Cheers & Gears Forums: C&G Spy Shots: The Rear Of Zeta

Jump to content


  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

C&G Spy Shots: The Rear Of Zeta

#61 User is offline   SS427 

  • Stock Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 04-September 05

Posted 10 September 2005 - 05:45 PM

IbuyGM, on Sep 10 2005, 06:30 PM, said:

Okay Insiders,

What do you know about the GMT900? 

The point is, we dont know who were the insiders until now and how is someone new to this site supposed to know that a member on here has been right before? 

And just because someone else on here doesnt claim themself as an insider, does not mean they have insider info also


This is the whole point I have been trying to make 91z, so instead of patting yourself on your back about your precious insiders, like you said PM Josh or whoever you said it was, get them some i.d. so this problem can be avoided in the future, that would most certainly shut my mouth.
0

#62 User is offline   SS427 

  • Stock Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 04-September 05

Posted 10 September 2005 - 05:48 PM

91z4me, on Sep 10 2005, 06:14 PM, said:

You don't like it don't read it.  Nothing is keeping you here.  I for one don't mind when someone, who can't say who they are but have been right SO many times in the past about future products, lets us have a glimpse behind the curtain.  Or when they give us a nudge in the right direction.

Your right you didn't know who was an insider.  Maybe we should have a note under their names to indicate that they are in fact an insider.  I will PM Josh to suggest that we have that.  Perhaps instead of crying because someone said you are wrong you should do more research into subjects and tie leads together to get a bigger better picture.


Oh and I probably spend more time doing research than any two of your insiders here, that is the disadvantage of not being an insider I have to dig for my information.
0

#63 User is offline   91z4me 

  • OSV Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,185
  • Joined: 18-August 05

Posted 11 September 2005 - 06:19 PM

SS427, on Sep 10 2005, 06:48 PM, said:

Oh and I probably spend more time doing research than any two of your insiders here, that is the disadvantage of not being an insider I have to dig for my information.

Some people spend each and every day at work researching cars, ever hear of JD Powers? They publish reports that can be purchased that give information on each and every manufacure and parts supplier in the industry, they also forcast production of new models and plants that will be used to manufacture them. They reseach through public records to find land sales. To find contracts for labor, parts, power supplies, etc. Just because you get on here and have an idea and some says no that is wrong does not mean that those who have the information have to give it up. In fact if they did they would not be true to themsleves or their companies. I am sure that some of the stuff they are given the source or sources don't mind the info being given out. Also when multiple sources are involved there less chance of someone getting into trouble.

PS I am PMing Josh now to ask if we can have an ID on insiders. If they want to be identified I am sure that we could see something happen.
0

#64 User is offline   SS427 

  • Stock Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 04-September 05

Posted 11 September 2005 - 07:28 PM

91z4me, on Sep 11 2005, 07:19 PM, said:

Some people spend each and every day at work researching cars, ever hear of JD Powers?  They publish reports that can be purchased that give information on each and every manufacure and parts supplier in the industry, they also forcast production of new models and plants that will be used to manufacture them.  They reseach through public records to find land sales.  To find contracts for labor, parts, power supplies, etc.  Just because you get on here and have an idea and some says no that is wrong does not mean that those who have the information have to give it up.  In fact if they did they would not be true to themsleves or their companies.  I am sure that some of the stuff they are given the source or sources don't mind the info being given out.  Also when multiple sources are involved there less chance of someone getting into trouble.

PS I am PMing Josh now to ask if we can have an ID on insiders.  If they want to be identified I am sure that we could see something happen.


Thank You your assistance on this matter has been greatly appreciated.
0

  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users