• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Rumorpile: Ford and UAW Talking About Building The Ranger In U.S. , Restarting Sales


    • The Ranger is coming back?!

    Ever since Ford ended production of the Ranger in the U.S. in 2011, many have been clamoring for the blue oval to bring the Ranger sold elsewhere to the U.S. But Ford has said no since the current Ranger since the new model is close in size to the F-150, and would be very close in terms of pricing. But the blue oval could be changing that.

     

    The Detroit News has learned from sources that Ford wants to resurrect the Ranger pickup and build it at the Michigan Assembly Plant. Sources explained that Ford and the UAW are currently in contract talks, with one of the items being bringing the Ranger to the U.S. for the production. Now this will need to be agreed by the UAW and then Ford’s board of directors.

     

    Now bringing the Ranger over to the U.S. would allow Ford to take advantage of a marketplace that seems interested in mid-size trucks again - thank the Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Colorado.

     

    “There’s a real hunger for midsize trucks right now. Once upon a time, there were a lot of midsize trucks in this market. The ones that are available are cashing in on the demand,” said Karl Brauer, senior analyst for Kelley Blue Book.

     

    Bringing the Ranger to the U.S. would also solve the problem of what would be built at the Michigan Assembly plant. As we reported last month, Ford will be moving Focus and C-Max production from Michigan Assembly to a new plant, most likely Mexico.

     

    Source: The Detroit News

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    If they did that does that mean all new and not the global ranger?  They made it sound like the global Ranger won't work because it is too close to F150 in size..so does that mean we would be talking about something all new for us?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Obviously, it would be timed with an all new truck, be it global or US too. So I would expect anything at this point.

     

    So we have it on good rumor that Ford is bringing more Diesels to the US and now, possibly, Ranger too.

     

    Hey, being a fast-follower, instead of an trail blazer, at times, has it's advantages with of course, very few of the downsides. Can't wait to see what Ford does with all this.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If they did that does that mean all new and not the global ranger?  They made it sound like the global Ranger won't work because it is too close to F150 in size..so does that mean we would be talking about something all new for us?

     

    We don't know. Everyone seems to think it's going to be global Ranger because its ready to go. But as you pointed out, the Ranger is very close in size to the F-150 (older one). I don't know if this holds any water with the new one though.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GM seems to be enjoying a healthy resurgence in small trucks here, so, it would be a smart move.

    Would be Great if FORD did bring back a Compact Ranger for the market. while the Mid Size trucks have taken off, I believe this is more to do with it being the smallest truck available right now. I think there is plenty of Inner City ad Suburban home owners that would love to have a compact truck to use in running to Home Depot or Lowe's.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    GM seems to be enjoying a healthy resurgence in small trucks here, so, it would be a smart move.

    Would be Great if FORD did bring back a Compact Ranger for the market. while the Mid Size trucks have taken off, I believe this is more to do with it being the smallest truck available right now. I think there is plenty of Inner City ad Suburban home owners that would love to have a compact truck to use in running to Home Depot or Lowe's.

     

    I don't know the dimensions of the global Ranger but is it smaller than the Canynado..?

     

    Edited by ccap41
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    post-12-0-18035400-1440608521_thumb.jpg

     

    So the Global Ranger based on what I have been able to find appears to be a bit bigger than the Canyon / Colorado and the pictures in this story show is it not much smaller than a RAM. So I would think FORD would need to do a TRUE mid size or compact size truck.

     

    http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2013/03/global-ranger-could-be-right-size-for-us.html

     

    post-12-0-36672300-1440608523_thumb.jpg

     

    Here is the AU web site that covers the Rangers 3 models you can choose from.

    http://www.ford.com.au/commercial/ranger

     

    http://www.ford.com.au/commercial/ranger/models#step=1

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    GM seems to be enjoying a healthy resurgence in small trucks here, so, it would be a smart move.

    Would be Great if FORD did bring back a Compact Ranger for the market. while the Mid Size trucks have taken off, I believe this is more to do with it being the smallest truck available right now. I think there is plenty of Inner City ad Suburban home owners that would love to have a compact truck to use in running to Home Depot or Lowe's.

     

    I don't know the dimensions of the global Ranger but is it smaller than the Canynado..?

     

    Give me some time, and I'll be able to have answer for that.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ Awesome.

     

    Also, I guess, the Colorado/Canyon as well compared to their larer siblings.Because I was on a lot looking for one when they first came out and I literally walked right past a pair from the back side. They have to be 9/10ths Sierra/Silverado..

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Employees at MAP, were notified recently that the Focus will no longer be built there, even after installing all their latest flexible tooling lines.  Kind of makes sens then, that Ford would want to make their smaller truck there, and right down the road from the large truck plant.  

