Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    GM's Bankruptcy Terms Could Reduce Liabilities Over Ignition Switch Lawsuits

    Sign in to follow this  

      Another Twist In The GM Ignition Switch Recall Saga

    Another twist in the General Motors' ignition switch recall story. Automotive News reports that the company may have a possible legal shield from lawsuits stemming from the recall. During the restructuring process, GM negotiated with state attorney generals and consumer groups to carry product liability on vehicle faults after it left bankruptcy in 2009. Those faults prior to 2009 would need to take it up with old GM. So far, any lawsuits brought against the company for pre-2009 faults have gone nowhere.

    "It is true that new GM did not assume liability for claims arising from incidents or accidents occurring prior to July 2009.Our principle throughout this process has been to the put the customer first, and that will continue to guide us," said GM spokesman Greg Martin in a email.

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    While I can respect the things GM is saying right now, had they put the customer first all along they would not be in this mess. It really is that simple.

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    While I can respect the things GM is saying right now, had they put the customer first all along they would not be in this mess. It really is that simple.

    I have to actually fully disagree with you on your statement. It is NEVER that Simple.

    You can have the Customer first all along and until you build it and go through a extensive QA process, you can miss simple things and then due to Government regulations have to go back and re-engineer something that can actually make a product a money losing item.

    Yes, there is plenty of History to support the Bean counters and Lawyers and Executives protecting their HUGE bonuses and paychecks when if they had properly served the customer with a quality item to begin with the mess would not have happened. Yet there are also plenty of times that small items just might be ok to let it go and correct it in the next round of product building.

    In this case, GM should have started the product but then immediately made changes to the item in question here to address this and changed it out mid way through the first year.

    In this case the old guard of the old GM failed in their job for what they were paid for out of pure greed.

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What the other side of the story people are missing is that NHSTA had known about this issue but put it under the rug. As much as GM is to blame, the government agency is on the same pedestal.

    What is now going on is damage prevention act and political dog and pony show with Congressional hearing. GM is going to be a loser here unfortunately.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    While I can respect the things GM is saying right now, had they put the customer first all along they would not be in this mess. It really is that simple.

    I have to actually fully disagree with you on your statement. It is NEVER that Simple.

    You can have the Customer first all along and until you build it and go through a extensive QA process, you can miss simple things and then due to Government regulations have to go back and re-engineer something that can actually make a product a money losing item.

    Yes, there is plenty of History to support the Bean counters and Lawyers and Executives protecting their HUGE bonuses and paychecks when if they had properly served the customer with a quality item to begin with the mess would not have happened. Yet there are also plenty of times that small items just might be ok to let it go and correct it in the next round of product building.

    In this case, GM should have started the product but then immediately made changes to the item in question here to address this and changed it out mid way through the first year.

    In this case the old guard of the old GM failed in their job for what they were paid for out of pure greed.

    I'm not saying I don't see how this made it into production. Trust me, I know that can happen. You are very correct if you were saying that design and development is not that simple. Every automaker has many, many tests they run their vehicles through as part of development and many, many more they run individual components through. What people often don't realize is that those tests are constantly evolving based on lessons learned from new designs. I can guarantee you GM learned their lesson on this issue a long time ago and have been testing all new ignition switches for this issue for a while.

    My post was in reference to the fact that they new they had a problem along time ago, at least outwardly appeared to know it could be a serious problem (hell, they were buying vehicles back), had a redesign in place to address the issue and then killed it for some unknown reason.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2QuickZ's

    "had a redesign in place to address the issue and then killed it for some unknown reason."

    I would totally agree with your statement, I wonder also. Who got paid off to ignor this.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The best current GM can hope for is to blame it on Old GM and then fix the problem free of charge to anyone who wants the fix.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2QuickZ's

    "had a redesign in place to address the issue and then killed it for some unknown reason."

    Probably some beancounter did the math and determined it was cheaper to do nothing than do a redesign. Also in big companies it's often better for one's career to say nothing, do nothing in a situation like this than rock the boat. Lots of CYA at work in these old style companies...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'll bet 99% of the OLD GMC is now the NEW GMC - Same thing, they just changed the wording in their last name. Extremely disappointed in this latest fiasco.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The best current GM can hope for is to blame it on Old GM and then fix the problem free of charge to anyone who wants the fix.

    Going to have to be a bit more than that....they need as much goodwill as possible.

    A couple local dealerships are offering "extra trade in money" on GM products....so they can be rid of their "junker" I fully expect other automakers to try to jump on this......

