Jump to content
Create New...
  • 🚗 Your People Are Here. Get In.

    The internet is full of car content. This is the community.

    Cheers & Gears has been bringing enthusiasts together since 2001. Join the conversation, show off your garage, and find your people.

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Suzuki Is Shrinking, Is The End Coming?

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    April 16, 2012

    To say Suzuki is hurting would be a large understatement. The brand is showing many signs of trouble which include,

    • Suzuki's first quarter sales totaled 6,561 vehicles, a drop of 2% over last year. Meanwhile, in the same quarter, the market rose 13%.
    • Suzuki skipped the Los Angeles and Detroit Auto Show
    • Suspended their social media activity (i.e. Facebook & Twitter) two months ago
    • Steve Younan, the top U.S. product planning and marketing executive, left in January and will not be replaced.
    • Suzuki hasn't aired a ad nationally since 2009
    • In January, Suzuki stopped getting data from J.D. Power and Associates
    • Since 2005, Suzuki has been losing dealers. Last year, 32 Suzuki dealers closed (about 12%)
    • A Suzuki dealer told Automotive News that about 60% of Suzuki's remaining dealers sell five or less vehicles per month

    Now, a report from Automotive News says Suzuki is focused on short-term profitability than investment.

    "They seem to be more interested in controlling expenses than increasing revenue," a source said.

    The brand has been cutting costs wherever possible. A good amount of those cuts have effected the promotional aspect of the business. Not a good thing since Suzuki has refreshed versions of the SX4 subcompact and Grand Vitara SUV coming out later this year.

    "The strange thing to me is, even at this bare minimum, when the opportunity is presented to make some news and provide something positive for customers and the dealers, they avoid it," said another source.

    The question being asked now is whether Suzuki is planning to rebuild their U.S. operations or make an exit out of the U.S.?

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I have to go with Exiting the US market. The dealership where my son bought his Jeep says most people will not bother even looking at the Susuki cars. The sales people says the dealership stopped taking cars and pretty much they are working to sell off the 30+ new cars treating them like they did when they had their Saturn Dealership. Sell them cheap and exit out. The best media I had heard on the cars was the C&D drive over eastern europe to Alaska and down to LA. Yet Susuki failed to capitalize on this for selling more cars. I have lately heard from the Susuki Motor cycle dealership which also sells Yamaha and services my wave runners that the motor cycle side is no different than the car side and how people seem to just be waiting out the eventual death\exit from US markets.

    Doing a search on sales for other Susuki products does not grab much growth either. I wonder if they are just focusing on exiting the business over all world wide or if they just so lost their focus and way that they will pull back to the mother land and regrow slowly.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's a shame, really. Suzuki actually had potential, but I guess when you're a company so small you're lucky to pay the bills to keep the lights on it doesn't matter.

    If they had somehow managed to let their sportbike and ATV range heavily influence their cars and SUVs, I think it could've yielded an interesting result. A Grand Vitara replacement renamed and restyled to reflect the attidude of the Suzuki KingQuad and Ozark would've been neat, ditto a trail-worthy crossover in the vein of the QuadSport racing ATVs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's odd that they've generated so much brand-equity with their powersports divisions, but that hasn't translated to their cars. Honda has done it with aplomb. But I guess Hayabusa riders won't find SX4's terribly exciting.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Independent Automotive Journalism

    25 years of honest automotive coverage — because someone has to do it.

    Cheers & Gears has never been filtered by manufacturer relationships or driven by algorithm. Just real people, real opinions, and a genuine love of cars. Subscribers keep the lights on and get an ad-light experience starting at $2.25/month.*

    View subscription options

    *A small number of ads feature member-exclusive coupon deals and will still appear.

  • Posts

    • Many Porsche owners assume the active engine mount has failed as soon as they see a PADM Disabled warning. However, after disassembling multiple OEM PADM sensors, we found that most failures are actually caused by the internal sensor chip becoming loose or detached. The OEM design relies heavily on adhesive to secure the chip. After years of engine heat and vibration, the adhesive gradually weakens, eventually causing sensor failure and fault codes. The issue is that Porsche’s official repair solution only involves replacing the complete active mount assembly, which is expensive and still uses the same basic sensor structure, meaning the problem can return again later. Lumistag PADM Sensors were redesigned specifically to address this weak point. The internal chip is mechanically reinforced with locking pins and protected by a CNC-machined aluminum housing for improved durability and stability. Fully plug-and-play with no coding required. Compatible with Porsche 981 / 982 / 991 platforms. https://lumistag.com/
    • That is certainly your opinion but I stand by it. That thing is hideous and just looking at the profile of the two, the $650K Ferrari looks way too similar to a $40K Toyota. That is not a Ferrari. That is a $650K bar of soap with wheels.    You are right about the rest of it though. Just a whole lot of “meh” for that kind of coin.  If it had a different logo attached to it, then it might look okay. However, if no one told us this was a Ferrari, we would never have guessed it was. That is my point here. Nothing about it says Ferrari and it looks very stale and boring for the price point. 
    • Oh that is just plain silly that they'd have the same vehicle but some trims do and do not have CarPlay. I'm also in the same boat in not wanting a base model of pretty much anything. I dig the Lyriq (even though the name is horrible), but they're too pricey around me still. The cheaper ones are 40-42k and I just can't justify spending that. 
    • The front 2/3 of the car are attractive enough.  I don't know much else about it.
    • I would not get a Super.  Find one with the normally aspirated 3800 V6.  Toward its final year, they may have gone to a Chevy sourced 3900 V6 or 3500 V6.  I guess those are ok if lower mileage, but the Buick 3800 V6 tends to be stellar. I just saw this or would have responded earlier.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search