• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Lawsuit Alleges Unintended Acceleration In Ford Vehicles


    By William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    March 30, 2013

    A group of Ford customers have filed a class action lawsuit in West Virginia alleging that vehicles were not equipped with the proper safety equipment to prevent unintended acceleration.

    According to Reuters, the suit lists thirty vehicles built between 2002 and 2010 with electronic throttle control systems but without a brake override system. The vehicles in the suit include 2004-2012 F-Series pickups and the 2005-2009 Lincoln Town Car. (A full list of vehicles in the suit will be at the end of the article.)

    "They're trying to be compensated for their economic losses by having overpaid for cars that contained defects," said Adam Levitt, a partner at Grant & Eisenhofer and head of the law firm's consumer practice group. "Had they and the other class members been aware of these defects, they either wouldn't have bought the cars or would have paid a lot less for them."

    In response to the suit, Ford issued a statement that points towards studies done by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that state unintended acceleration is mostly caused by driver error.

    "NHTSA's work is far more scientific and trustworthy than work done by personal injury lawyers and their paid experts," Ford said in a statement. "In rare situations, vehicle factors, such as floor mats or broken mechanical components, can interfere with proper throttle operation, and manufacturers have addressed these rare events in field service actions.

    Vehicles named in the suit:

    Ford:

    • 2005-2007 500
    • 2005-2009 Crown Victoria
    • 2005-2010 Econoline
    • 2007-2010 Edge
    • 2009-2010 Escape
    • 2005-2010 Escape Hybrid
    • 2005-2010 Expedition
    • 2004-2010 Explorer
    • 2007-2010 Explorer Sport Trac
    • 2004-2010 F-Series
    • 2009-2010 Flex
    • 2008-2010 Focus
    • 2005-2007 Freestyle
    • 2006-2010 Fusion
    • 2005-2010 Mustang
    • 2008-2010 Taurus
    • 2008-2009 Taurus X
    • 2002-2005 Thunderbird
    • 2010 Transit Connect

    Lincoln:

    • 2003-2006 LS
    • 2006-2008 Mark LT
    • 2009-2010 MKS
    • 2010 MKT
    • 2007-2010 MKX
    • 2006-2010 MKZ
    • 2005-2009 Town Car
    • 2006-2010 Zephyr

    Mercury:

    • 2002-2005 Cougar
    • 2005-2009 Grand Marquis
    • 2009-2010 Mariner
    • 2005-2010 Mariner Hybrid
    • 2006-2010 Milan
    • 2005-2007 Montego
    • 2004-2010 Mountaineer
    • 2008-2010 Sable

    Source: Reuters

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    uh, my '81 Oldsmobile doesn't have a brake override either... should I sue for that? It doesn't have airbags or crumple zones or stability control....... I should sue because all of that wasn't installed on my car in 1981. No.. it doesn't matter that those weren't commonly installed in 1981.... they should still be there regardless...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    WOW the inbreeding stupidity continues to run rampant in Virgina.

    Talk about a group of people that feel they should not be held accountable for their own actions let alone their own choice to go into debt and then not be able to pay for it.

    This totally smells of Lawyers just going after money and the occasional Past Prius owner who could not get anything out of Toyota, so figured I buy an american brand and go after them. Since Ford has the highest debt, Guess I go after them in court and hope they want to settle out fast.

    Over all this just stinks of owner regret about their choice in vehicle they bought while also having lawyers looking for a way to get money.

    I hope this gets thrown out fast as it is a waste of the legal systems time

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    WOW the inbreeding stupidity continues to run rampant in Virgina.

    Talk about a group of people that feel they should not be held accountable for their own actions let alone their own choice to go into debt and then not be able to pay for it.

    This totally smells of Lawyers just going after money and the occasional Past Prius owner who could not get anything out of Toyota, so figured I buy an american brand and go after them. Since Ford has the highest debt, Guess I go after them in court and hope they want to settle out fast.

    Over all this just stinks of owner regret about their choice in vehicle they bought while also having lawyers looking for a way to get money.

    I hope this gets thrown out fast as it is a waste of the legal systems time

    Yep, Sounds like you have all the bases covered! Having worked at a law firm that handled all of the 'old' GM's big cases, the records I saw and stories/cases I read about would make you C R I N G E!

    Yes, lets sue the automaker and get our justice!