    So I think this is a pretty solid rumor.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Slap a 2.7L V6 in an offroad version (Raptor like, if you will) of the Ranger, and they will sell like hot cakes. The current global Ranger is a sharp looking truck that I could see with a top shelf off road package.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Slap a 2.7L V6 in an offroad version (Raptor like, if you will) of the Ranger, and they will sell like hot cakes. The current global Ranger is a sharp looking truck that I could see with a top shelf off road package.

    ROFLMAO -  :rofl:

     

    Ranger Raptor with EcoBoost Powertrain, 

     

    I can see all the Marketing play on this!  :rolleyes:

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Slap a 2.7L V6 in an offroad version (Raptor like, if you will) of the Ranger, and they will sell like hot cakes. The current global Ranger is a sharp looking truck that I could see with a top shelf off road package.

    ROFLMAO -  :rofl:

     

    Ranger Raptor with EcoBoost Powertrain, 

     

    I can see all the Marketing play on this!  :rolleyes:

     

    Yeah, I try not to think about the marketing that would go behind this but that type of truck would be a hot seller nonetheless.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Here are the measurements of the Ranger vs. the 2014 and 2015 F-150. (I'm looking at extended and crew cabs).

     

    Height:

    Ranger Extended Cab: 71.3 to 71.5 inches

    2014 F-150 SuperCab 2WD: 75.2 inches

    2014 F-150 SuperCab 4WD: 76.1 inches

    2015 F-150 SuperCab 2WD: 75.5 inches

    2015 F-150 SuperCab 4WD: 77.2 inches

     

    Length:

    Ranger 2WD Extended Cab: 210.7 inches

    Ranger 4WD Extended Cab: 210.7 to 211 inches

    2014 F-150 Supercab: 231.9 inches

    2015 F-150 Supercab: 231.9 inches

     

    Width:

    Ranger 2WD Extended Cab: 72.83 inches

    Ranger 4WD Extended Cab: 76.8 inches

    2014 F-150 SuperCab: 79.2 inches

    2014 F-150 SuperCab: 79.9 inches

     

    Wheelbase:

    Ranger Extended Cab: 126.8

    2014 F-150 SuperCab: 144.5 inches

    2015 F-150 SuperCab: 145 inches

     

    (Ranger Extended Cab beds are about 6 Feet long, F-150 SuperCab beds are 6.5 feet)

     

    Crew Cab:

     

    Height:

    Ranger Double Cab: 71.5 to 72.8 inches

    2014 F-150 SuperCrew 2WD: 75.0 inches

    2014 F-150 SuperCrew 4WD: 76.7 inches

    2015 F-150 SuperCrew 2WD: 75.6 inches

    2015 F-150 SuperCrew 4WD: 77.2 inches

     

    Length:

    Ranger Double Cab: 210.7 to 211 inches

    2014 F-150 SuperCrew: 231.9 inches

    2015 F-150 SuperCrew: 231.9 inches

     

    Width:

    Ranger 2WD Double Cab: 72.83 inches

    Ranger 4WD Double Cab: 76.8 inches

    2014 F-150 SuperCab: 79.2 inches

    2015 F-150 SuperCab: 79.9 inches

     

    Wheelbase:

    Ranger Extended Cab: 126.8

    2014 F-150 CrewCab: 144.5 inches

    2015 F-150 CrewCab: 145 inches

     

    (Ranger Double Cab beds are about 6 Feet long, F-150 SuperCrew beds are 5.5 feet)

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Raptor is getting a 3.5L EB engine to the tune of 450hp, 10 speeds and lots of torque.  

    Raptor name does not belong on a Ranger.

     

     

    And there is talk on another forum about the fact that Bronco coming back rumor might run down same line, seeing as how MAP is such a large facility.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Here are the measurements of the Ranger vs. the 2014 and 2015 F-150. (I'm looking at extended and crew cabs).
     
    Height:
    Ranger Extended Cab: 71.3 to 71.5 inches
    2014 F-150 SuperCab 2WD: 75.2 inches
    2014 F-150 SuperCab 4WD: 76.1 inches
    2015 F-150 SuperCab 2WD: 75.5 inches
    2015 F-150 SuperCab 4WD: 77.2 inches
     
    Length:
    Ranger 2WD Extended Cab: 210.7 inches
    Ranger 4WD Extended Cab: 210.7 to 211 inches
    2014 F-150 Supercab: 231.9 inches
    2015 F-150 Supercab: 231.9 inches
     
    Width:
    Ranger 2WD Extended Cab: 72.83 inches
    Ranger 4WD Extended Cab: 76.8 inches
    2014 F-150 SuperCab: 79.2 inches
    2014 F-150 SuperCab: 79.9 inches
     
