Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Department of Transportation Proposes Their Distracted Driving Guidlines For Automakers


    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    February 17, 2012

    Distracted Driving is a topic that’s on everybody's minds, and with good reason. Newer vehicles are packed with more technology; ranging from touchscreen infotainment systems options to voice-controlled applications to smartphone integration.

    It comes as no surprise that the U.S. DOT Secretary Ray LaHood, the man who is leading the Distracted Driving cause has announced a new set of proposed guidelines for automakers to limit the use of in-car tech solutions that are "not directly relevant to safely operating the vehicle, or cause undue distraction by engaging the driver's eyes or hands for more than a very limited duration while driving."

    “Distracted driving is a dangerous and deadly habit on America’s roadways—that’s why I’ve made it a priority to encourage people to stay focused behind the wheel. These guidelines are a major step forward in identifying real solutions to tackle the issue of distracted driving for drivers of all ages.” LaHood said in a statement.

    Phase 1 of the three-phase process of recommendations would include:

    • Reducing the time it takes to operate devices
    • Limit operation of devices to one hand only
    • Limit the time eyes spend away from the road to two seconds or less
    • Limit unnecessary visual information from the driver’s view
    • Limit the number of inputs needed to operate devices

    The recommendations would also block devices such as navigation units from having addresses put into them while the car is moving, as well as limit the operation of:

    • Text messaging
    • Internet browsing
    • Social media use
    • 10-digit phone dialing
    • Display more than 30 characters of text unrelated to driving

    NHTSA will hold public hearings on the guidelines in March at Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington D.C.

    Press Release is on Page 2


    U.S. Department of Transportation Proposes 'Distraction' Guidelines for Automakers

    Proposed recommendations would encourage manufacturers to develop "less distracting" in-vehicle electronic devices

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced the first-ever federally proposed guidelines to encourage automobile manufacturers to limit the distraction risk for in-vehicle electronic devices. The proposed voluntary guidelines would apply to communications, entertainment, information gathering and navigation devices or functions that are not required to safely operate the vehicle.

    Issued by the Department's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the guidelines would establish specific recommended criteria for electronic devices installed in vehicles at the time they are manufactured that require visual or manual operation by drivers. The announcement of the guidelines comes just days after President Obama's FY 2013 budget request, which includes $330 million over six years for distracted driving programs that increase awareness of the issue and encourage stakeholders to take action.

    "Distracted driving is a dangerous and deadly habit on America's roadways – that's why I've made it a priority to encourage people to stay focused behind the wheel," said Secretary LaHood. "These guidelines are a major step forward in identifying real solutions to tackle the issue of distracted driving for drivers of all ages."

    Geared toward light vehicles (cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, minivans, and other vehicles rated at not more than 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight), the guidelines proposed today are the first in a series of guidance documents NHTSA plans to issue to address sources of distraction that require use of the hands and/or diversion of the eyes from the primary task of driving.

    In particular, the Phase I proposed guidelines released today recommend criteria that manufacturers can use to ensure the systems or devices they provide in their vehicles are less likely to distract the driver with tasks not directly relevant to safely operating the vehicle, or cause undue distraction by engaging the driver's eyes or hands for more than a very limited duration while driving. Electronic warning system functions such as forward-collision or lane departure alerts would not be subject to the proposed guidelines, since they are intended to warn a driver of a potential crash and are not considered distracting devices.

    "We recognize that vehicle manufacturers want to build vehicles that include the tools and conveniences expected by today's American drivers," said NHTSA Administrator David Strickland. "The guidelines we're proposing would offer real-world guidance to automakers to help them develop electronic devices that provide features consumers want-without disrupting a driver's attention or sacrificing safety."

    The proposed Phase I distraction guidelines include recommendations to:

    • Reduce complexity and task length required by the device;
    • Limit device operation to one hand only (leaving the other hand to remain on the steering wheel to control the vehicle);
    • Limit individual off-road glances required for device operation to no more than two seconds in duration;
    • Limit unnecessary visual information in the driver's field of view;
    • Limit the amount of manual inputs required for device operation.

    The proposed guidelines would also recommend the disabling of the following operations by in-vehicle electronic devices while driving, unless the devices are intended for use by passengers and cannot reasonably be accessed or seen by the driver, or unless the vehicle is stopped and the transmission shift lever is in park.

    • Visual-manual text messaging;
    • Visual-manual internet browsing;
    • Visual-manual social media browsing;
    • Visual-manual navigation system destination entry by address;
    • Visual-manual 10-digit phone dialing;
    • Displaying to the driver more than 30 characters of text unrelated to the driving task.

    NHTSA is also considering future, Phase II proposed guidelines that might address devices or systems that are not built into the vehicle but are brought into the vehicle and used while driving, including aftermarket and portable personal electronic devices such as navigation systems, smart phones, electronic tablets and pads, and other mobile communications devices. A third set of proposed guidelines (Phase III) may address voice-activated controls to further minimize distraction in factory-installed, aftermarket, and portable devices.

