Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Ford Will Finally Reveal What Cars Will Be Cut Later This Year

      We're getting closer to finding out what models will be cut by Ford

    Since last year, we've been hearing various rumors of Ford cutting a number of passenger cars. In October, Ford CEO Jim Hackett said various cuts were incoming, including ones for the vehicle lineup. This would be part of a $7 billion shift of development funds from passenger cars to SUVs/Trucks. At the time, Ford wouldn't say what vehicles would be cut.

    During Ford's fourth-quarter and 2017 earnings call, Hackett said details about which models would be cut would finally be revealed later this year. Analysts hoping to get an answer were frustrated by this news.

    Ford has already ended production of the C-Max Energi late last year and is planning to end production of the C-Max Hybrid sometime later this year. Other models that have been rumored to be cut include the Fiesta, Taurus, and recently the Fusion

    Source: Automotive News Europe (Subscription Required)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Shot themselves in the foot as making that statement in their earnings call already has depreciated these unsold new auto's. People are now wondering if they should even bother looking at them. Bad move Ford.

    Best thing I think they could do is make a positive marketing message about a great time to buy X, Y and Z Auto's for a real deal!

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And the MKT also..

    10 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Probably cutting Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Taurus, Flex.  Adding Bronco, Ranger and a sub Ecosport SUV.

    That would be cutting all the cars except for Mustang, MKZ and Continental...don't think they will go that far...MKT will go if Flex goes, I would think. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    33 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Probably cutting Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Taurus, Flex.  Adding Bronco, Ranger and a sub Ecosport SUV.

     

    22 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    And the MKT also..

    That would be cutting all the cars except for Mustang, MKZ and Continental...don't think they will go that far...MKT will go if Flex goes, I would think. 

    Yet with the multi billion investment in EV's do not be surprised if they do cut that deep to make room for the new EV family.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 hours ago, dfelt said:

     

    Yet with the multi billion investment in EV's do not be surprised if they do cut that deep to make room for the new EV family.

    That's actually a very good point. Here I'm thinking, "why would they cut all 4 cars???" but if two are getting replaced with EVs, then it doesn't matter. 

    It would seem odd to get rid of the fusion before an EV replacement comes out though, and the Focus. Those seem to have a pretty solid name behind them and still sales high enough one would think they're profitable. 

    Just now, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    If they drop all of their sedans, it's basically them giving up and saying they can't compete with the Asians. Which is sad. 

    Or that the investment isn't worth it because car sales have absolutely tanked the last few years. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 minute ago, ccap41 said:

    That's actually a very good point. Here I'm thinking, "why would they cut all 4 cars???" but if two are getting replaced with EVs, then it doesn't matter. 

    It would seem odd to get rid of the fusion before an EV replacement comes out though, and the Focus. Those seem to have a pretty solid name behind them and still sales high enough one would think they're profitable. 

    Or that the investment isn't worth it because car sales have absolutely tanked the last few years. 

    Or a sign that they are incompetent at managing product budgets and costs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 minute ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Or a sign that they are incompetent at managing product budgets and costs.

    Or a million other reasons why not to sell a car. Automotive margins are usually pretty tight to begin with then cars are even worse as they're cheaper. 

    They screwed up ~10 years ago not consolidating platforms and making more flexible platforms. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    21 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    That's actually a very good point. Here I'm thinking, "why would they cut all 4 cars???" but if two are getting replaced with EVs, then it doesn't matter. 

    It would seem odd to get rid of the fusion before an EV replacement comes out though, and the Focus. Those seem to have a pretty solid name behind them and still sales high enough one would think they're profitable. 

    Or that the investment isn't worth it because car sales have absolutely tanked the last few years. 

    My gut tells me they will announce all these product cuts but not actually kill them off yet but produce them as legacy products till they are ready to cut over to the EV product replacing it.

    Kinda how GM did the Malibu and Ford with the F150. We are seeing so many Legacy products hang around for 1-2 years. 

    Agree that with a couple hundred thousand units selling yearly, they could milk it for 12-18 months till they are ready to go EV production, then kill it, change over the assembly line with a 6 month shutdown and then Boom. EV product production.

    2 hours ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Didn't GM do this dumb shit 20 years ago? I get producing more CUVs but there is still a huge level of car lovers out there. Autonomous driving added to this will kill the average enthusiast buyer. 

