ccap41

Especially when there are three vehicles at the home. If you truly wanted an EV one of those three could be an EV and your wife would never deal with them being too small for her to drive.

I know for a fact none of those drive like a car. At all. The fact you even say that is mind blowing.

Not the greatest across the board but nice to see some things are up, lol.

Your spouse drives all of those vehicles regularly?

It seems like a great city car but that's about it. For the money spent, I can't see buying this over a Chevy Sonic or other sub compact cars for around 15-18k and it would take an eternity for the increased fuel mileage to pay itself off.

That's what you SAY but that's sure not what it LOOKS like. 100% spot on.

LOL Your head is hunched forward and that door cannot close with your leg NEXT TO the driver's seat. You have no clue how happy I am to see you not comfortably fit in the back of the Bolt after all you preach about it. @ocnblu

How big of a back seat do those EV's have? Asking for a friend.

I am surprised they aren't more competitive than they are. I don't think they could ever get a foothold to bury any of the D3 though. Even if they made the best product, hands down, it would still be 4th place, imo. It would sell better but I just can't see a Japanese truck maker taking any of the D3 down. People still believe it though. That's all that really matters. I talk to people looking at vehicles all the time who aren't enthusiasts at all and Toyota and Honda are always on the top of their lists without even knowing vehicle names. My brother bought a CR-V last weekend because his wife's family had good luck with Hondas in the past.

It's just nothing I would want.

Um... No thank you. It's cool and all but not my cup of tea.

It does look good, @Drew Dowdell!

The Tundra is closer to catching the Sierra than the Sierra is to the Ram.

Their volume could stay the exact same with the extra 25-50k, they'd still be making more cash.

Oh damn, I never even thought of that.

Oh I know. I'm just saying they probably don't want to slap the V Series title to something and not have it a true V Series.

Because that's the spirit of the V Series. Same reason Ford didn't want to slap ST badges on their Sport models. You can't just throw monster power at something and call it an AMG, M, RS, or V.

I'm just not sure if they want the investment for a vert stout AWD system and the work to eliminate torque steer. There likely isn't enough market for such vehicles. I think a V-Sport would be plenty as they'd still be in the 300-400hp range, depending on the model. Of course a true V for the 'Slade would likely be easier and should have been done years ago. I guess their biggest problem is in order to make a true V series they likely want them to handle accordingly and it's probably near impossible to get an Escalade to dance the way the engineers would like.

I don't think they will do a "real" V in any of the front drive-based vehicles but I could see them doing V-Sport versions of all of them, like the XTS.

100% my feelings. The '19 Sierra looks GREAT but the 18' Silverado looks better than the '19.

My head touched the roof line in the ATS and I'm 5'8"... I don't recall anything about the Malibu's rear seats as I haven't been in one. The auto mags were the ones ragging on the back seat of the Malibu.

2.3L EcoBoost*

5' 8", THANK YOU VERY MUCH! But I'm always concerned my taller friends and family have 17 spare inches of rear leg and hear room.

This is neat.

Dang, a couple typos.