Jump to content
Get the Cheers & Gears App! ×
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: President Trump Wants To Ban German Vehicle From U.S.

      Because automakers really want more uncertainty

    President Donald Trump is no fan of German automakers. Take for instance this quote from last January,

    Quote

    “When you walk down Fifth Avenue, everyone has a Mercedes-Benz in front of their house. How many Chevrolets do you see in Germany? Not too many, maybe none at all, you do not see anything over there, it’s a one-way street.”

    He has also made comments about BMW in the past few months in light of possible tariffs (which appear to be going into effect today). Now, new comments have been brought to light where the president wants to try and ban German cars from the U.S.

    German magazine Wirtschaftswoche reports that during French President Emmanuel Macron's visit to the U.S. in April, Trump said that he will maintain his current trade policy "until no Mercedes models rolled on Fifth Avenue in New York." This information comes from several unnamed European and U.S. diplomats. At the time of this writing, Reuters hasn't able to verify this information.

    As we reported last week, the Trump administration has ordered a probe into new car imports on the basis of national security. It may result in imported vehicles being hit with a 25 percent tariff.

    Let's suppose that President Trump somehow presents a ban on German cars, trying to get it implemented may be quite problematic .For one, not all vehicles from German automakers will fall under the ban - an example is the Mercedes-Benz G-Class is built in Austria by Magna-Steyr. German automakers also have a sizable production presence in the U.S. Germany’s auto industry association VDA said German automakers built 804,000 vehicles in the U.S. last year.

    One thing is for sure; automakers will be dealing with more uncertainty for some time.

    Source: Wirtschaftswoche, Reuters

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Yet Potus 45 buys Rolls Royce, owned by BMW. So Supporting Germany as he pounds his Imperial America first drum. 🙄

    I honestly cannot see this really happening as I think he will hit some very hard road blocks. 

    It will be interesting to see how MB and BMW respond considering that they import in their performance lines last time I checked, so M and AMG would be the hit points more so than the regular auto lines or as the story points out the G-Wagon.

    The world is getting more and more crazy. 😵

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The idea behind the threat, from my understanding, is to get the tariff on the same level playing field as they tax our cars 10% while we only tax theirs 2.5%, whether it is raising our tariff or getting them to lower theirs.

    •  

    I think there is zero chance they ban German automobiles.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, dfelt said:

    Yet Potus 45 buys Rolls Royce, owned by BMW. So Supporting Germany as he pounds his Imperial America first drum. 🙄

    I honestly cannot see this really happening as I think he will hit some very hard road blocks. 

    It will be interesting to see how MB and BMW respond considering that they import in their performance lines last time I checked, so M and AMG would be the hit points more so than the regular auto lines or as the story points out the G-Wagon.

    The world is getting more and more crazy. 😵

    Exactly, I don't see Trump and his family driving Chevrolets.  Trump has had Rolls Royces for decades and England isn't buying many American cars either, and Rolls is now German owned.

    If he puts a tariff on just cars made in Germany, the GLE and GLS are made in the USA, so doesn't affect those Mercedes, BMW builds SUVs in South Carolina, doesn't affect those.   And then what if Mercedes takes Chinese built E-classes and imports them to the USA, and sends the German built E-classes to China.  Is he going to tax all Chinese made cars too?  

     

    The major problem here is you have a president that wants to pick winners and losers, which is more like North Korean communism, and not capitalism.  What if the next president decides there should be a 50% sales tax on Trump hotels and a 0% sales tax on Marriott Hotels?  And tries to pick which companies make money and which ones go out of business.  

    4 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    The idea behind the threat, from my understanding, is to get the tariff on the same level playing field as they tax our cars 10% while we only tax theirs 2.5%, whether it is raising our tariff or getting them to lower theirs.

    •  

    I think there is zero chance they ban German automobiles.

    They could have a 0% tariff on American cars, Europeans aren't buying them because the only good American cars are big trucks that are too thirsty and too large to sell over there.  Likewise for China with the displacement taxes.  If GM wants to make a Malibu with Cadillac CT6 level build quality that gets 55 mpg then game on in international markets, but that current car is hopeless.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Governments picking winners and losers (otherwise known as industrial policy) seldom works well for markets or consumers.  Too bad Trump never ran a real multinational corporation: at that point he would recognize that free trade and minimal governmental interference on the consumer-facing side are good things to have as policy.