    Wheelbase:
    Ranger Extended Cab: 126.8
    2014 F-150 SuperCab: 144.5 inches
    2015 F-150 SuperCab: 145 inches
     
    (Ranger Extended Cab beds are about 6 Feet long, F-150 SuperCab beds are 6.5 feet)
     
    Crew Cab:
     
    Height:
    Ranger Double Cab: 71.5 to 72.8 inches
    2014 F-150 SuperCrew 2WD: 75.0 inches
    2014 F-150 SuperCrew 4WD: 76.7 inches
    2015 F-150 SuperCrew 2WD: 75.6 inches
    2015 F-150 SuperCrew 4WD: 77.2 inches
     
    Length:
    Ranger Double Cab: 210.7 to 211 inches
    2014 F-150 SuperCrew: 231.9 inches
    2015 F-150 SuperCrew: 231.9 inches
     
    Width:
    Ranger 2WD Double Cab: 72.83 inches
    Ranger 4WD Double Cab: 76.8 inches
    2014 F-150 SuperCab: 79.2 inches
    2015 F-150 SuperCab: 79.9 inches
     
    Wheelbase:
    Ranger Extended Cab: 126.8
    2014 F-150 CrewCab: 144.5 inches
    2015 F-150 CrewCab: 145 inches
     
    (Ranger Double Cab beds are about 6 Feet long, F-150 SuperCrew beds are 5.5 feet)

     

    Thank You! Great work, first of all!

     

    It definitely is smaller in ever way.. I just don't know if that is enough to justify bringing it here though. I know everybody always wants bigger bigger bigger but I think if they could make it the size of the old one(fairly small) and get 30mpg out of it they could have a winner. It would be considerably smaller, still economical enough for somebody to justify buying a truck but not the expensive(both cost and fuel economy, etc) of the big guys.

     Not to hassel you but how much smaller is te Canyon/Colorado than their larger siblings, too?

    Here's the kicker, does the global Ranger weigh any less than the aluminum F150?

    FANTASTIC question. And honestly.. if the current F150 can weigh as little as 3950lbs in 2wd, single cab, n/a v6 form..and this hypothetical Ranger we speak of isn't aluminum..then it won't weigh less than the F150. Unless it is as small as I said/suggested in ^ post.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Raptor is getting a 3.5L EB engine to the tune of 450hp, 10 speeds and lots of torque.  

    Raptor name does not belong on a Ranger.

     

     

    And there is talk on another forum about the fact that Bronco coming back rumor might run down same line, seeing as how MAP is such a large facility.

    Never, not once, said that it needed the "Raptor" name. I just said "Raptor like". It is something else when you can't even give a compliment without a Ford employee getting it all twisted. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GM seems to be enjoying a healthy resurgence in small trucks here, so, it would be a smart move.

    Following the leader.

    Imagine that.

    Edited by El Kabong
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's the kicker, does the global Ranger weigh any less than the aluminum F150?

    An Aluminum small ranger would CERTAINLY weigh less and do well too.

    And if a unicorn ran the Kentucky Derby I'd bet on it to show-but at this point neither scenario is especially relevant.

    Edited by El Kabong
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Burnt Valve LS7

    Posted

    GM seems to be enjoying a healthy resurgence in small trucks here, so, it would be a smart move.

    Following the leader.

    Imagine that.

    Yup. GM and maybe Ford, are following Toyota.
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Raptor is getting a 3.5L EB engine to the tune of 450hp, 10 speeds and lots of torque.  

    Raptor name does not belong on a Ranger.

     

     

    And there is talk on another forum about the fact that Bronco coming back rumor might run down same line, seeing as how MAP is such a large facility.

    Never, not once, said that it needed the "Raptor" name. I just said "Raptor like". It is something else when you can't even give a compliment without a Ford employee getting it all twisted. 

     

     

     

    Raptor is getting a 3.5L EB engine to the tune of 450hp, 10 speeds and lots of torque.  

    Raptor name does not belong on a Ranger.

     

     

    And there is talk on another forum about the fact that Bronco coming back rumor might run down same line, seeing as how MAP is such a large facility.

    Never, not once, said that it needed the "Raptor" name. I just said "Raptor like". It is something else when you can't even give a compliment without a Ford employee getting it all twisted. 

     

    Never, not once, did I say you did.

     

    Just made a general statement.

     

    Thanks

    -2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Here's the kicker, does the global Ranger weigh any less than the aluminum F150?

    An Aluminum small ranger would CERTAINLY weigh less and do well too.

    And if a unicorn ran the Kentucky Derby I'd bet on it to show-but at this point neither scenario is especially relevant.

