Nick

death

That's what I was kind of getting it. I figure it is an integrated application being that Behr specializes in engine cooling products (including chargecoolers)...which would also explain the lines which look to be some sort of coolant lines running through the front of it.

Hmmm...the label on that metal piece on top of the engine say BEHR on it. BEHR produces cooling components for cars (my car has a behr radiator and I'm sure many other cars do as well)...So I can only assume that is the chargecooler for the supercharger. I just want to know what that big pulley next to the intake is (as well as what is going on with the intake...looks like it is going into some oddly shaped throttle body)...It's kind of hard to tell what anything is...I'll be interested to see how they integrate the engine and how the final presentation will look.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17228226/ XM and Sirius reach agreement on merger Deal between two satellite radio providers would be ‘merger of equals’ NEW YORK - XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and Sirius Satellite Radio Inc., rivals in the fledgling satellite radio industry, have agreed to combine in a deal that investors hope will result in lower costs, assuming it overcomes significant regulatory hurdles. The companies billed the deal announced Monday as a merger of equals, with shareholders of both companies owning approximately 50 percent of the combined entity. However, Sirius will be giving $4.57 billion of its stock to XM shareholders, a substantial premium to the value of their shares. Sirius' Chief Executive Mel Karmazin will lead the combined company, and XM's CEO Hugh Panero will stay on only until the deal is closed. XM Chairman Gary Parsons will remain in that role. Story continues below ↓ advertisement The deal faces substantial obstacles in Washington, including a Federal Communications Commission provision that specifically forbids the two companies to combine. Analysts have noted that the FCC could change the rule, but in a statement late Monday FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said that the "hurdle" would be "high" to prove that the deal would be in the public interest. "The companies would need to demonstrate that consumers would clearly be better off with both more choice and affordable prices," Martin said. A combination would also have to meet antitrust approval from the Department of Justice. The companies are expected to argue that they compete not only with each other but also with traditional radio and a growing base of digital audio sources such as iPods, mobile phones and non-satellite digital radio. The XM shareholders will receive 4.6 shares of Sirius stock for every share they own, valuing them at $17.02 each based on Friday's closing price for Sirius shares. That gives XM shareholders a premium of 22 percent to the $13.98 closing value of their stock on Friday. Markets were closed Monday for the Presidents' Day holiday. "This combination is the next logical step in the evolution of audio entertainment," said Karmazin. "Together, our best-in-class management team and programming content will create unprecedented choice for consumers, while creating long-term value for shareholders of both companies." Investors and analysts have been speculating about a deal for months, and are hoping that the cost savings that would result would make up for softening retail demand for satellite radio units. Both services offer dozens of channels of talk and commercial-free music for monthly fees of about $13. XM radio receivers can't receive signals from Sirius, and vice versa. But Karmazin and Parsons said in an interview that the companies are working on developing a receiver that could receive both signals. In the meantime, they said, assuming the deal goes through, the companies would make other arrangements to bring programming that's currently exclusive to one provider to listeners of the other, such as getting Major League Baseball games — currently only available on XM — to Sirius listeners. "We will be taking every effort to find the best possible programming combination," Parsons said. It's too early to say what the deal will mean for subscription prices. The merger could bring down the cost of providing service, but at the same time give the company more pricing power as the only U.S. satellite radio provider. Karmazin declined to comment specifically about how much the companies hoped to save by the merger, but he said he expected the deal to clear regulatory approval and close within six to nine months. "We understand that there's a lot of work to be done," Karmazin said. Neither XM nor Sirius have turned a profit yet as they spent heavily to build up their programming lineups and subscriber bases, including a five-year, $500 million contract that Sirius made with the shock jock Howard Stern. Both stocks declined more than 40 percent last year on concerns about their continued growth in subscribers, but investors have held out hope of a merger. The combined company would have had about $1.5 billion in revenues in 2006 and about 14 million subscribers, they said. The companies said they would work together to decide on a new name and also to determine where it would be based. XM is based in Washington, while Sirius is based in New York. The new company's board will have 12 members, including Parsons, Karmazin, four independent directors named by each company, and one representative each from General Motors Corp. and Honda Motor Co. News of a possible merger was reported earlier Monday by the New York Post. On Friday, a Bear Stearns analyst said in a research note that a merger would have a good chance of overcoming regulatory obstacles. Other analysts remain less sure. Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Craig Moffett said he gives the deal a "50-50" chance of passing regulatory muster. Moffett said the deal could have a particularly tough time getting through the FCC, and said it was "anyone's guess" as to whether the FCC would change its rule barring a consolidation of the two satellite radio companies. A group representing radio companies, the National Association of Broadcasters, put out a statement Monday urging federal regulators to block the satellite radio deal. © 2007 MSNBC Interactive

I can't even see the brochure...I keep getting a board message...somebody mind hosting and posting he images?

GM dealer experience at its finest!

Who doesn't?

I'm just outside of the valley. Westlake Village/Thousand Oaks is the next town over north a bit from Agoura Hills/Malibu. It snowed a bit in Malibu on Kanan. It's right down the way so my friends and I actually went through the snow and even got out, made snowballs, and threw them at eachother...Crazy crazy weather we've been having lately.

Wait...what?

I saw one driving up the street recently...They look beautiful. They have a very nice presence.

Sometimes you feel like a nut... Sometimes you don't.

First the T-bird...now this?! Granted, the T-bird isn't nearly as bad as the camaro... http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=216827

My sister has a IS300...Nice little car I suppose. It handles pretty well. It's nimble and tossable and feels light. I don't care for the steering too much, but it's not bad. It could definitely use some tuning. :AH-HA_wink:

Well, I must say, a couple years back I went on a trip to Australia...upon return into LAX I stepped outside of the plane and immediately thought to myself "What died in here?" Apparently I wasn't the only one who felt the same way.

I drive PCH every day...nothing special Be sure to let us locals know when you come out NOS...I'll be happy to show you around the canyons a bit. :AH-HA_wink:

Front plate? I've never used a front plate, and neither has any of my family or friends...so far, no issues.

I'm surprised you've never heard of it....especially being an owner of an M3 and all...LSD's are like the modern version of posi...kinda (it offers benefits in both the straight and curvy).Most cars come with an open diff (like mine. 2.81 open...so stupid...want to change it out for a m5 3.15 lsd). Your M3 has a LSD...I don't know why BMW didn't put LSD's across the entire model ranges like they used to. Or at least offer it.

Does anyone else think it looks like a Ranger?

Somewhat agree, though, it seems they went with more function over form in most of the design.

914 with a SBC conversion.

You don't need a 4.0 to eat waffles.

For every animal you don't eat, I'll eat 3.

Fixed.

Oh man...if only it had the LS2 in it I would be so over that!