Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: No V6 Mustang For 2018

      Good-bye Mustang V6

    The Mustang is expected to get a refresh in 2018 and there is a possibility that the V6 engine will be dropped. 

    This information comes to us from the Mustang6G.com's forums where a dealership employee posted the order guide for the 2018 Mustang. The guide revealed that the V6 engine order code was marked as “invalid.” Dropping the V6 would make the 2.3L EcoBoost the new base engine, which is close in terms of horsepower to the V6 (310 vs. 300). 

    The order guide also reveals that the 2018 Mustang will get a 10-speed automatic and a set of MagneRide adaptive dampers as options.

    Source: Mustang6G.com

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Hate to see the V6 go, but honestly, why should Ford spend a lot of time and capital getting another 30hp out of it, while offering it as a base engine that generates little ROI, when they can easily get another 50hp plus out of the next gen I4 GTDI.

    They could also offer several tunes of GTDI, in front of that 10 speed.  And I also love how Ford will offer chassis choices through staged performance pack options.  Very nice.  Not one size fits all, after all.  Some automakers don’t get that.

    • Downvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    40 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

    Hate to see the V6 go, but honestly, why should Ford spend a lot of time and capital getting another 30hp out of it, while offering it as a base engine that generates little ROI, when they can easily get another 50hp plus out of the next gen I4 GTDI.

     

    They could also offer several tunes of GTDI, in front of that 10 speed.  And I also love how Ford will offer chassis choices through staged performance pack options.  Very nice.  Not one size fits all, after all.  Some automakers don’t get that.

     

    Ford does a much better job at providing buyers options on the Mustang than Dodge does with the Challenger or Chevrolet does with the Camaro.

    That is one thing I like about the modern Ford motor company....lots of ways to set up a Fiesta, Focus or Fusion as well!

    Compared with the comparable products from Toyota such as the 86 and the Celica, which have virtually nothing you can change on them to make them suit your needs....or the God awful Nissan line up....or Kia...or Hyundai...

    20 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Makes sense, I wonder if the Mustang will ever get a Hybrid or EV version?

    Doubtful, it is out of character for the car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A Mustang hybrid?

     

    Nope. Never. They can make an EV if they want. But the Mustang is really another car that is part of a dying breed. Musclecars as they used to be are on the verge of extinction, and true sports cars are also feeling it.

     

    I think what we are going to see is model/nameplate consolidation. There's just too many models in some cases for many automakers. If they make mass-market EV's, which usually require their own, specific chassis to be great, they will have to consider killing off whatever that fits the same bill but drinks gas.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If Ecoboost is so great as Ford says, why is there no Ecoboost V6 in the Mustang?  They could do a 300 hp Ecoboost four, a 400 hp Ecoboost six, and a 500+ hp Ecoboost V8.  There is really no need for a naturally aspirated engine anymore.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Ford probably really does want to have the 2.7 in the Mustang, but probably customer research is telling them that the American pony car buyer expects a V8 as the upgrade option.

     

    I don't know how Ford managed otherwise in their trucks, but they've converted 60% of their truck buyers to EB. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm wondering if the next-gen Mustang will be EB only, atleast anything not directly a variant of Ford Performance.

    I could see the 3.0TT be a probably replacement of the Coyote. And you know what, apart from sound, it might be a better engine for a lighter Mustang (hoping D6 brings lighter weight).

    But then will the Mustang then go through the endless march of making products larger or more upmarket every generation?

    I guess that is not a hypothetical. The 2.3 being offered was a experiment to see whether people would forgo a V6 and pary more for it to get the unlocks for option packages. And on paper, it compares to, rather as if by design, the German coupes which all over turbo 4's standard. No other coupes are viable besides established members like the Miata or crosstown rivals from GM or Mopar. 

    And the Mustang being a world car meant the EcoBoost was going into the Mustang no matter what.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well CAFE will force the Coyote V8 out, and the GT or whatever they call it will have to have an eco boost 6.   But Ford came up with Ecoboost at least 6 years ago and still no Ecoboost V8.  Couldn't they pair up a couple 2.3 ecoboosts and make a 4.6 liter ecoboost V8 with 550 hp for the Mustang?  But it could just be a price point thing too, the desire for Mustangs that cost above $45,000 could be so tiny that an ecoboost V8 would be too expensive and not sell.  But consider that 2.3 ecoboost 4 makes the same horsepower as a 2010 V8 Mustang, so they don't really need the V8 to deliver the expected performance of a $30-40k sports car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 11/23/2016 at 8:50 PM, smk4565 said:

    Well CAFE will force the Coyote V8 out, and the GT or whatever they call it will have to have an eco boost 6.   But Ford came up with Ecoboost at least 6 years ago and still no Ecoboost V8.  Couldn't they pair up a couple 2.3 ecoboosts and make a 4.6 liter ecoboost V8 with 550 hp for the Mustang?  But it could just be a price point thing too, the desire for Mustangs that cost above $45,000 could be so tiny that an ecoboost V8 would be too expensive and not sell.  But consider that 2.3 ecoboost 4 makes the same horsepower as a 2010 V8 Mustang, so they don't really need the V8 to deliver the expected performance of a $30-40k sports car.

    There is a huge part of the Mustang buyers pool that demands a V8, this will be one of the last cars offered with a V8 IMHO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On ‎11‎/‎21‎/‎2016 at 5:10 PM, smk4565 said:

    If Ecoboost is so great as Ford says, why is there no Ecoboost V6 in the Mustang?  They could do a 300 hp Ecoboost four, a 400 hp Ecoboost six, and a 500+ hp Ecoboost V8.  There is really no need for a naturally aspirated engine anymore.

    They put an ecoboost in their bread and butter F150. If that doesn't say they are confident, nothing else will.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 11/23/2016 at 5:50 PM, smk4565 said:

    Well CAFE will force the Coyote V8 out, and the GT or whatever they call it will have to have an eco boost 6.   But Ford came up with Ecoboost at least 6 years ago and still no Ecoboost V8.  Couldn't they pair up a couple 2.3 ecoboosts and make a 4.6 liter ecoboost V8 with 550 hp for the Mustang?  But it could just be a price point thing too, the desire for Mustangs that cost above $45,000 could be so tiny that an ecoboost V8 would be too expensive and not sell.  But consider that 2.3 ecoboost 4 makes the same horsepower as a 2010 V8 Mustang, so they don't really need the V8 to deliver the expected performance of a $30-40k sports car.

    The EPA CAFE will be cooled under the Trump Administration

    http://www.allpar.com/news/2016/11/hemi-reprieve-35117 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, Belair said:

    The EPA CAFE will be cooled under the Trump Administration

    http://www.allpar.com/news/2016/11/hemi-reprieve-35117 

     

    Perhaps for 4 years, but I wouldn't bank on regulations severely dropping because what if they don't.  You still have to plan for what is on the table now.

    How many countries is the Mustang sold in?  I am pretty sure they sell it outside of the USA, and regulations exist there.  There are 4 or 5 European countries thinking of banning gasoline powered cars after 2025, and Europe is Ford's 2nd biggest market.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    10 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Perhaps for 4 years, but I wouldn't bank on regulations severely dropping because what if they don't.  You still have to plan for what is on the table now.

    How many countries is the Mustang sold in?  I am pretty sure they sell it outside of the USA, and regulations exist there.  There are 4 or 5 European countries thinking of banning gasoline powered cars after 2025, and Europe is Ford's 2nd biggest market.

    As I posted here about the new Europe EV charging system, I think if they want the Mustang to live on and grow, they need an EV model more than a Turbo V8.

    More and more countries in the major markets are pushing for the cleaner EV solution and no matter what Trump trys here, the cat is out of the bag in regards to EV's and what they can do, so like it or not, I have little faith that the EPA will get reduced or closed down. This is not going to go away or stop others from pushing the electric agenda.

    Plus auto's like the Nio EP9 are going to force people to rethink the Mustang and Camaro.

    With a proper range and power, I could see the pony cars going this route.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    59 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    There are 4 or 5 European countries thinking of banning gasoline powered cars after 2025

    I haven't really looked into this but are they talking a 100% ban on anything that uses gasoline or just cars that are 100% gasoline powered and hybrid systems are okay?

    59 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    There are 4 or 5 European countries thinking of banning gasoline powered cars after 2025

    I haven't really looked into this but are they talking a 100% ban on anything that uses gasoline or just cars that are 100% gasoline powered and hybrid systems are okay?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    I haven't really looked into this but are they talking a 100% ban on anything that uses gasoline or just cars that are 100% gasoline powered and hybrid systems are okay?

    I haven't really looked into this but are they talking a 100% ban on anything that uses gasoline or just cars that are 100% gasoline powered and hybrid systems are okay?

