Jump to content
Create New...

G. David Felt

Premium Subscriber
  • Posts

    36,873
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    382

Everything posted by G. David Felt

  1. Why take on a debt ridden company that is poorly managed and clearly only has a few things of value that does not justify the cost to get. Yet since Common Sense is not Common some people will look at this as a good idea to a point. I agree that Chrysler could have their product line of the few things, mainly the Minivan rolled into Chevy and you kill Chrysler. Dodge should be merged into GMC / Buick / Dodge. Dodge becoming their performance line. Ram is sold off to recapture spent money to a company that wants to get into the US market for trucks. Mercedes Benze should buy them as it would be a superior truck line than NissaBenze could do. Jeep would be GM's stand alone 4x4 offroad group. Cadillac and Maserati become their dual Luxury line, Kill off the stupid Alfa once and for all and stop wasting money on it. It is a History Foot note.
  2. The Next Big Bankrupt Auto Company! They should be stopping R&D on dead brands or trying to revive them and focus on what they have. This will destroy many lives if they do go bankrupt again.
  3. I love the way GMC did their LED's Much better than the Chevy Face. Though it looks like the 2017 will get these headlights also now or something similar.
  4. Very Cool, 8sp and 10sp transmissions should help with MPG. Aluminum is fine as I think they will do better with using bolt on body parts rather than the whole bed at this point. Should be a nice ride to replace the current.
  5. Would require getting the Gov to get out of telling the Auto companies to include all the stupid nanny devices. Airbags all over, backup cameras, lane warnings, blind spot detection, etc. It is amazing how many people think driving as well as Internet access, cell phones and TV are rights, not the Privileges they earn. I say we need to make it harder to get a drivers licenses. Way too many idiots out there driving that should not be. Auto's were plenty safe in the 70's and we could have them as simple as then if it was not for the Gov trying to tell you what to do and when.
  6. Body Snatchers
  7. The Renegade is new, different and so will make a splash and have sales. Down side, BIG DNA from the Terrible Fiat 500 line. Not sure I would be willing to take a risk on it as they have way to many problems right now on their new auto releases. Yet to compare external and internal pics while nice, The Chevy does stand on it's own.
  8. Sweet looking ride. I love it that you removed that airdam underneath. It looks way better.
  9. Interesting, they should do well, I am just worried about their DNA connection to the Poorly built 500 World.
  10. 99% of the ATS out does both MB and BMW. Just too many Badge snobs with their heads buried in the sand like an Ostrich and poor marketing / advertising to get people to check out the superior product. Cadillac would do well to have MB and BMW identically equipped auto's on hand to allow real comparison to their ATS and CTS and this is where you will see the separation of the Curds from the Whey!
  11. Going up against a stale product line from MB and BMW. The tweaks show they have not done much on their product line and a C refresh is nice but not revolutionary. Cadillac can and I believe will trounce people like you who only want them to fail to justify your NissaBenzeing of MB to be just another also ran of mass produced auto's.
  12. Peas
  13. Very true, people just starting out are not going to be spending on Hybrids or EV's. They need as cheap as possible transportation..
  14. Cherries
  15. That is good information that I was not aware of. I find it interesting, but also still feel it is a waste of money to try and revive this name plate to the US when they have so many quality problems on product lines already here. It would make better sense to investing in making the existing products top in their market segments than to bring in another name plate.
  16. With the terrible quality of auto's in the larger family, this is a waste of valuable R&D dollars that should be invested in the other product lines to make them solid and grow their already established low Quality to a higher one. This is truly a waste of money.
  17. Lovely cars, there were truly something special.
  18. Personally the more I look at this the more Bland and just plain boring this car is.
  19. So their Models at the auto show will be more reliable than the auto's. Maybe by 2027 is what he meant.
  20. anybody
  21. This was a car that should have never been. If it was not for the R&D cost, I am sure they would have killed it after year 2.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search