Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Quick Drive: 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LTZ

      An expensive if powerful pickup truck

    Trucks are a big deal in the U.S. Last year alone, 15 percent of the more than 17 million vehicles sold were some sort of truck. Case in point is the Chevrolet Silverado. So far in 2017, Chevrolet has sold 212,425 Silverado trucks. So what is it about the Silverado that makes it one of Chevrolet popular models?

    • A key reason might be the large number of configurations on offer. The Silverado offers five bed and cab configurations, eight trims, three engines, and two drivetrain choices. That’s before you start looking at the long list of options. Our test truck is a prime example of what you might find a dealer - an LTZ crew cab with the short bed (5-foot).
    • We’re not kidding on the long options list. Our truck features over $11,000 in options including a 6.2L V8 engine, 20-inch chrome wheels, power-assist steps, heated and ventilated seats; Bose sound system, navigation, max trailering package, and chrome mirrors. 
    • GM updated the exteriors of their half-ton trucks last year with revised front ends. I’m not so keen on the new front end as it doesn’t seem to fit with the rest of the truck’s design. At least the chrome grille seen here looks slightly better than the one you get if you order the Z71 package which has a body-colored center and different inner. Otherwise, the Silverado looks much the same as the one we drove back in 2014 with a boxy, muscular shape.
    • The LTZ is the middle ground in the Silverado lineup between blue-collar LT and luxurious High Country trims, and that puts it in a tough spot. You can see this in the interior as GM tries to straddle the middle and ultimately fails. The faux leather upholstery isn’t nice to sit on due to a waxy feel. The trim pieces may look nice at first glance, but look closer and you can easily tell they are plastic. I would be willing to give this a pass, but not when said truck is a hair over $60,000.
    • General Motors does earn some points back when it comes to their half-ton’s interior layout. With large buttons and knobs placed in logical places, GM knows keep keeping it simple earns big points from truck buyers. The same is true for Chevrolet’s Intellilink infotainment system with an easy to navigate menu system, legible graphics, and redundant controls for common controls.
    • As mentioned, our Silverado came with the big 6.2L V8 with 420 horsepower and 460 pound-feet of torque. It comes hooked up to an eight-speed automatic and four-wheel drive. Two-wheel drive comes standard.
    • The 6.2L V8 engine is the biggest ace up the Silverado’s sleeve. Not only does it provide some impressive towing numbers - 11,700 with the max trailering package, but it also moves this truck like it was something smaller. 0-60 mph is said to take around six seconds which is quite impressive. Plus, it makes the right noises when you step on the accelerator.
    • Fuel economy for the 6.2L V8 is the same as the 5.3L V8 when equipped similarly (eight-speed automatic and 4WD) - 15 City/20 Highway/17 Combined. We saw an average of 16.2 mpg for our short test period in mostly city driving.
    • The only downside to the 6.2L V8? You can only get it on the LTZ and High Country trims. It would be nice if Chevrolet made it optional on lower LT trim.
    • We’ve considered General Motors’ half-tons to run a close second to the Ram 1500 in terms of ride quality. Despite sticking with leaf-springs in the rear, GM somehow tuned the suspension to provide a compliant ride over any surface. It needs to be noted that the Max Trailering package does ride somewhat firmer due to a new suspension package which brings heavy-duty springs and revised shock tuning.
    • We now need to talk about price. As we mentioned, the as-tested price of our Silverado 1500 LTZ tester came in at $60,020 mostly due to the large amount of options equipped. If I were buying an LTZ, I would skip the power assist steps, 20-inch chrome wheels, Siren Red paint, and max trailering package. to help bring the price to around $55,500 or so. It is still an expensive proposition, but it becomes slightly easier to swallow.

    Disclaimer: Chevrolet Provided the Silverado, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas

    Year: 2017
    Make: Chevrolet
    Model: Silverado 1500
    Trim: LTZ Crew Cab
    Engine: 6.2L VVT DI with Active Fuel Management V8
    Driveline: Eight-Speed Automatic
    Horsepower @ RPM: 420 @ 5600
    Torque @ RPM: 460 @ 4100
    Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 15/20/17
    Curb Weight: 5,299 lbs*
    Location of Manufacture: Silao, GJ, Mexico
    Base Price: $47,175
    As Tested Price: $60,020 (Includes $1,195.00 Destination Charge)

    *Curb weight of a base Silverado 4WD crew cab.