    The Phase I guidelines were published in today's Federal Register and members of the public will have the opportunity to comment on the proposal for 60 days. Final guidelines will be issued after the agency reviews and analyzes and responds to public input.

    NHTSA will also hold public hearings on the proposed guidelines to solicit public comment. The hearings will take place in March and will be held in Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington D.C

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    While I think some of these limitations are good, I feel the bulk of this is Big Brother telling you what you can do and when.

    I agree that a driver should NOT be browsing the web or social media or any other visual/manual input, but the ability to enter an address into nav via voice input should be allowed as well as voice operation of other devices. I do not see this as distracting to the driver.

    I do agree that things should always be less complicated.

    Will be interesting to see what the input from the public will be on this. Also WHY CHICAGO? I get LA and DC, but I would think they could and should get input from say the Tech Valley of California, Seattle, Dallas, Miami and NY as well as Chicago.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I look at this as very dependant on one's skills. If you have the skills to operate these devices and drive safely, do so... but risk police intervention if it works out that you can't maintain a lane, swerve, forget to signal, etc. We already have laws on the books in nearly every state to write tickets for these infractions. If you cannot handle the distraction, pull over at your earliest convenience and adjust your radio station, use your cell phone, play Angry Birds, etc. Everyone shouldn't be penalized and dumbed down to the lowest common denominator.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i agree with the 1st phase. because it would make things easier. faster media response is always nice and being able to do it with 1 hand is also nice. the next part im iffy on. while i dont think its a good idea to text and drive and driving while talking on the phone is against the law around here. but telling car makers to block these items in the car is stupid. idk maybe its for the better, but at the same time you still have stupid people on the streets therefore how big of a difference will this make. so people cant make a call useing their NAV system anymore.... whats to stop them from useing their real phone to Text, call, and surf the web. its these types of things i wish the government would think through before they even try.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It means more to you when you have a family in the car you want to protect......

