Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Volkswagen NA CEO: 40 Percent of Model Mix Will Be Made of Crossovers Within A Few Years

      Expect more crossovers at your local Volkswagen dealer

    Volkswagen sees crossovers as its savior in the U.S. marketplace. Speaking with Wards Auto, Volkswagen North America CEO Hinrich Woebcken said their model mix would change from 10 to 12 percent crossovers to 40 percent in the next few years. 

    “We are shifting the brand into a position where we will enjoy more business volume because we were not present in those segments. We’re currently at 12% and the industry is nearly 60% light trucks and SUVs, so we are severely underrepresented,” said Woebcken.

    To accomplish this, Volkswagen will be launching the brand-new Altas and redesign Tiguan later this year. Interestingly, Volkswagen will keep the current Tiguan for a bit to act as an entry-level model for the crossover lineup. Down the road, Volkswagen will introduce an all-new Touraeg and is considering doing another crossover using the Atlas' platform.

    One vehicle that is still off the table is a truck. Rumors have been flying around about Volkswagen doing a car-based pickup (i.e. Honda Ridgeline). Woebcken said there is little interest for this at Volkswagen's HQ due to how small the segment is. 

    Source: Wards Auto

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Well, this is a no-brainer. If you want sustainability as a mainstream maker, this is a necessity. They better get something smaller than the new Tiguan out stat! Also, pony up and give us a damn Amarok already!!

     

    On a realted note, I get to go drive the new Atlas next week

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Everyone really wants tall station wagons, but no one wants to admit it. 

    Can I get mine with rubber fender flairs and tall 36" BF Goodrich All terrains, low end lockers. I loved my Old Station wagon that we lifted.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Can I get mine with rubber fender flairs and tall 36" BF Goodrich All terrains, low end lockers. I loved my Old Station wagon that we lifted.

    No, sorry.  It will be 4 mini-spares, electric motors and solar panels on the roof.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was at the auto show last night and touched ! The atlas. There was a crowd of first baby urbanites milling about it. It looks in person ok but it also looks confused. Is it a Subaru Forester XL or Honda Pilot in drag?  Dude opened the doors for a bit and the interior looks Passat Jetta cheap as well. 

     

    It it did look roomy and space efficient. Give it credit for that. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    I was at the auto show last night and touched ! The atlas. There was a crowd of first baby urbanites milling about it. It looks in person ok but it also looks confused. Is it a Subaru Forester XL or Honda Pilot in drag?  Dude opened the doors for a bit and the interior looks Passat Jetta cheap as well. 

     

    It it did look roomy and space efficient. Give it credit for that. 

    Now this is just funny, because the Passat's interior is anything but cheap. The fit and finish is among the best in the class. Just more evidence of people mistaking over the top styling and design for quality. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Eh... the plastic on the door panels is just this side of tupperware.  The HVAC controls in particular were from Fisher Price, only not that solid.  (The Atlas, not the Passat. It's been awhile since I've been in a Passat).  It was all put together really well, but the material quality isn't what I'd expect on a vehicle that will likely sell primarily in the mid-$30k range.  Some competing vehicles that have been on the market for years or are just now going out of production have better material quality than what this new Atlas is getting. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    But But But America Loves Tupperware, it is part of the Make America Great focus! :P

    JK, But that is a sad state that today we still have auto's that are using such piss poor quality of materials.

    Surprised a vendor has not just sprayed the whole interior with LineX and called it a day.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/18/2017 at 11:07 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

    Eh... the plastic on the door panels is just this side of tupperware.  The HVAC controls in particular were from Fisher Price, only not that solid.  (The Atlas, not the Passat. It's been awhile since I've been in a Passat).  It was all put together really well, but the material quality isn't what I'd expect on a vehicle that will likely sell primarily in the mid-$30k range.  Some competing vehicles that have been on the market for years or are just now going out of production have better material quality than what this new Atlas is getting. 

    Plenty of other vehicles in this class have loads of hard plastic in them. This is nothing new. And they all have their own shortcomings, as well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    Plenty of other vehicles in this class have loads of hard plastic in them. This is nothing new. And they all have their own shortcomings, as well.

    Yes, I'm aware there are no perfect cars.  I'm saying that the Atlas in particular was a let down on material quality especially given the levels we've come to expect from VW in the past. While the show car I was in was well put together, the whole thing felt over a decade old in materials all over. The outgoing Chevy Traverse, which I would never point to as a standard by which to do things, has much better feeling material quality than the Atlas, particularly around the switchgear and HVAC controls.   And that's the rub, the Atlas is already behind an old Chevy I don't particularly like and that is about to be replaced. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/20/2017 at 11:19 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

    Yes, I'm aware there are no perfect cars.  I'm saying that the Atlas in particular was a let down on material quality especially given the levels we've come to expect from VW in the past. While the show car I was in was well put together, the whole thing felt over a decade old in materials all over. The outgoing Chevy Traverse, which I would never point to as a standard by which to do things, has much better feeling material quality than the Atlas, particularly around the switchgear and HVAC controls.   And that's the rub, the Atlas is already behind an old Chevy I don't particularly like and that is about to be replaced. 

    Lol, the materials in the Traverse are NOT better than the Atlas. Not by a long shot. That's just comical.

    The dash trim on the higher models is where the biggest criticism can be levied against the Atlas. The center stack and console areas are as good as or better than the rest of the class I've been in. Which is everything but the new Koreans.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Frisky Dingo said:

    Lol, the materials in the Traverse are NOT better than the Atlas. Not by a long shot. That's just comical.

    The dash trim on the higher models is where the biggest criticism can be levied against the Atlas. The center stack and console areas are as good as or better than the rest of the class I've been in. Which is everything but the new Koreans.

