Jump to content
Create New...
  • đźš— Your People Are Here. Get In.

    The internet is full of car content. This is the community.

    Cheers & Gears has been bringing enthusiasts together since 2001. Join the conversation, show off your garage, and find your people.

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    House GOP's Tax Plan Will Scrap Electric Vehicle Credit

      This will make EVs even a tougher sale

    One key selling point automakers have been using to move electric vehicles is the federal tax credit of up to $7,500. But a new tax cut bill being proposed by House Republicans could eliminate that credit.

    The bill announced today includes a provision of eliminating the credit after the 2017 tax year if the bill goes into law.

    The credits are important as it helps level the playing field between internal combustion engines and EVs. Currently, the credit will begin to phase out once an auto manufacturer once it sells 200,000 EVs or plug-in hybrids. Bloomberg reports that Tesla would be the first automaker to reach the limit, followed by GM and Nissan. If that tax credit is eliminated, automakers worry they would experience a plunge in sales.

    “The credits matter a lot. In states without EV mandates or incentives, you’ll see sales crater,” said Eric Noble, president of the CarLab.

    Bloomberg cites the example of Georgia which cut its $5,000 electric vehicle tax credit back in 2015. Sales tumbled from 1,400 to just fewer than 100.

    Automakers are spending a lot of money and time in lobbying to make sure the credit is renewed partly due to new mandates being placed by California and a number of other states saying a certain percentage of new cars sold have to EVs.

    "The potential elimination of the federal electric vehicle tax credit will impact the choices of prospective buyers and make the electric vehicle mandate in 10 states — about a third of the market — even more difficult to meet," said Gloria Bergquist, a spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group representing various automakers such as GM and Toyota.

    Source: Bloomberg, Reuters


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    8 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    And when I get one is none of his business given the obvious tactic here. 

    I guess you're not then.  And our own Mr. dfelt didn't get a Bolt immediately because of the white dash trim.  I can understand that, since it was a super valid reason for not getting us off those nasty fossil fuels that hinder our growth.  White dash trim is worse than gasoline.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I'm waiting until the CPO CT6 PHEVs are widely available. 

    The CT6 is a sharp car.  Not so sure about the pee heaving part, but OK.  Pics when you get it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Are you getting one this week?  :wub:  PICS PLEASE!

    It would be so nice if he was...just like I would like to see you in an F150 4 x 4 with a nice color and a nice option package.  I like the idea of a wide range of choices for car buyers,  Gas, diesel, electric and steam.

    I think I would like to now a vintage Stanley steamer, seriously.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    I guess you're not then.  And our own Mr. dfelt didn't get a Bolt immediately because of the white dash trim.  I can understand that, since it was a super valid reason for not getting us off those nasty fossil fuels that hinder our growth.  White dash trim is worse than gasoline.

    Just stop the bull$h! OCN. We get it. You think EVs suck while you parade around in a POS Jeep. Honestly, just take a flying leap. 

     

    BTW, my reasons for not having one are quite simple. I’m selling my house soon and don’t want to take on extra debt genius. It has zero to do with the car itself.

     

    Grow the f@#k up.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    I guess you're not then.  And our own Mr. dfelt didn't get a Bolt immediately because of the white dash trim.  I can understand that, since it was a super valid reason for not getting us off those nasty fossil fuels that hinder our growth.  White dash trim is worse than gasoline.

    Since the wife was going to drive it the most and she has to see it every day and I care about making sure she is happy like any of us with our spouses, yes, sadly the white dash accent was a deal killer. If the dash was all black, we would have one. 

    So now I await the new EV's from GM and hope they do not mess it up. If they had the Mocha trim or dark brown accent dash, she would have gone for that as she loves the brown interiors and the warmth it gives over black. But not going to spend money on a new auto till she really likes it. After all no auto payments at all, so just save till the right EV comes along and BOOM, we will have it.

