Jump to content
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    GM To Launch Electric Bike Brand in Europe

      Starting price 2,800 €

    General Motors is launching a new brand to sell electric bikes in Europe. The brand, ARĪV (pronounced Arrive) will launch first in German, Belgium, and the Netherlands, countries where lithium-ion powered bikes are already popular.

    Two models will be offered, the Meld at 2,800€ and the foldable Merge (shown above) at 3,400€.  

    Both bikes include Bluetooth technology for riders to track metrics such as speed, distance, battery level, and more. A USB port is included to help charge riders phones while underway.

    GM's experience in automotive EV technology was used for developing the powertrain on these bikes. The motor provides top of the segment torque for its size and enables speeds of up to 25 kph. The ARĪV battery charges from empty in about 3 1/2 hours with up to a 40-mile range on a single charge.

    Shipments of the bikes are scheduled to begin in Q2 of 2019.



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Very cool since I posted the story about the bike and the naming contest that they have moved forward with the official name and more detials. Very cool, I can actually see many in the HighTech Community buying this.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't know what battery powered bike sales prices are like, but like all things GM lately, this seems pretty overpriced. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Finally!

    GM has re-entered  the Europen market! 

    Maybe this bike could help with Cadillac sales over there! 

    • Haha 2
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 minute ago, ocnblu said:

    What sort of BS is Barra pedaling now?

    Well if they can't make any money selling cars in Europe.. maybe they can sell bikes. 

    • Haha 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I don't know what battery powered bike sales prices are like, but like all things GM lately, this seems pretty overpriced. 

    These prices are right inline with current electric bikes here in the States and in Europe. Benefit of the GM eBike is that it has class leading Torque and a cell phone holder with USB and Bluetooth.

    Now celebrating 10 years here in Seattle, you can compare and see that the prices are inline with what GM is selling them for in the 3 largest European market.

    https://www.seattleelectricbike.net/

    A number of US eBike dealers are willing to import this bike for those that are interested.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There you go. Your overpriced Blazer funds overpriced bikes.

    Europeans are on the whole much healthier and therefore lighter than Americans. They don't need the assist.

    I see this going two ways. 

    It either makes money but still is a waste of time.

    Or it doesn't make money and it's a collosal waste of time.

    Wait I get. They want to make autonomous bikes. No pedaling... No handlebar. Just sit hunched over and look at your phone the whole damn time with wind in your face. It's the new convertible! So good!

    • Haha 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41

    Posted (edited)

     

    On 2/15/2019 at 4:58 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    I don't know what battery powered bike sales prices are like, but like all things GM lately, this seems pretty overpriced. 

    My mom recently bought one and they're 3-5k(just another thing she will use for a month or two and never use it again..🙄). This doesn't seem too optimistic. Hers is an "actual" road bike though, not this funky city bike-like thing. 

    Edited by ccap41

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    16 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

     

    My mom recently bought one and they're 3-5k(just another thing she will use for a month or two and never use it again..🙄). This doesn't seem too optimistic. Hers is an "actual" road bike though, not this funky city bike-like thing. 

    That's really pricey for something not being used for commuting.  At least in the countries listed, commuting by bike is common. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    17 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    That's really pricey for something not being used for commuting.  At least in the countries listed, commuting by bike is common. 

    Yes and no. I agree it's a lot of money but if riding is your hobby you likely already have a couple/few grand into a bike anyway. My parents justification is so my mom can ride further with my dad. I think it's a bunch of BS, personally.. 

    Yeah, this GM bike looks like a commuting bike as it looks more compact and funky ergonomics.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    54 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Yes and no. I agree it's a lot of money but if riding is your hobby you likely already have a couple/few grand into a bike anyway. My parents justification is so my mom can ride further with my dad. I think it's a bunch of BS, personally.. 

    Yeah, this GM bike looks like a commuting bike as it looks more compact and funky ergonomics.

    Do not forget the cool Blue tooth connectivity, recharging dock and place to hold your phone. ;) :P  Yes it has that and I am being sarcastic as the bulk of people in Seattle do not bike ride in the rain up and down hills.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Random-but-related aside..back in the oughts when I rode a bicycle on trails/etc for 'fun', I worked for a few years at a company that would have a bike to work day once a month in the summer.    I lived about 5 miles from their office in Denver.   I would come in early, hauling my bike on a rack on the back of my Jeep, park in the parking garage, unload the bike, and ride out a couple blocks from the office and then 'ride to work'... 

