• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Cadillac and Endurance Racing, Take Two!


    • Cadillac makes a return to Endurance Racing

    It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.

    The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.

    Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.

    "Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.

    Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.

    Source: IMSA

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    You see...this is where I think Cadillac is spinning its wheels stupidly going nowhere fast!

    MONEY WASTED BIG TIME!!!

    1. Cadillac's image woes have nothing to do with having a racing heritage...

    First of all, Cadillac hardly has a racing heritage. What? Once or twice in their 100 plus year history Cadillac raced in maybe 5-6 races?

    2. Cadillac's image woes have something to do with an award that was won by them 100 years ago and them not meeting those standards for quite some time...

    The Dewar award...and how Cadillac aint the Standard of the World anymore...

    THAT is what plagues Cadillac...not for the lack of racing cars in 2016...

    They build a Ciel and build it right...people will come back...

    V Series Cadillacs have torn the 'Ring all right...people aren't exactly breaking down the door to own a Cadillac...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good for them. I wish them luck.

     

    Maybe this new class will make the IMSA WeatherTech series exciting. The last few years have been a snore. They've catered to the ugly Daytona Prototypes and they organize the races poorly in many cases. They need to condense GTD and GTLM, keep Prototype Challenge, and put all 3 classes on every venue, rather than splitting some of them up.

     

     

     

     

     

    2 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    You see...this is where I think Cadillac is spinning its wheels stupidly going nowhere fast!

    MONEY WASTED BIG TIME!!!

    1. Cadillac's image woes have nothing to do with having a racing heritage...

    First of all, Cadillac hardly has a racing heritage. What? Once or twice in their 100 plus year history Cadillac raced in maybe 5-6 races?

    2. Cadillac's image woes have something to do with an award that was won by them 100 years ago and them not meeting those standards for quite some time...

    The Dewar award...and how Cadillac aint the Standard of the World anymore...

    THAT is what plagues Cadillac...not for the lack of racing cars in 2016...

    They build a Ciel and build it right...people will come back...

    V Series Cadillacs have torn the 'Ring all right...people aren't exactly breaking down the door to own a Cadillac...

     

    I see your point but i think these endeavors are good for brand image and awareness.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Racing is the wrong place to invest money. 

    Start with the Snooze marketing program they have, the idiot choices to not commit to the higher end auto price points. The needs to make the existing product lines best in class so that subject BS like MT review of the CT6 is ignored by most everyone.

    Time to focus on the auto's you sell and the message that goes along with it not wasted on racing a prototype that will have no connection to the selling inventory.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guys, relax. Chevy was already competing in IMSA, and this body is on an established chassis. It also uses the engine it has been for several years. GM was going to race anyway, there's no harm in them rebadging their effort as a Cadillac. The development costs for this were very low in the world of sports car racing.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    Guys, relax. Chevy was already competing in IMSA, and this body is on an established chassis. It also uses the engine it has been for several years. GM was going to race anyway, there's no harm in them rebadging their effort as a Cadillac. The development costs for this were very low in the world of sports car racing.

    Aaaaaaagreeed.

    Nobody would have said anything if it was a Chevy. But because it's a Caddy...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Aaaaaaagreeed.

    Nobody would have said anything if it was a Chevy. But because it's a Caddy...

     

    17 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    Guys, relax. Chevy was already competing in IMSA, and this body is on an established chassis. It also uses the engine it has been for several years. GM was going to race anyway, there's no harm in them rebadging their effort as a Cadillac. The development costs for this were very low in the world of sports car racing.

    If it was Chevy with it's long history of Corvette racing, fine. But Caddy, should be focusing every dollar on the auto's they sell and a way better marketing message. The money spent on racing could have gone for a new CUE system to upgrade the existing one.

    Focus should be at this time on marketing, sales and quality of product. Leave racing to Chevy which has a superior racing history.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    Guys, relax. Chevy was already competing in IMSA, and this body is on an established chassis. It also uses the engine it has been for several years. GM was going to race anyway, there's no harm in them rebadging their effort as a Cadillac. The development costs for this were very low in the world of sports car racing.

    OK....I read the article fast and kinda misinterpreted the existing established chassis part of this whole equation.

    I still stand by my rant though, minus the waste of money part as really it wont cost Cadillac that much money.