    Then I will show it off and share the experience with you all. :D 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    Just stop the bull$h! OCN. We get it. You think EVs suck while you parade around in a POS Jeep. Honestly, just take a flying leap. 

     

    BTW, my reasons for not having one are quite simple. I’m selling my house soon and don’t want to take on extra debt genius. It has zero to do with the car itself.

     

    Grow the f@#k up.

    That's a good enough reason.  You're off the hook.  Thanks.

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 11/9/2017 at 10:39 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

    No, EVs won't drop below ICEs... but ICE pricing will be nudged upwards providing the same effect. 

    Probably true; meaning any economies of scale WON'T be passed on to EV buyers, and IC buyers will get gouged in tandem.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Independent Automotive Journalism

    25 years of honest automotive coverage — because someone has to do it.

    Cheers & Gears has never been filtered by manufacturer relationships or driven by algorithm. Just real people, real opinions, and a genuine love of cars. Subscribers keep the lights on and get an ad-light experience starting at $2.25/month.*

    View subscription options

    *A small number of ads feature member-exclusive coupon deals and will still appear.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Some of these famous buildings are hideous, some are interesting with decent parts to them, and a rare few are really nice. The hideous ones include the newer architecture building at University of Washington, Wurster Hall (also architecture) at UC Berkeley, and perhaps the Salk Institute in San Diego.  These buildings are cold and soul sucking, so they're hard to be in.  They also come from a fairly ugly (on various levels) sixties and seventies granola period. One of these buildings would be a "hybrid" and it's fine.  That would be Campbell Hall (again ... architecture) at the University of Virginia, which is definitely brutalist reinforced concrete at the first taller level or two, with an exposed waffle slab at levels above you.  However, they soften it up by using brick on the upper floors' exterior, as well as lower floor to ceiling heights.  The one brutalist gem would have to be the main library at University of California San Diego.  They definitely did not do this to reduce costs because it's a complicated building.  However, it's probably a nice space to be inside because of the floor to ceiling windows all around. It's just that there was a wave of putting up these buildings on West Coast campuses, surrounded by eucalyptus or fir and hemlock, and it was usually at hippieish campuses and their atmospheres don't gel with me.
    • Happy Mother's Day to the mothers in our lives - family, friends, coworkers  She came to mind, so I looked for a gif on her.  She is originally from Buffalo!  Most people have doubles.  I don't think she does. Happy Sunday.
    • Having looked at all the images online, I have to say that the interior and exterior other than the color which I like is a let down and I would even say for a Luxury brand looks cheap.
    • Due to my tradeshow season, do not have the time till June to do any writeups, but Lexus has released their Luxury version 3 row SUV EV that Toyota released as the Highlander and Subaru also has. Clearly not connected to the ICE Spindale grill or as many of us called the Predator mouth. https://pressroom.lexus.com/all-electric-three-row-luxury-the-all-new-2027-lexus-tz/ The press release says 300 miles of range on Select Grade. Look at the fine print, this is a sea level level road, anything else is 250 to 280 miles of range. FAILURE Lexus / Toyota along with the 400V system.
    • After doing a bunch of research on this, it isn't so much Honda/Acura are limiting charging speeds as it is the battery pack total size directly correlates to the rate of charge they can accept. The Prologue and non-SS Blazer EV have 85kWh batteries at 288 total volts and the ZDX/Lyriq/Blazer EV SS all have the larger 102kWh battery at 345 total volts.  Because of the way the Ultium platforms have multiple pack sizes that can and are linked together to make larger or smaller packs, the total pack volts varies based on the application and why the Hummer/Silverado/Sierra EVs can charge at 800v when they're still on 400v architecture.  Because kW = amps * volts, the bigger packs have more nominal volts because they have more cells.  Below is a Prologue example and change the 288v for the Prologue to 345v for the larger packs of the Lyriq, ZDX, or Blazer EV SS and you get 190kW for the maximum (or do the math for the other chargers, as well)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search