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      General Motors and Bechtel are teaming up to form a new company to deploy a widespread fast-charging network. Neither company plans to put any money into the project, outside investors are being solicited.  The network will help General Motors, which plans to introduce 20 new EVs by 2023.  It will also help other manufacturers of EVs. 
      General Motors will provide data to help decide where to locate the EV charging stations and Bechtel will use its own experts for the engineering and building of the stations. Much of the data will come from GM's OnStar system to help learn where people tend to park.  Data from both electric and gasoline powered vehicles will be used.
      Additional fast-charging infrastructure is seen as a requirement to increasing electric vehicle sales. According to a survey by AAA, one of the biggest concerns Americans have about EVs is having enough locations to charge them.  
      The network built by Bechtel and GM will not be limited to interstate highways where most fast charging stations have been located so far.  The company will also locate chargers in urban areas targeting apartments and condos where drivers cannot have a home charger of their own. 
      The new venture joins major initiatives from Electrify America, a Volkswagen funded EV station program, and Tesla with Supercharging, to build out a nationwide network of charging stations. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      General Motors and Bechtel are teaming up to form a new company to deploy a widespread fast-charging network. Neither company plans to put any money into the project, outside investors are being solicited.  The network will help General Motors, which plans to introduce 20 new EVs by 2023.  It will also help other manufacturers of EVs. 
      General Motors will provide data to help decide where to locate the EV charging stations and Bechtel will use its own experts for the engineering and building of the stations. Much of the data will come from GM's OnStar system to help learn where people tend to park.  Data from both electric and gasoline powered vehicles will be used.
      Additional fast-charging infrastructure is seen as a requirement to increasing electric vehicle sales. According to a survey by AAA, one of the biggest concerns Americans have about EVs is having enough locations to charge them.  
      The network built by Bechtel and GM will not be limited to interstate highways where most fast charging stations have been located so far.  The company will also locate chargers in urban areas targeting apartments and condos where drivers cannot have a home charger of their own. 
      The new venture joins major initiatives from Electrify America, a Volkswagen funded EV station program, and Tesla with Supercharging, to build out a nationwide network of charging stations. 
    • By William Maley
      Maven, General Motors' car-sharing service launched in 2016 will be ceasing operation in several cities in the U.S.
      The news was first broken by the Wall Street Journal on Monday and has been confirmed by a GM spokeswoman. Eight out of the seventeen markets that the service operates including Boston and Chicago will be closed down within the next few months. According to the spokeswoman, the shutdown is due to GM wanting to "concentrate on markets in which we have the strongest current demand and growth potential." Those markets in question include Detroit, Los Angeles, and Toronto.
      Another possible reason is the lack of awareness of Maven in the eight markets being shut down. There isn't enough demand for people wanting to use car-sharing or wanting to allow the use of their vehicles.
      Source: Wall Street Journal (Subscription Required), Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Maven, General Motors' car-sharing service launched in 2016 will be ceasing operation in several cities in the U.S.
      The news was first broken by the Wall Street Journal on Monday and has been confirmed by a GM spokeswoman. Eight out of the seventeen markets that the service operates including Boston and Chicago will be closed down within the next few months. According to the spokeswoman, the shutdown is due to GM wanting to "concentrate on markets in which we have the strongest current demand and growth potential." Those markets in question include Detroit, Los Angeles, and Toronto.
      Another possible reason is the lack of awareness of Maven in the eight markets being shut down. There isn't enough demand for people wanting to use car-sharing or wanting to allow the use of their vehicles.
      Source: Wall Street Journal (Subscription Required), Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Among General Motor's restructuring and cost slashing activities of 2018, GM was apparently in talks to sell their headquarters in Detroit.  GM bought the Renaissance Center in 1996 for $70 million and has made substantial renovations over the years.   The RenCen, as it is also known, was originally built by Ford in 1971 who later sold it in the 1980s.
      The potential buyer was billionaire Dan Gilbert.  Talks fell through rather early because the aging structure requires expensive upgrades to its heating and air conditioning systems along with other renovations. There does not appear to be another buyer in talks with GM at this time.
      News of the potential sale follow a year of cost cutting measures by the company that include closing five North American plants and cutting up to 14,000 jobs.  The company hopes to have $6 Billion in annual savings by 2020. 

      View full article
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. carman21
      carman21
      (36 years old)
    2. JayBlue83
      JayBlue83
      (36 years old)
    3. thedriver
      thedriver
      (47 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...