This has gone so far in circles it's become useless.
Show me where I said I didn't want radical change at GM. I even posted my "manifesto" of some of the changes in hardware that GM needs to make. Now, right or wrong, I don't know. However it most certainly was not "more of the same".
You have a beef with the board. Fine, fire them all. Personally, I think Wagoneer has been failing at his job for so long that he deserves to be fired. Look at all the changes Mulally has made over at Ford in such a short time. As I stated in another thread; GM has no excuse, none, zero.
As far as my motivations for getting my CTS, you are right, those are my own. However, GM got a 24 year old who bought his first house a year prior, into it's newest Cadillac luxury sedan by giving him a loyalty rebate for his Cutlass and a conquest rebate for his Continental allowing him to afford the car he so desired. The same day I took delivery of my car, there was another guy around my age who took delivery of a silver CTS.
What was your comment about "not even getting people into the showroom in the first place."? Before the CTS, when was the last time GM was pulling young guys into Cadillac showrooms?
GM has a lot of work to do, I've never denied that. All I want is for you to give credit where it is due. You do nothing but $h! all over every good announcement to come from GM. Even in the announcement about the Volt premiering at Paris, you armed yourself with enough vagueness, "as long as it comes close to production with minimal changes", that you'll still be able to bash it once it's released.
Just.. when a good announcement comes out... stop being an asshole. You can dance your "I told you so" dance in all the negative announcement threads. I'll leave it to you and PCS to figure out who leads and who follows. It's hard enough being a GM fan these days without you bashing everything that comes from the company.