Jump to content
Create New...

smk4565

Members
  • Posts

    13,776
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. The C8 had a better presentation. I was comparing the events. This Mach-e presentation was overly scripted and even Bill Ford seemed wooden and stiff, he didn’t even seem that excited. Tadge Juecter or however you spell it was super excited and passionate about the C8, he made you want to go out and buy one. Bill Ford and Jim Hackett didn’t sell me on anything.
  2. Obviously these sort of things are a lot of fluff, but they barely talked about performance other than up to 300 mile range and an estimated 0-60 time of the GT. They didn’t talk price or trim levels, or any features outside of Sync. And this was over a half hour, iris like these people don’t know how to sell cars. And judging by recent performance that seems to be the case. When the C8 reveal happened they gave you a price, features engineering, they gave you reasons to buy it. Every reason Ford gave to buy one of these Tesla already does, and probably better than Ford does it.
  3. Sells all day long at $55k if they make that a crossover coupe.
  4. It is a good idea and I am surprised they have not done it already. A lot on consumers want all wheel drive whether they actually need it or not. So this broadens the customer base and gets existing buyers to fork over another $1500 because they think awd is safer.
  5. I think it looks good, but it has a lot of Audi A7 in the rear, which is part why it looks good. But at the same time, since everyone is doing 4-door coupes, if someone made a 3-box sedan it would actually be unique. The decklid looks about 6 inches long which seems ridiculous, but there could be trunk space still with how big that rear window is.
  6. Seems like a good deal.
  7. Hydrogen fuel cell could kill of diesel in bigger trucks, electric will kill it off everywhere else. Combined with emissions standards. Personally I think diesel pickups even the heavy duty ones should be held to the same emissions standards as cars.
  8. If PSA can make money on small cars, they can easily make money on larger cars/SUVs or luxury cars. Everyone wants to dump on Alfa Romeo, and their sales do suck but they and Maserati are the only 2 luxury brands out of this mess of brands they have. Luxury brands are where money is at, so they have to make one of them work. They have DS but that isn't that high and and the sales are tanking on that brand.
  9. They were going to kill the G-wagen back in 2005 or 2006, in fact I think the decision was a done deal to kill it because the GL was coming. But the G-wagen fans lobbied for Mercedes to keep making it so they did.
  10. More horsepower is nice, but keeping price in line is more important because this isn't rear drive so real performance buyers aren't going to buy it. So they need to appeal to that conventional sedan buyer that isn't happy with 200 hp, the people that used to buy Camry, Accord, Altima V6's before they got killed off or will be killed off.
  11. PSA figured out how to make money on small cars, mid-size sedans and small crossovers. The stuff most people lose money on, so I think given the combined pool of R&D budget and overhead cost savings, they will be able to keep a lot of brands profitable. Some of these brands they don't need, I think a survival of the fittest may come into play.
  12. Of course there will be an electric G-class. Daimler has a plan to be carbon neutral in 20 years, so the whole line will have to EV by then, I imagine the G-wagon being one of their icons, will be electric to lead that change.
  13. He might not kill any brands now but “history” isn’t a reason to keep a brand it it doesn’t sell or turn profit. They are going to have to cut a few, Jeep and Ram alone are worth more than FCA so Fiat/DodgeChrysler/Alfa are worth negative money. I think what happens is Peugeot comes to the USA, Fiat leaves USA. And basically they come up with 1 product line that has an Opel badge in Germany, a Dodge badge in the USA, a Vauxhall badge in the UK, etc.
  14. I looks nice inside, most Aston Martins look good on the outside as well. The interior materials and quality look top notch. $189k isn't that bad considering most Aston Martins cost more than that and I don't think look this nice on the inside. This one has AMG V8 power, no V12. Wouldn't surprise me if they do a Lagonda SUV north of $300k, the millionaires and billionaires keep getting richer so the market is there. They had a Lagonda concept that will probably turn into an SUV to slot above the DBX, assuming DBX does well, and I bet the DBX is their #1 seller right out of the gate.
  15. Not successful companies, successful ones stay on schedule. Nissan-Renault is the 3rd biggest car company in the world. They should have money unless Carlos Ghosn took it all.
  16. With this merger things like Giorgio platform or some powertrains will live on no matter what, they might just live on in different brands. Jeep and Ram survive, Peugeot will come to the USA and they are going to call a lot of shots.
  17. That’s not much, especially when one is a rebodied GLA they were given in exchange for the X-class. Mercedes put out an all new E-class with 4 body styles, G-wagon, GLE, GLS, A-class, CLA, refreshed S-class, refreshed C-class, refreshed GLC since 2017.
  18. Very true, but crossover coupe = money to the marketing people. I am shocked there isn’t an Escalade 4-door coupe with a fastback roofline and a 4 seat configuration, they could sell that for $130k easily.
  19. That’s good since I don’t think they have had a new product in about 5 years.
  20. Because it is a coupe they can sell it for $10k more than the regular SUV because buyers are stupid.
  21. Crossover coupe = hottest segment ever!
  22. I feel like the turbo was a good move here, because before the only option was a 184 hp, 180ish lb-ft engine, which isn't a lot for an SUV when with people in it is probably 4,000 lbs. A lot of this segment is 1 engine choice, and maybe 2, but I don't get when when this is probably the largest segment in the industry now. You'd think car makers would have more choices for powertrain, interior colors, option packs, etc. Almost every vehicle in this segment should have a base 4, a turbo 4 and a hybrid option. There wasn't a question in there, but I guess I'd have to ask if the turbo is worth the extra money over the base motor? I tend to think the optional engine is always worth the money, unless it is a car where the base engine is like 500 hp, then different story.
  23. I would say that Mercedes and AMG build faster, more exciting product that BMW. Fastest SUV, fastest wagon, fastest 4-door car around the Nurburgring are AMG's. 6 consecutive F1 championships to Mercedes-AMG as well. BMW has gone a bit soft, they do have a 500 hp X3 M Competition now, so maybe they will turn things around. Need an X7 with over 600 hp. Mercedes is 5k units behind for the year, will be a close finish, although globally I imagine Mercedes will beat them.
  24. I remember when Prius sold over 20,000 a month, now it is down to 6,000 and outsold by the Rav4 Hybrid. That Prius is crazy ugly, I don't know they even bother, just pump up marketing of the Corolla and Camry Hybrid and let them take the sales. Or make Prius a Crossover coupe hybrid and the buying public will go wild. 4Runner is older than dirt and still selling strong, I don't get it. Lexus can kill the GS, RC, IS and just concede that market to the Germans, they lost.
  25. They are up 19% because they had a crappy month in October 2018, A6 and A7 combined last October sold 102 cars.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search