surreal1272

Maybe read what El Kabong said. He assured all it was the Camaro that was quicker. He is even saying so on M/T comment section. So I went straight to the source. Got a problem with it? Again, get your knickers out of a bunch. In case you missed it, I agreed with your claim about the 0-60 but it was clear as day on that video what it was and didn't require the lengths you went to in order to prove Bong wrong. All you were doing there was instigating another never ending argument about absolutely nothing. Again, in case you are not getting the gist and just want to continue to argue and insult me, Bong is wrong here. Actually, by asking the source, I ended the argument. Well just go ahead and give yourself that much deserved pat on the back when anyone could have seen that by watching the video itself. It only took me one viewing to see who came out ahead.

Valid comparison using your logic and the fact that the discounts on those two are from the dealers and not the manufacturer.

My argument is if one need to put 20-25k on the hood of a limited edition car to move it, obviously it was a rip of to begin with. And take a look at the as tested price in the video. It clearly shows that 10k difference is IN FACT correct. It is not a rip off. That is pure opinion on your part. Guess when dealers offer $12K off on a new F-150, it must be a rip off too, based on your logic. Remember, this is not Chevrolet offering this deals. These were from select dealers. Man, you can't even handle it when I agree with you so unless you have something productive to say to me for once, don't bother replying. And yes you are correct about the $10K difference. I was referencing a page that was not correct. Sue me.

Maybe read what El Kabong said. He assured all it was the Camaro that was quicker. He is even saying so on M/T comment section. So I went straight to the source. Got a problem with it? Again, get your knickers out of a bunch. In case you missed it, I agreed with your claim about the 0-60 but it was clear as day on that video what it was and didn't require the lengths you went to in order to prove Bong wrong. All you were doing there was instigating another never ending argument about absolutely nothing. Again, in case you are not getting the gist and just want to continue to argue and insult me, Bong is wrong here.

Why would anyone have to ask the people who did the test? The video clearly shows the GT350R at 3.9 and the Z28 at 4.0. Not really a big deal though, going by the logic used by some when the SS beat the GT by 4/10ths of second going 0-60. Again, this is not surprising given the fact that we have a new model against an outgoing model (on an older heavier platform). Now what happens when that Z/28 goes to the much lighter Alpha platform? That is what everyone who is not a blind fanboy wants to see (and by "blind fanboy" I mean both brands before some here get their knickers in a knot).

Here's the part where the hypocrisy gets exposed. For pages upon pages (up until the last two), at least one poster has gone on and on about the Z28 being beaten by a car that is $10K cheaper (which wasn't correct to begin with but that's beside the point). In fact one harped on and on asking the following, "Why would someone pay 13% more ( MSRP per video ) for a Z/28 that doesn't perform as well as a track car, street car and drag car ( not intended function ) compared to the GT350R?" Now that the remaining Z28s are considerably cheaper, what is their argument?

We have been told over and over again, that the Z/28 is in the low/mid 50k's... Thats why I said knock 20k off... 72k-20k = low/mid 50k.... Seems you have not been paying attention. Take a look at the link I added. http://jalopnik.com/on-black-friday-go-buy-yourself-a-camaro-z-28-with-a-r-1744593201 And I do not recall Frisky saying " used " either. Can you link me to it? That link was not there the first time. Having looked at the updated link, yes I can see that there are some for that price. You were right but if you are expecting an apology, you are barking up the wrong tree because you have not earned an apology and will never get one from me. You know why if you search hard enough. BTW, it also doesn't change the fact that you cherry picked the 302 price as well when there are plenty for a far lower price than $52K. That is all. Now excuse me for not being impressed by a huge mark down of an OUTGOING platform on an OUTGOING car. What do you mean by if it's a 20% of unit?

I did and it's a $52K 302 with only 5K miles. Now show me where a Z/28, much less a new one, is selling for the price you claim. Back up what you THINK Frisky said and find me this mythical $50K NEW Z/28 or just drop it. Honestly, it is that simple because all you want to do is the same crap you do at MT and argue semantics. Show me the Z/28 for that price. It's that simple.

