Flybrian

Agreed completely. One big thing holding Chrysler/Dodge back right now is that they offer the exact same vehicles with different styling. The budget 300 is cheaper than the budget Charger. Chrysler sold the Voyager for less than the Caravan for a few years. This is a problem.

Anymore entries, please let me know ASAP. I'd like to get at least a few more people. Anyone? Its a blank canvas! Blank!

We have a good number of entries, so anyone needing an extension to finish up your work must let me know immediately, otherwise we close shop at midnight.

I believe its been suggested in the past that we have a GM Media section that would have links to all the GM-related videos people have dug up as well. That, combined with an Image Directory, sounds like a good idea. Look for it very soon. Thanks for the suggestion!

Buick Lucerne as said. HHR is getting a turbo'd 2.0l Ecotec, so that solves my issues. DTS needs a bump, too.

That looks very much like a Photoshop.

If Rick Buda is there, tell him I said hi.

How is filling up a Diesel car tricky?

GMC Acadia (FWD) Old - 18/26 New - 16/24 Buick Enclave (FWD)

The 19th, sir.

Complaints about the appearance of the third-row. Get real. Remember, that area is designed for cargo, too.

You think these mirrors are bad? Look at a Lexus IS. But good writeup.

The PM alert thing doesn't always go off. Checking now!

More like Plan 9 From Driver's Ed!!. Geez. I remember our Driver's Ed video and textbook mentioned things like if your car has power brakes and if your car has power steering. Uh. Yeah.

If the lock is flush and your power locks fail for some reason, how will you unlock the door? Solution: put the lock with the handle. Cleaner, classier.

So why does their current execution look so bad? The '62's grille is rather bland and nondescript, but its not the centerpiece; rather, the eye-catcher is the dynamic chrome prow that wraps and sweeps down the fuselage over floating round headlamps. Its low, wide, and beautiful. The concept has headlights buried in this rectangular alcove. It looks like a Continental with busted headlamp doors. And the concept's grille is so JC Whitney that I bet they actually sold something very similar for the stock 300. Combined with the absolutely wasteful dead slab of wasteland beneath the headlamp cutouts, and you're left with a bad joke. Its tall, narrow, bulky, has suicide doors, and looks ridiculous...like a Phantom. What irritates me is not ten years ago, Chrysler built this... Its low, long, sleek. Its modern yet classic. Its unmistakably Chrysler and undeniably timeless. The Chronos would transcend age; this 'Imperial' concept would fade worse than an Earl Scheib paintjob.

Why do people think modern American cars are so hard to work on? They're not, unless you're dropping the transmission, which is something 97% of people don't ever do by themselves.

The bread is fine, but the portions for the sandwiches suck. Schlotsky's was similarly pricy, but you got what you paid for.

Can you imagine that? The most unadvanced, archaic, obsolete cars can be propelled by the fuel of the future? Amazing.

Its really an unattractive car and certainly the last thing Chrysler should be worried about building right now. Seriously.

Another pointless waste of money.

Ha. Well, it is. Similarly-priced Saturns I've seen around here are 1st-generations or have like 89k miles.

Noticed this on Craigslist. 2000 Toyota Echo WOW! OMG! For that car to get that mileage is pathetic. :rotflmao:

Damn. That's a nice car/price.

Nothing beats the '58 Bonneville. Nothing.