ccap41

Already makes the Bison look like crap.

Personally, I don't care who or when. Point fingers at whoever you'd like. I just want it even for both parties. Charge 100% tariffs, charge 0% tariffs. Whatever it is, just be equal.

If US companies are charged to sell to X country, I believe it is fair to then charge X country's companies to sell their products here.

I'm for them if we're being charged them. I'm for whatever is most fair. None of the one-sided BS.

I don't know the details about everything out west but I'm not sure what else the federal government can do.

Don't dis-include the X as being an overpriced SUV. For comparison's sake, I would have liked to see the GLE63 or the (god forbid, it's ugly) GLE63 Coupe.

If I'm buying old-school and retro I'm buying something like this. Royal Enfield "Royal Enfield was quick to point out that the bike, as it stands, is a concept and not slated for production. It's still made out of feasible parts, and the badging appears to show that the engine in it is a new 838cc v-twin with oil cooling, rumored to be based on a collaboration with Polaris. "

I don't care what it's called because both those names are pretty gnarly.

What you're really getting with the Bison is an appearance package with skid plates and fog lights.

There aren't REAL upgrades though.. I can't imagine buying skid plates, non-body matching bumpers and tires would set you back that much. The Rubicon gets actual upgrades with 33inch tires, a true crawl ratio, sway bar disconnect, and Dana 44 axles(front and rear). Also, the Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon starts at 43k.

$5-6,000 for that stuff?!? There's no way I would buy this over a ZR2 or at the 50k price I'd special order a base model Raptor.

Oh yeah, I knew what the 2WD was for. I was just saying the wording was funny because within the same paragraph it says you can get 2WD and it also says you cannot get that on the EV Ural.

This is very confusing to me: "A two-wheel-drive Gear Up runs $16,499" "And Ural fanatics may very well be disappointed that this EV is powered by a single wheel with no option for on-demand power from the sidecar wheel."

For 15-20k I would never consider something like this. Triumph Street Triple For Less than 10k, 112hp, 54tq, 53mpg, it is fuel efficient enough for me.

Absolutely true. Those 1.5 gallon fill-ups only take a couple minutes.

Welcome!

I don't know what the range of these are supposed to be but some of the riders are already content stopping every 50-90 miles with their itty bitty tanks.

Correct. That's why I also said this > They're such a great size. They're not too big. They're not small. I also love the look of them.

I have definitely seen Escalades and Navigators with car trailers at tracks. I would wager interior space is close to the top of the list. and 0-60 being a tenth or three is also low on the list. They're all quick enough to make passing a breeze.

Happy Birthday, @Drew Dowdell!

I think it is safe to say that once a car is running 13.0 (and it isn't some AWD w/ auto trans)or quicker it is almost all driver skill.

Per Lincoln's website: Navigator 4x2: 8700lbs Navigator 4x4: 8300lbs Navigator L 4x2: 8400lbs Navigator L 4x4 8100lbs Correct, the GLS63 per Mercedes' website is rated at 7500lbs.

The new Gator did it in 5.5 per C/D

Shocker, SMK doesn't think a vehicle will do well that isn't German or Mercedes.

The GLS is not in the same league as the 'Slade or 'Gator. I'd argue they are all doing "fine". They might not be leading sales in their respective segments but none of them are towards the bottom, as far as I know.