    I stand by what I said about racing will not cure what is ailing Cadillac even if racing does indeed bring exposure.

    People that might one day buy a Cadillac TODAY and in the NEAR FUTURE dont  care about racing....irony as this whole RWD Arts and Science project when it began almost 2 decades ago was what people wanted THEN for cars and for Cadillac..maybe.

    That ship has sailed...that was 20 years ago.

    Today, my guy feeling tells me rich folk are aching to buy a modern Cadillac Land Yacht. Not necessarily a wobbly floaty Cadillac and not necessarily a speed demon either...

    Escalade SUV extra premium luxury  and Ciel convertible and El Miraj personal coupe and 4 door sedan in my opinion is what is missing from Cadillac rather than an NSX or LFA or SLS type halo car.

    The sports cars they have in the V Series cars

    The pedigree to legitimize these V Series cars through this racing endeavor wont do too much to bring people into the showrooms...a sexy long sleek 4 door convertible will....and a dealership experience that is akin to a boutique car maker to  complete the package....

    Instead of going racing, maybe they should go to a beauty salon for a dealership experience make-over...

     

    WITH 1 HUGE EXCEPTION...

     

    if Cadillac went ELECTRIC MOTOR racing...THEN it would be beneficial to its image going forward....

    TECHNOLOGY.....THAT is what got them the Dewar award a 100 years ago....

    Precision engineering was a breakthrough then and was part of technological advancement...

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

     

    If it was Chevy with it's long history of Corvette racing, fine. But Caddy, should be focusing every dollar on the auto's they sell and a way better marketing message. The money spent on racing could have gone for a new CUE system to upgrade the existing one.

    Focus should be at this time on marketing, sales and quality of product. Leave racing to Chevy which has a superior racing history.

    But it's just a badge change in this case. This is a form of marketing.. lol

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think racing is a good idea, it helps from an engineering and marketing standpoint.  However they are in a racing series that hardly anyone has heard of, so there isn't that much marketing exposure, and I don't know how much entering benefit there is using a Corvette racing engine.  

    They should step up to prime time and join Formula 1.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    29 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    I think racing is a good idea, it helps from an engineering and marketing standpoint.  However they are in a racing series that hardly anyone has heard of, so there isn't that much marketing exposure, and I don't know how much entering benefit there is using a Corvette racing engine.  

    They should step up to prime time and join Formula 1.

     

    Joining F1 would be a terrible decision. It's hideously expensive and is being greatly restricted from an engineering advancement perspective.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    I think racing is a good idea, it helps from an engineering and marketing standpoint.  However they are in a racing series that hardly anyone has heard of, so there isn't that much marketing exposure, and I don't know how much entering benefit there is using a Corvette racing engine.  

    They should step up to prime time and join Formula 1.

    F1 is an absolute money pit from what I've read. The only reasons teams still do it is pride or some sh!t. At least the technology is finally coming down from them(KERS, small turbo motors). But that's about it. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Depends on how you do and how much you can get from sponsorship.  And it depends on what you want to spend.  Mercedes and Ferrari spend $400-500 million a year on F1, a team like Sauber spends $100 million.   Ferrari gets a payout from F1 every year, that with their prize money is $150-200 million, Mercedes made about $170 million in winnings this year.  So it comes down to sponsorships to make up the difference.  I read the Williams F1 team posted a small profit.   I found a story that Daimler lost $30 million last year on the F1 program, but they think the advertising value more than makes up for it. 

    I would imagine any factory backed racing team in any league isn't really in it to make money.  I doubt Audi made any profit in prize money for winning Le Mans all those years, but they got advertising out of it.  So it is really in how you weigh the exposure and the bragging rights that come from racing.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Agree with the comment that Cadillac needs an even higher level of Escalade and having an Escalade V would be a benefit also.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 hours ago, Frisky Dingo said:

     

    Joining F1 would be a terrible decision. It's hideously expensive and is being greatly restricted from an engineering advancement perspective.

    Agree completely.  Would more likely be an expensive embarrassment....

    8 hours ago, dfelt said:

    Agree with the comment that Cadillac needs an even higher level of Escalade and having an Escalade V would be a benefit also.

    This would be good....

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    15 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Would more likely be an expensive embarrassment....

    Sadly.. I agree.

