• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Rumorpile: Chevrolet Trailblazer In The Cards For The U.S.


    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    August 6, 2013

    The Chevrolet Trailblazer could be coming to the U.S. if a recent report proves to be accurate.

    Edmunds learned from an internal source that a version of the Trailblazer could be going on sale in the U.S. in 2014. It's not clear if the vehicle will retain the name or be built in the U.S.

    The Trailblazer made its debut at 2012 Bangkok Auto Show and went on sale last year in a number of markets, including Thailand and Brazil. The model uses the same body-on-frame architecture with the midsize Chevrolet Colorado and comes with a variety of engines and the choice of two-wheel or four-wheel drive.

    Chevrolet has gone on record time and time again that the Trailblazer will not be sold in the U.S.

    "We have no plans to add another SUV/crossover to the portfolio. We are pleased with the way Equinox, Traverse and Tahoe/Suburban are performing in the marketplace," said Chevrolet spokesman Mike Albano in a email.

    Source: Edmunds

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    0


      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    Yes I would agree with GM that their current CUV's are doing well, but they have ignored a important segment of hardcore users/buyers. Us Body on Frame folks like a true 4x4.


    I see a decent profitable size market for the Trailblazer especially if they bring it here with the powerful baby Duramax engines. :D

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yet... they can keep the Captiva in production? I cannot see how the Captiva is a better fit for Chevy than the Trailblazer when the Captiva isn't even sold retail.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    True, yet I keep seeing more and more Captiva's on the roads around here. I thought it was a canada version at first since we are on the boarder with Vancouver and then I saw my local Chevy Dealer Lee Johnson have about 20 of them in various configurations on the lot and as I looked around found more and more chevy dealers having them on the lot for sale to the public. Thought it was a fleet only ride, but guess there is always ways to get around it.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yet... they can keep the Captiva in production? I cannot see how the Captiva is a better fit for Chevy than the Trailblazer when the Captiva isn't even sold retail.

    Well, the Captiva does give them a compact CUV...the Equinox is more of a midsize. It is odd that Chevy isn't retailing anything in the compact CUV market (the Buick is more of a subcompact)..

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As long as they keep making and selling Captiva regardless of fleet or personal purchase, they figure they can probably put the resources on other auto's that need it.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Captiva is taking the Fleet hit for the Nox. Chevy dumps these on fleets and they get dumped on the market and do not affect the Nox Resale as past GM models did like the Impala and Grand Prix. Resale on the Nox has been good.

    Now the Trailblazer will do fine but just were will all the sales come from? How many defected to the Tahoe? Traverse? Nox? Will GM draw in conquest sales from Ford since they are now FWD based with the Explorer?


    There is a lot to consider here as While the Trailblazer will do fine who will get hurt by it being here? I think GM has more to gain than lose but It will be interesting to see just who the buyers will be and will they buy in numbers like they did in the past now there are many other choices out there in the CUV lines that get better MPG and cost less.

    Many of the past Trailblazer buyers were not hard core off roaders and just wanted something truck like that sits up higher. The market has changed dynamics and it will be interesting to see just how many will return because they like this kind of vehicle better and how many stay away as they are happy with the Nox or Traverse.

    GM has little risk here since they are already selling it globally and even then I see little risk anyways. This is not one deal where a product planner will lose much sleep.

    Again here is another model they will not sell here at into but ends up here later as most of us expected.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would think Toyota 4Runner owners and prospective buyers for the current 4Runner would be the target market for the new TrailBlazer, if offered in the US. I know many Envoy and TrailBlazer owners that would love a replacement vehicle for their aging SUV that is the same as what they have now (BOF). At the same time many of these owners balked at the Acadia/Traverse and Terrain/Equinox as these are car-based CUVs and not truck-based SUVs. Those that wanted the higher seating position and better MPG fuel economy went over to the CUVs; those that want more towing and off-road ability (not rock climbing but able to go off the road into lake and wooded areas) kept their older SUVs. If GM were to offer a new, BOF truck-based SUV here in the States I'm sure you'll see there's buyers. If production can be shared on the same lines as the upcoming Canyon/Colorado, then you may just have a winner on your hands (if it needed a separate factory, then the $$$ issue comes into play).