    Yes Ford has FAILED in the consolidation of Platform game. But as I stated below, I can see them announcing a large level of product end of life and then move into a 12-18 month Legacy production till they are ready to replace it with an EV model.

    Will stop by and talk to the local Ford dealer as they are remodeling and have a large area with trenches in the ground. I am thinking it will be a large outside fast charging lot for the new EV family coming.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    6 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    My gut tells me they will announce all these product cuts but not actually kill them off yet but produce them as legacy products till they are ready to cut over to the EV product replacing it.

    Kinda how GM did the Malibu and Ford with the F150. We are seeing so many Legacy products hang around for 1-2 years. 

    Agree that with a couple hundred thousand units selling yearly, they could milk it for 12-18 months till they are ready to go EV production, then kill it, change over the assembly line with a 6 month shutdown and then Boom. EV product production.

    I could see something like that. It isn't like they said they're cutting them off as of the announcement just that some vehicles are getting cut. 

    It would be nice to see them go full on with their EVs because the half-ass stuff they've done so far hasn't been worth a damn. The C-Max wasn't terrible but it's range and awkward body of a car/hatch/cuv just couldn't appeal to too many people. A true EV car that's midsize would be very welcoming. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    From Fords Communication Director which would go with my thinking above:

    Christin Baker, provided the following statement:

    We are driving carbon reductions with more hybrids, plug-in hybrids and battery electric vehicles. Last week, we announced we are investing $11 billion to put these new electric vehicles on the road.

    Specifically, by 2022, we will have 16 battery electric vehicles and 24 plug-in hybrids and regular hybrids for a total of 40 electrified vehicles.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And yet they are WAY ahead of any hope for a market beyond impractical dreamers.  And there are not enough of those to sustain the company.  They don't sell now, they won't sell in 4 years.  WHO is going to buy all this silliness?  And with aluminum going up and up in price as a commodity... it could easily become a doomsday scenario for Ford when they'll be depending even more on trucks.

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 minute ago, ocnblu said:

    And yet they are WAY ahead of any hope for a market beyond impractical dreamers.  And there are not enough of those to sustain the company.  They don't sell now, they won't sell in 4 years.  WHO is going to buy all this silliness?  And with aluminum going up and up in price as a commodity... it could easily become a doomsday scenario for Ford when they'll be depending even more on trucks.

    Or you can stay like an Ostrich with his head in the sand and deluid yourself that EVs have no valid need in today's society and yet many will Dump ICE auto's the moment there are more options for a less maintenance required appliance to drive daily to and from work.

    There are plenty of options to Aluminum and the hold back is just that simple, options for variety auto's. This has always been and with China Dictating the type of auto's, the days are over for US Leadership dictating what people drive. 

    Enjoy your delusion as the future is EV's that do not require all the maintenance of ICE auto's and with a plethora of options coming, people will dump the ICE for EV faster than many realize.

    Fact is regardless of the powertrain, there will always be a need for repair shops as humans are inherently lazy. The bulk of people want simpler transportation and it is coming with the EV from a powertrain standpoint but accidents will keep you employed as you have to fix them still.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They are fools if they cut the Focus and Fusion, and both those cars could continue on with an electric motor instead of a gas motor.  I think coming up with a new model name for an electric car isn't the way to go, when you already has established names.   

    But these are the people that killed the Taurus when it was their #1 selling car, gave us the Five Hundred, gave us the Freestyle after introducing the equally terrible Freestar so that customers could get the 2 confused.   They killed the Continental, only to bring it back because the MKS was a total flop.   So not the best track record here.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Or you can stay like an Ostrich with his head in the sand and deluid yourself that EVs have no valid need in today's society and yet many will Dump ICE auto's the moment there are more options for a less maintenance required appliance to drive daily to and from work.

    There are plenty of options to Aluminum and the hold back is just that simple, options for variety auto's. This has always been and with China Dictating the type of auto's, the days are over for US Leadership dictating what people drive. 

    Enjoy your delusion as the future is EV's that do not require all the maintenance of ICE auto's and with a plethora of options coming, people will dump the ICE for EV faster than many realize.

