Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Chevrolet City Express Is A Nissan NV200 With Bowtie Badges

    By William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    May 14, 2013

    Please do not adjust your monitor. What you are seeing here is real (well somewhat). This is the new 2015 Chevrolet City Express which will go on sale next fall - and yes, it's a Nissan NV200 wearing Chevrolet badging.

    "Our fleet customers have asked us for an entry in the commercial small van segment, so this addition to the Chevrolet portfolio will strengthen our position with fleets and our commercial customers," said Ed Peper, U.S. vice president of GM Fleet and Commercial Sales in a press release.

    The City Express comes equipped a 2.0L four-cylinder producing 131 horsepower and 139 pound-feet of torque. This is mated to a CVT.

    Pricing will be released at a later time.

    Source: GM

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at [email protected]or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    Press Release is on Page 2

    GM to Source Small Cargo Vehicle from Nissan for U.S., Canada Markets

    DETROIT and NASHVILLE, Tenn. – General Motors Co. and Nissan announced today the companies have signed an agreement for Nissan to produce a small cargo vehicle that GM will sell in the United States and Canada.

    GM will procure the vehicle from Nissan and distribute it through the Chevrolet dealer network. GM expects the Chevrolet City Express, based on the Nissan NV200, to be available for sale in the fall of 2014.

    "Our fleet customers have asked us for an entry in the commercial small van segment, so this addition to the Chevrolet portfolio will strengthen our position with fleets and our commercial customers," said Ed Peper, U.S. vice president of GM Fleet and Commercial Sales.

    Joe Castelli, Nissan vice president, commercial vehicles and fleet added, "Working with partners to expand markets for our innovative products enhances Nissan's growth and manufacturing efficiency by leveraging our capacity to meet growing demand in this space."

    Nissan currently sells a version of the vehicle as the NV200 in numerous markets globally, including the United States and Canada. The Nissan NV200, a spacious-yet-compact commercial vehicle, is a previous winner of the International Van of the Year Award. Cost of ownership for the vehicle is among the lowest in the class due to low running costs, the high efficiency of the engines and drivetrains and a safety structure that helps to minimize crash damage.

    The price of the Chevrolet City Express will be announced later.

    Chevrolet Enters Small Cargo Van Segment

    City Express to arrive in dealer showrooms in fall 2014

    DETROIT – Chevrolet announced today that it will enter the small cargo van segment with the City Express to meet the demands of customers in an emerging commercial vehicle segment.

    The 2015 City Express, Chevrolet’s first entry into the small van segment in the U.S. and Canada, joins the full-size Express van as part of the Chevrolet lineup in the fall of 2014.

    “Our fleet customers have asked us for a small cargo van, so this addition to the Chevrolet portfolio will strengthen our position as the partner of choice for all of our customers,” said Ed Peper, U.S. vice president of GM Fleet and Commercial Sales. “It’s quite common in many parts of the world to leverage available manufacturing resources to bring transportation solutions to market for our customer’s benefit. It’s just smart business!”

    Chevrolet’s entry into this segment will allow business customers to purchase all of their vehicles from one manufacturer, and service them through the largest dealer network offering even more convenience for their business.

    Designed for small businesses to large fleets looking for a small, fuel-efficient, cargo carrying vehicle, the City Express will be available in LS and LT trim levels.

    The LS model has the following features:

    • 2.0 liter DOHC 4-cylinder engine
    • Continuously Variable Transmission
    • 4-wheel antilock brake system
    • 15-inch steel wheels with 185/60R15 tires
    • Gray cloth interior with vinyl bolster wear patches
    • Fold down passenger seat with seat back tray table
    • Center console with storage for file folders, laptop, etc.
    • Upper dashboard mounted storage bin
    • 40/60 split rear cargo doors (180-degree max opening)
    • 20 integrated interior reinforced cargo mounting points
    • Six exterior roof rack mounting points
    • Six standard air bags
    • Electronic stability control.

    The LT model adds the following features:

    • Power heated outside mirrors
    • Power door locks with auto locking feature
    • Remote keyless entry
    • Cruise control with steering wheel mounted controls.

    The City Express offers 122.7 cubic feet of space, along with various packages adding functionality and efficiency for the commercial customer.