    The Captiva is taking the Fleet hit for the Nox. Chevy dumps these on fleets and they get dumped on the market and do not affect the Nox Resale as past GM models did like the Impala and Grand Prix. Resale on the Nox has been good.

    Now the Trailblazer will do fine but just were will all the sales come from? How many defected to the Tahoe? Traverse? Nox? Will GM draw in conquest sales from Ford since they are now FWD based with the Explorer?


    There is a lot to consider here as While the Trailblazer will do fine who will get hurt by it being here? I think GM has more to gain than lose but It will be interesting to see just who the buyers will be and will they buy in numbers like they did in the past now there are many other choices out there in the CUV lines that get better MPG and cost less.

    Many of the past Trailblazer buyers were not hard core off roaders and just wanted something truck like that sits up higher. The market has changed dynamics and it will be interesting to see just how many will return because they like this kind of vehicle better and how many stay away as they are happy with the Nox or Traverse.

    GM has little risk here since they are already selling it globally and even then I see little risk anyways. This is not one deal where a product planner will lose much sleep.

    Again here is another model they will not sell here at into but ends up here later as most of us expected.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, consider Jeep Grand Cherokee shoppers as prospective targets and anyone that is considering a new Ford Explorer that wants more than 3500 lbs of towing capability. I spoke to a guy last year at the NYIAS that was looking over the new Explorer with his wife and complaining that his old Explorer can tow his 5,000 lb boat & trailer but the new one wouldn't, plus he had little faith in it going off-road to his cabin in the woods with the AWD system (I told him that there was an option for selectable AWD modes that would likely aid him off-road). She only cared about getting better MPG/fuel efficiency compared to his current, older Explorer :lol: He wanted to go look at the Grand Cherokee next.

    Edited by GMTruckGuy74
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with you Roger, I think GM should be able to do this BOF Trailblazer on the same line as the Colorado/Canyon and take care of all us BOF lovers and make money while winning conquests from the 4 Runner crowd or Pathfinder crowd. I have a friend that has always driven 4 runners with v8 and when Toyota stopped offering them with a v8 he stopped buying and held onto his last one which was from the last year they offered them with a v8. Like me, he is not looking at the fuel mileage but the other capabilities of what the BOF SUV's have to offer.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hence why you still have people buying Yukons/Tahoes and not converting over to the Acadia/Traverse models. Some people have needs that a BOF SUV offers. Then there's the market for people who want a BOF SUV but don't want a full-size SUV. That's why Toyota still sells the 4Runner and even though unibody, the Grand Cherokee sells well too (because it's Trail Rated and has numerous suspension modes for on- and off-road needs). Nissan caved and switched the Pathfinder over to a car-based platform so it's now off the list for BOF SUV shoppers (I know of a few older Pathfinder owners that are pissed about the change and want to find a new BOF SUV to purchase). Trust me, if GM sells a new TrailBlazer (and Envoy) they will get customers. Setting realistic goals - say 20/40k units and not 100/150k units - would be a better way to handle this. If more are sold than adjust their factory plan as needed.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, consider Jeep Grand Cherokee shoppers as prospective targets and anyone that is considering a new Ford Explorer that wants more than 3500 lbs of towing capability. I spoke to a guy last year at the NYIAS that was looking over the new Explorer with his wife and complaining that his old Explorer can tow his 5,000 lb boat & trailer but the new one wouldn't, plus he had little faith in it going off-road to his cabin in the woods with the AWD system (I told him that there was an option for selectable AWD modes that would likely aid him off-road). She only cared about getting better MPG/fuel efficiency compared to his current, older Explorer :lol: He wanted to go look at the Grand Cherokee next.