    Existing auto's on the road would be allowed so you are not looking at a pure ban on using petro. With that said 5 European countries lead by Germany is looking at 2030 where ALL AUTO's would have to be EV, Petro would be banned in new auto's unless it could be a hybrid certified as PEV Zero. Example is a Chevy Volt is a PEV Zero auto.

    So yes, we are looking at a future of auto's being EV or PEV Zero Hybrid.

    That is the discussion as of right now and of course everything is up for debate since nothing is in firm written form and signed off yet.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    21 hours ago, dfelt said:

    Existing auto's on the road would be allowed so you are not looking at a pure ban on using petro. With that said 5 European countries lead by Germany is looking at 2030 where ALL AUTO's would have to be EV, Petro would be banned in new auto's unless it could be a hybrid certified as PEV Zero. Example is a Chevy Volt is a PEV Zero auto.

    So yes, we are looking at a future of auto's being EV or PEV Zero Hybrid.

    That is the discussion as of right now and of course everything is up for debate since nothing is in firm written form and signed off yet.

    Brexit will play into this, but again, I think some of the political leadership and initiative will come in the form of cities.  You would not think so looking at them, but Paris has a population density twice that of NYC. Cars create more of a problem in cities largely built before the automobile in Europe than they do in the US.

    Also, the younger generation has little sympathy for repair bills and complexity, and electric cars will be inherently more simple to maintain.  Once a charger network is in place, convenience will bring in electric cars, just like the convenience of using ones own automobile killed off passenger trains in the USA.

    Electric is inevitable, once people get over that idea, things will be a lot smoother.

    The other thing to consider is that even if the EPA is cut by Trump, California is the tail wagging the dog in terms of emissions regulations, and given their love of the automobile and highway usage, those regs are not going away any time soon.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By David
      Since Ford Motor Company reported a complete Q4 / 2020 fiscal year report with a loss of $2.8 Billion but a doubling of R&D on EVs to $22 Billion from $11 Billion and a $7 Billion for EV Autonomous driving, the auto reporters are asking this very question: Is this a Shot across gm's bow or is it targeted more broadly across the whole industry as everyone wants to take sales away or greatly slow down Tesla.
      Tesla's valuation appears to be based on investors putting money with new technology seems to be driving changes of the future. 
      gm has now committed to moving into the technology camp with a solid date of when new ICE auto's will no longer be produced as the whole portfolio will change over to EV's. Ford also is now committing to this same strategy. This now makes one wonder about the rest of the auto industry.
      Stellantis CEO did an interview with Forbes that has put cold water on Peugeot coming to the US in the near term future as he wants to invest in the existing US name brands and grow their 12.7% market share. He also said that Stellantis has the manufacturing power and EV technology, but getting it into the hands of everyone is the concern at reasonable prices. Stellantis CEO says this is in the hands of the various global governments as he wants cleaner air and believes diesel the dirtiest of fuels will die off before regular petrol and where dictated by governments such as China and Europe will see a faster change over than other countries. Yet with the change in administration in the US, he says this could move the Stellantis brands to move into the full EV camp at a future date.
      Then we have small countries that have decided to make a major change in moving the country into EVs way sooner than other places and killing ICE sales like Thailand. This will allow local Thai startups to compete for the first time with international companies that also do not have anything in the market yet. 
      With a large range of battery plants coming online over the next 18 months, the move to EVs could happen at a pace that took decades for ICE in the early 1900's.
      So this brings this back to the original question, Is Fords Doubling commitment to EV's and moving ICE into the last generation like GM a shot across GM's bow or a shot at the whole industry to say, look at us, we are moving into a Technology driven auto company and our stock should be much higher like Tesla's.
      Currently gm is valued at just under $80 Billion, Ford is valued at $40 Billion, Tesla is valued at $807 Billion, Toyota is valued at $155.5 Billion, Stellantis is valued at $50.5 Billion, Daimler is valued at $71 Billion, BMW valued at $46 and VW is valued at $90.7 Billion and while there are plenty of other auto companies, one has to wonder what Ford is focused on with the drastic change and speeding up of moving to EVs as a complete global portfolio.
      Sound off and discuss how, what, where and when you think this will have it's big affect.
      Charged EVs | Is Ford’s increase in EV investment a shot across GM’s bow? - Charged EVs
      Stellantis CEO Reveals Peugeot U.S. Fate, Job Security, EV Conflict (forbes.com)
      Future Toyotas, Stellantis, batteries and EVs - the week | Automotive Industry Comment | just-auto (just-auto.com)
    • By William Maley
      We've been reporting on Ford's upcoming truck, the Maverick since 2018. The truck would sit underneath the Ranger and become the entry-level model for the brand. Now, we have gotten our best look at what it will look like.
      The Maverick Truck Club forum got its hand on an image showing a prototype Maverick on the line reportedly at Ford's Hermosillo, Mexico plant. Up front, the Maverick borrows some ideas from the Bronco Sport with C-shaped headlights and a horizontal bar splitting the grille. We don't know if Ford is planning to offer any cab configurations aside from the crew-cab seen in the photo.
      Ford did not immediately reply to comment on this when reached out by Roadshow. 
      The Maverick is expected to use the C2 architecture which underpins the new Escape and Bronco Sport. Autoblog speculates there could be two rear suspension setups based on spy shots that show a mule with twist-beam style setup with no rear differential for the front-wheel driver version. A slightly beefier setup might be used for the all-wheel drive version.
      Right now, everyone seems to think that the Maverick could debut as a 2022 model year vehicle.  
      Source: Maverick Truck Club, Roadshow, Autoblog
      Pic Credit: Maverick Truck Club