    I'm not sure I'd ride a bike much where I live now in the Cleveland suburbs..too many hills and potholed streets.   But in the some local parks (the metro park system is very extensive here) I might ride one...

    Edited by Robert Hall

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    15 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    Random-but-related aside..back in the oughts when I rode a bicycle on trails/etc for 'fun', I worked for a few years at a company that would have a bike to work day once a month in the summer.    I lived about 5 miles from their office in Denver.   I would come in early, hauling my bike on a rack on the back of my Jeep, park in the parking garage, unload the bike, and ride out a couple blocks from the office and then 'ride to work'... 

    I'm not sure I'd ride a bike much where I live now in the Cleveland suburbs..too many hills and potholed streets.   But in the some local parks (the metro park system is very extensive here) I might ride one...

    Too many hills and traffic for me to get to work here in Pittsburgh... plus only about 3 months a year of acceptable weather to do it in 

    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Too many hills and traffic for me to get to work here in Pittsburgh... plus only about 3 months a year of acceptable weather to do it in 

    Totally agree, Seattle is the same way, at most 3 months a year of decent weather for bike riding, rest of the year. PASS, too wet or frozen.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • DRIVEN: 2020 Subaru Ascent Premium (AWD 2.4 turbo) HIGHS: -Finally, what the market was looking for, a worthwhile Subaru entry into the 3 row crossover segment.  And packaging, size wise, styling, just about perfect for Subaru -2.4 engine can snarl, nice go juice, and the CVT is actually fairly responsive.  Moves out well, or at least feels like it does.  Makes the Ascent feel sporty actually. -As mentioned above, packaging is just about perfect for Subaru.  It might be considered a tweener, but it does not feel hulking or girthy...and it still will be garagable for many of those folks that would shop import brands.  Cabin width not as wide as a Traverse, noticeably so...but conversely feels like a nice size upgrade from an Outback.  Maybe if you try to have three in the second row its a concern but otherwise should be ok.  Plenty of comfort remains and the third row is decent sized for leg room.  This may be the sweet spot size of a 3 row for many customers. -Cloth seats were attractive and did feel nice at the bottom. -Simple clean dash layout, noticeably signature Subaru.  Some interesting trim.   -Open and airy feel inside the cabin, and likewise visibility out.  In particular in front it doesn't feel significantly larger in front then a Forester or Outback. -Carlike ride and handling.  At least in line with the sort of current expectations of a Subaru / Toyota / Honda type of customer.  And reasonably quiet inside. -Nothing particularly egregious, and entirely in line with Subaru and Japanese car in general brand character.  If you are a Subaru fan, this is your manna, this should EXCITE you. LOWS: ...all that said (above) -A few times I caught the CVT with its pants down and it went into slow response / rubber bandy mode. -Dash, to me, did feel plain and basic (and that also is entirely in character for a Subaru).  I will go on record saying that a Traverse is nicer inside and much more interesting.  -Steering felt light and numb enough that I can't say it was anything besides decent.  All while being a huge upgrade in steering compared to other Subarus I have driven the last few years.  It is very much improved compared to those.  And the suspension was composed enough in the Ascent that it didn't bounce and bob and weave like I had when i drove a Forester before. -I didn't dissect the cargo area greatly but I do think maybe it is down a little bit in terms of usable dimensions compared to say, a Traverse or Atlas....probably as useful or more useful than an Acadia. -At the end of the day, apart from the kind of lively powertrain, the whole rest of the vehicle is MILQUETOAST.  Which, if you are a Subaru fan, should EXCITE you.  I mean, I think a Santa Fe may be more appealing emotionally.  I was expecting something to feed the soul here, there is nothing.  How they made it still feel lifeless while still miraculously making this vastly improved over other Subarus, must have required special skill. SUMMARY: At the end of the day, a perfectly innocuous but highly useful device that absolutely fulfills the Subaru brand character while at the same time borders on being something equal to the NPC version of an automobile.  And some will absolutely love that.  While superbly capable, I think I VASTLY prefer my GM's or even the VW Atlas.  Seek those out instead if you want ANY personality in your 3 row family hauler.        
  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...