     

     

     

    Assuming the rumor is true about the Ranger in the first place, one could easily make the aluminum assumption, especially considering the proximity of the plant to the suppliers involved with current aluminum trucks.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bandit '79
      Bandit '79
      (44 years old)
    2. Ur_pimp
      Ur_pimp
      (27 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      A group of Shelby GT350 owners are not happy with Ford.
      Yesterday, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida claiming that the track-ready GT350 isn't. According to filling, owners complain that the vehicle overheats in as little as 15 minutes due faulty transmissions and rear differentials when driven on a track. When the vehicle does overheat, it goes into a limp mode that reduces power to protect the powertrain. The filing goes on to say that Ford fixed this issue in the 2017 model, but told owners of the 2016 model to make the fixes themselves - a possible breach of the car's warranty.
      “When Ford marketed and sold these Shelby GT350 Mustangs, it knew exactly how to appeal to track-enthusiasts: it marketed enhanced performance in a limited-edition iconic vehicle that has been associated with racing for generations,” said Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman, the law firm handling the case.
      “We believe that Ford induced purchasers with its ‘track-ready’ marketing, when in fact it knew that this defect would ultimately bar these Mustangs from ever being the hotrod consumers paid for.”
      At the moment, the lawsuit has four named plaintiffs. Hagens Berman estimates about 4,000 owners are affected by this issue. 
      “Ford is committed to providing our customers with top-quality vehicles. However, we do not comment on pending litigation,” said Ford spokesman Bradley Carroll to The Detroit News.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      A group of Shelby GT350 owners are not happy with Ford.
      Yesterday, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida claiming that the track-ready GT350 isn't. According to filling, owners complain that the vehicle overheats in as little as 15 minutes due faulty transmissions and rear differentials when driven on a track. When the vehicle does overheat, it goes into a limp mode that reduces power to protect the powertrain. The filing goes on to say that Ford fixed this issue in the 2017 model, but told owners of the 2016 model to make the fixes themselves - a possible breach of the car's warranty.
      “When Ford marketed and sold these Shelby GT350 Mustangs, it knew exactly how to appeal to track-enthusiasts: it marketed enhanced performance in a limited-edition iconic vehicle that has been associated with racing for generations,” said Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman, the law firm handling the case.
      “We believe that Ford induced purchasers with its ‘track-ready’ marketing, when in fact it knew that this defect would ultimately bar these Mustangs from ever being the hotrod consumers paid for.”
      At the moment, the lawsuit has four named plaintiffs. Hagens Berman estimates about 4,000 owners are affected by this issue. 
      “Ford is committed to providing our customers with top-quality vehicles. However, we do not comment on pending litigation,” said Ford spokesman Bradley Carroll to The Detroit News.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News
    • By William Maley
      Last week, we reported on comments made by Volkswagen NA CEO Hinrich Woebcken on wanting to expand the number of crossovers in their lineup. It seems there is another crossover possible destined for the U.S.
      According to a source, Volkswagen is planning to launch the T-Roc compact crossover for the U.S. beginning in 2019. First shown as a concept back at the 2014 Geneva Motor Show, the production model will launch this summer in Europe. The decision was made by Volkswagen once dealers in the U.S. gave a firm commitment to the company they would be able to sell enough T-Rocs to make a profit. It also appears this decision was made only last week judging from a comment made by VW brand chief Herbert Diess.
      "It was only yesterday that we decided on an additional SUV for 2019," Diess told reporters when asked about product strategy for the U.S.
      There are still a number of items up in the air, however. For one, Volkswagen needs to decide where it will build the T-Roc. It could import the model from Volkswagen's Portugal plant, build it in Puebla, Mexico, or have it in the same assembly plant as the Atlas in Chattanooga, TN.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
      Pic Credit: Newspress

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Last week, we reported on comments made by Volkswagen NA CEO Hinrich Woebcken on wanting to expand the number of crossovers in their lineup. It seems there is another crossover possible destined for the U.S.
      According to a source, Volkswagen is planning to launch the T-Roc compact crossover for the U.S. beginning in 2019. First shown as a concept back at the 2014 Geneva Motor Show, the production model will launch this summer in Europe. The decision was made by Volkswagen once dealers in the U.S. gave a firm commitment to the company they would be able to sell enough T-Rocs to make a profit. It also appears this decision was made only last week judging from a comment made by VW brand chief Herbert Diess.
      "It was only yesterday that we decided on an additional SUV for 2019," Diess told reporters when asked about product strategy for the U.S.
      There are still a number of items up in the air, however. For one, Volkswagen needs to decide where it will build the T-Roc. It could import the model from Volkswagen's Portugal plant, build it in Puebla, Mexico, or have it in the same assembly plant as the Atlas in Chattanooga, TN.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
      Pic Credit: Newspress
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online