    well..he could have gotten a Ford Flex that has 4,500 lb towing capacity. But the Grand Cherokee is Unibody as well, so it clearly isn't a platform type issue. You can get up to 7400lb towing capacity in the Cherokee if you order the Hemi, but a Dodge Ram 1500 5.7l short-bed, 4WD with 20" wheels is only rated for 5,000 lbs.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hence why you still have people buying Yukons/Tahoes and not converting over to the Acadia/Traverse models. Some people have needs that a BOF SUV offers. Then there's the market for people who want a BOF SUV but don't want a full-size SUV. That's why Toyota still sells the 4Runner and even though unibody, the Grand Cherokee sells well too (because it's Trail Rated and has numerous suspension modes for on- and off-road needs). Nissan caved and switched the Pathfinder over to a car-based platform so it's now off the list for BOF SUV shoppers (I know of a few older Pathfinder owners that are pissed about the change and want to find a new BOF SUV to purchase). Trust me, if GM sells a new TrailBlazer (and Envoy) they will get customers. Setting realistic goals - say 20/40k units and not 100/150k units - would be a better way to handle this. If more are sold than adjust their factory plan as needed.

    Sorry, gotta call you on this. The Traverse has 5200lb tow rating while the Trailblazer was 5400. Not a significant enough difference for most people.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can't say I've ever seen anyone towing with an Acadia/Outlook/Traverse/Enclave, but I've seen plenty of Envoys and TrailBlazers towing boats, utility trailers and pop-up campers. My point was that a FWD-based AWD CUV won't be the choice for someone that needs to leave the road to travel to their campground or outdoor cabin with a trailer in tow. Someone looking to tow a recreational-use trailer and wanting to go off-road will likely not consider a CUV for that purpose (hence the popularity of pickups and full-size SUVs). When's the last time you saw a newer Explorer, Acadia, Traverse, Pathfinder take a boat on a trailer down a boat launch ramp? I see plenty of pickups and SUVs doing this all the time in Burlington County (NJ).

    Just because the CUV can tow that much doesn't mean the customer will be using that feature. GM got rid of the GMT-360s and put the towing capability on the Lambdas. But I'm wondering how great of a tow vehicle they'd be if used often? Plus most of the people I see buying these CUVs are not choosing a minivan and are not wanting the big fuel loss of a full-size SUV so the Lambda is the compromise. Three Lambda's in my neighborhood replaced an older Ford Expedition and the other two replaced Honda minivans.

    Also, how many people with BOF trucks and SUVs really go off-roading (not trail-riding and rock crawling) and tow a trailer? For most I'd say it's a preference issue. Just like some prefer to drive an appliance versus a sport performance sedan, while others perfer a minivan over a CUV, truck and full-size SUVs are bought not only based on function and need but also preference. One reason I never pulled the trigger on a GMC Terrain is because to me it's just a boxy, stunted station wagon that rides too low to the ground. I don't have the need to tow, but having selectable 4WD with 4hi and 4lo and a frame underneath me is important because when I drive in any kind of weather I feel more confident that my vehicle can get me where I need to go.

    Hence why you still have people buying Yukons/Tahoes and not converting over to the Acadia/Traverse models. Some people have needs that a BOF SUV offers. Then there's the market for people who want a BOF SUV but don't want a full-size SUV. That's why Toyota still sells the 4Runner and even though unibody, the Grand Cherokee sells well too (because it's Trail Rated and has numerous suspension modes for on- and off-road needs). Nissan caved and switched the Pathfinder over to a car-based platform so it's now off the list for BOF SUV shoppers (I know of a few older Pathfinder owners that are pissed about the change and want to find a new BOF SUV to purchase). Trust me, if GM sells a new TrailBlazer (and Envoy) they will get customers. Setting realistic goals - say 20/40k units and not 100/150k units - would be a better way to handle this. If more are sold than adjust their factory plan as needed.

    Sorry, gotta call you on this. The Traverse has 5200lb tow rating while the Trailblazer was 5400. Not a significant enough difference for most people.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think any Unibody could be given what people have come to expect out of BOF if it is done right. GC has proven that, but sadly we have lost what was gained with the hummer for offroad capabilities and the GC seems to be the only game in town with that capability now. I would like to have a BOF capable or Uni capable SUV/CUV if they would just pay attention to those extra details.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Most Unibody can handle most of what these smaller BOF can do.