    Options:
    6.2L V8 w/Eight-Speed Automatic - $2,695.00
    Power and Articulating Assist Steps - $1,695.00
    20-Inch Chrome Wheels - $1,495.00
    Enhanced Driver Package - $945.00
    Max Trailering Package - $925.00
    LTZ Plus Package - $770.00
    Heated & Ventilated Front Seats - $650.00
    Leather Appointed Buckets with Center Console - $510.00
    8-inch MyLink with Navigation - $495.00
    Siren Red Tintcoat- $495.00
    Spray-On Bedliner - $495.00
    Chrome Trailering Mirrors with Power Folding - $295.00
    Cargo Box with LED Lighting - $125.00
    Moveable Upper Tie Dows - $60.00

    Edited by William Maley


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    7 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    Wait a minute. $60K and you're not even sitting on real leather? Just no. 

    Yeah, that jumped out at me..that's really f'ed up...it is confusing, the list of options says 'leather appointed buckets-$510.00. 

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Expensive but a damned nice truck!

    It's still hard to wrap my head around the idea of a $60k light-duty pickup...that is a lot of money. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I will say this. I disagree with Willam about the Front end. I think it looks a million times better with a color matched grill than in chrome. Saw one in black at my shop, and it looked really sharp. The chrome is just too much IMO.

    Edited by surreal1272
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    It's still hard to wrap my head around the idea of a $60k light-duty pickup...that is a lot of money. 

    My neighborhood is as full of them as dandelions in the spring...

    1 hour ago, surreal1272 said:

    I will say this. I disagree with Willam about the Front end. I think it looks a million times better with a color matched grill than in chrome. Saw one in black at my shop, and it looked really sharp. The chrome is just too much IMO.


    I prefer the color matched as well...

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, surreal1272 said:

    I will say this. I disagree with Willam about the Front end. I think it looks a million times better with a color matched grill than in chrome. Saw one in black at my shop, and it looked really sharp. The chrome is just too much IMO.

    Totally agree, so over with the crazy chrome everything that the auto companies are doing. Will take Monochromatic any day over chrome.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, A Horse With No Name said:

    My neighborhood is as full of them as dandelions in the spring...


    I prefer the color matched as well...

     

    My ex-manager in Arizona just bought a '17 Silverado Midnight Edition..big all black truck...makes no sense in the desert--his previous '10 Silverado was white. 

    The color matched trim just doesn't work for me, look cheap compared to chrome to my eyes, but it's good that the automakers give buyers lots of trim choices.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    My ex-manager in Arizona just bought a '17 Silverado Midnight Edition..big all black truck...makes no sense in the desert--his previous '10 Silverado was white. 

    The color matched trim just doesn't work for me, look cheap compared to chrome to my eyes, but it's good that the automakers give buyers lots of trim choices.

    When I was working in Atlanta a few years ago my wife and kids came down to visit me...I told them not to wear black or dark colors. Being the "rebellious teenager" phase...a couple of them chose to wear black...

    They were miserable.

    Common sense is not so common.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    When I was working in Atlanta a few years ago my wife and kids came down to visit me...I told them not to wear black or dark colors. Being the "rebellious teenager" phase...a couple of them chose to wear black...

    They were miserable.

    Common sense is not so common.

    Of course, I'm one to talk since I bought a black Jeep..at least I have the cream interior...and it's not as big of an issue in Ohio than AZ, IMO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Totally agree, so over with the crazy chrome everything that the auto companies are doing. Will take Monochromatic any day over chrome.

    That would be three of us...

    9 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Of course, I'm one to talk since I bought a black Jeep..at least I have the cream interior...and it's not as big of an issue in Ohio than AZ, IMO.

    But you knew you were probably moving back to the Midwest...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

     

    But you knew you were probably moving back to the Midwest...

    Oh yeah... I never registered it in AZ, got a 90 day temporary tag then registered here in Ohio a couple weeks ago.   My last moving Pod left a couple days ago, I had made the offer on the house in early December, closed in January..this move has been going on for a while... 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Oh yeah... I never registered it in AZ, got a 90 day temporary tag then registered here in Ohio a couple weeks ago.   My last moving Pod left a couple days ago, I had made the offer on the house in early December, closed in January..this move has been going on for a while... 

    You will like that 4WD system if that lake effect snow hits you....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    You will like that 4WD system if that lake effect snow hits you....

    I have used the 4WD mud setting a couple weeks ago when I was at the farm...worked well. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    I will say this. I disagree with Willam about the Front end. I think it looks a million times better with a color matched grill than in chrome. Saw one in black at my shop, and it looked really sharp. The chrome is just too much IMO.

    I would agree with you if this was the older front end. I like the body color on that one. This new grille along with GMC just look terrible to me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    the new grille and headlight treatment is too busy, IMO...I liked the '14-15 front better...

    I totally agree, I am not a fan of the nose at all.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, William Maley said:

    I would agree with you if this was the older front end. I like the body color on that one. This new grille along with GMC just look terrible to me.

    Guess I'm one of the few who likes the new front end better. Either way, the chrome is just too much and borderline tacky to me. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest AsianPersuasian

    Posted

    GM needs more engine options.  This $2700 upgrade is too miuch and the 5.3L is not quite enough.  Forget the V6, it lacks refinement.