This this this. And with GM having to knock off 20k to move Z/28's off the lots, the bean counters may think twice about making another Z/28. ( Ford had no issues moving the Boss 302's - used ones are going for a premium.) http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?listingId=358117636 Okay, so I'm going to be a liar this one time because your post is just out in deep left field here. Show us where Chevrolet is offering $20K off of a NEW no longer in production Z28. Let me help you with that. http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro-z28-track-car.html As a matter of fact, here is the current offer on the Z28. "Finance 0% APR for 72 months Plus $1,000 Purchase Bonus Cash" For the record, with a current price of $72K, I am pretty sure it never was $92K and if you are referring to what Dingo said a few days ago, then you clearly were not paying attention to what he said. Now, regarding your 302 claim, I guess it's real easy to make your claim when you pick the highest priced one by a private seller (never mind the one 5,000 miles on it hence the stupid price). Now here is one from a dealer with average miles. http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?zip=85345&endYear=2016&modelCode1=MUST&showcaseOwnerId=73009&startYear=1981&makeCode1=FORD&listingType=used&listingTypes=used&searchRadius=50&showcaseListingId=410630270&trim1=MUST%7CBoss+302&mmt=%5BFORD%5BMUST%5BMUST%257CBoss%2B302%5D%5D%5B%5D%5D&listingId=412060730&Log=0 We have been told over and over again, that the Z/28 is in the low/mid 50k's... Thats why I said knock 20k off... 72k-20k = low/mid 50k.... Seems you have not been paying attention. So you did not pay attention to the fact that he said that you can get a USED one for $50-55K. There is a big difference there having known that ONE fact. Now, having said that, the cheapest USED Z/28 in my area is $61K with two others fetching $67K and $70K respectively, so again I say, you are the one that needs to pay attention to what is being said.

This this this. And with GM having to knock off 20k to move Z/28's off the lots, the bean counters may think twice about making another Z/28. ( Ford had no issues moving the Boss 302's - used ones are going for a premium.) http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?listingId=358117636 Okay, so I'm going to be a liar this one time because your post is just out in deep left field here. Show us where Chevrolet is offering $20K off of a NEW no longer in production Z28. Let me help you with that. http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro-z28-track-car.html As a matter of fact, here is the current offer on the Z28. "Finance 0% APR for 72 months Plus $1,000 Purchase Bonus Cash" For the record, with a current price of $72K, I am pretty sure it never was $92K and if you are referring to what Dingo said a few days ago, then you clearly were not paying attention to what he said. Now, regarding your 302 claim, I guess it's real easy to make your claim when you pick the highest priced one by a private seller (never mind the one 5,000 miles on it hence the stupid price). Now here is one from a dealer with average miles. http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?zip=85345&endYear=2016&modelCode1=MUST&showcaseOwnerId=73009&startYear=1981&makeCode1=FORD&listingType=used&listingTypes=used&searchRadius=50&showcaseListingId=410630270&trim1=MUST%7CBoss+302&mmt=%5BFORD%5BMUST%5BMUST%257CBoss%2B302%5D%5D%5B%5D%5D&listingId=412060730&Log=0

Some people can't even take a simple complement about their favorite car without a snide remark. Tsk tsk tsk.

Yes, hang your hat on the NEW GT350R beating the outgoing Z/28. It was a well deserved showing by the GT350R and it is certainly a change from the NEW GT getting beaten by the NEW SS earlier this month (by more sizable performance margin than the other two). Now, we will see what GM has in store next year. Again, it's a great time to be a fan of these cars, no matter your allegiance.

Drew, honestly, preemptively modding remarks like that is strange. Should I have qualified it as to why it would have helped? Interesting that you had no problem with his modding when you first came here.

Again, as Drew has told you at least hundred times now, Cadillac has a V8 option and a twin turbo V8 on the way. Just drop the misinformation you keep slinging.