    The key here is there were a lot of people who were on BOF vehicles that have gone Uni and the real question is how many will come back.

    It is hard to tell yet since I have not seen the Trailblazer in person but will GM grow the segment or just split up what they have. I just have to wait till I see the real thing in person to really pass judgment on this. Don't get me wrong I love the TB but I no longer represent the average person in the market like so many others here.

    These things are hard to call anymore as little Buick Encores are out selling expectations and CUV's like the Terrain and Nox are increasing sales every year vs. the normal decline. It is a crazy market these days and the CUV/SUV market is all over the place anymore. Every company is looking for an edge and it is not a Ford.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My one BIG draw back to CUV, Lack of a real SUV sitting position and aftermarket lift kits. Compared to BOF Trailblazer and the ability to do aftermarket lift-kits for off roading.

    I would love it if I could get a 6" lift kit for the AWD Terrain so I had the high visibility as I love the Terrain body style. Just need it to sit up about 6 more inches.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think a new Trailblazer would be a most welcome addition to GM's U.S. lineup. For example, my brother and sister-in-law would probably be first in line for one, as their '02 TB is getting long in the tooth.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They don't like the Equinox and they don't like the Traverse. They bought the Trailblazer brand new. I would guess by now (since talking to my bro a while back about it) that it has over 130k on it. This would be perfect for them, because it is fully authentic.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    First off you have to consider this and this is the biggest difference. The CUV is not an off road vehicle. The AWD is just for people who can not drive in snow ands added profits.

    I own a Terrain and the last thing in the world I would do is lift it or even think about off roading it.

    I can tell you first hand that few people who own CUV do much to modify them. For most all they are street cars that look and feel like a Truck or SUV. As heavy and narrow as my Terrain is the last thing I would want to do is hobble it with an added 6" of top heavy. I could see that one on it's side very easy.

    Even on the Tahoe we get few people lifting them and doing big mods. We sell almost every lift kit known to man and 90% are trucks and Diesel trucks anymore. I do not know if it is the cost or what but that is what we see the most of anymore. Used to be in the old days it was pretty even.

    I think the big issue is the cost of lifting the new trucks properly is a lot more. Also the cost of most SUV's are $50K-$80K and many unless they have unlimited funds want to do the changes unless they really need it. Most of these in the past did not go off road anyways. In the past you could lift a truck with some blocks but today you need to change out members and other parts to get it right, Also you void warranties and run the risk of other issues with Air Bags etc.

    Body lifts took off for a while but many will not offer kits for Air Bag trucks due to liability and other issues on the new trucks.

    I see some guys cranking on the bars and adding blocks but they eat up tires and end up breaking bars.

    The SUV market has changed as with the CUV many people who were not real truck people have left the SUV market. Most are the stereotypical Soccer moms etc.

    Also cost of fuel and the SUV have driven many done to the CUV. Most do all of their driving on the road. Few pull more than a small boat. CUV also has taken in many Mini Van owners too. Take a look around and see how few Mini Vans are at the mall and how many CUVs are now in their places.

    The Trailblazer will make it so you can lift it easier and use it more like a truck. It will have more off road ability but I do not expect many lifted. Even the last trailblazer was one you seldom seen lifted I suspect due to he axle through the pan. I sis see many 2wd lowered and lots of wheels.

    Just a view from a Terrain owner and some one in the aftermarket.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    Loading...



