Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

  • 🚗 Your People Are Here. Get In.

    The internet is full of car content. This is the community.

    Cheers & Gears has been bringing enthusiasts together since 2001. Join the conversation, show off your garage, and find your people.

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Hybrid Vehicles Are Losing Their Appeal

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    January 16, 2012

    Automakers have been pushing Hybrid vehicles for the past few years as a way for owners to save gas and the environment. However, according to LMC Automotive, hybrid sales in the United States have slowed last year to 2.2% compared to 2.4% in 2010.

    Mike Jackson, chief executive of auto retail chain AutoNation Inc., says that while 75% of customers that walked into his showrooms wanted to talk about hybrids, they only make 2.5% of AutoNation sales.

    “What happens from the 75 percent consideration to the 2.5 percent commitment? They look at the price premium for the technology, which is already subsidized and discounted, and say ‘the payback period is too long; not for me.’ It’s a back-of-the envelope conversation on the part of the American consumer,” said Jackson.

    Hybrid vehicles face two challenges: the cost of hybrids haven't come down fast enough to justify the added expense and regular internal combustion engines have become more efficient.David Champion, senior director of the Auto Test Center of Consumer Reports points out that a regular Civic gets 32 MPG combined while the Civic hybrid achieves 44 MPG combined. That extra MPG means $322 savings in fuel for a year. But with a larger price tag, the Civic hybrid takes more than six years to get the money back.

    What’s more, improvements to a regular internal combustion engine can potentially improve fuel economy by 40% while costing an extra $2,000 per model by 2020. Also, putting a vehicle on a diet and doing better aerodynamics can lower consumption by up to 10% and would cost approximately $200 per car by 2020.

    “The advantages of hybrids are getting harder to justify. It’s the cost differential. Consumers are rational and they understand the cost of ownership,” said Scott Corwin, vice president of consulting firm Booz & Co., New York.

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt

    Let's also get real, Hybrids / pure electric only make sense in big cities with recharge stations and moderate weather.

    Seattle is a perfect example of extreme tree huggers going overboard on putting charging stations all over even having the first ones in the country on the passes as free rapid charging stations paid by your hard working tax payer.

    This weekend, these electric tree huggers who want to drive their front wheel electric auto's up the pass to go snowboarding ended up causing headaches for the rest of us in our properly equiped 4x4 or AWD auto. They get stuck, or just plain die at 12 degrees and heavy snow.

    They have their place, but that is in the city and they need to keep them there. It is a small market which is overblown.

    Reality is we can do much better with diesel, alternate fuels like Propane, etc. Many better ways than Green house gas creating Batter powered auto's.

    Yes for those that think they are saving the world, wake up to the fact that your battery pack in your Nissan leaf create more gas during it's productions than 10 years of a compact running on regular gas.

    • Agree 2
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell

    I'm wondering why the developments to the ICEs haven't trickled into hybrids to make them even better. The Pruis, the current Fusion, the Volt..... none have direct injection. None have low boost turbo charging with direct injection.

    The new Camry Hybrid comes with the same 2.5 liter 4-cylinder as the base 4-cylinder, albeit slightly de-tuned. For real fuel savings, that engine should be downsized to somewhere around 1.8 liters with direct injection and light turbo added.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt

    If we are going to say that Hybrids like the VOLT should be the future for ALL Auto's then let's take a page form the RV industry where they use tiny Generators to create power all night long to run the Heaters, Microwaves, etc.

    With this thought in mind, then we should be able to create an AWD Electric auto ( Electric motor at each wheel) and have a small 1 liter DI generator that charges the battery pack, This should be good for crazy gas milage and make all the Tree Huggers happy! :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell

    That concept has been done... just hasn't been put in production yet.

    The Volt is sort of a beta version in this regard. A better engine of smaller capacity would have improved mileage further. It would be even more amazing with a <1 liter turbo diesel.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt

    That concept has been done... just hasn't been put in production yet.

    The Volt is sort of a beta version in this regard. A better engine of smaller capacity would have improved mileage further. It would be even more amazing with a <1 liter turbo diesel.

    That is cool to hear, I would be very interested in an AWD vehicle like this with a <1 liter turbo diesel generator. :D

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ocnblu

    I've seen NOTHING "amazing" about electrics and gas/electric hybrids. They're worthless. They suck and they have their own set of problems more prohibitive than any real internal combustion vehicle.