    Fact is regardless of the powertrain, there will always be a need for repair shops as humans are inherently lazy. The bulk of people want simpler transportation and it is coming with the EV from a powertrain standpoint but accidents will keep you employed as you have to fix them still.

     

    Ocn does make a valid point though...don't get me wrong-I agree with you as well. It's just in Ford's case, they might want a backup plan and keep a little ICE, just because they do not have a large lineup like many other automakers It's putting all the eggs into one basket and praying. The true test for Ford is going to be balance.Bring the future, but don't forget to have a foot in the past.....

    Believe it or not-I think i ford's case much of small cars are going to disappear- as it seems the compact is even going quicker than the sedan. JUst going to have to see how it plays off.....

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 1/26/2018 at 9:18 AM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Or a sign that they are incompetent at managing product budgets and costs.

    In that FoMoCo posted a $7.6B profit last year, I'm going to go ahead and say managing costs & budgets isn't a problem in Dearborn.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    And that's the thing.. I'm as much a gear-head as anyone, but i the end scenario.. the majority of the consumers these day simply are not.. They actually seem to see themselves as enthusiasts driving a Tesla.. a computer on wheels. Yeah.. the Tesla Model S is fast, but that's it. That being said.. and with no more enthusiasts of ole around.. why not move to the more cost efficient, more efficient.. "Generator powered" vehicles? The only thing that's holding back all manufacturers from leaving the ICE really boils down the ANXIETY from their customers. Conquer the fear.. conquer the range (400miles) and conquer the time it takes to charge up.. and its a wrap for the ICE

    And price...and they will come....

    • Upvote 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 1/25/2018 at 9:06 PM, smk4565 said:

    Probably cutting Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Taurus, Flex.  Adding Bronco, Ranger and a sub Ecosport SUV.

    One can only hope.

    On 1/27/2018 at 8:31 PM, Cmicasa the Great said:

    And that's the thing.. I'm as much a gear-head as anyone, but i the end scenario.. the majority of the consumers these day simply are not.. They actually seem to see themselves as enthusiasts driving a Tesla.. a computer on wheels. Yeah.. the Tesla Model S is fast, but that's it. That being said.. and with no more enthusiasts of ole around.. why not move to the more cost efficient, more efficient.. "Generator powered" vehicles? The only thing that's holding back all manufacturers from leaving the ICE really boils down the ANXIETY from their customers. Conquer the fear.. conquer the range (400miles) and conquer the time it takes to charge up.. and its a wrap for the ICE

    Again, one can only hope this is the case.  it would get my vote.

    On 1/26/2018 at 8:25 PM, ocnblu said:

    And yet they are WAY ahead of any hope for a market beyond impractical dreamers.  And there are not enough of those to sustain the company.  They don't sell now, they won't sell in 4 years.  WHO is going to buy all this silliness?  And with aluminum going up and up in price as a commodity... it could easily become a doomsday scenario for Ford when they'll be depending even more on trucks.

    Europe and China will move ahead of the US.  Head in the sand thinking will pull America down and push the others ahead...

    On 1/26/2018 at 9:23 AM, ccap41 said:

    Or a million other reasons why not to sell a car. Automotive margins are usually pretty tight to begin with then cars are even worse as they're cheaper. 

    They screwed up ~10 years ago not consolidating platforms and making more flexible platforms. 

    Quoted for Truth.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 1/26/2018 at 8:25 PM, ocnblu said:

    And yet they are WAY ahead of any hope for a market beyond impractical dreamers.  And there are not enough of those to sustain the company.  They don't sell now, they won't sell in 4 years.  WHO is going to buy all this silliness?  And with aluminum going up and up in price as a commodity... it could easily become a doomsday scenario for Ford when they'll be depending even more on trucks.

    I think they are aiming for a bigger market than rurals and the neo-Amish.

    • Upvote 2
    • Downvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    9 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I think they are aiming for a bigger market than rurals and the neo-Amish.

    If you think "rurals and the neo-Amish" are the only electric car skeptics, then you are sadly mistaken.  Wake up and stop using that tired line.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    8 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

    If you think "rurals and the neo-Amish" are the only electric car skeptics, then you are sadly mistaken.  Wake up and stop using that tired line.

