Jump to content
Create New...

ocnblu

Members
  • Posts

    35,458
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    57

Everything posted by ocnblu

  1. I believe it was because at that point they could make the car generally smaller overall and maintain passenger space to a point. Smaller, lighter cars = better mileage. It wasn't strictly the FWD layout. This was before the sophisticated fuel management systems and whatnot that are available today. Notice that cars in general are growing with each successive generation with ever-improving fuel economy, a testament to improving technology. There should be no reason why an Impala today couldn't have the same fuel mileage whether it's F or RWD, imo.
  2. The Dakota and Durango front bumpers, with their "jutting chin" look, look like afterthoughts to me, stuck on there as a band-aid to improve crash test results, as if the bumper is the sole piece of crash protection engineered for these trucks. That would scare me if I were a Dodge Boy.
  3. I think Dodge had a model called "Royal" back in the day. And Dodge Dart was more of a full-size car before it was a compact. Did you see a little Dart, or a big Dart? I can't remember seeing anything unusual lately. I'll have to keep my eyes peeled.
  4. Yeah, I was all loud about wanting RWD to return myself. I still have faith that it will on larger cars. But until then, I think Chevrolet (and Pontiac with G6) has done a good job with the FWD cars. I can't wait to see and hear an '06 Monte Carlo SS, even though it's prolly gonna be out of my price range.
  5. That gorgeous orange Fiero proves my point about spoilers... doesn't it look great with a nice, clean, low rear deck? I am so thankful the "Buck Rogers" finned monstrosity is missing from the '06 G6 coupe. That car is absolutely light years ahead of its predecessor in looks and class... I want an Emerald Green/Ebony cloth 6 speed G6 GTP coupe with polished rims!
  6. Regal Cielo, funny story: The top completely disappears, but the rear door glass doesn't go down all the way. How's that for convertible fun? :P
  7. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :rolleyes: (Vipes must be so mad he can't speak. Or type, whatever.) http://www.cheersandgears.com/public/style_emoticons//AH-HA_wink.gif
  8. I do not believe that any religion should judge a person based on sexual orientation. It is fine to advocate fidelity to preserve a home, but let adults choose their adult partner as they will. The commercialization of Christianity is wrong, imo. This website makes fun of "Christians" ©, and also puts to shame in a funny way anyone who improperly uses their faith to bring shame on gay people. If you believe in God, you must acknowledge that he made us too. We have a right to live as we were designed. We're not going to take over the world, that would be impossible. But we should be left alone and not shunned for being who we are. We are not evil. Would you cast out a fellow Quaker if you found out he loved another man? What purpose would that serve the community as a whole? It would only weaken the community, for we are everywhere, we just don't shout about it.
  9. That's a tight little hatchback. Compare that to the rust bucket, oil-burning Excel of 20 years ago. Hyundai has learned very quickly how to make an appealing car.
  10. :blink:
  11. Jeez, I honestly did not post this to start a fire. I thought it was funny.
  12. Dsuupr, the people being made fun of at my link are hypocrites purporting to be Christian, not TRUE CHRISTIANS. To me, a true Christian has his faith inside. He keeps it quiet. He doesn't use his faith to condemn others. I thought the linked site was hilarious, in an Onion sort of way, and decided to share. It's a satire.
  13. I admit I love getting ahold of "the latest thing". I've had quite a few first-year vehicles. Right now I'm in love with the HHR, G6 GTP coupe, Solstice, Civic EX coupe, Impala, and Cobalt SS and SS/SC, among others... Mustang, LXs, etc. I've been accused recently of being "obsessed" with cars by a family member. It's like they didn't know I've been this way since I was born. :rolleyes: http://www.cheersandgears.com/public/style_emoticons//AH-HA_wink.gif
  14. http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news0704/homoprevention.html http://www.cheersandgears.com/public/style_emoticons//AH-HA_wink.gif
  15. I don't like wearing stinky stuff. For years there I used to get Stetson every year from my stepmom for Christmas. I wonder if she could see the fake smile when I opened it as she made a comment about how the girls love it. One year I just had to say "I don't wear cologne" in the most polite way I could. I never got another bottle of Stetson.
  16. I find that the ride and handling are light years ahead of my S-10s. I've owned 5 S-10s, the last being a '98 extended cab ZR2. My '04 Colorado Z71 4X4 extended cab is a much more comfortable, solid-feeling vehicle. On trips, I get 4 mpg better mileage than with the 4.3L. Both trucks had 3.73 rear ends.
  17. That backwards helmet picture is freakin' funny as hell! :lol:
  18. Very sweet Olds, man. Welcome to the board. I love '78-'88 A/G bodies.
  19. Whoa, and by the looks of the car, he's been rearended one too many times.
  20. "In Auto News, disgraced former head of VW is hired by Subaru. 'WE SHOULD COMPETE WITH AUDI! NO ONE WANTS AN AFFORDABLE AWD CAR! I HAVE A GRAND VISION!'" :rolleyes:
  21. The red sedan is HOT, but I hope they give us the 5 door too. I am not a Mitsu fan either, but this is light years ahead of the current uber bland Lancer.
  22. Very, Very modern day SAAB 900. Clean up some details for production and it could be another shared product between these two far-flung affiliates.
  23. Oh, I dunno, Oldsmoboi says that paint scheme is very masculine. :P http://www.cheersandgears.com/public/style_emoticons//AH-HA_wink.gif
  24. I am wondering if her panty hose match her hat.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search