Cadillac offers a V8 in the mid-size CTS-V for the low 90s. MB only offers a V8 in the mid size E-Class when you fork over $100K for the privilege. Not sure what you are trying to prove here based on that simple fact. Unless you get an E550 coupe or convertible which are $60-65k with a V8. I am not saying the V8 cars are value, but that other luxury makers offer them. Luxury brands are supposed to offer the best and supposed to offer excess. CT6 has no V8 when that the common engine for the large sedan segment. A turbo V6 is plenty for most, but I still think luxury and sports cars need that aspirational product too. You don't see a turbo 4 or turbo v6 in a Corvette, even though it would make for adequate performance, because they know buyers want the most power they can get and will pay a premium for it. I mentioned the V8 about the Continental. The MKZ is bigger than an E-class or 5-series, the same length as an Infiniti Q70. The Continental will be as big as an LS460, K900, Genesis/Equus/G90 and those are V8 cars. Oncblu is 100% right about the primary Focus. You know it is coming eventually. A Lincoln Explorer would have higher margins so they'll do that first. Until this generation, the CTS-V was offered in a coupe as well so you are not making a very good case here. Again, you expose your bias when you expect companies, such as Lincoln and Cadillac, to sell something for dirt cheap (on top of that) that your own favorite brand doesn't even come close to doing. Stop bringing trucks into this. Good lord, you love beating a dead horse. If you don't understand why their are not turbo V6s in GM's full size trucks (especially when their V8s do it better for less most of the time), then you have not been paying attention at all to the market.

Cadillac offers a V8 in the mid-size CTS-V for the low 90s. MB only offers a V8 in the mid size E-Class when you fork over $100K for the privilege. Not sure what you are trying to prove here based on that simple fact.

So now there is a distinction because there wasn't one, according to you, back on page 2? "production vs availability is pretty much semantics in my book." (your exact words) Because the mods asked us not to bicker, I will not go into detail, but obviously it has to do with each context of each discussion -- which you cherry picked each from. Now, about the comparison. How do you think each manufacturer will up their game in the next rounds? Nothing was cherry picked. It was a direct correlation, but I digress. Again, this win did not surprise me. Ford went all out on the GT350R and it shows. Now, next year we will see what GM has up it's sleeve, since it has already been caught testing the next possible ZL1/Z28 (depending on which source you want to use). It's a great time to be a fan of these cars.

So now there is a distinction because there wasn't one, according to you, back on page 2? "production vs availability is pretty much semantics in my book." (your exact words)

It is amusing that some think that GM doesn't have any other options in the high performance engine game. So yeah, very little exotic about the FP 5.2L, other than the FP crank. As has been said over and over. And no, I never said GM never had other options, now did I. I wonder who the people are that think GM doesn't have any other HiPo options in the engine game? It's amusing one would even post that some think that. well, when you don't implicate or name anyone, it sure is easy to make statement like that. Edited because I went too far and can admit it. Sorry Drew.

It is amusing that some think that GM doesn't have any other options in the high performance engine game. So yeah, very little exotic about the FP 5.2L, other than the FP crank. As has been said over and over. And no, I never said GM never had other options, now did I. I wonder who the people are that think GM doesn't have any other HiPo options in the engine game? It's amusing one would even post that some think that. What is a "wonder" is the fact that you seem to think I owe you anymore more explanations about anything ever Cosworth of MT. You have to ask why, then you have not been paying attention. Let's remove the extra "more" shall we (too late to edit apparently)? And let me revise the last sentence. "If you have to ask why, then you have not been paying attention."

It is amusing that some think that GM doesn't have any other options in the high performance engine game. So yeah, very little exotic about the FP 5.2L, other than the FP crank. As has been said over and over. And no, I never said GM never had other options, now did I. I wonder who the people are that think GM doesn't have any other HiPo options in the engine game? It's amusing one would even post that some think that. What is a "wonder" is the fact that you seem to think I owe you anymore more explanations about anything ever Cosworth of MT. You have to ask why, then you have not been paying attention.

It is amusing that some think that GM doesn't have any other options in the high performance engine game. So yeah, very little exotic about the FP 5.2L, other than the FP crank. As has been said over and over. And no, I never said GM never had other options, now did I. Did I mention you by name? Nope. Sure didn't.

So there really isn't anything "exotic" (your word) or special about the 5.2L despite the endless PR hype brought on here? Thanks for clarifying that. Oh, my mistake. It does make a pretty noise so maybe that is what's special about it and that's it. It is amusing that some think that GM doesn't have any other options in the high performance engine game.