  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. §carlet §wordfish
      §carlet §wordfish
      (27 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Big November Gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac Keep GM the Fastest Growing Automaker
      November U.S. retail market share highest since 2009 Year to Date U.S. Retail Share up 0.5 Percentage Points November Commercial sales were highest since 2008 DETROIT — General Motors (NYSE: GM) sold 197,609 vehicles in November to individual or “retail” customers in the U.S., up 8 percent from last year. Based on initial estimates, GM once again outperformed all full-line manufacturers, led by strong retail sales gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac. GM’s November retail sales performance drove GM’s U.S. retail share to its highest November level since 2009.
      Based on initial estimates, GM’s retail market share jumped 0.3 percentage points in November to 16.8 percent.  GM has gained retail market share in 17 of the past 20 months.
      GM’s four U.S. brands posted strong retail sales results in November compared to last year.
      Chevrolet — up 5 percent for its best November since 2004 Buick — up 22 percent for its best November since 2003 GMC — up 9 percent for its best November since 2001 Cadillac — up 17 percent for its best November since 2013 GM’s total U.S. sales in November were 252,644 vehicles, up more than 10 percent from last year.   All four brands outperformed the industry in November with Buick, Cadillac and GMC posting double-digit gains.
      “GM’s November performance reflects the continued strength of our U.S. business.  We gained profitable retail share, commercial and small business deliveries were strong and we commanded the industry’s best average transaction prices,” said Kurt McNeil, GM’s vice president of U.S. Sales Operations. “We are ahead of plan selling down our 2016 model year inventory and we expect to close out December with more retail share growth. GM is heading into 2017 in a position of strength with the planned launch of key new products, like the all-new Chevrolet Equinox, into the heart of the market.” 
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average and ahead of last November. 

      Through the first 11 months of the year, GM’s U.S. retail sales were up nearly 2 percent compared to last year. GM gained 0.5 percentage points of U.S. retail market share during that timeframe, the largest retail share gain of any full-line automaker. Year to date, Chevrolet U.S. retail sales are up nearly 3 percent and the brand’s retail share has grown 0.5 percentage points to 11.1 percent. Chevrolet continues to be the U.S. industry’s fastest-growing brand.
      Year to date, Buick retail deliveries have grown more than 5 percent and Buick has gained 0.1 percentage points of retail share.
      GM continues to benefit from a strong U.S. economy and strong retail demand for its products.
      “All economic indicators show significantly improved optimism about the U.S. economy including consumer and business sentiment, which continue to drive a very healthy U.S. auto industry,” said Mustafa Mohatarem, GM’s chief economist. “We believe the U.S. auto industry is well-positioned for sales to continue at or near record levels into 2017.”
      November 2016 Retail Sales and Business Highlights vs. November 2015 (except as noted)

      Chevrolet
      Malibu and Volt were up 24 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Silverado and Colorado were up 5 percent and 39 percent, respectively. Suburban, Tahoe, Equinox and Trax were up 6 percent, 12 percent, 7 percent and 47 percent, respectively. Malibu had its best November since 1997. Silverado had its best November since 2003. Colorado had its best November since 2004. Trax, Volt and Equinox had their best November ever. Tahoe and Suburban had their best November since 2007. 17th straight month of year over year gains for Chevrolet full-size utilities. GMC
      Sierra and Canyon were up 14 percent and 43 percent, respectively. Acadia, Yukon and Yukon XL were up 4 percent, 22 percent and 19 percent, respectively. Brand ATP was at $43,887, the highest November on record. Highest November ever for Denali penetration, at 27.8 percent. Best November ever for Canyon and ninth month of year over year increases. Yukon and Yukon XL had their best November since 2007. Buick
      Regal and Encore were up 41 percent and 35 percent, respectively. 68 percent of sales were crossovers. Best year to date retail performance since 2005. Cadillac
      Escalade was up 24 percent and had its best month of the year. Escalade had its best November since 2007. XT5 had its best month since launch with sales up 12 percent over last month and up 27 percent over the SRX last November, the vehicle it replaced. Year to date ATP was $53,690, the highest ever in Cadillac history Average Transaction Prices (ATP)/Incentives (based on JD Power PIN estimates)
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average. In November, GM’s incentive spending as a percent of ATP was 13.7 percent, above the industry average of 12.4 percent. However, year to date, GM’s incentive spending was 11.7 percent, slightly above the industry average of 11.4 percent and well below the incentive spending of its domestic competitors and many of its global competitors. Fleet and Commercial
      Automotive Fleet magazine named Malibu “Fleet Car of the Year”. GM Fleet sales were up 19 percent versus last November. Fleet sales were 22 percent of GM’s sales for the month. Commercial deliveries were up 11 percent for the month and it was the best November Commercial sales since 2008. Malibu Commercial deliveries were up 170 percent versus last November. Small Business deliveries were up 15 percent for the month versus last November, driven by large vans, which were up 93 percent and large pickups, which were up 16 percent versus last November. Federal government sales were up 9 percent versus last November. Rental sales were up 27 percent versus last November but are down 25 percent CYTD, according to plan. GM’s outlook on its daily rental sales mix remains in the 11 percent range of total U.S. sales for 2016 and daily rental sales for the year are expected to be down about 75,000 vehicles. Industry Sales
      GM estimates that the seasonally adjusted annual selling rate (SAAR) for light vehicles in November was approximately 17.9 million units. On a calendar year-to-date basis, GM estimates the light-vehicle SAAR was 17.5 million units.
    • By William Maley
      Plans for a flagship Jeep may have been trashed. Autoline Daily reported yesterday that Fiat Chrysler Automobiles have cancelled plans for the Grand Wagoneer that was due for the 2019 model. Citing information from industry planning company Auto Forecast Solutions, Autoline Daily says the company cannot stretch out the platform that underpins the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango for a model that would be in a higher segment. 
      Autoline Daily goes on to say that work may continue on a flagship model for Jeep, but use the platform that underpins the Ram 1500 pickup.
      Rumors of the Grand Wagoneer have been floating around for a couple of years and it only recently confirmed by Jeep CEO Mike Manley. Last month, we got a possible preview as to what Grand Wagoneer's front end could look like.
      Source: Autoline Daily (Video Below)
       