    US teams aren't known to be winning teams and it would be GREAT if GM/Ford could collaborate and send the best America has but the way F1 is ran... it would be insanity to try and field a team. There seems to be too many politics involved. That and the sport itself just isn't a great sport to watch. I used to love it but the competition just isn't there anymore. It seems every year there is 1 team that will win it all from week 1 and a second team trying to knock them down some. Basically, who spends the most in R&D in the of season, wins.

    For what it's worth though, HAAS F1 was very successful for their first season in F1 as an American team. They scored points in their first race ever, which is a very rare feat.

    Just look at how the teams are so close to each other and you can see where they consistently run every week. Mercedes 1-2, Ferrari/Redbull for 3-6, Ford India/Williams for 7-9, 11. They just need better competition when it comes to racing..like NASCAR. A lot of people think NASCAR is a lame and boring sport but it's the most competitive form of auto racing there is.

    2016 F1 Standings

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    9 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Depends on how you do and how much you can get from sponsorship.  And it depends on what you want to spend.  Mercedes and Ferrari spend $400-500 million a year on F1, a team like Sauber spends $100 million.   Ferrari gets a payout from F1 every year, that with their prize money is $150-200 million, Mercedes made about $170 million in winnings this year.  So it comes down to sponsorships to make up the difference.  I read the Williams F1 team posted a small profit.   I found a story that Daimler lost $30 million last year on the F1 program, but they think the advertising value more than makes up for it. 

    I would imagine any factory backed racing team in any league isn't really in it to make money.  I doubt Audi made any profit in prize money for winning Le Mans all those years, but they got advertising out of it.  So it is really in how you weigh the exposure and the bragging rights that come from racing.

    I agree that there isn't a set monetary value to advertising your brand through F1 but of all forms of racing F1 is the most costly with likely the least amount of return on said investment. It would definitely be a way to get their name out there in likely a great way but I don't think they are really set out to lose money when even the best teams still aren't making money.

    I don't know for fact but it just seems the way F1 is run that there are other forms of racing that Cadillac could benefit from entering.

    You're right, likely Audi didn't profit a dime from winning Le Mans but with a rich history in racing they still have a well known race program and can advertise their winnings even if it is just on pamphlets and signage. That alone just gives companies a little more cache and prestige in their products which Cadillac is greatly missing.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well here is what I see going on here.

    JDN is playing the Audi card here getting into prototype racing.  Audi entered prototypes here and in Europe to promote their Diesel engines.

    With that said I expect GM will enter IMSA with this car from Dallara a proven chassis builder and compete using the bullet proof Chevy engine while they sort out the car. They then will move to use a Cadillac based engine to promote their new engines once they arrive in about 2-3 years. to do a Chassis and engine would prove to be a disaster as it was the first time they tried this with the LMP.

    Cadillac jumped in the last time way over their head. They had a new chassis and used the N star engine and both proved to be a problem. They never really sorted this out.

    Now this car will be able to not only run Daytona and Sebring but also Lemans. This should prove to be a good combination that they could not do before with the Daytona prototype cars.

    Chevy is already well established with the GTLM program and they will embark on new C8 Mid Engine in about a year and a half. Being based on a stock platform for the Corvette is very important. Not so much at Cadillac. Making the prototype for Chevy would really have little added value.

    F1 is such a mess now and has been for a while. Cost are off the charts and to get results is even more difficult unless you have been at it for a while.  GM really has little need or use for F1.

    As for now F1 needs to get their house in order.

    Might note two things. The car from the side resembles the Audi prototypes. The nose and tail hints as a little of the styling of the headlamps and tail lamps we may see in the future Cadillac products.

    But if Cadillac joins IMSA with this prototype it will be a way to promote the brand globally. Also I see a future with their own powertrains and possibly a hybrid system much like Porsche uses today.

    They just need to avoid doing this as the past LMP car as while it was neat they were way in over their heads on that deal. That would have been a major challenge even to the most established teams from Germany.

    If you look at many of the Porsche and Audi programs they take proven cars or engines and advance them not blow them up and starting over. The early 917 begat the later 917, Also what they learned carried over to the 936 and 962. Even what they learned there has been applied to the cars they race today.

    Cadillac is smart to go to Dallara and use the Chevy engine that has a proven record. Once the car is a winner then drop in the new Cadillac engine when ready.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I could see Cadillac once they sort out the proper EV Engine going with an F1 EV team.