While you try to focus on his obvious over-statement (no one has ever said the Z28s steering felt numb, including Pobst himself.). His statements from the last Z28 retest via MT. Pay special attention to the last two words at the bottom. Remember. These are straight from the mouth of Randy Pobst. “Oh my God, you fixed it!” came the voice. “This is so much better. It’s back. This is how it should perform. We were so right to name this car Best Driver’s Car.” "“It’s funny — it was loose and sucky last time,” he said. “Now, it’s so hooked up. It’s back to the car we chose for Best Driver’s Car. It is so well-balanced and hooked up. It’s predictable. What a pleasure to drive. I could just attack Turn 8, I was in the power way in there, forget about the brakes. It just felt so fast. It handles so well. The grip is so high. It’s the car we love again. Last time, it was loose. It wouldn’t put power down. It was just kind of nervous. This time, it was just so fantastic in every way. It was balanced all the way around Turn 2 sweeper, maybe just a wee bit of understeer. At the end of the corner, I could just roll into the power, drive right off that corner. I kept getting on the power sooner and sooner and sooner. I’m pissed I can’t go faster, ’cause I think the tires just don’t have it in ’em. After a couple laps, they’re just not as good as they are when they’re fresh. The car is so well-balanced. The car is nicely behaved on bumps. Over the jump over here — no problem. I was shifting right in the air, and when it landed, it just hooked and kept going. It was just an absolute pleasure. It’s one of the best-handling factory cars I’ve ever driven. I wouldn’t change the car a lick if I was going to go racing right now. I would leave it exactly as it is. I would just tie the crew’s hands up, like ‘Don’t you touch this car!’ It’s perfect.”" So next time, you might want to remember that before you try to hang certain statements on one person who has driven both cars rather extensively, especially when you totally miss the context by which these things are spoken. Those last few words, they were before Randy drove the R, right! Refer to what others have said when publications declare a winner in a comparo and why they really don't mean much, case and point, the same driver who stated perfection on the Z/28 a year ago, now says the steering is "numb" when that term has NEVER been used to described the best drivers car from last year. Just think about it for more than a minute before you and your buddy hang your hat on the "numb steering" statement. The funniest part of this is that you are hanging your hat on the words of a man who has been less than complimentary towards past Mustang variants (that you and other Ford fans promptly criticized) but now that he is being less than stellar towards the Z/28, you are all about some Randy Pobst. Just very interesting how that perspective suddenly changes when it favors your brand.

While you try to focus on his obvious over-statement (no one has ever said the Z28s steering felt numb, including Pobst himself.). His statements from the last Z28 retest via MT. Pay special attention to the last two words at the bottom. Remember. These are straight from the mouth of Randy Pobst. “Oh my God, you fixed it!” came the voice. “This is so much better. It’s back. This is how it should perform. We were so right to name this car Best Driver’s Car.” "“It’s funny — it was loose and sucky last time,” he said. “Now, it’s so hooked up. It’s back to the car we chose for Best Driver’s Car. It is so well-balanced and hooked up. It’s predictable. What a pleasure to drive. I could just attack Turn 8, I was in the power way in there, forget about the brakes. It just felt so fast. It handles so well. The grip is so high. It’s the car we love again. Last time, it was loose. It wouldn’t put power down. It was just kind of nervous. This time, it was just so fantastic in every way. It was balanced all the way around Turn 2 sweeper, maybe just a wee bit of understeer. At the end of the corner, I could just roll into the power, drive right off that corner. I kept getting on the power sooner and sooner and sooner. I’m pissed I can’t go faster, ’cause I think the tires just don’t have it in ’em. After a couple laps, they’re just not as good as they are when they’re fresh. The car is so well-balanced. The car is nicely behaved on bumps. Over the jump over here — no problem. I was shifting right in the air, and when it landed, it just hooked and kept going. It was just an absolute pleasure. It’s one of the best-handling factory cars I’ve ever driven. I wouldn’t change the car a lick if I was going to go racing right now. I would leave it exactly as it is. I would just tie the crew’s hands up, like ‘Don’t you touch this car!’ It’s perfect.”" So next time, you might want to remember that before you try to hang certain statements on one person who has driven both cars rather extensively, especially when you totally miss the context by which these things are spoken.