    Whatever..I don't care.   I won't buy an electric, but I can understand that there is a growing market for them...Ford needs to ride the wave and NOT sit on the sidelines...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By David
      Since Ford Motor Company reported a complete Q4 / 2020 fiscal year report with a loss of $2.8 Billion but a doubling of R&D on EVs to $22 Billion from $11 Billion and a $7 Billion for EV Autonomous driving, the auto reporters are asking this very question: Is this a Shot across gm's bow or is it targeted more broadly across the whole industry as everyone wants to take sales away or greatly slow down Tesla.
      Tesla's valuation appears to be based on investors putting money with new technology seems to be driving changes of the future. 
      gm has now committed to moving into the technology camp with a solid date of when new ICE auto's will no longer be produced as the whole portfolio will change over to EV's. Ford also is now committing to this same strategy. This now makes one wonder about the rest of the auto industry.
      Stellantis CEO did an interview with Forbes that has put cold water on Peugeot coming to the US in the near term future as he wants to invest in the existing US name brands and grow their 12.7% market share. He also said that Stellantis has the manufacturing power and EV technology, but getting it into the hands of everyone is the concern at reasonable prices. Stellantis CEO says this is in the hands of the various global governments as he wants cleaner air and believes diesel the dirtiest of fuels will die off before regular petrol and where dictated by governments such as China and Europe will see a faster change over than other countries. Yet with the change in administration in the US, he says this could move the Stellantis brands to move into the full EV camp at a future date.
      Then we have small countries that have decided to make a major change in moving the country into EVs way sooner than other places and killing ICE sales like Thailand. This will allow local Thai startups to compete for the first time with international companies that also do not have anything in the market yet. 
      With a large range of battery plants coming online over the next 18 months, the move to EVs could happen at a pace that took decades for ICE in the early 1900's.
      So this brings this back to the original question, Is Fords Doubling commitment to EV's and moving ICE into the last generation like GM a shot across GM's bow or a shot at the whole industry to say, look at us, we are moving into a Technology driven auto company and our stock should be much higher like Tesla's.
      Currently gm is valued at just under $80 Billion, Ford is valued at $40 Billion, Tesla is valued at $807 Billion, Toyota is valued at $155.5 Billion, Stellantis is valued at $50.5 Billion, Daimler is valued at $71 Billion, BMW valued at $46 and VW is valued at $90.7 Billion and while there are plenty of other auto companies, one has to wonder what Ford is focused on with the drastic change and speeding up of moving to EVs as a complete global portfolio.
      Sound off and discuss how, what, where and when you think this will have it's big affect.
      Charged EVs | Is Ford’s increase in EV investment a shot across GM’s bow? - Charged EVs
      Stellantis CEO Reveals Peugeot U.S. Fate, Job Security, EV Conflict (forbes.com)
      Future Toyotas, Stellantis, batteries and EVs - the week | Automotive Industry Comment | just-auto (just-auto.com)
    • By William Maley
      We've been reporting on Ford's upcoming truck, the Maverick since 2018. The truck would sit underneath the Ranger and become the entry-level model for the brand. Now, we have gotten our best look at what it will look like.
      The Maverick Truck Club forum got its hand on an image showing a prototype Maverick on the line reportedly at Ford's Hermosillo, Mexico plant. Up front, the Maverick borrows some ideas from the Bronco Sport with C-shaped headlights and a horizontal bar splitting the grille. We don't know if Ford is planning to offer any cab configurations aside from the crew-cab seen in the photo.
      Ford did not immediately reply to comment on this when reached out by Roadshow. 
      The Maverick is expected to use the C2 architecture which underpins the new Escape and Bronco Sport. Autoblog speculates there could be two rear suspension setups based on spy shots that show a mule with twist-beam style setup with no rear differential for the front-wheel driver version. A slightly beefier setup might be used for the all-wheel drive version.
      Right now, everyone seems to think that the Maverick could debut as a 2022 model year vehicle.  
      Source: Maverick Truck Club, Roadshow, Autoblog
      Pic Credit: Maverick Truck Club