    $60K is a lot, and so is the $55.5K when some options are removed.

    Personally, I would take Honda pickup instead.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    $2700 is about the same as the upgrade from a Pentastar to a Hemi in a 300. .. but yes that is a bit much for an upgrade.

    A low boost 4.3 V6 might make an interesting option, but for most people, the 5.3 is more than plenty.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Guest AsianPersuasian said:

    GM needs more engine options.  This $2700 upgrade is too miuch and the 5.3L is not quite enough.  Forget the V6, it lacks refinement.

    $60K is a lot, and so is the $55.5K when some options are removed.

    Personally, I would take Honda pickup instead.

    As a Ford employee you would buy an F series.

    Amazing how one fanboi is as bad as another.

    7 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    Guess I'm one of the few who likes the new front end better. Either way, the chrome is just too much and borderline tacky to me. 

    You did not hear me say this but the F series is quite attractive.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    $2700 is about the same as the upgrade from a Pentastar to a Hemi in a 300. .. but yes that is a bit much for an upgrade.

    A low boost 4.3 V6 might make an interesting option, but for most people, the 5.3 is more than plenty.

    A 5.3 would be perfect for me.

    Love the look of the F series but GM power train reliability would win me over.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    A 5.3 would be perfect for me.

    Love the look of the F series but GM power train reliability would win me over.

    I'd only go for the Ford with a 5.0 engine, no ecoboost for me.  Luckily they don't have much of an upcharge for it... about half the upcharge as the 6.2 in the GM Twins. Still, the 6.2 and the 8-speed are a fantastic setup. I doubt I'd miss the 2 extra gears the Ford has for now. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I do like the 5.0.  Ford V8 powerplants have such a fantastic sound...that truck with the right cat back exhaust...might make me forget all of my animosity towards Ford.

    My actual money would still be on a GM truck I think.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest AsianPersuasian

    Posted

    Assuming no cap reduction, I bet a premium lease like that is over $500 per.  Not to mention higher fuel and insurance costs. Totally cool, if one has the spare income. Most don't.  It's a fun ride, but giving it back sucks and you are left with zilch.  Done it myself, but now just follow the lease deals. It minimizes your selection, but paying half as much, is easier to feel bad about.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Guest AsianPersuasian said:

    Assuming no cap reduction, I bet a premium lease like that is over $500 per.  Not to mention higher fuel and insurance costs. Totally cool, if one has the spare income. Most don't.  It's a fun ride, but giving it back sucks and you are left with zilch.  Done it myself, but now just follow the lease deals. It minimizes your selection, but paying half as much, is easier to feel bad about.

    Different strokes for different folks...I prefer to pay cash or pay vehicles off quickly, and then drive them till they die.

    I could see leasing a vehicle at some point...but not at this stage of life.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Different strokes for different folks...I prefer to pay cash or pay vehicles off quickly, and then drive them till they die.

    I could see leasing a vehicle at some point...but not at this stage of life.

    The only reason we leased the Buick is that we were expecting a life change at the end of the 2 years.  That didn't happen, so we ended up buying it out. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The only reason we leased the Buick is that we were expecting a life change at the end of the 2 years.  That didn't happen, so we ended up buying it out. 

    Not a bad route to take. That Buick. worked out infinitely better than the CRV!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Not a bad route to take. That Buick. worked out infinitely better than the CRV!

    Well we still have he CRV, it's primarily a rental property work vehicle now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Well we still have he CRV, it's primarily a rental property work vehicle now.

    I was thinking you gentlemen could almost keep the Buick and buy an F series crew cab with the 5.0 For the other vehicle.

    Yeah, I know I said earlier I would take the GM truck...but the Ford F series is also Amazingly nice.

    Plus pickup trucks hold resale really well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    I was thinking you gentlemen could almost keep the Buick and buy an F series crew cab with the 5.0 For the other vehicle.

    Yeah, I know I said earlier I would take the GM truck...but the Ford F series is also Amazingly nice.

    Plus pickup trucks hold resale really well.

    It really boils down to whether Ford or GMC can get me the better deal on the configuration I want. GMC has the advantage here based solely on my ability to get supplier pricing.

    That said, I'm still pretty stuck on finding a low mileage Avalanche or Escalade EXT because I don't do many miles anymore and I could keep it a long time with just a head unit upgrade.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It really boils down to whether Ford or GMC can get me the better deal on the configuration I want. GMC has the advantage here based solely on my ability to get supplier pricing.

    That said, I'm still pretty stuck on finding a low mileage Avalanche or Escalade EXT because I don't do many miles anymore and I could keep it a long time with just a head unit upgrade.

