ccap41
New Member
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by ccap41
-
My god do I hate that people think AWD is some crazy miracle worker. It's great to have but it still needs to have adequate traction to the ground. I don't think it would be bad if they gave it some on-road nuts like an SS version or Z#####. Just a basic CUV seems pretty lame.. It seems like a good vehicle just a little boring.
-
-
Do they though? Tesla 3 interior BMW 3 interior Bolt interior volume: 94 cubic ft. HR-V interior volume 100 cubic ft. Well I know that.. That's why they sell them in the first place. But if they're trying to get the technology out to people it just feels like something that would start smaller with much larger volumes before a much larger 3-rower. GM with their fckn Kohls sales model. ?
-
-
-
-
-
Right?!? I thought about looking into a used one as a toy last week and thought I'd look up what can be done to get about 200whp and a couple grand gets you almost jack sh!t?!? Super disappointing. Does your future toy need to have a back seat? I would think the Mustang's V8 would make it an easy sell to the kiddos...less so to the wifey...
-
-
@Cubical-aka-Moltar @Drew Dowdell @ocnblu, Sorry for the tagging. Testing something and accidently posted and I couldn't delete, only edit.
-
-
I'm pretty sure CAFE has to do with footprint and that's why vehicles have gotten larger and not smaller. @Drew Dowdell(It won't allow me to tag anybody else for some reason) but doesn't CAFE have to do with the footprint of the vehicle as well as the fuel economy? Isn't that why we need a CAFE score of like 50mpg and not literally 50mpg.
-
I think that might be it. The proportions just seem a tad off everywhere on the X7 compared to the X5. Granted, I've always though the X5 was one of the best proportioned and designed SUVs so there's that.
-
X5 looks way better to me. It's nothing major just a bunch of small tweaks that make it look better to me.
-
-
-
-
But MeRcEdEs iS tHe BeSt
-
And I'm not missing the point. I think you are. You ask about size for every vehicle no matter the class and then act surprised or like the automaker is oblivious to different size humans. Then go the next size up, CT6. There are vehicles that will fit you and you know from the outside which ones those are. ATS vs ATS-L is not an additional 16 inches of rear legroom. It's 3.3 inches. Which is still smaller than a CTS so if you already said the CTS was too small why are you even bringing up the ATS? If you are interested in an ATS-L, buy a CTS.
-
-
-
They absolutely are. They probably make a killing off them too because I see quite a few of them and I highly doubt they give any discounts on them. I hate them but it's a smart move on the dealers' side.
-
My local Chevy/GMC dealer sells new 1500's with wheels/tires and a small lift brand new. They're not terrible but they're definitely on the track to be true bro-dozers.
-
2500 size comparison
-
I have also looked at and sat in the new truck, parked next to the last gen.
