Intrepidation

But it's not as fun when the car in question doesn't even start these days.

Sounds like a form of torture.

Well the Jeep interior is at least somewhat accurate as it matches the spy shot we've seen. The renders themselves are pretty primitive though.

Sounds a lot like Pontiac too.

Please point to me which CHM-900 has has thin headlights like that. I'm dying to know. It looks like what it is: an evolution of the current GC. So you can tell interior quality based on a tiny 3D model huh? Reg you never cease to amaze me. You should really pay attention more often: next LX cars will have the new Phoenix V6 engines,s one of the most advanced V6 engines in the world, and at least some version of the powertrain will be hooked up to an 8-speed automatic. That comment is dumb.

GM is going in to Toyota mode. :wink: But seriously, the little money they have has to be spent on more important, mainstream stuff so they can actually make money. Perhaps teh normal cars will be more sporty now. They can always regroup...as said, teh engineers aren't leaving.

Yeah, spot on like blind guy throwing a dart and hitting the wall 20 feet away from the dartboard.

I wonder if it disappeared in one of our site crashes

I just hope that different kind of company doesn't even up being Geelies.

Sorry, I have TTAC on my spam filter...they aren't worth the wasted load time.

I like it a lot as well, and it's nice to finally see a Cadillac coupe again.

The bottom line is just because you don't like the car doesn't mean it won't sell and won't find plenty of buyers.

Saturn dealers want to spin-off from GM, start own company

And you are one of those people who believe their opinions are fact, your incorrect facts to be true, and never admit when they are wrong. I would have to check dimensions to see if what you claim is true but 1.) 2 inches wider does not a large car make. 2) The Epsilons are known for being on the narrow side.

Certainly a Buck Century or regal would be an option, you could consider a LH car with the 3.2 or 3.5, although I don't know if you're looking solely at GMs or not. Whatever you go with I would try to get later model year versions because the general rule of thumb is that most of the problems have been taken care of.

The 300 image would have made for a good refresh, not a redesign. I agree Captainbooyah, the first gen Durango is the best looking, and that image is helping to keep the track record.

That sounds like another poster I know (cough) smk (cough).

I'm calling you old.

The BMW 3-Series isn't by any stretch a midsize car.

I'm disappointed with the 300, it looks like a new nose grafted on the current car. I'm hoping it's nothing more than a Photochop to give an idea what the car will ve like without giving the final design away. I like the GC..although the profile image is crap, there's enough to make out that it's not a refresh. Charger looks interesting...I'm not sure I like how it lost its signature belt line kink, but it is cleaner and has a more athletic stance. Durango gives me a Sequoia vibe.

Maybe because, ZOMG some people actually prefer the styling o the coupe. What you and several others on this board fail to realize when making posts like this is that your opinion is not fact, and nor is it always he opinion of the majority of others (such as in this case). Also, the Challenger is a large coupe, if anything is is closer to midsize.

Chrysler's restructuring/viability PDF showed off some interesting stuff, with mention to the 200C's possible production among other things. Noteworthy are leaked images of the next gen 300, GC, Charger, and Durango. How accurate anything these are (outside of the Grand Cherokee) is unknown, as the others are in the relatively early development process.. http://www.media.chrysler.com/dcxms/assets...m_Viability.pdf

Ding!

Wow...now I know not to order one with the stripe package! It's already peeling!

That's your opinion. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean lots of other people don't, and that doesn't make it a wast eof anyone's money.