    I did see an absolutely pristine and sweetly detailed Avalanche on 70 Eastbound the other day...was that metallic orange GM used for a couple of years.  Thought of you and Albert.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I think the 18.3c needs to increase too if we're already having to shift money around to cover things.  And we're not even covering everything with that. The state of bridges here in PA is horrible. They just reduced traffic on a bridge here because they found serious defects. It's a major interstate artery through the city.
    • I'm glad this breakdown was in the article, because this was the first thing I thought of. I didn't think I was paying anywhere close to $250/yr worth of 18.3c gasoline tax, which I'm not, according to those numbers.  I can understand the EV tax being slightly higher due to the pretty significant weight different, but this is too much. This proposed tax should probably be cut in half, maybe more, IMO. $100/yr doesn't seem unreasonable. 
    • FYI - Using this story and my thoughts above, I wrote my House and Senate representatives on this and this is what I sent them:   Hello Suzan, Patty, Maria, Sam Graves, Republican for Montana and head of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is proposing a $250 annual charge for electric vehicles as part of an effort to shore up funding for the national highway system and other transportation projects. Graves stated that with the increase in electric, hybrid and just overall efficiency in internal combustion automobiles that the federal tax collected per mile traveled has dropped, making it a challenge to keep the Federal Highway Administration funded. With the new fees, Republicans hope to raise $50 billion in new funding over the next 10 years. The additional money would go to pay for highway repairs and additional funding for air traffic control. Republicans point out that since 2008, more than $275 billion has been shifted from the general fund to pay for road repairs.  The federal government has not raised fuel taxes, currently 18.3 cents per gallon, since October of 1993. The latest proposed fee schedule would be $250 per electric vehicle per year and $100 per hybrid-vehicle per year. An earlier proposal had the electric vehicle fee at $200 per year and also included a $20 per year fee for gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles.  The Federal fee would be on top of any state fees imposed. Many states have adopted EV fees to replace the loss in gas tax revenue at the local level. The federal fees are tied to inflation and would be recalculated each year and grow over time. The U.S. Energy Information Administration has pointed out that the proposed $250 fee would require the average EV owner to pay the equivalent 1366 gallons gas tax while hybrid owners would pay roughly the equivalent of 547 gallons of fuel tax on top of paying 18.3 cents at the pump. For an EV owner, they would be paying as much tax as someone driving 15,000 miles per year in an 11 mpg vehicle. The average amount of gas used by non-hybrid gasoline vehicles is roughly 489 gallons per year. I do not mind paying an equal share for my EV on the roads. Yet if they are going to charge me $250 then it is time to raise the gas tax equal to what Hybrid and EVs must pay. ICE = 489 gallons of gas X .183 cents per gallon = $89.49 cents per year based on the Governments only numbers. If they are to charge EVs $250, then they need to raise the Federal gas tax to .511 cents per gallon for equality and tie it into inflation so that gas tax goes up just as the Hybrid / EV tax goes up. With having to pull from the General fund $275 Billion to support the Federal Highway Administration, I find it a little odd that the estimated $50 Billion over 10 years really would make a difference compared to increasing the Federal Gas tax having everyone share in the responsibility to fund our inner state highway system. I look forward to hearing from you, Sincerely, G. David Felt   FYI 2024 according to statista.com, 134.55 billion gallons of gas were sold for the year. At .183 cents federal gas tax, that was $24,622,650,000 billion dollars collected in gas tax. At .511 center federal gas tax, that would have been $68,755,050,000 Billion collected in gas tax in addition to the Hybrid and EV fee that would be collected for our inner-state highway system.  
    • That is so true, all the shopping malls here have major charging areas that are free to the shoppers, but then pretty much anyone can pull in and plug in for an L2 charge. Most city government locations around here have free L2 chargers and Shell has many Volta free L2 charging at various tourist spots around Washington. Major work campuses have free L2 charging like Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Boeing, Paccar, to name just a few.  Fast charging locations are growing as Tesla has signed with the Kroger / QFC / Fred Meyers locations for major charging stations and EVgo / ChargePoint / Electrify America have signed on with Walmart / Safeway / Albertson for stations in their parking lots. Costco has signed on with a private Seattle company to install fast chargers for a fee on their lots. So lots of changes coming for sure. Be interesting to see when the Auto Industry start up gets more places open other than the first one they did on the East coast.
    • One, EVERYONE needs to write their House and Senate representatives on this and make sure they are aware of this very imbalanced approach to funding a government department. With that said, I do not mind paying an equal share for my EV on the roads. Yet if they are going to charge me $250 then it is time to raise the gas tax equal to what Hybrid and EVs must pay. ICE = 489 gallons of gas X .183 cents per gallon = $89.49 cents per year based on the Governments only numbers. If they are to charge EVs $250, then they need to raise the Federal gas tax to .511 cents per gallon for equality.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search