    I wonder if NASCAR will ever consider an EV program?

    Honestly, Electric would be the way to go of showing true leadership and innovation.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    NASCAR will only consider EV when they absolutely HAVE to. I just can't see them considering it before they need to just because the sport has always been around simplification and basic engine on a street car(I know it is nothing like that today as they have standardized bodies and engines so much for competition's sake) but in general, they are the most simple cars racing today. Yes, there are millions into R&D and testing to tweak suspensions and bodywork that they are allowed to. I'm not trying to say that it's cheap and easy for anybody to just field a car but I'm saying that in the grand scheme of racing, they are still the most simplistic cars out there(On the national/international level).

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. stlcadet11
      stlcadet11
      (27 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      The long-delayed Cadillac Super Cruise system will be arriving as an option for the 2018 CT6 this fall. Described as "the industry’s first true hands-free driving technology for the highway,"(Tesla would argue otherwise) Super Cruise combines the driver assistance features currently on the CT6, along with a driver attention system and LiDAR-based mapping data.
      Unlike other systems that monitor forces on the steering wheel to see if the driver is paying attention, Super Cruise uses a camera mounted on the steering column to monitor a driver's head position and movement. If it detects the driver has turned their head away from the road, the system will issue an alert to have the driver bring their eyes back to the road via a light bar on the steering wheel and then the safety alert system. If the driver fails to do this, Super Cruise will bring the car to a stop and call OnStar “if necessary.”
      As for the "LiDAR-based mapping data", this scan of limited-access highways in the U.S. and Canada is paired with an improved GPS system, real-time cameras, and sensors to determine whether or not the system can come on, along with keeping the vehicle on the road.
      “American drivers travel twice as many miles on urban and suburban highways as they do on rural roads. Super Cruise™ allows hands-free driving and operates only within the environment where it has the most benefit. While it is technically possible for the technology to drive hands-free on other kinds of streets and roads, we feel strongly that this targeted approach is the best to build consumer and regulatory confidence and enthusiasm for advanced mobility,” said Barry Walkup, chief engineer for the system.
      Source: Cadillac
      Press Release is on Page 2



      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The long-delayed Cadillac Super Cruise system will be arriving as an option for the 2018 CT6 this fall. Described as "the industry’s first true hands-free driving technology for the highway,"(Tesla would argue otherwise) Super Cruise combines the driver assistance features currently on the CT6, along with a driver attention system and LiDAR-based mapping data.
      Unlike other systems that monitor forces on the steering wheel to see if the driver is paying attention, Super Cruise uses a camera mounted on the steering column to monitor a driver's head position and movement. If it detects the driver has turned their head away from the road, the system will issue an alert to have the driver bring their eyes back to the road via a light bar on the steering wheel and then the safety alert system. If the driver fails to do this, Super Cruise will bring the car to a stop and call OnStar “if necessary.”
      As for the "LiDAR-based mapping data", this scan of limited-access highways in the U.S. and Canada is paired with an improved GPS system, real-time cameras, and sensors to determine whether or not the system can come on, along with keeping the vehicle on the road.
      “American drivers travel twice as many miles on urban and suburban highways as they do on rural roads. Super Cruise™ allows hands-free driving and operates only within the environment where it has the most benefit. While it is technically possible for the technology to drive hands-free on other kinds of streets and roads, we feel strongly that this targeted approach is the best to build consumer and regulatory confidence and enthusiasm for advanced mobility,” said Barry Walkup, chief engineer for the system.
      Source: Cadillac
      Press Release is on Page 2