    • Upfit ready with weld nuts for attaching bins
    • D-Rings affixed on the floor to allow securing of cargo from side to side and front to back
    • Floor cover for entire cargo area to protect the vehicle and cargo
    • Standard dual sliding doors to allow easy access to cargo from either side of the vehicle
    • Flexible window options to meet the needs of business customers including window configurations for sliding doors
    • Standard full–size spare tire
    • Two different wheels with three different appearances
    • Spotter side mirrors for wider angle vision
    • Technology package with navigation radio, steering wheel audio controls, USB input, rear view camera, XM Radio and Bluetooth
    • Appearance package with body color bumpers, mirrors, door handles and chrome grill with black accents

    The 2.0-liter 16-valve DOHC 4-cylinder engine is rated at 131 horsepower and 139 lb-ft of torque. The engine is preliminarily matched with a responsive and efficient CVT transmission.

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    ocnblu

    Well if I think about it, I have no real problem with this arrangement. Won't this van be built in America? So it will be readily available. Seems like a pretty savvy move, actually.

    Cheaper than federalizing one of GM's current Euro small vans. And quicker... with Ford updating the Transit Connect and Dodge bringing the Fiats over soon, striking the market now will give Chevy a leg up.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    The funny thing is that the small van that GM has in Europe for Opel/Vauxhall is a rebadged Fiat Doblo, which Ram will probably be getting a version of soon for a small van (they are getting the Fiat Ducato based Pro Master large van).

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    NINETY EIGHT REGENCY

    The reason why GM used the Nissan van to make a Chevrolet version was for several reasons:

    1. The small Euro van market is taking off in the United States. GM needs to be a contender.
    2. GM had to act quickly and this was the fastest way to do it.
    3. GM already had a van agreement with Renault-Nissan already in Europe.
    4. It would take 24 to 48 months to get a new van in the segment to market. GM does not have that time.
    5. This buys GM some time to design and create its own van that it will most likely use globally in the future.
    6. The Nissan van is already built here in Mexico and federalized. It would be more of an issue and money to bring the Vauxhall and Opel versions here.


    The van is based on the Renault Kangoo:





    The only thing I do not understand is why GM did not use this vehicle instead:


    Chevrolet Orlando:






    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    hyperv6

    The fact is Ford too GM's lunch money with their small work van. I don't even think Ford expected the large response they got.
    GM was more than 48 months from having anything ready and could not wait.

    Point two is importing a van would have been a major issue. Ford has been importing theirs from Turkey. Yes Turkey. To avoid the tariff Ford imports them with a rear seat and window hence it is a passenger vehicle. Once here they remove the seat and the windows in needed and turn it into a work vehicle. Yes it is cheaper to trash or recycle the seat and glass than pay the tariff.

    I am sure GM is working on this vehicle but they could not wait any longer nor could they pull people from other projects as important that still need done.

    I hate to see GM do something like this as to me it is a sign of weakness in the public eye but on the other hand they can not afford to have a stake in this segment that is exploding.

    Not only was a tariff an issue but was the Opel good for the US regulations or how much investment would it had required and would that money and time spent be better spent on the new platform tailored for this segment.

    Orlando was too small and too light to match the Ford. It would have been at a great disadvantage.

    The bottom line the Transit was turning into the next Econoline van that dominated for way too long.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    Not only was a tariff an issue but was the Opel good for the US regulations or how much investment would it had required and would that money and time spent be better spent on the new platform tailored for this segment.

    It would have been confusing if they had brought the Opel Combo van (which is the Fiat Doblo, built in Turkey) since it is coming as a Ram...

    http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2013/02/ram-to-get-turkish-built-fiat-doblo/

    Opel-Combo-Cargo-Van-Left-Side-1024x640.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    And why isn't this a GMC ? They are professional grade after all. . .

    I'm sure they will slap a GMC badge on some of them to keep the GMC dealers happy. Though 'City Savanna' doesn't really work since a Savanna is a rural pairie or something like that..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    daves87rs

    The reason why GM used the Nissan van to make a Chevrolet version was for several reasons:

    1. The small Euro van market is taking off in the United States. GM needs to be a contender.

    2. GM had to act quickly and this was the fastest way to do it.

    3. GM already had a van agreement with Renault-Nissan already in Europe.

    4. It would take 24 to 48 months to get a new van in the segment to market. GM does not have that time.

    5. This buys GM some time to design and create its own van that it will most likely use globally in the future.

    6. The Nissan van is already built here in Mexico and federalized. It would be more of an issue and money to bring the Vauxhall and Opel versions here.

