As if the insurance companies needed an excuse to drive rates up......
but still, insurance premiums are not calculated that way. There is no "perception" about it at all. It's all based on past performance.
The equation goes like this:
(Last years medical bills for the entire company + 10%)/number of members in the plan = individual insurance premium for the year.
again, it has nothing to do with any perception at all
Most of the fortune 500 companies, GM included, offer partner benefits. If the insurance thing was going to be an issue it would already have happened!
You cannot marry a goat because a goat cannot legally consent. Same reason you cannot marry a child. The difference is that one day, the child becomes a legal adult, and then they can legally consent.
I like how you throw Darwinism and religion into the same rant.
You are using a logical fallacy call Slippery Slope.
I don't care if you affirm my union or not. That's your business. I just want my union legally protected in all the ways yours would if you were married.
I'll let the nature of english language take it's course on the rest. :AH-HA_wink:
No, it doesn't offend a gay person at all. But when I'm holding hands with my partner while walking through the mall... guess what, you can get over it.
no, you took his statement the wrong way. He was saying how it is hipocritical of people to expect gay people to be invisible <no hand holding, etc> while straight people can be affectionate in public. It isn't the affection that is offensive, it's the hipocracy.
because you keep setting up pins for me to knock down.
eh, we pretty much all agreed it was a stupid commercial, and it is stupid for the gay rights group to get upset over it.... no one else had anything more to say about it so we moved on to a more important discussion.