50k - $75k range for the Continental to compete with?
  16. Neither does 400hp RWD-based stuff Infiniti Q60 - Averaging 350 a month sales Infiniti Q70 - Averaging 500 a month sales Kia K900 - Averaging 100 a month sales Eqqus - Averaging 100 a month sales BMW 6-series - Averaging 400 a month sales BMW 7-series - Averaging 875 a month sales MB CLS - Averaging 400 a month sales Lexus GS - Averaging 600 a month sales And yet Cadillac XTS - Averaging 2000 a month sales Lincoln MKS - Averaging 660 a month sales All the Continental has to do is sell at the same rate as the MKS does today and it will be in the same sales league as some of the "best" from Germany.
  17. Spotted a Beetle GSR today
  18. How about a 1960s Fatigue Green Nottingham Raleigh with internal 3 Speed fixed Sturmey Archer? Now you're riding in style my friend! gesundheit
  19. The first group isn't even trying to compete with the second group. The S80 is out of date, the ES350 is unimpressive and bland... but neither of those issue have to do with driving wheels. Hell yeah I'll take an XTS (V-sport) over a CTS. I'd take it over a dull and harsh riding 5-series also.
  20. That's because Cadillac is trying to not be quiet luxury. They're trying to be BMW.
  21. Ouch, I bet that smarts.
  22. So how about we refrain from calling a car a failure for being FWD based when we haven't even seen the production version yet.....?
  23. LFX is superior.. and U need to stop quoting the 305HP number as it is a FWD only application that U are comparing to Pentastars that come close with RWD vehicles. The comparison U should be making is the RWD GM vehicles to the RWD FCAs 323HP Camaro vs 305 HP Challenger, the GM engine with a 6% advantage. . before the new one arrives giving it a solid 10% advantage with Start/Stop.. and AFM I am not reading all your GM humping, but that peak HP number doesn't mean much when an auomatic Camaro coupe runs the same times as the heavier CHallenger, oops, and the Camaro gets worse FE, tell me again how the LFX is superior? GM humping? When me and GM get together we do a helluva lot more than Hump.. I leave her loins wet and sticky everytime... Chrysler? That Skanky ass whore. Been passed around more times than a 9 year old boy, being advertised as virgin at an ancient Roman bath house... As for fuel economy... Again 2 extra cogs will do that for u... Not to mention the less amount of HP. V6 Challenger could get taken down by effin Corolla lol Let's tone it down a bit please. and I've been able to get that fantastic fuel economy out of 5-speed auto Chargers and 300.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search