      View full article
    • By William Maley
      We've been reporting on Ford's upcoming truck, the Maverick since 2018. The truck would sit underneath the Ranger and become the entry-level model for the brand. Now, we have gotten our best look at what it will look like.
      The Maverick Truck Club forum got its hand on an image showing a prototype Maverick on the line reportedly at Ford's Hermosillo, Mexico plant. Up front, the Maverick borrows some ideas from the Bronco Sport with C-shaped headlights and a horizontal bar splitting the grille. We don't know if Ford is planning to offer any cab configurations aside from the crew-cab seen in the photo.
      Ford did not immediately reply to comment on this when reached out by Roadshow. 
      The Maverick is expected to use the C2 architecture which underpins the new Escape and Bronco Sport. Autoblog speculates there could be two rear suspension setups based on spy shots that show a mule with twist-beam style setup with no rear differential for the front-wheel driver version. A slightly beefier setup might be used for the all-wheel drive version.
      Right now, everyone seems to think that the Maverick could debut as a 2022 model year vehicle.  
      Source: Maverick Truck Club, Roadshow, Autoblog
      Pic Credit: Maverick Truck Club

    • By William Maley
      Jim Hackett's tenure as Ford CEO will be coming to a close on October 1st as he will retire from the position. His replacement is Jim Farley, currently Ford's Chief Operating Officer, a role he took on at the beginning of this year. In a press release, Ford said the two will be working together over the next two months on the transition. Hackett will stay on as "special advisor" for some time after.
      “I am very grateful to Jim Hackett for all he has done to modernize Ford and prepare us to compete and win in the future. Our new product vision – led by the Mustang Mach-E, new F-150 and Bronco family – is taking shape. We now have compelling plans for electric and autonomous vehicles, as well as full vehicle connectivity. And we are becoming much more nimble, which was apparent when we quickly mobilized to make life-saving equipment at the outset of the pandemic,” said Ford executive chairman, Bill Ford.
      Hackett became Ford's CEO in 2017 after the ousting of then CEO Mark Fields. His short tenure brought forth some major and controversial decisions such as Ford killing off most of their passenger car nameplates to focus on trucks and utility vehicles; spending $11 billion in electric vehicles by 2022, and the introductions of the Mach-E, 2021 F-150, and Bronco. He has also dealt with a lot frustration from various groups as The Detroit News outlines,
      Hackett admitted that his tenure did cause a fair amount of friction, but said his efforts are starting to show.
      "I aimed for moving ahead versus just moving fast. Could we aim for a longer-arc kind of reward. In this case, for the three years it takes to get products to market, you're starting to see the fruits of our labor."
      Farley, who has been with Ford since 2007, knows he has a tough road ahead. Aside from realizing the various paths laid out by Hackett, he also has to deal with the issues of the COVID-19 pandemic and hopefully launch two of Ford's key product without any issues.
      Source: Ford
      Press Release is on Page 2


