Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    56,009
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    551

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. Well congratulations on getting married at least! I've done this drive many many times all the way down to Key West from my parent's place in Miami. It is, unfortunately, not a sporting drive at all. Cars I've had on this drive: Sebring Convertible (both 2nd gen and 3rd gen) Mustang Convertible (more than a few) Challenger Lincoln MKS Chrysler 300 Cadillac DTS Mercedes GL (supplied by Benz, not a rental) Jeep Wrangler soft top
  2. What was the new technology in a spring of insufficient tension in an ignition switch? Even the Toyota unintended acceleration wouldn't have changed things had the car had a physical throttle cable instead of drive by wire.... a floormat certainly isn't high tech.
  3. They are, by far, the norm. You don't see a manufacturer throwing a bunch of new technology at a vehicle and then have it end up less safe than its predecessor. The only time you see a vehicle with less power, the engine has been drastically downsized. Sure, the Mitsubishi Mirage may not be all that safe nor powerful... but even then, it is leagues better than the Mirage of 15 years ago which was rated one of the worst vehicles in its day in crash tests.
  4. and safer, and more efficient, and quieter, and more powerful, and cleaner, and more reliable
  5. I was going through old pictures today and found this one of GM's new 9-speed fwd auto.... With my cocktail for size comparison. Look how small it is.
  6. Next refresh on those. There is an XTS refresh coming, so I might expect that to get the first 9-speed in the Epsilon cars. Cadillac is doing yearly rolling changes to their cars, so the XT5 could be right there behind it. for the RWD cars, Cadillac is sticking with the 8-speed for the moment, which is fine with me because it is an excellent transmission.
  7. GM's new 9-speed has all sorts of patents on it because they managed to get 9 forward gears while using about half the parts one would expect in a transmission with that many speeds. I don't understand the full technical ramifications of what GM did, but apparently it is fairly groundbreaking transmission design. It's seriously tiny as far as transmissions go. Physically, there's no reason they couldn't fit it in cars as small as the Spark or Adam, though they won't do it for cost reasons.
  8. Well there is also talk of Holden as a brand going away too... so if this is the current course, I wouldn't be surprised to see GM shed 3 brands (Opel, Vauxhall, Holden) and then just do 2 or 3 brands in all markets except US which also gets GMC. China could support Chevy/Buick/Cadillac, Australia and Middle East could support Chevy and Cadillac. Buick could even make a return to Europe for select models like Verano, Encore, and Regal.
  9. well, I still think this whole thing is an attempt to scare the German unions and government. Also... how sad is it that Mary may have found a buyer for Opel, but Serg couldn't find a buyer for all of FCA?
  10. you can even get CPO S-classes with low mileage for that money. I actually prefer the looks of the GLC over the XT5, but I wouldn't call it particularly better. It's just my subjective opinion on styling
  11. Heck, a CPO CLS for that money. Or a CTS V-sport. Or a heck of alot of Continental. Or a rather nice Genesis G80 V6 AWD.
  12. C&D's GLA45 tester had an as-tested price of $67k I can think of about 200 other vehicles I would choose over the GLA45 for that price.
  13. Most consumers can't even handle a Corolla at 7/10th, so even an Envision is well above their skill grade. RWD v FWD has nothing to do with vehicle ride. The Explorer and Durango ride equally well. You are correct that it is a crowded segment, but even if Cadillac put the XTS V-Sport engine in an XT3, it wouldn't make a difference to the buyers of the segment and would not increase sales in any measurable way. That isn't going to be the way the Cadillac wins sales. Furthermore, the XT5 is mostly not being sold at base prices. The mid-level trims are where the bulk of the sales are and the Platinums are doing fairly well.
  14. Because luxury crossovers aren't performance oriented in 95% of sales. The orientation of the engine doesn't matter. Last warning. Get back on topic. We're talking about compact entry-lux crossovers here. You're limited to the GLA if you want to discuss Benz.
  15. It's simple. Malibu tuning Vs. Regal tuning. Regal tuning is much better and, not counting the GS, there is nothing particularly more expensive about the Regal hardware.
  16. It's a coach built vehicle and the build quality is still junk. You don't get to complain about the frame of the Escalade anymore if you want to continue down that path. Also, get back on topic. We're talking entry lux crossovers here. Not X5s, not Cayennes. You want the alpha platform and the ATS-V engine for something that's going to be priced against the GLA? Try to be more realistic.
  17. A good 4-cylinder diesel. Good 4-cylinder turbo engines. Superior suspension and steering tuning (the Opel people seem to have it down better than the GMNA people, at least for typical consumer products outside of the high performance V-series and Camaro stuff). GMNA and GMDAT can obviously tune a family sedan's ride and drive.... but Opel does it better.
  18. Because there is no point. People who buy crossovers, even luxury crossovers, do not care if the AWD system is FWD based or RWD based. I would bet that 95% of the AWD buyers don't even know what it means. The top three luxury crossovers in terms of sales are the RX, the XT, and the MDX. You've still yet to learn your lesson about praising the Mercedes G-Class Quality.
  19. I've had to hide 90% of the posts in this thread. You people are getting ridiculous with your off topic tangents. Back to the PSA / Opel deal.
  20. There is still a possible brain drain for GM to be concerned about.
  21. Chevy Europe failed because they were peddling old Daewoos.
  22. Not quite. Toyota and Honda have struggled there for years. It wasn't until fairly recently that there was any model overlap between Ford US and Ford EU.
  23. SHELL GAME.... say it with me! It's all accounting tricks. Losses get booked to one division, profits to another. GM China would have nearly NO SALES without all of the R&D coming out of GM Europe. They sell 1 million Buicks a year in China, with most of those being Opel based, meaning none of the R&D for those Opel cars is coming from GM China. That makes China look extra profitable and GM Europe not so much. But now GM has ammunition against the German Unions and the German government.....
  24. Again, it's an accounting shell game. Opel is a major R&D center for GM and the products resulting from that R&D are sold globally.
  25. Pressure on the German unions, pressure on the German government. Trying to impress our own administration.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search