Jump to content
Create New...
  • 🚗 Your People Are Here. Get In.

    The internet is full of car content. This is the community.

    Cheers & Gears has been bringing enthusiasts together since 2001. Join the conversation, show off your garage, and find your people.

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Some Chevrolet Dealers To GM: No Thanks To More Volts

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    January 23, 2012

    The Chevrolet Volt has been having a tough time in the marketplace. First was the Volt missing it's goal of 10,000 vehicles sold last year (only sold 7,671 vehicles) due to the plant being shut down back in the summer. Then there was the whole NHTSA investigation into Volt's battery, which was closed last week.

    Now there's another roadblock for the Volt. Automotive News is reporting that some Chevrolet dealers are turning down Volts. In New York City, GM offered 104 Volts to its 14 local dealers last month. Dealers only took 31. Even dealers that had no problem selling Volts are being more cautious.

    Brett Hedrick, dealer principal at Hedrick's Chevrolet said they have turned down offers for Volts for the past two months.

    Rob Peterson, a GM spokesman confirmed that "dealer ordering is down" for the Volt. He said the reason for the drop is due to the NHTSA investigation into the Volt's battery.

    Source: Autoweek


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    I have a picture of a deer that was shot near one of the fracking sites in PA that is far too graphic to post here, but it is absolutely covered with softball sized cancerous tumors.... almost to the point of being something you'd see on The Simpsons.

    From Snopes:

    [The] controversy prompted the circulation of the photograph displayed above, which supposedly ties the fracking activities in Dimock to the discovery of a "cancerous" deer in that area. However, the image has nothing to do with Dimock or fracking; it's an example of cutaneous fibromas (warts) that occur among white-tailed deer, a phenomenon caused by a virus.

    I'm not going to post it here, but the picture in question is contained within that Snopes article. If you have a weak stomach, don't eat dinner before you view it.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The issue with Fracking is not clear cut and dry on either side. There are many things with it that are unknown at this point. It comes down that there is a need to do work on both sides as there are safe ways to deal with this but they need to do more research into it to know their limits.

    Just like driving a car. It too can be dangerous but it also can be done safely if you know what you can do and limits that you need to follow.

    Right now in this area if some one sneezes some want to blaime fracking. Both sides need to work together to figure out the whole deal or both sides will lose. The paying jobs are important to this area as few major companies are willing to move in with the heavy union mind set of the workers in this area. The oil has already brought more money than they have had in the Youngstown area since steel. It is worth the effort to figure this out and make sure what works and what does not work for all. This is more than just about oil. It means a lot of jobs and security for many families too.

    To make matters worse it also has become a political fight.

    As for the quakes I can't say the drilling was not to blame but the fact is we have has more and more quakes in this area for a good number of years. Many even long before the drilling and fracking started, some even had some damage. Nothing like a Cali quake but pretty good for Ohio. Many of them from under Lake Erie but no one blames the deep salt mines out there under the lakes. LOL!

    We had one here not long ago you could hear it coming and it sent the lights in the house swinging. Note that they are not drilling where that one happened or in my county. I thought a airplane crashed with all the nosie and shaking. Even the frige shook.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Oldsmoboi, was that your faucet she was talking about or are you just saying that yours does this also?

    Either way, I do have bad feelings about the long term impact fracking does to the ground and I suspect we will see in 5 to 10 years medical problems from all this. Then the gov will step in and shut it all down.

    I have "city water", so this will never happen to me and I am not in a fracking area yet. I live in a "green" town that places a high priority on natural conservation and keeping waterways and aquifers as pollution free as possible. So I doubt there will ever be fracking in my town... they wouldn't even let Progressive Insurance take out a wooded area along the highway for a claims adjustment center.

    The thing is, I didn't move to a "green" town intentionally. I just happened to find an amazing deal on a house (no really, I stole this place) and liked the look of the neighborhood.

    All that said. I support going slower with fracking and making sure the drilling companies clean up their messes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And that's not a bad approach as long as business works with the public and Government with business while Government and Industry watchdogs protect the public.

    I totally agree with you on this, all for growth of business as long as they clean up after themselves and work with the community to make things safe and clean.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Independent Automotive Journalism

    25 years of honest automotive coverage — because someone has to do it.

    Cheers & Gears has never been filtered by manufacturer relationships or driven by algorithm. Just real people, real opinions, and a genuine love of cars. Subscribers keep the lights on and get an ad-light experience starting at $2.25/month.*

    View subscription options

    *A small number of ads feature member-exclusive coupon deals and will still appear.

  • Posts

    • I love the clean '04 GT (that looks like the anniversary badge for an '04). I'm a sucker for that gen, even though they're kind of a black sheep of Mustangs. 
    • Obviously, but I'd think you could cut 200 miles worth of range on the battery pack and save hundreds of pounds making it just a more overall efficient vehicle and still yielding 700 miles of range.  As I said to David, I'd remove as much battery pack as the engine weighs so it would be a net 0 gain in weight and you'd still have a sh!t ton of range yet it would be more efficient at achieving those miles. I'd assume it would be similar to my guesstimated numbers above.
    • Without knowing specifics of their design, I'd think reducing the battery pack by the weight of the engine would yield sufficient results. You'd still have a ton of electric-only range and then you'd have your "backup genergator" for when you run out of juice.  Speaking of which, I ran into a guy with a 2nd gen Volt a few weeks back while taking my kids on a walk. I asked him how he liked it and what kind of efficiency/range he was getting. He loved it, HOWEVER.. he said he almost never plugs it in. He just runs it as a hybrid. I'm pretty certain they aren't all that efficient when operated as just a hybrid. I thought that was kind of a waste of a Volt, to be using it that way. I didn't tell him this because I didn't want to sh!t on his situation or anything, but I thought it was odd to buy a plug-in hybrid then just never even utilize the full capacity of the battery. Then again, this falls right in line with a multiple studies I've read about that say most plug-in hybrid owners never utilize the plug-in capability of their vehicles. 
    • Maybe, but if it sells units, they will build it. 
    • The Americans have given up on cars, and I have given up on the Americans. Also, water is wet, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. Hume talked about the problem of induction, but this continuing seems like a pretty safe bet.    A low functioning theocracy is a bad thing, and what we are slipping into in the USA. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search