    • By William Maley
      GM Was the Fastest Growing Automaker in March, Driven by Chevrolet and Buick
      Strong Retail Share Gain for the First Quarter DETROIT — General Motors (NYSE: GM), which grew its retail sales faster than any other full-line automaker in 2016, outpaced the industry once again in March. The company also gained retail share in the first quarter of 2017.
      “The economy is strong and we see more growth ahead for our brands,” said Kurt McNeil, U.S. vice president of sales operations. “More people are working, consumer confidence is at a 16-year high, fuel prices are low and Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac have a wave of new crossovers to compete in the industry’s biggest and hottest segments.”
      At Buick, crossovers are expected to account for more than 75 percent of retail deliveries in 2017, up from 66 percent in 2016, driven by the Encore, Envision and Enclave. GMC, which has the highest average transaction prices (ATPs) of any non-luxury brand, will launch the all-new 2018 Terrain in late summer, complementing the redesigned Acadia that went on sale in late summer 2016. Cadillac will benefit from a full year of production of the new XT5 crossover, which is now the second best-selling vehicle in its segment. Chevrolet, which grew retail market share in 2015 and was the industry’s fastest-growing brand in 2016, is particularly well positioned. Chevrolet had its best March and first quarter retail sales since 2007.
      “Chevrolet will have the industry’s broadest and freshest lineup of utility vehicles led by the all-new 2018 Equinox and Traverse, plus we have a unique three-truck pickup strategy and a dominant position in large SUVs,” McNeil said. “We also have a first-mover advantage in many segments. It will be years before key competitors are able to launch rivals to the Chevrolet Bolt EV, Colorado and Trax.”
      Highlights (vs. 2016)
      First Quarter Overview
      GM’s retail sales were 546,838 units, up 1.9 percent, and retail market share was up 0.2 percentage points to an estimated 16.8 percent. The gains were primarily driven by crossovers, which were up 21 percent. Truck deliveries were up half a percentage point. Chevrolet increased its first quarter retail share by an estimated 0.1 percentage point, as did GMC. Commercial deliveries were up 4 percent, and daily rental deliveries were down 8 percent, or about 6,000 units. Total fleet sales were down 3 percent. Total sales were 689,521 units, up 1 percent, and market share was up an estimated 0.3 percentage points to an estimated 16.7 percent. Average transaction prices were approximately $34,000, in line with last year’s first quarter. March Overview
      Retail sales were 203,113 units, up 5 percent, and market share was up 0.6 percentage points to an estimated 16.1 percent. Chevrolet’s estimated retail market share increased 0.4 percentage points and Buick was up 0.3 percentage points. Total sales were 256,224 units, up 2 percent, and market share was up an estimated 0.4 percentage points to 15.9 percent. Commercial deliveries were up 3 percent driven by a 67 percent increase in Malibu deliveries and strong pickup and large van sales. Daily rental sales down 18 percent, or more than 5,100 units. Fleet sales were down 9 percent. Brand Highlights (vs. 2016)
      Chevrolet Crossovers
      On a retail basis in March, the Trax was up 51 percent, the Equinox was up 26 percent and the Traverse was up 24 percent. For the quarter, Trax retail sales were up 54 percent, the Equinox was up 16 percent and the Traverse was up 7 percent.  Bolt EV sales in the quarter were 3,092 units, with limited availability. The days to turn is exceptionally low at 14 days. Chevrolet Trucks
      Chevrolet had its best first quarter truck sales since 2008, up 6 percent. Key drivers were the Suburban, up 26 percent; the Tahoe, up 11 percent; and strong full-size van sales to small business customers and fleets. Silverado sales were essentially equal to a year ago. Chevrolet retail truck sales in the first quarter were up 2 percent, with the Tahoe up 9 percent, the Colorado up 7 percent and the Suburban up 5 percent. Silverado sales were essentially equal to a year ago. The Tahoe and Suburban had their best March total sales since 2008, and their best first quarter total and retail sales since 2008. The Colorado had its best first quarter retail sales since 2005.   Chevrolet Cars
      Retail deliveries were very strong in March, up 9 percent. The drivers were the Cruze, up 63 percent; the Sonic, up 14 percent; the Spark, up 50 percent; the Volt, up 15 percent; and the Camaro, up 2 percent.  During the quarter, retail car deliveries were down 11 percent, reflecting industry-wide changes in customer demand. However, Cruze retail sales were up 22 percent during the quarter; the Spark was up 37 percent; and the Volt was up 39 percent. The Volt had its best first quarter total and retail sales ever.  Buick Sales