    Then again, the GOP rank-and-file probably prefer protectionism (if not autarky), whereas their (former?) leaders and elites actually prefer free trade and NO industrial policy.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    The idea behind the threat, from my understanding, is to get the tariff on the same level playing field as they tax our cars 10% while we only tax theirs 2.5%, whether it is raising our tariff or getting them to lower theirs.

    •  

    I think there is zero chance they ban German automobiles.

     

    Yes. All these sensationalized pieces and article titles are getting out of control.

     

    Nobody in their right would think that the actual goal here is to ban German cars. It's to merely level the playing field in regards to taxes as you pointed out.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To me, the threat of ban sounds more like he is trying to get our tariff lowered as opposed to raising theirs. IMO, because everybody raising prices doesn't really help but if ours got lowered from 10% to match theirs at 2.5%..1: they would still sell here which is a good thing and 2: our sales to them would likely increase as prices to consumers over there would decrease with a lower tax which would still help our overall economy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Frisky Dingo said:

     

    Yes. All these sensationalized pieces and article titles are getting out of control.

     

    Nobody in their right would think that the actual goal here is to ban German cars. It's to merely level the playing field in regards to taxes as you pointed out.

    To a degree... but at the same time he doesn't like Chancellor Merkel.  You'll notice it wasn't Korean cars he mentioned wanting to ban.

    He is just saber rattling on this, but I don't doubt that he'll enact high tariffs if he doesn't get what he wants.  It will be fairly devastating to the auto industry on both sides of the pond.  Buick in particular would probably die in the US. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Buick in particular would probably die in the US. 

    This does bring up an interesting thought...with the sale of Opel, I assume future Buicks will be designed in the US and China and no more Opel-derived models (after the current generation models)?  Or does GM have a long term agreement/contract w/ PSA for components and models.. 

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    This does bring up an interesting thought...with the sale of Opel, I assume future Buicks will be designed in the US and China and no more Opel-derived models (after the current generation models)?  Or does GM have a long term agreement/contract w/ PSA for components and models.. 

    Of all the American brands on sale in the US, Buick has the highest percentage of models not built in the US. (Buick has 6 models of which only 2 models are built in the US.)

    Conversely, the vast bulk of Toyota brand vehicles are built in the US with the RAV4 being the only high volume Toyota model not built in the US. (Corolla, Camry, Avalon, Highlander, Sienna)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    What's their tariff/tax on our autos to their country? 

    In 2012, South Korea lowered its tariffs on U.S. cars to 4 percent from 8 percent

    For reference, the tariff for US cars entering the EU is 10%.  For US cars entering China, it is currently 25% but will drop to 15% on July 1. 

    Japan has no import tariff on US cars, however Japanese market tastes are... unique... and American cars aren't suited for that market, so an increase in tariffs on Japanese cars isn't going to balance the trade.

    Tariffs for cars imported into the US are 2.5%, and for commercial vehicles, trucks, and 2-door SUVs, the tariff is 25%. This is commonly known as the Chicken Tax.

    Regardless of the numbers, I still think it is a personal thing between him and Merkel. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I do wonder how many US 

    6 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

     

    Regardless of the numbers, I still think it is a personal thing between him and Merkel. 

    Yeah, that wouldn't surprise me...his foreign policy seems to be largely based on personal relations or lack of them..

    As far as Japan, Jeep is 'big' there... http://www.thedrive.com/sheetmetal/14782/jeep-is-by-far-the-hottest-american-brand-in-japan

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Mazda unveils the Iconic SP concept

    At the 2023 Tokyo auto show, Mazda unveiled a sports car concept. Originally named Vision Study Model, the Iconic SP, utilizes an interesting engine combination. This hybrid-rotary-powered sports car uses the twin-rotor rotary engine as a generator to recharge the batteries. Iconic SP is around 10 inches longer than Mazda’s compact Miata. Although Mazda hasn't disclosed the number of electric motors, they are the main propulsion system. As a range-extending EV, that rotary engine doesn’t dr