    HVAC controls and other switchgear... yeah.. it is. The Traverse has really nice dials, metal ring with rubber grips and electroluminescent numbers for the HVAC. The Atlas has flat silver plastic and they don't have a solid feel to them.   The Atlas has hard plastic on the lower dash, fine, so does the Traverse... but then VW also covered the entire inner door panel with the same stuff.  The Traverse, at least for the front seats, has a padded foam material for the upper part of the door and then the hard plastic only at the map pockets at the bottom.  The Traverse upper dash pad is hard plastic, but then the face of it is stitched material... the Atlas is all plastic face and dash upper (though I think you can get a stitched dash cover on upper trims)

    2017-volkswagen-atlas-interior.jpg

    mm_gal_item_c2_0.img_resize.img_stage._3.jpg

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Atlas has no more hard plastic on the door panels than the Traverse. The actual switch gear being better on the Traverse I will give you, but the upper dash material is not nicer. It doesn't have anymore soft touch materials than the Atlas. Also, the area immediately surrounding the infotainment screen is cheaper looking, with its terrible faux wood finish. Same thing the Atlas is guilty of on the dash and door panel. And the overall fit and finish is worse on the Traverse. I've seen more instances than I can count of flimsy interior pieces breaking off and coming loose in Lambdas. Especially around the seats and floor.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Rivian has opened a new 8 stall 350kW fast charger station at Lynnwood mall plus a 9th Handicap fast charge stall. Seems when remote service is being done they are tagged red as two of the units are. They take credit or debit cards on top of if you setup a Rivian app account.  There are now over 100 fast charge stations within a 5 mile radius of where I live.
    • Happy Birthday!!! Cheers!!!  
    • Yes. Ferrari was always a company selling towards the top tier rich.  I am not sure about Porsche's marketing after 1945, but I do know that Porsche wanted to go up market, really up market,  to sell to the rich in the late 1990s.    Rolex watches were always expensive.  But not always being a  chic jewellery accessory.  Rolex watches were expensive time pieces because they were highly precise time pieces meant for professions that required time pieces that were precise in time telling. Also, Rolexes were also engineered to be tough and not break in those job environments. Therefore the high price tags of them were because the high standard of engineering that went into them.  The value of the brand went up because of the people that bought them praised them. It was after the quartz movement of the 1960s and 1970s that Rolex needed to re-invent themselves as battery powered watches were MORE precise ate their lunch. So...like many other "swiss" automatic watch makers launched their new image as luxury time pieces. It was easy for Rolex to do as Rolex was coveted as a great engineered watch to begin with.   Like I said...its a boys club that they want to be known as and bought by (rich) people that have bought into that boys club mentality.  It aint for you or for @ccap41.   Even if you or @ccap41 had the money, its obvious that you guys have not fallen for this marketing gimmick.  Its barely for me either.  1. I cant afford Ferraris, Porsches or Rolexes. 2. I do not want to be in a Porsche Boys club.  I like Porsches and all, but Im not in their camp.  Not because of the boys club marketing schemes. Its just that I am not a rabid Porsche guy fanatic.  3. If I had 1% money, I am not sure Id be a Ferrari guy either.  After deep thought, I am more of a Ferrari guy than I am a Porsche guy.  But maybe not enough for me to fall for this kind of sales scheme either. 4.  Rolex...   I do like a Rolex.  But I am not one to boast about what kind of time piece Im wearing. So...nix me on that club as well. 5. It looks like I am aligned with you and @ccap41's take on this, but with me, I shrug it off.  I see why the companies want to go down this road. And I see why there are some people...rich people...that do not mind giving their monies away to these companies. And at the end of the day, its what makes them happy and superior to the rest of us as we do not have the time or money or will to buy into any of this. And kudos for them for buying into that lifestyle.    At the end of the day, whether we are talking about Ferrari or Porsche or Rolex, some of their product, past and present, have been REALLY REALLY EXCELLENT product. Whether we are talking about looks and style or engineering and technology, all 3 have styled and engineered awesomeness.  We could talk about their products that were failures, but wouldnt that signal some sort of sour grapes analogy on our part? Its a company's right to mold their brand image as they wish.   Whether we agree to it as individuals is irrelevant. What is relevant though is how collectively we ALL feel about it.  In Ferraris case its a huge success. Porsche and Rolex have to work on it just a tad more. But I feels its successful.  If there is a downfall for Porsche, I think it has more to do with their decisions to being a sports car maker ALONGSIDE being a (rich) family grocery getter/soccer mom SUV maker.  The failure of having two opposing identities is killing Porsche.  And it is a double edged sword.  On the one hand, if not for the SUVs, Porsche would have been gone by the early 2000s.  The inevitable was prolonged?  Rolex... Too many boutique time piece makers have propped up in the last 15 years that took their place in some areas of the really expensive realm.  Quartz time pieces keep on being a nuisance to them. This time around its the fashion watch trend. The name brand watch sellers like Michael Korrs and Hugo Boss and even Porsche that have taken some of Rolexes market share.  The advent of smart watches also hurts them.  So they decided to change it up in the sales realm.  Are there enough Rolex worshippers out there that will buy cheaper Rolexes or older models just to get that one highly anticipated limited edition time piece? Well...although watches are strictly fashion devices today, there are more than enough fashionable time pieces around for people to by-pass Rolex fandom.  Some have their own unique look to them and are sought after and some just emulate Rolex but watch brand snobs are too few today so Rolex has a steep hill to climb because most people that wear watches dont give a shyte what kind of watch you wear.  Unlike cars, car snobbery actually still exits...  Hence why Ferrari is still king of the douchiness and going on strong. Stronger than ever Id say.    
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search