      FORD ANNOUNCES JIM HACKETT TO RETIRE AS PRESIDENT AND CEO; JIM FARLEY TO SUCCEED HACKETT AS COMPANY CONTINUES TRANSFORMATION
      Jim Hackett, who has led Ford Motor Company’s transformation since 2017 as president and CEO, has elected to retire from the company Jim Farley, currently chief operating officer, becomes president and CEO of Ford effective Oct. 1. He was also elected to the Ford board of directors. He will work closely with Jim Hackett on the transition over the next two months Seamless CEO transition underscores strength of Ford’s leadership team, succession planning, and company progress over the past three years, Executive Chairman Bill Ford says DEARBORN, Mich., Aug. 4, 2020 – Ford Motor Company today announced that Jim Hackett, who has led the company’s transformation since 2017, plans to retire from the company. Jim Farley has been named the company’s new president and CEO and will join the board of directors, effective Oct. 1.
      Hackett, 65, and Farley, 58, will work together on a smooth leadership transition over the next two months.
      Under Hackett, Ford moved aggressively into the new era of smart vehicles and drove a deeper focus on customers’ wants and needs. At the same time, Ford improved the fitness of the base business – restructuring operations, invigorating the product portfolio and reducing bureaucracy.
      “I am very grateful to Jim Hackett for all he has done to modernize Ford and prepare us to compete and win in the future,” said Bill Ford, Ford’s executive chairman. “Our new product vision – led by the Mustang Mach-E, new F-150 and Bronco family – is taking shape. We now have compelling plans for electric and autonomous vehicles, as well as full vehicle connectivity. And we are becoming much more nimble, which was apparent when we quickly mobilized to make life-saving equipment at the outset of the pandemic.”
      Farley, an automotive leader with deep global experience and a successful track record, collaborated with Hackett over the past three years to develop and execute Ford’s Creating Tomorrow Together plan to transform Ford into a higher-growth, higher-margin business.
      “Jim Farley matches an innate feel for cars and customers with great instincts for the future and the new technologies that are changing our industry,” Bill Ford said. “Jim’s passion for great vehicles and his intense drive for results are well known, and I have also seen him develop into a transformational leader with the determination and foresight to help Ford thrive into the future.”
      Farley joined Ford in 2007 as global head of Marketing and Sales and went on to lead Lincoln, Ford South America, Ford of Europe and all Ford global markets in successive roles. In April 2019, Farley was chosen to lead Ford’s New Businesses, Technology & Strategy team, helping the company determine how to capitalize on powerful forces reshaping the industry – such as software platforms, connectivity, AI, automation and new forms of propulsion. He was named chief operating officer in February of this year.
      Hackett, who will continue as a special advisor to Ford through March of 2021, said the time is right to pass the mantle of leadership to Jim Farley.
      “My goal when I took on the CEO role was to prepare Ford to win in the future,” Hackett said. “The hardest thing for a proud, long-lived company to do is change to meet the challenges of the world it’s entering rather than the world it has known. I’m very proud of how far we have come in creating a modern Ford and I am very optimistic about the future.
      “I have worked side-by-side with Jim Farley for the past three years and have the greatest confidence in him as a person and a leader,” Hackett said. “He has been instrumental in crafting our new product portfolio and redesigning our businesses around the world. He is also a change agent with a deep understanding of how to lead Ford in this new era defined by smart vehicles in a smart world.”
      Said Farley: “I love Ford and I am honored by the opportunity to serve and create value for Ford’s employees, customers, dealers, communities and all of our stakeholders. Jim Hackett has laid the foundation for a really vibrant future and we have made tremendous progress in the past three years. I am so excited to work together with the whole Ford team to realize the full potential of this great company in a new era.”

      View full article
  • Posts

    • Yeah...that would be a personal opinion.  I like both equally.  But no matter which one you think is better looking, you cannot deny that the other is NOT not good looking.               
    • Lots of Italians, Sicilians, and Greeks in Steubenville, Ohio where I spent my childhood.  Our next door neighbors had immigrated from Palermo.   
    • Yes.  Along with a few remote villages in Sicily, some remote villages on the heel of the peninsula have retained modified forms of Greek.  Probably because they're even closer to the Peloponnesus.  Greek (this brings back memories): "Ohi" means "no," but "Ne" means "yes"  My favorite Greek surname:  Papadiamantis, also the name of the main street on the island of Skiathos Italian and Greek: I know of only one word that is common to both Italian and Greek:  pantofoli (bedroom slippers), thought there are surely others Sicilian and French: The 200 years of French Norman rule is seen in the Sicilian dialect, where some words come from French, like some of the ones in the video: where:  "unni" from "ou" work:  "travagghiu" from "travail" buy:  "accattari" from "acheter" and many, many more Sicilian and Italian (per video): Most words in Sicilian use "u" sounds for the "o" sounds in Italian, which makes it sound more guttural... that's the biggest difference. I have rarely heard cheese called "tumazzu," as in the video.  Most people just call it "furmaggiu." But they didn't include one of the most humorous differences of them all:  snail:  "lumaca" (in Italian), but "babbaluccia" (in Sicilian) (bubb-a-looch-cha)!
    • @trinacriabob       I was listening to those clips above and others a few weeks back. I was shocked to see that in some parts of Southern Italy, Greek is spoken still and mixed with Italian.   I knew that about Sicily, but not on mainland Italy.   I was even shocked to learn, this was yesterday, that a classic 1980 Giannis Poulopoulos song was but a cover. An Italian cover. From 1974.  And there is a catch, the song was written and sung by a very popular Italian singer, but the song was written and sung...in Greek.     Original  Mia Martini   Una faccia, una razza!  http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yDqhw4Vhh-I/Tvr6TfymTmI/AAAAAAAABiw/ia8Zwy4TxDI/s1600/ItaliaGreciaBandiere.jpg    
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 25ThTA
      25ThTA
      (38 years old)
    2. DenCo
      DenCo
      (37 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...