    The van is based on the Renault Kangoo:

    The only thing I do not understand is why GM did not use this vehicle instead:

    Chevrolet Orlando:

    This.

    Odd as it is, it will be a money maker....Will fill that "astro" niche, but much better on gas....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    daves87rs

    The fact is Ford too GM's lunch money with their small work van. I don't even think Ford expected the large response they got.

    GM was more than 48 months from having anything ready and could not wait.

    Point two is importing a van would have been a major issue. Ford has been importing theirs from Turkey. Yes Turkey. To avoid the tariff Ford imports them with a rear seat and window hence it is a passenger vehicle. Once here they remove the seat and the windows in needed and turn it into a work vehicle. Yes it is cheaper to trash or recycle the seat and glass than pay the tariff.

    I am sure GM is working on this vehicle but they could not wait any longer nor could they pull people from other projects as important that still need done.

    I hate to see GM do something like this as to me it is a sign of weakness in the public eye but on the other hand they can not afford to have a stake in this segment that is exploding.

    Not only was a tariff an issue but was the Opel good for the US regulations or how much investment would it had required and would that money and time spent be better spent on the new platform tailored for this segment.

    Orlando was too small and too light to match the Ford. It would have been at a great disadvantage.

    The bottom line the Transit was turning into the next Econoline van that dominated for way too long.

    +1

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt

    Was talking with a few guys who are on the GM Fleet sales and host the GM Fleet linkedin group and they say a CNG version is also being considered since this van has CNG in Europe. This would meet the needs of cities that are requiring taxi's and inner city deliveries to be on a green source of energy.

    I see big potential here for this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt

    I found that this engine under the Nissan NV200 is rated at 48.6mpg. They also have a diesel version that is rated at 53.3mpg. Chevy should have both engines at launch in addition to the CNG version which is also rated at 48.6 mpg as this could really turn into an cash cow for them as fleets move to fuel efficient service/work mini vans.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×



  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • oldshurst442
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By oldshurst442 · Posted

