Drew Dowdell

And 0% of them will go 0-60 in less then 5 seconds. And 0% of them will have over 300hp. It's give and take.

I even like the Hybrid symbol

MOOOOM!!! TIMMY SAT ON MY PORCHE CAYANNE!!!

<drinks Toyota coolaid> LA LA LA! I'm NOT LISTENING!! LA LA LA

Soo... why is the interior of the IS with it's parts bin switches and unimaginative design "ok for an entry level Lexus" when the interior of the CTS has very few parts bin parts and is at the very lease an original design.... It sounds like the CTS out handles it. Sure, the IS would out run the CTS in the straight away.... right up till a loaded 44k when you start hitting CTS-V territory. Also keep in mind that the IS is all new, but a new CTS is about 18-24 months away. Edit: And I've seen the renderings of the new CTS. The exterior and interior positively blow away the IS.

Not really. I would put myself down as homo-flexible. I mostly date guys. I'm in a long term <permanent> relationship with a guy. Having a sexual fling with a woman is not out of the question with me. I will never have a relationship with a woman though. Reverse genders to understand a hetero-flexible person. Bisexual is someone who is just as likely to end up in a relationship with the same gender as they are with the opposite gender.

Cadillac doesn't NEED to sell 20k-25k Kappa's. That's what the Sky, Solstice, Opel Speedster, and whatever Kappa Chevy are for. What is the point of platform sharing otherwise? They are forcasting ~30k Solstices, ~25k Skys. How many Opels? Maybe 10k on the very conservative side. Right there is 65k units. It is likely that Cadillac could sell another 8k-10k of a Mini-XLR based on Kappa.

and we saw where that got the Ford Excursion.

link doesn't work

I got your business case right here:

You got an e-mail like that and she didn't even put out yet? Imagine if you married her and you forgot to take out the trash....

ok..... You're old fashioned. :P

Can you tell that I've had this debate before....?

I would think that there is still room for both a Camaro and a GTO. The GTO has a much more usable back seat and trunk then that camaro concept would.

At least you accept the possibility..... but then why the "slippery slope" rant about how if being gay were natural, humans would be extinct? Surely you understand how wrong you are in at least this regard. Seeing a gay wedding doesn't make people gay. :rolleyes: Kids get teased. Fat kids, skinny kids, tall kids, short kids, kids with braces, kids with glasses, kids with two dads, kids with no dad. They all get teased. The only way your son will be raised with less stigmatization is if he's perfect and lives a perfect life..... then he'll get teased for it. Both a selfish and unfounded one. Being gay doesn't mean one doesn't have kids. It's only a matter of time before my partner and I either surrogate or adopt. It could be worse, he could end up in the priesthood*.... then he'll definately never give you grandkids. *only from the offspring producing aspect

abnormal != bad

Hey! I have attached earlobes! I'm abnormal!? :( :( :( :(

Croc... I wonder if you can get a pic of the Grand Prix in pink? Mary Kay makes them for the 2nd place winners I think.

I have a feeling that he's talking about us here on C&G seem to get along better then those on GMI. When we have a conflict here, it's usually from an "outsider". Don't get me wrong. I enjoy having you here. I harbor no ill will towards you.... I just wish to show you the error of your ways. <mostly logic flaws>

This is what we call slippery slope You have to make the assumption that the ENTIRE HUMAN RACE would have to become homosexual to support your claim. Somehow I don't think that will happen. You apparently do not have an understanding of the recessive gene in gentics. Both of my parents have brown hair and brown eyes. I have blond hair and blue eyes. Both of my parents are heterosexual. I am homosexual.

[quote name='funkypunnk' date='Jan 10 2006, 11:35 PM']No more parades, drama queens, or leather. How about just living your life and seeking happiness. That is hard enough!!!!! [post="71958"][/post] [/quote] [quote]Yes to all of the above when appropriate. My wife and I do hold hands in public, as do my children and I. Do I make out with her in public, no. My office is my house and therefore I am surrounded with pictures of my family. As far as announcing the marriage publicly, of course. She is a hottie and she was marrying ME, I found that so unbelievable that I had to put it in the paper or no one else would believe it.[/quote] I didn't say make out. I said my partner and I would likely be holding hands at NAIAS. [quote]I would not have brought my son, as I feel that life model not appropriate for him,[/quote] v. [quote]I have no problem with that.[/quote] [quote]I would not have brought my son, as I feel that life model not appropriate for him,[/quote] v. [quote]I have no problem with that.[/quote] [quote]What I can never understand is why the minority always feels it is their personal burden to force open the minds of the majority. I like Pontiacs, yet I don't hold parades every year trying to get Ford lovers to buy a Pontiac.[/quote] Address what I am saying, not what you may have seen on the 6pm news in San Fran. The majority of gay people are not like what you see on T.V. Hell, neither my partner and I attend any pride parades. Few of our friends do. What gay people want is the freedom to do the things in my above list without persecution. To say you support your co-worker yet wouldn't allow your son to see it reeks of hypocrisy. How about being the good role model and show your son how to be caring and accepting of other people's relationships regardless of your personal feelings? [quote]whenever I see gay couples[/quote] I think you see them a lot more often then you think. The ones you describe just happen to be the only ones you notice. [quote]No more parades, drama queens, or leather. How about just living your life and seeking happiness.[/quote] Fine... in return we ask: No more hate, no more persecution, no more "constitutional amendments", no more unequal treatment. Deal?

Sing it with me kids! Kappa Caddy!! Kappa Caddy!! Kappa Caddy!! Kappa Caddy!!

I find that irritating too.

Another great one!! :) Homosexuality in animals has been shown to increase as population density increases. As a population becomes oversaturated, homosexuality spikes. Homosexuality could be nature's population check valve. Only if the number of off-spring produced by the heterosexuals is lower then the death rate in the entire population. Sweeden is having a population problem, not because of homosexuals, but because heterosexuals aren't having as many kids. Take the homosexuals out of the population and Sweeden will still have the same problem. This is what we call a logical Genetic Fallacy.