Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    55,976
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    543

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. Usually. The 2.7 is supposed to be a V8 replacement though, so it's priced accordingly and above a non-EB V6. But if someone is comparison shopping a non-EB 3.5 and a 2.7 EB, they're most likely looking at power difference rather than fuel economy. It's when someone is comparison shopping a 5.0 and a 2.7 EB that the fuel economy thing comes into play.
  2. The 500 is a reliability dog, I know, but that doesn't mean the entire company is like that.
  3. As I mentioned, any relaxation of CAFE is going to do next to nothing for manufacturers. California is going to get to keep it's waiver and about a dozen other states follow the California standards. You can't even buy California specific cars anymore.... They just build them all to that standard. Trump is again, over promising and under delivering.
  4. I doubt it, Enclave is showing there. But it's gotta be soon.
  5. There is nothing left or right about pointing out the hypocrisy of a man who tells people to "Buy American" but doesn't buy American himself. It's not even political. Romney told people to buy American and he would roll around in Yukon Denalis and DTSes.... McCain had a CTS.... Obama had a 300 and an Escape Hybrid prior to becoming President. Four Presidential candidates there, across the political spectrum... only one can be called a hypocrite about his automotive purchases against the backdrop of his rhetoric.
  6. I had two friends with similar vintage Firebirds that couldn't stay running when making right hand turns at suburban speeds. I'm still willing to forget about quality problems from 3 decades ago and give GM and Alfa a chance.
  7. This segment doesn't care about 0-60 times. The top 3 players are V6 fwd based cars. Adding a 400 HP variant would increase sales of each by a fraction of a percent. It's just not worth it.
  8. Cadillac beats the MKX in sales.
  9. gah... you have a point there. Tour Cross makes me think this would be the "sports activity vehicle" version of the LaCrosse.
  10. Really? A 1976? Come on now... if we're going to expect people to stop bringing up the Cadillac Cimerron or 8-6-4 in every CTS-V review, we need to let a 1976 Alfa go too. As I said earlier... a faulty sunroof switch isn't that big of a deal. My 2nd year CTS had a similar issue and it was otherwise rock solid after the sunroof dial was replaced under warranty. (I wish they'd bring that dial back as a sunroof control, so much better than the pushbutton)
  11. So what? S-Classes are used as taxis. An excellent platform is an excellent platform. The Edge and Explorer are both at the top of their game with Explorer being the best seller in its segment. This generation of MKX no longer has the same body shell as the Edge, so it is unique in that regard. I too wish that Cadillac would put the 3.6TT in the XT5, but I'm not going to pity Cadillac being beaten in performance by Lincoln when Lincoln is putting out a fantastic product. The MDX is a less than mediocre SUV now... I don't know how Acura sells any of them except for people who refuse to look at anything else. Nearly any similarly sized luxury SUV you can name is better than the MDX. Even some of the "consumer" brand SUVs like Explorer and Grand Cherokee are superior in top trim. I'd even rate the new Acadia Denali better than the MDX and my enthusiasm for the Acadia is about as bright as a night light. My enthusiasm for the XT5 is similarly dim. Why is the MDX so bad? Because they used the badly underbaked Pilot platform. Sure the Pilot is selling okay, but I suspect that it is mostly out of Honda brand loyalty more than anything else. MDX v. MKX... two luxury vehicles that share a platform with more plebian models with very different outcomes.
  12. Why is that sad? The MKX is an excellent vehicle. I'd put it above the MDX and RX, particularly in top trim.
  13. That makes the new Regal sound promising from a performance standpoint. We're in a bit of a jam with what we're going to do about our current car situation and I'm trying to hold out until the new Regal arrives. About not being able to defeat start/stop. I wonder how much of that is an EPA thing. Like do they get bonus points from the EPA for not offering a disable?
  14. I too prefer Tour Ex rather than Tour Cross.
  15. No... that would not be the case. A lot of work goes into creating a modern body shell. Just having a different rear hatch is enough to push that cost over $1,000. An Escalade Sedan with a trunk? That's an idea I can get behind if Cadillac decided to invent it.... again...
  16. I know. Neither AMC nor the Subaru Outback SUS are that recent either. It was more a comment on the idea of what's old is new again when Mercedes fanbois decide that MB has invented something. (See also, Airbag restraints and Anti-Lock Brakes)
  17. Suzuki X-90. Based on the Suzuki Sidekick / Geo Tracker
  18. Fixed that for you.
  19. Copying AMC, Subaru, and Suzuki.
  20. No.. the coupes don't pull those numbers. The whole GLC and GLE lines might, but that is including the .. erm..... GLE/C "sedan".
  21. At the most, I would like to see Cadillac offer the 3.6TT from the XTS in the XT5... that is sufficient without going overboard. And they don't have to reengineer the engine to transverse.
  22. I can see how Cadillac is happy though... they're the second best selling in their market after the RX. I'm sure all five GLE AMG Coupe drivers feel so good feeling superior though....
  23. This is an all new Enclave. New platform and everything.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search