      Id like to add:  Because it seems NOBODY wants to talk about the REALITY OF WHY manufacturing will NEVER come back to North America no matter WHAT kind of monies we throw at it to try to bring it back. And FYI, NOBODY is REALLY investing in ACTUALLY bringing back manufacturing to North America...  PRELUDE Nixon opened up the door to do trade with China. (not a bad thing) Reagan allowed Wallstreet and corporate America to move manufacturing from the US to China.  (In hindsight, a very bad thing for what it was to be)  CHAPTER 1 The industrial revolution arrived. It supercharged the British Empire and it helped to introduce a young country into being a very powerful nation in the decades to come.  We are here to talk about the young nation and not about the British Empire. CHAPTER 2 Ultimately, the industrial revolution brought many innovations on how to produce and manufacture even more efficiently and faster.  It helped win a world war or two and the last man standing so to speak allowed this young nation become almost the sole superpower on the planet. CHAPTER 3  Many many many products were produced.  Many many new technologies came to be that introduced a new modern society. And those new modern products also brought with them NEW MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES. CHAPTER 4 Remember when I said that this new nation rose up to the challenge to help win a world war or two?  Well, it was the industrial revolution ace up the sleeve that the USA had and the sheer amount of war machines produced efficiently and with speed was the key to these victories.  Especially that last world war.  When the war was over, the USA enjoyed the technology of mass production that was the envy of the world. (remember the bolded part.) CHAPTER 5  Eventually, manufacturing left the USA to go to China. The world followed suit.  China produces the world's gadgets. CHAPTER 6   (THIS IS THE IMPORTANT CHAPTER THAT NOBODY TALKS ABOUT) China has invested TRILLIONS of dollars in manufacturing. Why? THE WORLD depends on it. China holds itself PROUD to be the world's producer of goods. China wants to CONTINUE TO BE the world's producer of goods. So...China has upgraded their manufacturing plants to be very very state of the art. They will CONTINUE to INVEST not only in monies to ALWAYS RENOVATE their manufacturing plants, but they TEACH their populace to go to ENGINEERING schools so they could ALWAYS have STATE OF THE ART MANUFACTURING.  CHAPTER 7    (ALSO IMPORTANT THAT NOBODY TALKS ABOUT) The USA actually stopped renovating in manufacturing looong before the manufacturing plants left for China. But that is not the issue. The issue is, there are NO monies invested RIGHT now to bring back manufacturing. There are NO plants being built.  LOL tariffs...   And where are those monies from the tariffs?   No American company has invested in manufacturing plants to be built. No American company has worked with AMERICAN engineering schools to teach graduating students to manufacture goods in the USA to actually be with techniques of the early 2000s let alone 2025.  Loooooong gone are those 1930s/1940s/1950s techniques...  We are in 2025 let us not forget.   The USA doesnt even have the TOOLING of those 1930s/1940s/1950s plants. Those were sold to China and elsewhere in the world, but those metal tooling dies right now, have probably been recycled. NEW technologies to manufacture...   CHAPTER 8  (A TRUTH THAT WILL PROBABLY HURT BUT DEFINITELY NOT TALKED ABOUT) A certain American does not favour education.  This certain American favours ignorance.   MOST Americans do NOT want to work in a factory.  But ALL Americans do NOT realize MODERN factory work is NOT how it used to be.  To be fair, Apple iPhone workers in China committing suicide because of shytty work hours is also loooong gone. But then again, American media does not allow for  American peoples to know what a modern manufacturing plant consists of.  Also, engineering is too hard for those subset of Americans to actually learn how to manufacture goods in a modern state of the art way to not only compete with China, but to surpass their prowess in manufacturing to BRING BACK manufacturing from China to the USA.    CHAPTER 9 (ALSO IGNORED) And even if, some manufacturing plants came back to the USA.   There is something that we learned DURING the industrial revolution that says the USA will NEVER get ANY manufacturing plants back.  Sheer volume.  The WORLD has China to produce its goods.  China will ALWAYS remain CHEAPER to produce there just BECAUSE of economies of scale.   The skilled labour is in China.  The raw materials are shipped to China to produce whatever you want to produce. ALL the plants of whatever you have thought of producing whatever you want are ALL in China.  All kinds of different ports exist in China to accept ALL kinds of RAW materials.  ALL the ports are huuuuuge in China. ALL the ports are state of the art.  The BOATS to ship ANYTHING ALL OVER THE WORLD are ALL in China.  The boats are huuuuge and the ports could accept them.  And ALL that coordination is done by STATE OF THE ART communication, education and logistics.   PS:  China and the Chinese government subsidize world ports. The USA once did that...  The USA declares the  Panama Canal as their own.  Past history is past history in subsidizing the canal, but China actually finances it PRESENTLY to open up a bigger canal.  The USA whines abut the name of Gulf of Mexico....      In 2025, CHINA is the envy of the world in manufacturing techniques.     No...manufacturing is NEVER coming back to the USA.   Forget about tariffs, ICE agents, DOGE, assassinations, school shootings and everything wrong (or right) about right wing politics  and left wing lunacy.  THOSE are  just ADDED reasons NOT to do business in the USofA. 
    • A Horse With No Name
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By A Horse With No Name · Posted

      IIRC the other founder of Turning Point died of Covid after denying safety steps for covid or something. You can argue morality and logic, but the impacts/results/effects of what you do are objective and real.  A bit of non political fun, this is gorgeous.  If I wasn't turning 60 years old today, I would drive that damn thing. 
    • surreal1272
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By surreal1272 · Posted

      100% spot on analysis of Kirk. Yes, the way he died was horrible, no matter what side of the political spectrum on which you stand. However, let us not ignore the man's ACTUAL words and actions that helped fuel the "radicalization" of certain factions in this country and create this exact scenario where someone decided to take matters into their own armed hands. Ten years of pure madness fueled by one giant narcissistic A-Hole in D.C.
    • A Horse With No Name
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By A Horse With No Name · Posted

      This guy gets the toxic state of America right on so many levels. it's pretty much cooked.  Drew feel free to delete this if need be. 
    • A Horse With No Name
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By A Horse With No Name · Posted

      I like a lot of this guys analysis, he explains well why American manufacturing is declining at a greater and greater pace and why jobs are moving away from the United States.   

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search