    Mazda

    Mazda CX-70 Delayed Until 2024

    Since the introduction of the Mazda CX-90, a smaller SUV has been in the pipeline. The CX-70 was supposed to go on sale at the end of this year but has been delayed until 2024. Mazda is aiming to offer more SUVs for American customers.  This means that the CX-70 will compete alongside the CX-90 is the mid-size SUV segment.  Europe already has the CX-60, and Mazda said the CX-70 is essentially the same with a wider body. CX-70 will have a shorter wheelbase than the CX-90 due to it being a tw

    Mazda

    EPA Has Announced the Range for the 2024 Kia EV9

    The EPA has announced the various electric ranges of the Kia EV9. This new crossover SUV is Kia's flagship SUV, with various battery sizes and ranges. Kia gave the EV9 five trim levels along with two battery sizes. At the bottom of the EV9 lineup is the $56,000 Light rear-wheel-drive Light trim level. An EV9 Light utilizes a 76.1-kWh battery, good for 215 horsepower/160 kW and 258 ft-lb /339 Nm. The range for the Light rear-wheel-drive is 230 miles, or about 3.0 miles/kWh. The Light trim le

    Kia


  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • I've got this Toyota Camry they assigned to me.  Wow ... this has the second highest mileage of any vehicle I've ever been assigned - 56,000 miles!  That's over 9 transcontinental U.S. round trips.  The only other car that beat it was in Italy when I was given a Seat Leon wagon with 105,000 km (which is over 60,000 miles).  That one looked kind of mangy and they didn't seem to care about all the scratches and all that, including the front bumper panel that had separated on one side and was provisionally fastened together.  I asked her if this Seat Leon wagon could get me from Ancona to Bari for the one-way drop (basically most of the length of the Adriatic side) and she said that it would.  It did.   As for this Camry, it's a rough one.  The engine is noisy and, unlike ones I've been put in that have had about 20,000 miles where the 8-speed automatic had some of the best shift quality I've experienced, this Camry revs out to the next shift point and then there's what seems like a pause after that shift.  It reminds me of some Smart cars and Opel Corsa automatics I've rented across the pond ... some 20 years ago.  I don't believe in these new long intervals for transmission service.  I think people need to be routinely servicing their geared automatic transmission every 30,000 to 40,000 miles. It's a basic LE and has none of the bells and whistles, like any of the traffic and parking sensors.  It also has that nasty diagonal sweep over the cubby hole for one's electronics.
    • Chevrolet Bolt gets lower-cost LFP batteries for next gen - Autoblog QUOTE: CEO Mary Barra confirmed the hatchback's return, telling analysts, "I know there has been some speculation in the market as to why we are developing a new Bolt EV. Our strategy is to build on the tremendous equity we have in the brand and to do it as efficiently as possible." The efficiency bit is the key phrase in that sentence, Barra explaining that GM can get the new Bolt to market quicker than a vehicle program from scratch while " saving billions in capital and engineering expenses." A big part of that savings comes from the plan to use lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which are markedly less expensive than the lithium-ion pack in the current car and the nickel-cobalt-manganese-aluminum (NCMA) chemistry in GM's Ultium packs. Barra explained, "This will be our first deployment in North America of LFP technology in the Ultium platform."  General Motors Company (GM) Q3 2023 Earnings Call Transcript | Seeking Alpha QUOTE:  The team is optimizing the software strategy and fine-tuning the plans for our new vehicles to help make sure we executive with the highest possible quality and customer experience, while positioning the company to drive significant revenue growth from subscriptions in the future. To give the team time to do this, we'll move out the launches of three products, the Chevrolet Equinox EV, the Silverado EV RST, and the GMC Sierra EV Denali, each by only a few months. This will ensure their success. We believe our products will succeed, and the costs are coming out quickly. For example, our cost per cell has already decreased 45% over the last 12 months as production volume in Ohio has ramped up. We also expect to achieve significant margin improvement on our battery electric trucks through engineering efficiency and improvement, supplier cost, and reducing order complexity, buildable combinations, and manufacturing. However, by leveraging the best attributes of today's Bolt EUV as well as Ultium,, our latest software, and NACS, we will deliver an even better driving, charging, and ownership experience with a vehicle we know customers love. In the process, we are saving billions in capital and engineering expenses, delivering a significantly cost improved battery pack using purchased LFP cells. We are getting to market at least two years faster and our unit cost will be substantially lower. This is will be our first deployment in North America of LFP technology in the Ultium platform.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we notice you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search