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Plans for a flagship Jeep may have been trashed. Autoline Daily reported yesterday that Fiat Chrysler Automobiles have cancelled plans for the Grand Wagoneer that was due for the 2019 model. Citing information from industry planning company Auto Forecast Solutions, Autoline Daily says the company cannot stretch out the platform that underpins the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango for a model that would be in a higher segment. 
      Autoline Daily goes on to say that work may continue on a flagship model for Jeep, but use the platform that underpins the Ram 1500 pickup.
      Rumors of the Grand Wagoneer have been floating around for a couple of years and it only recently confirmed by Jeep CEO Mike Manley. Last month, we got a possible preview as to what Grand Wagoneer's front end could look like.
      Source: Autoline Daily (Video Below)
       
    • By William Maley
      Ever since Mercedes-Benz introduced the new E-Class earlier this year, there has been speculation as to when its sister model, the CLS would be redesigned. A new report says that it will take place in 2018.
      According to Automotive News, the next-generation CLS is expected to go on sale in the summer of 2018 for the U.S. The model will use Mercedes' Modular Rear Architecture (MRA) that is not only lighter than the platform underpinning the current CLS, but also bring more room. Spy shots reveal that the design of the next CLS will evolve, but will not depart from the current look. There is talk that the new inline-six that Mercedes announced earlier this month could be used for the CLS.
      The interesting bit about Automotive News' report is that Mercedes could move the CLS name to a new four-door sedan that AMG is currently developing, while the standard model would use the CLE nameplate. Also under speculation is that CLS shooting brake will be dropped when the next-generation model is introduced.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Ever since Mercedes-Benz introduced the new E-Class earlier this year, there has been speculation as to when its sister model, the CLS would be redesigned. A new report says that it will take place in 2018.
      According to Automotive News, the next-generation CLS is expected to go on sale in the summer of 2018 for the U.S. The model will use Mercedes' Modular Rear Architecture (MRA) that is not only lighter than the platform underpinning the current CLS, but also bring more room. Spy shots reveal that the design of the next CLS will evolve, but will not depart from the current look. There is talk that the new inline-six that Mercedes announced earlier this month could be used for the CLS.
      The interesting bit about Automotive News' report is that Mercedes could move the CLS name to a new four-door sedan that AMG is currently developing, while the standard model would use the CLE nameplate. Also under speculation is that CLS shooting brake will be dropped when the next-generation model is introduced.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)