      View full article
    • By William Maley
      We've been reporting on Ford's upcoming truck, the Maverick since 2018. The truck would sit underneath the Ranger and become the entry-level model for the brand. Now, we have gotten our best look at what it will look like.
      The Maverick Truck Club forum got its hand on an image showing a prototype Maverick on the line reportedly at Ford's Hermosillo, Mexico plant. Up front, the Maverick borrows some ideas from the Bronco Sport with C-shaped headlights and a horizontal bar splitting the grille. We don't know if Ford is planning to offer any cab configurations aside from the crew-cab seen in the photo.
      Ford did not immediately reply to comment on this when reached out by Roadshow. 
      The Maverick is expected to use the C2 architecture which underpins the new Escape and Bronco Sport. Autoblog speculates there could be two rear suspension setups based on spy shots that show a mule with twist-beam style setup with no rear differential for the front-wheel driver version. A slightly beefier setup might be used for the all-wheel drive version.
      Right now, everyone seems to think that the Maverick could debut as a 2022 model year vehicle.  
      Source: Maverick Truck Club, Roadshow, Autoblog
      Pic Credit: Maverick Truck Club

    • By William Maley
      The COVID-19 pandemic has possibly caused another auto show to rethink their plans. According to Automotive News, organizers of the show are planning to delay the show from November to next May. Three sources tell the outlet the new dates are May 21st to 31st. Two of sources go on to say that an announcement could come this week.
      Automotive News tried to get comment from Terri Toennies, president of the show, but did not reply.
      By possibly moving the LA Auto Show to May, automakers and organizers of the New York and Detroit shows find themselves in a difficult spot. The LA show sandwiches between New York (April) and the revised Detroit show (June), which may cause automakers to make difficult decisions as to which shows get the most significant unveilings or whether to attend at all.
      Auto shows in general have been struggling before the onset of the pandemic. With automakers deciding to hold their own events to have more time in the spotlight and save cash, the spectacle of the show has gone down.
      We'll keep you posted.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
  • Posts

    • I think as we move towards EV's just like GM has their connect and cruise motor, transmission and electrical harness with CPU that allows someone to update an old ICE auto with a modern power train, GM has committed to having connect and cruise EV conversion kits with choice of battery packs.  I can see Yamaha doing the same thing and if not, a 3rd party company that will bundle the motor/controller with a battery pack and wiring for those that want to convert an auto to electrical.
    • While we keep hearing this, I have a hard time believing they will pass ANY of those savings to the consumer. 
    • The Yamaha would be last on my "want" list but I'd have to at least give it a thorough look before actually crossing it off.  Yep, anything European is going to be a little pricier to repair/maintain but they just have so much more character than Japanese bikes. I'd sacrifice the money for what the European bikes offer, even if they're slower around a track or in a straight line. I'm not good enough to care about that stuff and I'm not buying a supersport anyway. A Streetfighter would be pretty much THE top of the list but I know if I was buying, it wouldn't be that price bracket. Then again, it would be tough to turn down a Speed Triple so I'd have to look at those two closely. the Streetfighter might actually be too sporty than what I'd want.  And, in all honesty, your bike would be high on the to-ride list if my price range would be higher as well.  Naked and sporty are my sweet spot.
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. F&K
      F&K
      (57 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...