    Nevermind that the plaintiff was driving a car with shot brakes, no tread, beat to piss (NOT maintained) DRUNK, and had an accident at 3:30 in the AM on the way home from...yes, you guessed it, a bar -

    There are thousands & thousands of these cases...the new American way to get rich.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      A group of Shelby GT350 owners are not happy with Ford.
      Yesterday, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida claiming that the track-ready GT350 isn't. According to filling, owners complain that the vehicle overheats in as little as 15 minutes due faulty transmissions and rear differentials when driven on a track. When the vehicle does overheat, it goes into a limp mode that reduces power to protect the powertrain. The filing goes on to say that Ford fixed this issue in the 2017 model, but told owners of the 2016 model to make the fixes themselves - a possible breach of the car's warranty.
      “When Ford marketed and sold these Shelby GT350 Mustangs, it knew exactly how to appeal to track-enthusiasts: it marketed enhanced performance in a limited-edition iconic vehicle that has been associated with racing for generations,” said Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman, the law firm handling the case.
      “We believe that Ford induced purchasers with its ‘track-ready’ marketing, when in fact it knew that this defect would ultimately bar these Mustangs from ever being the hotrod consumers paid for.”
      At the moment, the lawsuit has four named plaintiffs. Hagens Berman estimates about 4,000 owners are affected by this issue. 
      “Ford is committed to providing our customers with top-quality vehicles. However, we do not comment on pending litigation,” said Ford spokesman Bradley Carroll to The Detroit News.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      A group of Shelby GT350 owners are not happy with Ford.
      Yesterday, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida claiming that the track-ready GT350 isn't. According to filling, owners complain that the vehicle overheats in as little as 15 minutes due faulty transmissions and rear differentials when driven on a track. When the vehicle does overheat, it goes into a limp mode that reduces power to protect the powertrain. The filing goes on to say that Ford fixed this issue in the 2017 model, but told owners of the 2016 model to make the fixes themselves - a possible breach of the car's warranty.
      “When Ford marketed and sold these Shelby GT350 Mustangs, it knew exactly how to appeal to track-enthusiasts: it marketed enhanced performance in a limited-edition iconic vehicle that has been associated with racing for generations,” said Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman, the law firm handling the case.
      “We believe that Ford induced purchasers with its ‘track-ready’ marketing, when in fact it knew that this defect would ultimately bar these Mustangs from ever being the hotrod consumers paid for.”
      At the moment, the lawsuit has four named plaintiffs. Hagens Berman estimates about 4,000 owners are affected by this issue. 
      “Ford is committed to providing our customers with top-quality vehicles. However, we do not comment on pending litigation,” said Ford spokesman Bradley Carroll to The Detroit News.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News
    • By William Maley
      FORD F-SERIES, SUVS, LINCOLN POST GAINS IN FEBRUARY; FORD'S OVERALL U.S. SALES DOWN 4 PERCENT VERSUS YEAR AGO
      Ford brand SUVs post record February results, with 68,820 vehicles sold Ford F-Series U.S. sales increase 9 percent versus a year ago, with 65,956 pickups sold Lincoln sales increase 9 percent, with gains coming from MKC, MKX and all-new Continental Ford Motor Company total U.S. sales of 208,440 vehicles are down 4 percent from a year ago; retail sales are down 3 percent, while fleet sales decline 5 percent DEARBORN, Mich., March 1, 2017 – Overall Ford Motor Company U.S. sales totaled 208,440 vehicles in February, a 4 percent decline versus a year ago.
      Retail sales of 134,576 vehicles decreased 3 percent, while fleet sales were down 5 percent, with 73,864 vehicles sold. The fleet decline reflects a strong year-ago comparison, with customer orders front-loaded in early 2016.
      Overall car sales were down 24 percent, while customers continue to shift to trucks and SUVs.
      Ford brand SUV sales totaled 68,820 vehicles – record February sales – up 6 percent versus a year ago. Record Escape sales of 27,637 vehicles and a 48 percent increase in Expedition sales drove the gains.
      Ford F-Series was up 9 percent, with 65,956 trucks sold. This represents F-Series’ best sales since 2004, with all-new Super Duty retail gains coming from every region of the country.
      “We continue seeing strong consumer demand for the highest-series Super Duty pickups and the all-new F-150 Raptor, plus greater availability of 2017 model year F-150s,” said Mark LaNeve, vice president, U.S. Marketing, Sales and Service. “This drove a $3,600 increase in average transaction prices for F-Series last month alone, Lincoln had a $2,100 increase, ultimately delivering an overall company transaction price increase of $1,900 per vehicle.”
      Lincoln sales totaled 8,744 vehicles, a 9 percent increase. Lincoln MKC, up 12 percent, MKX, up 1 percent, and all-new Continental sales of 1,079 cars fueled the growth.

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)