    The roads are inherently not safe, regardless of the laws in place. If you love your family, don't let them leave your house... er, bunker. And if they ABSOLUTELY need to leave the house, only in an Armored Semi.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • I’ve been busy, and it’s a few days late, but here is what will probably be the penultimate edition of “Cheers and Jeers.”  Next year will be the 25th edition, and that seems to be the right time to put this to rest or for someone else to carry on with it.  Cheers! For the first time in the history of the United States, a convicted felon was sworn into office as President, and he wasted no time on his priorities of revenge, retribution, illegal immigration, dirty energy, and gutting DEI policies and subsidized healthcare, and generally making people sicker.  With tariffs used to punish perceived enemies and the longest federal government shutdown in history, chaos and economic uncertainty reigned.  The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, was a bust, with either miniscule savings or net cost increases.  Worldwide turmoil continued with wars in the Middle East between Israel and the Palestinians, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict continued. In the beginning of the year, the Palisades fire in the Los Angeles area destroyed nearly 7,000 structures, and resulted in 12 deaths and damage in the $100 billion range.  Towards the end of the year, the horrifying Wang Fuk Court fire in a Hong Kong apartment complex killed 161 people.  2025 will not be the warmest year on record, but the second or third warmest, as the El Niño conditions that contributed to the record heat in 2024 was not replicated for 2025. Prominent passings included actors Robert Redford, Malcolm-Jamal Warner, Diane Keaton, and Gene Hackman, director Rob Reiner, and musicians Ozzy Osbourne, Roberta Flack, and Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys.  Other passings included conservative political activist Charlie Kirk, former Vice President Dick Cheney, Pope Francis, fashion designer Giorgio Armani, primatologist Jane Goodall, wrestler Hulk Hogan, and boxer and kitchen appliance spokesperson George Foreman. In automotive news, the $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit expired at the end of September, and fines for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards were eliminated.  Against the EV headwinds, automakers made significant adjustments to their future product portfolios by substantially scaling back EVs and investing instead on hybrids and range extenders.  Tariffs resulted in some production being shifted to the U.S., and some prices were raised, but manufacturers for the most part absorbed the tariffs and will take major earnings hits.  Stellantis brought back the Hemi V8 to the RAM pickup, due to popular demand, after the Hurricane inline-six that had replaced it a couple of years ago did not catch on.  The Hemi will also be brought back to the Dodge Charger. With great fanfare, Tesla debuted robotaxi service with safety drivers in downtown Austin, Texas in June.  There were at least eight reported crashes over the next 6 months, even with the safety drivers.  Lucid is busy getting their midsize EV offerings ready to market, and Rivian likewise with the more affordable R2 model.  Toyota repositioned the Century model into an ultra luxury brand above Lexus to be sold in select Lexus dealerships. Jaguar fired their lead designer, Gerry McGovern, one year after their bold Type 00 concept reveal and heavily criticized rebranding effort.  In December, Mercedes-Benz announced that their Chief Design Officer, Gordon Wagener, is leaving the company the following month after 28 years with the company. In a rare instance of the Chinese government taking the lead on a vehicle safety issue, with some occupants unable to exit Teslas and Xiaomis on fire, backup mechanical mechanisms will be mandatory for electronic interior or exterior door handles in 2027 and 2028 in the Chinese market.  With globalization, that will likely lead to changes to EVs sold elsewhere. Vehicles canceled prior to the New Year include the Acura TLX and ZDX, Cadillac XT4 and XT6, Chevrolet Malibu, Ford Escape and related Lincoln Corsair, Infiniti QX50 and QX55, Kia Soul, Lexus RC, Nissan Versa, Porsche Boxster and Cayman, Subaru Legacy, and the Volvo S60 and S90.  The Ford F-150 Lightning made it to the 2026 model year but is already out of production for good as a fully electric pickup. There were several concept vehicles in 2025, but none was particularly notable. New vehicle introductions were sparse.  Against that backdrop, here’s the 24th annual edition of Cheers and Jeers for the best and worst things automotive in 2025: Cheers to BMW for the Best New EV with the iX3 for providing class-leading technology and a reset to BMW styling.  The “Neue Klasse” design dials back a lot of the excessive surface excitement of recent years. Honorable mention to GM for bringing back the Chevrolet Bolt with more modern technology, faster charging, and an affordable price in a familiar package.  The vehicle will be a limited edition offering, but it was also revealed that there will be a family of Bolts, without further elaboration. Jeers to the Tesla Board for Worst Corporate Governance for failing to rein in Elon Musk, who seems to be doing a good job of making people not want to buy Teslas, and for providing an absurdly excessive pay package.  Tesla is losing the carbon credits paid for by other manufacturers, who have previously provided billions of dollars of revenue, and future profitability is uncertain.  With an aging lineup and the spectacularly unsuccessful Cybertruck, Tesla is betting it all on autonomy. Jeers to Mercedes-Benz for the Worst Luxury Vehicle Interiors with their focus on massive screens rather than cohesive style, material quality, or build quality.  Mercedes-Benz has become a shadow of its former self when they used to be “Engineered like no other car in the world.” Cheers to Kia for Best Non-SUV Introduction with the K4 hatchback, which makes the compact K4 much more attractive and functional than the awkwardly styled sedan.  Kia is on a roll with record-breaking sales the last three years. Honorable mention goes to Honda for the Prelude in the near-dead sports coupe market.  The new Prelude has not been embraced by performance enthusiasts, but the Prelude was never about all-out performance.  The Prelude is being marketed to middle aged to older buyers wanting to relive the glory of their youth.  Jeers to the Honda dealers who have been tacking on $15k market adjustments. Cheers to Cadillac for the Best Luxury EV Lineup with the Optiq, Lyriq, Vistiq, and Escalade IQ.  Cadillac has been successful reinventing itself.  The lineup is far from perfect, with charging speeds that are not class-leading and excessive heft, but the vehicles are proof that a legacy automaker can be successful in the EV realm, at least until Chinese EVs are unleashed on American soil. Cheers and Jeers for the Best and Worst Rebadge Job with the Nissan Rogue Plug-In Hybrid.  Mitsubishi has only about 300 dealerships in the U.S, compared to Nissan with about three and a half times as many.  The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is a decent 7-passenger SUV with about 7,000 sales in the U.S. every year.  Nissan is broke and desperate for fresh product to fill gaps in its lineup.  The Outlander is based on the Nissan Rogue, but Nissan chose to take the cost-effective move of making only minor trim changes to the Outlander PHEV to turn it into a Nissan.  It will serve its purpose. Jeers to the Federal Government for the Most Regressive Sustainability Move by attempting to pull back National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) funds and removing EV chargers from federal government facilities in their all-out quest to promote the consumption of petroleum.  As the rest of the world electrifies their fleets, the long-term competitiveness of the American automakers will be diminished. Wishing everyone a safe, healthy, and prosperous New Year.
    • I was just about to give up because the Discovery and Range Rover was nowhere NEAR close to that. The only thing that kept me going was you said you tried Ford.  FoMoCo still owned LandRover then I think.  Or I kinda knew that the lesser Land Rovers were still Ford platforms along with Volvo.  So I said to myself, because you sleuthed Fords, maybe just maybe I should just go with what the storyline says the vehicle is a Rover of some kind along with your intuition of it being a FoMoCo family vehicle and I stuck to it and it paid off.  If it wasnt Land Rover, I would have gone to Volvo next. 
    • Thank you!  At least it was the right brand. 
    • Easy peasy. I started with Range Rover and like you...negative. But then I went down the Land Rover family from the 2015s. I did Discovery and said yikes...not even close. But I pressed on.  I got to this: And then I said...woah...that is close...so I then decided to continue on sleuthing with Land Rover and went further down the years  at around the 2010 mark And then I got this and said: BINGO!!! https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/163-2010-land-rover-lr2-photo-gallery/photos LR2  from the 2010 era:
    • Hey guys, see if you can figure this one out. Cannonically this is supposed to be to be a Range Rover in the story. It’s clearly not a Range Rover.   I looked at Pathfinder, Armada, some Fords and can’t figure out what it is. Should be something circa 2015 or earlier. The hazard button is in an odd place right under the screen and it looks like it has a speaker above the screen. There’s also clearly a CD player.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search