      Buick had its best March retail sales since 2005, with sales up 22 percent. The LaCrosse was up 60 percent on a retail basis in March, the Encore was up 17 percent and Regal was up 7 percent. On a total sales basis, it was Buick’s best March since 2006, with deliveries up 15 percent. First quarter retail deliveries were the highest since 2004, driven by a 29 percent increase in crossover sales. The Encore has posted seven consecutive months of year-over-year sales gains, and it had its best-ever March and first quarter sales. The Envision had its best month since launch. GMC Sales
      Total GMC sales were up 12 percent in March, driven by a 47 percent increase in crossover deliveries. The Acadia, which was redesigned last year, was up 84 percent and the Terrain was up 14 percent. The Yukon XL was up 17 percent. March was the highest-ever month for Denali models, at 29 percent of GMC retail sales. Total GMC sales for the first quarter were the best since 2000, with deliveries up 10 percent. First quarter retail deliveries were up 4 percent, with the Acadia up 30 percent and Sierra HD models up 22 percent. Cadillac Sales
      Cadillac XT5 retail sales in March were 22 percent higher than the outgoing SRX, and ATPs were about 9 percent higher. Cadillac’s ATPs continue to be in the upper echelon of luxury brands at more than $54,000. Full-year Guidance
      We believe strong car-buying fundamentals are reflected in the retail component of the light vehicle SAAR (seasonally-adjusted annual rate), which was 14 million in March, up 0.3 million versus a year ago. The retail SAAR for the first quarter was 14.3 million, up 0.1 million. Ten all-new or recently redesigned crossovers are expected to drive GM’s sales and share higher in 2017. GM’s deliveries to daily rental companies are expected to decline for the third year in a row. The company expects inventory in the second quarter to be lower than the first quarter, in a range around 90 days’ supply. The decline reflects strong sales, lower car production and strategic, launch-related growth in truck and crossover stocks. The company expects to end 2017 at essentially the same inventory levels as 2016 on a days’ supply basis, but with fewer cars and more trucks and crossovers in stock. As expected, incentives were down sharply from February 2017, according to J.D Power PIN estimates. Spending as a percentage of average transaction price (ATP) declined from approximately 14.9 percent to about 13.5 percent. The launches of new crossovers and adjustments to passenger car inventories will help moderate incentive spending going forward.
    • By William Maley
      We know Cadillac is planning a major product offensive beginning with the XT3 crossover next year, along with a few other products such as a seven-seat crossover and a competitor to the Audi A3 and Mercedes CLA. Automobile Magazine reports that Cadillac is planning eight all-new or redesigned models by 2022. They include,
      XT3: (Compact crossover) in 2018 CT3: (ATS Replacement) in 2018 XT7: (Seven-seat crossover that is reported to be on Omega. Other reports put say it will use the platform underpinning the redesign Buick Enclave/Chevrolet Traverse) in 2019 CT5: (Replacement for the CTS) in 2019 XT1 or XT2 (Subcompact crossover) in 2020 XT5 Redesign (Possibly going on Omega) in 2021 CT1 or CT2 (A3 and CLA fighter) in 2021 CT8: (Flagship using Omega) in 2021 All of these models are expected to use an evolutionary design theme from the Escala concept. It is still unknown whether or not the CT1/CT2 will use the Delta front-wheel drive platform or use Alpha.
      The brand is also planning investments totaling $800 million into their retail operations in the U.S.
      Source: Automobile
      Pic Credit: William Maley for Cheers and Gears

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      We know Cadillac is planning a major product offensive beginning with the XT3 crossover next year, along with a few other products such as a seven-seat crossover and a competitor to the Audi A3 and Mercedes CLA. Automobile Magazine reports that Cadillac is planning eight all-new or redesigned models by 2022. They include,
      XT3: (Compact crossover) in 2018 CT3: (ATS Replacement) in 2018 XT7: (Seven-seat crossover that is reported to be on Omega. Other reports put say it will use the platform underpinning the redesign Buick Enclave/Chevrolet Traverse) in 2019 CT5: (Replacement for the CTS) in 2019 XT1 or XT2 (Subcompact crossover) in 2020 XT5 Redesign (Possibly going on Omega) in 2021 CT1 or CT2 (A3 and CLA fighter) in 2021 CT8: (Flagship using Omega) in 2021 All of these models are expected to use an evolutionary design theme from the Escala concept. It is still unknown whether or not the CT1/CT2 will use the Delta front-wheel drive platform or use Alpha.
      The brand is also planning investments totaling $800 million into their retail operations in the U.S.
      Source: Automobile
      Pic Credit: William Maley for Cheers and Gears
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online