Jump to content
Create New...

balthazar

In Hibernation
  • Posts

    40,855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    583

Everything posted by balthazar

  1. ^ CTS doesn't compete with the 3-series. 2014 BMW 528i : MSRP : 49500, average paid : 44997, diff: 4503 2014 CTS base : MSRP : 45100, average paid : 42616, diff: 2484 The CTS IS the best bang for the buck, even with less off sticker. YTD 5-series U.S. sales : 37761 YTD CTS U.S. sales : 20639 Perfect. We need to break the mindset that used to say 'Cadillac is part of GM, therefore it should outsell every one of it's competitors'. Neither necessary nor desirable. I would like to see the CTS coupe & wagon continue on the current 3rd gen, tho, regardless of the sales volume. Especially the coupe!
  2. We just had a bunch of divisions ash-canned, the call is going up for MORE already?? The only major OEM with a lux brand that has only ONE other is mercedes, and only there because their range topper just flopped. BMW is 3 brands, Jag is part of the Tata conglomerate, audi is part of the VW conglomerate, Lexus is the 3rd cog @ toyoyo…. not sure where 'most have 2 brands' comes from.
  3. Cadillac/Buick joint dealerships are not common. I've not seen any in my travels in my state. GM made a move to pair Buick & GMC dealerships decades ago...
  4. Mini is diving like a submarine.
  5. neither does anyone else, IMO. -- -- -- Back to the ATS.... One wonders how mercedes turns away so many buyers from it's c-class; it has the worst of the 3 (ATS, 3, C) front legroom. It also has LLEESSSS rear legroom than the ATS, wonder the F how THAT escaped so many rag journalists? Why exclude "so many" potential buyers????????????????? BMW 3 : 42.0 / 35.1 = 77.1 Audi A3 : 41.2 / 35.1 = 76.3 ATS : 42.5 / 33.5 = 76.0 <---------- best in class front legroom MB c-class : 41.7 / 33.4 = 75.1 <---------- worst in class overall legroom. Yeah, let's all moan & groan over JUST the ATS rear legroom again- feels so go-oooood to vent those fact-supported frustrations.
  6. what full size sedans??
  7. It's all marketing- no one has any Earthy idea what platforms are under what models and no one cares. If 'K' means 'compact', why was the old C230 hatchback a 'C'?? If the numbers are engine size, why is the S550 not the 'S470'? Daimler is just farting around with alpha-numerics with little direction.
  8. a LOT of folk overlook flaws to protect the status quo…………………… . . .. .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . .
  9. I stuck this here 'cause I'm not sure what year this might be: I stuck this here because I'm not sure what this intention might be: Saw Rick Dore walking around- 1st tier car builder and on the show 'Masters of the Car Hoard' or whatever it's entitled. Saw a flyer with this car pictured on it: … Dore built it for James Hetfield, tho this car wasn't there.
  10. Some stuff from a north Jersey car show, in reverse chronological order :
  11. Not in this neighborhood- industrial zone. Warehousing is all I can see going up. Time will tell.
  12. Today's pics. Plant will probably be totally flat by the end of next week. Compare to old pic above:
  13. Exhaust tacked, final checked, then finish welded. Here's the 'tacked' pics of the 2 driver's-side pieces : Nice smooth mandrel bends for that screaming 105 HP.
  14. Probably not, but they should. It's more appropriate here than even with the Silvie, IMO.
  15. ^ the measurements are posted above; length is pretty much the same, but height & width are up. I agree with summer cruiser; would like to see a regular cab 2WD unit (not that these will ever appeal to me; I'm a full-size truck buyer).
  16. So it's relatively the same length/WB, but it's a foot taller and half a foot wider. I'm not sure it's not a smidge too large- the width is nice but the height is of no advantage.
  17. Metuchen/Edison did have a good rep, unlike nearby Mahwah (which actually got the axe because of quality & environmental issues.) Wish I knew what plant my '40 Ford was built in. It wasn't Metuchen/Edison- that opened in '48. This is the Metuchen/Edison plant site as of when it was demolished circa 2008/9 (it closed in 2007): That patch of 'grass' to the far left is home to a Sams' club now, the rest of the property is still empty. How many F'ing Starbucks, Targets & pizza places does NJ really need??
  18. On a 2-car trailer going down the highway: 1st gen Corvair convert, black over yellow, very clean, and '60 Eldorado Seville hardtop, pale icy green, very nice shape.
  19. I have witnessed (in that I have seen the before & afters with my own eyes) the demolition of both the local GM Linden plant & the Ford Edison plant here in NJ. GM-Linden is still a huge fenced lot of small piles of concrete rubble, Ford-Edison has the questionable 'improvement' of a Sam's Club and... weeds. My '64 Catalina was built in Linden, so on occasions I would drive by the plant in it, I would yell out my open window '834L88280 STILL ON ACTIVE DUTY!' I'm nuts like that. Just this week I am likewise witness to the demolition of the New Brunswick Delco plant, built in 1946 for battery production to support the East Coast assembly plants. Had a neat, low appearance with a number of rounded exterior 'corners' in a orange-ish brick. My father-in-law worked there for a short while. Delco #12 was a steady producer, getting plant enlargements over the years to at least double it's initial size. Plant enlargements: It was sold off in the GM-Delco spin off, to Delphi, then Johnson Controls owned it. This site has been dormant since 2007. Now it's coming down. I for one will miss it's silent symbolism of iron-backed manufacturing. I doubt anything will go in the hole to replace it- the immediate area will not support retail there.
  20. ...now. But they JUST introduced a FWD econosedan priced under the median new car price, in their most important market in the world (AND killed off their top-shelf lux sedan to boot). They are definitely changing course...
  21. Hard to tell from these pics, but I agree it looks pretty big. Whats the exterior specs vs. an S-10?
  22. Let mercedes follow Chevrolet & toyota in continually pushing global sales (at the expense of perception). Cadillac can stay truly exclusive. Cadillac has no need to challenge anyone on sales volume, that's low-level pedestrian brand territory. Mercedes has no choice. I will be watching maybach 2.0- other than a longer WB, it's not another body style, just a stretched version of the existing. What will really be interesting is the perception of failure around maybach 1.0 and how will that effect sales. I predict it flops again & gets pulled inside of 5 years. MB is willing to blow more billions on this trim package, yet the CLAh is FWD.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search