    • Agree 2
    • Disagree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell

    Not really faint praise at all. It's a 4-cylinder that rolls like a 6 and gets great gas mileage verse a 6 cyclinder that needs to down shift often and gets relatively poor gas mileage even amongst its peers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ocnblu

    Drewbert, where would the battery stack go in a Theta application of eek-Assist? Where would the plumbing for the battery cooling fan go? Do you believe the LaCrosse eek-Assist powertrain could be lifted and put into a Terrain, which is a blocky, AWD CUV, and be worth the price in mileage savings? Do you believe a Theta eek-Assist vehicle could get mileage that is worth the entry price, worth the potential for high repair bills after warranty expiration, and worth the complication v. the new 2.5L DI 4 by itself?

    The market is speaking to the carmakers here. All this investment in electrification is for what, if the customer will not plunk down their money and commit to the compromises intrinsic in their design?

    Edited by ocnblu
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    chesterharoldson

    Back when I was young we had steam powered automobiles, none of this gasoline tomfoolery. Eventually steam power was phased out and the world was worse of for it. Then we had the old crisis in the `70's and I would tell people, "See! See! If your cars were powered by coal this wouldn't be an issue."

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell

    Drewbert, where would the battery stack go in a Theta application of eek-Assist? Where would the plumbing for the battery cooling fan go? Do you believe the LaCrosse eek-Assist powertrain could be lifted and put into a Terrain, which is a blocky, AWD CUV, and be worth the price in mileage savings? Do you believe a Theta eek-Assist vehicle could get mileage that is worth the entry price, worth the potential for high repair bills after warranty expiration, and worth the complication v. the new 2.5L DI 4 by itself?

    The market is speaking to the carmakers here. All this investment in electrification is for what, if the customer will not plunk down their money and commit to the compromises intrinsic in their design?

    1. The battery shape would need to be changed.

    2. Yes there is room for it.

    3. It would probably end up being a more space efficient design than can be done in the LAX.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×



  • Support Independent Automotive Journalism

    25 years of honest automotive coverage — because someone has to do it.

    Cheers & Gears has never been filtered by manufacturer relationships or driven by algorithm. Just real people, real opinions, and a genuine love of cars. Subscribers keep the lights on and get an ad-light experience starting at $2.25/month.*

    View subscription options

    *A small number of ads feature member-exclusive coupon deals and will still appear.

  • Posts

    • ccap41
      05.09-10.24.2026 Cruise Nights

      By ccap41 · Posted

      I love the clean '04 GT (that looks like the anniversary badge for an '04). I'm a sucker for that gen, even though they're kind of a black sheep of Mustangs. 
    • ccap41
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By ccap41 · Posted

      Obviously, but I'd think you could cut 200 miles worth of range on the battery pack and save hundreds of pounds making it just a more overall efficient vehicle and still yielding 700 miles of range.  As I said to David, I'd remove as much battery pack as the engine weighs so it would be a net 0 gain in weight and you'd still have a sh!t ton of range yet it would be more efficient at achieving those miles. I'd assume it would be similar to my guesstimated numbers above.
    • ccap41
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By ccap41 · Posted

      Without knowing specifics of their design, I'd think reducing the battery pack by the weight of the engine would yield sufficient results. You'd still have a ton of electric-only range and then you'd have your "backup genergator" for when you run out of juice.  Speaking of which, I ran into a guy with a 2nd gen Volt a few weeks back while taking my kids on a walk. I asked him how he liked it and what kind of efficiency/range he was getting. He loved it, HOWEVER.. he said he almost never plugs it in. He just runs it as a hybrid. I'm pretty certain they aren't all that efficient when operated as just a hybrid. I thought that was kind of a waste of a Volt, to be using it that way. I didn't tell him this because I didn't want to sh!t on his situation or anything, but I thought it was odd to buy a plug-in hybrid then just never even utilize the full capacity of the battery. Then again, this falls right in line with a multiple studies I've read about that say most plug-in hybrid owners never utilize the plug-in capability of their vehicles. 
    • A Horse With No Name
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By A Horse With No Name · Posted

      Maybe, but if it sells units, they will build it. 
    • A Horse With No Name
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By A Horse With No Name · Posted

      The Americans have given up on cars, and I have given up on the Americans. Also, water is wet, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. Hume talked about the problem of induction, but this continuing seems like a pretty safe bet.    A low functioning theocracy is a bad thing, and what we are slipping into in the USA. 

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search