Jump to content
Create New...

2013 Malibu -- Powertrain Details


Recommended Posts

Engine

  • Description: Ecotec 2.5L Inline-4
  • Displacement (cu. in. / cc): 152.5 / 2457
  • Bore & stroke (in. / mm): 3.46 x 3.97 / 88 x 101
  • Block material: Lost Foam Cast Aluminum Alloy
  • Cylinder head material: Lost Foam Cast Aluminum Alloy
  • Valvetrain: DOHC-16-Valves w/Intake and Exhaust VVT
  • Valve lifters: Roller Finger Followers w/ Hydraulic Lash Adjusters
  • Ignition system: Coil-on-Plug Direct Ignition
  • Fuel delivery: Direct Gasoline Injection
  • Throttle Control: Electronically Controlled Throttle Body
  • Compression ratio: 11.3:1
  • Horsepower: 190 bhp / 141 kW @ 6200 rpm
  • Torque: 180 lb-ft / 245 Nm @ 4500 rpm
  • Recommended fuel: Regular unleaded (87 Octane)
  • Max. engine speed: 7000 rpm
  • Emissions: PZEV; Secondary Air Injection (SAI) system + close-coupled catalytic converter, positive crankcase ventilation & vapor recover system
  • Additional features: Extended-life spark plugs, Extended-life coolant
  • Estimated fuel economy: >= 35 MPG (Hwy)

Transmission

  • Description: Hydramatic 6T40, 6-Speed Automatic w/ Lockup converte
  • Axle Ratio: 2.89 : 1
  • Gear ratios:

[List1]

[*] 4.58 : 1

[*] 2.96 : 1

[*] 1.91 : 1

[*] 1.45 : 1

[*] 1.00 : 1

[*] 0.75 : 1

Official GM Release

Edited by dwightlooi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does "lost foam" mean?

Its hard to describe in a few words... its been around since the Quad4 used it, IIRC... here's a description...

Wiki

Thanks... I never even thought to check Wiki. You're right.. hard to describe in a few words lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

give me that engine/trans in my MC please GM?

I don't think they have plans for selling that as a crate engine.

oh i know. just be very cool to see gm retrofit older vehicles to really see if design and tech have overcome weight....and whatever else in older cars.

if the bu can get ~34-35 ish and my v6 can get 30.. then mine with that engine would prolly be par with the bu's mpg. not to mention 30hp more and w/i 5lbft of my 3.1 , but with 2 more gears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh i know. just be very cool to see gm retrofit older vehicles to really see if design and tech have overcome weight....and whatever else in older cars.

if the bu can get ~34-35 ish and my v6 can get 30.. then mine with that engine would prolly be par with the bu's mpg. not to mention 30hp more and w/i 5lbft of my 3.1 , but with 2 more gears.

GM would not be happy to hear that its drivetrains barely able to get 35 mpg in a Cruze were getting 45 mpg in a 45 year old Chevy II.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh i know. just be very cool to see gm retrofit older vehicles to really see if design and tech have overcome weight....and whatever else in older cars.

if the bu can get ~34-35 ish and my v6 can get 30.. then mine with that engine would prolly be par with the bu's mpg. not to mention 30hp more and w/i 5lbft of my 3.1 , but with 2 more gears.

GM would not be happy to hear that its drivetrains barely able to get 35 mpg in a Cruze were getting 45 mpg in a 45 year old Chevy II.

Actually, it probably won't. Older cars are inferior in every way except perhaps weight (on some economy models). Weight has a lot less bearing on the Highway MPG numbers than aerodynamics. You'll probably see a bit more in the city, but on the freeway you'll probably lose out. At cruise speeds, you don't have to change velocity much and as long as you are not changing velocity the amount of power it takes to keep 1 ton or 10 tons or 100 tons at 65 mph is exactly the same if the exterior size and shape is exactly the same. In other words, it's all aerodynamic drag. This is why trains are so economical on fuel use per ton of stuff hauled. It's a long, narrow, object with extremely low rolling resistance wheels that doesn't change speeds a lot once it gets going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings