Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    NHTSA Testing Mirrorless Cars

      ...New tech to replace old tech...

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has begun testing vehicles that have cameras in place of real mirrors.  The request to test such devices goes back to March of 2014 when the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers along with Tesla filed a petition with the NHTSA to get approval to install based rear or side vision cameras and screens  in their vehicles.  Daimler filed a similar petition in 2015 for their heavy duty trucks. Japan and Europe have already approved the technology. 

    The first car with cameras replacing the side mirrors was the Lexus ES sold in Japan, followed by the Audi e-tron in Europe back in December.  Both vehicles are sold in the U.S. with standard mirrors instead of the cameras.  Honda's coming Honda e will have the technology standard when it goes on sale in Europe later this year.

    Mirrorless systems are an area where the legislation has not yet caught up with the technology according to Mark Dahncke of Audi.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    2 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    But... they still have the pods on the side of the car... I'm not sure how much of an advancement it is.

    I expect those pods to go away to numbs on the side.

    I expect auto's to go this route:

    See the source image

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    SO much better to cast your eyes in the direction of where you intend to move (aka; merging left) than in the opposite directions. Easiler to catch someone coming out of your blind spot & into your peripheral. That said, some vehicles have pretty small side views.
    I like some of the rearview tech, such as Cadillacs, but you're looking in the same direction in that case.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    SO much better to cast your eyes in the direction of where you intend to move (aka; merging left) than in the opposite directions. Easiler to catch someone coming out of your blind spot & into your peripheral. That said, some vehicles have pretty small side views.
    I like some of the rearview tech, such as Cadillacs, but you're looking in the same direction in that case.

    What do you think of an implementation like Lexus version?

    See the source image

    I myself do not mind it, while I hate BMW version.

    See the source image

    Audi's implementation is not bad, I think a better integration than Lexus.

    See the source image

    VW has a nice integration that is probably same parts as Audi.

    See the source image

    I can also see side nubs like this for the cameras.

    See the source image

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    43 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    A lot of expensive tech to what benefit? Mirrors work

    Exactly my thought. When that tech goes on the fritz (and it will) one will wish they had that low tech mirror. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    Exactly my thought. When that tech goes on the fritz (and it will) one will wish they had that low tech mirror. 

    The problem with mirrors is that somebody could just act like a vandal and break them.  The advantage is that mirror replacement is cheap compared to those cameras if someone vandalizes your car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mirrors aren't exactly cheap, either. Power control, sometimes heated, and almost always you have to buy the entire assembly. It's hundreds to start.

    All the 'side view camera' images David posted above suck- both in integration, and field of vision. A distraction.

    Only reason I can see for overly-complicating side views is for aerodynamics, tho at the average speed most cars travel, it's pointless.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Mirrors aren't exactly cheap, either. Power control, sometimes heated, and almost always you have to buy the entire assembly. It's hundreds to start.
     

    Yeah, I had to replace a whole mirror assembly on my Jeep when the lower surround of it was cracked.  Was $380 to replace (incl. labor).   Have to take off the interior door panel to unbolt it and disconnect the wires..

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    The problem with mirrors is that somebody could just act like a vandal and break them.  The advantage is that mirror replacement is cheap compared to those cameras if someone vandalizes your car.

    Which is exactly my point to my last post. Cheaper to maintain by a country mile. Oh and some insurance coverage plans will cover a broken mirror. Your HD side view screen goes out? Better talk to the manufacturer and hope it’s still under warranty. 

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good News cost of S-Class side mirrors have dropped in the last few years. Bad News ya still looking at $570 to $675 dollars for the mirror module and then installation, so I bet a cool $1,500 for the repair of a broken mirror. 

    Estimate on the Camera nubs is probably  $1,500 to $2,500 depending on brand.

    image.png

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, dfelt said:

    Good News cost of S-Class side mirrors have dropped in the last few years. Bad News ya still looking at $570 to $675 dollars for the mirror module and then installation, so I bet a cool $1,500 for the repair of a broken mirror. 

    Estimate on the Camera nubs is probably  $1,500 to $2,500 depending on brand.

    image.png

    Thus solidifying my point. There’s a camera AND a screen to contend with in that situation. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love technology and advancement...but this continues to come off as more of a concept car experiment than anything. Mirrors still work.

    Small gear shifters still work too, vs. haptic feedback buttons. Advance the efficiency, advance the refinement, advance the safety...but another HD camera and another screen?

    Interesting but not needed. Curious to see who and what gets this first, if anything, here.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, caddycruiser said:

    Love technology and advancement...but this continues to come off as more of a concept car experiment than anything. Mirrors still work.

    Small gear shifters still work too, vs. haptic feedback buttons. Advance the efficiency, advance the refinement, advance the safety...but another HD camera and another screen?

    Interesting but not needed. Curious to see who and what gets this first, if anything, here.

    More than that, but those of us who have been driving a while have been trained to look in the mirrors. It would take a while to get used to looking at a different spot.

    The Center rearview mirror like Cadillac and Toyota have is different. You still look in the same spot for that.  They don't work as well at night though.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Another issue is taking your focal point from a transparent surface (the window) and moving to an opaque one (the door panel). That’s a possible step back from the optimum.

    A LOT of ‘new tech’ (OEMs have been toying with camera mirrors for around 60 years now) is ‘just because we can’.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    A LOT of ‘new tech’ (OEMs have been toying with camera mirrors for around 60 years now) is ‘just because we can’.

    Isn't that what the automobile was in the first place? There was never truly a "need" for an automobile. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    The problem with mirrors is that somebody could just act like a vandal and break them.  The advantage is that mirror replacement is cheap compared to those cameras if someone vandalizes your car.

    Who will make all of those videos on Youtube of guys on motorcycles busting off the mirrors of bad drivers if cars no longer have them?

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Is the tesla semi concept really a 1-seater??

    Appears to be only one seat in this pic of a prototype from 2018..they've been road testing them for a while.

     

    tesla-semi-1-e1539187374903.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Is the tesla semi concept really a 1-seater??

    There are two more seats behind the center seated driver.

    See the source image

    4 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    Appears to be only one seat in this pic of a prototype from 2018..they've been road testing them for a while.

     

    tesla-semi-1-e1539187374903.jpg

    Robert you can actually see the fold up seat behind the drivers seat.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Pretty sucky seating spot for passenger, back in the cave, but at least the capability is there.

    Total of 3 people, not sure why 3 compared to the traditional 2 but that is how Tesla went.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/29/2019 at 12:19 PM, ccap41 said:

    What was the need

    There are two things that make an economy when you boil it down to the basic elements. The flow of money and the flow of goods/services.  Roads and cars make that flow much faster and cheaper than horse and buggy.  Trains are good for long distance, but suck for the "last mile".

    Without the road network we have to day (and are letting crumble to bits) is why we have the economy we have today... which even in a recession is still better than 4th world economies. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/1/2019 at 2:54 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    There are two things that make an economy when you boil it down to the basic elements. The flow of money and the flow of goods/services.  Roads and cars make that flow much faster and cheaper than horse and buggy.  Trains are good for long distance, but suck for the "last mile".

    Without the road network we have to day (and are letting crumble to bits) is why we have the economy we have today... which even in a recession is still better than 4th world economies. 

    I know it was an improvement but it was still never a NEED. Everybody wanted to expand and grow but they never needed to. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    59 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    That's pretty Amish of you.. 

    Well, when one throws out the word "need" and you go back to the roots of it... It quickly becomes a "want". 

    At this point of the economy and life automobiles are absolutely a need in one fashion or another. But, when they first became a thing and everybody was used to not using them, they were a luxury and everybody was okay and used to using horse and buggy for transportation. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Well, when one throws out the word "need" and you go back to the roots of it... It quickly becomes a "want". 

    At this point of the economy and life automobiles are absolutely a need in one fashion or another. But, when they first became a thing and everybody was used to not using them, they were a luxury and everybody was okay and used to using horse and buggy for transportation. 

    Plus the Methan gas smell of Horse farts. 🤣

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Well, when one throws out the word "need" and you go back to the roots of it... It quickly becomes a "want". 

    At this point of the economy and life automobiles are absolutely a need in one fashion or another. But, when they first became a thing and everybody was used to not using them, they were a luxury and everybody was okay and used to using horse and buggy for transportation. 

    We needed the advancements to keep up with the rest of the world. Germany and England weren't going to sit still and not produce.  We would have been at a disastrous disadvantage in WWI and WWII if we had just stayed Amish back in 1895. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    We needed the advancements to keep up with the rest of the world. Germany and England weren't going to sit still and not produce.  We would have been at a disastrous disadvantage in WWI and WWII if we had just stayed Amish back in 1895. 

    Wouldn't those then be the first automobiles? If they weren't creating them then there would be no catch-up needed. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IMO early automobiles in the U.S. (1900- say 1915) were primarily a 'want'. Lifestyles were not hugely changed as they came on scene; people primarily stayed in the same locations and farming was prevail ant. Most early cars (including Chevrolet) were quite expensive. After that, professions and even personal lifestyles started to change / embrace the automobile. The second lifestyle change was the widespread improvement of roads, but aside from the interstate highways, this was piecemeal.

    Also keep in mind there was very very little in the way of 'global competition' during the beginning of the 20th century, countries were largely autonomous. I think it wasn't until WWI that most people began to evaluate just that.

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Plastic cladding = off road.  Instead of killing the Sonata, they should just put plastic body cladding down the side and raise the price by $10k and call it the Sonata HD Overlander X.  Instant hit.
    • Considering a planet with 8 Billion and he sold almost 2 million cars, then he is covering .025% of the population compared to other auto companies. I think 2024 going into 2025 we will see other auto companies top Tesla. You and I are two peas in a pod as I also was up on a hill watching the implosion and thinking what a waste as it was a great building. I love the Kingdome and hate the new stadium.  Agree it was surreal to see the ship hit the support pillar and the whole building just collapse. Be interesting to see what replaces it as today bridges built like that are not allowed due to the exact nature of how it collapsed.  Yes, Tesla is a love or hate and the minimalist approach is not for everyone. I honestly have to agree with the comment @smk4565 I believe made that the touch screen only will be the future of cheap autos and switches and buttons will be the higher end autos. Interesting times we live in for sure.
    • Decent upgrade to the aging 2024 model. Nice to see they are reducing costs of the curved screen in the EVs by pushing it out across the Hyundai Family and into Kia. The one thing I do not like is all the Chrome. 🤢 🤮
    • Today at the New York International Auto Show, Hyundai unveiled an update to its little truck, the Hyundai Santa Cruz. The refresh to the exterior is relatively mild, though it features a more menacing grille with bolder verticle lines.  Updated running lights and new wheel designs add to the fresher look. Inside, there is a new steering wheel, infotainment system, and instrument panel. on upper trims, an optional panoramic curved display houses dual 12.3-inch displays for driver and entertainment. The plenty-capable powertrains carry over with either a 191-horsepower direct injected 2.5-liter 4-cylinder or a turbo-charged version of of the same engine with 281 horsepower.  The transmission for the entry-level engine is a traditional 8-speed automatic, while the turbo-charged model gets an 8-speed dual-clutch transmission. Santa Cruzes with the turbo engine gain a new tow mode for enhanced towing control.  Both powertrains are towing capable with a 3,500 lb rating for the entry engine and a stout 5,000 lb rating for the turbo models when equipped with all-wheel drive. New for 2025 is an XRT trim geared even more towards outdoor adventure. It features a trim-specific front fascia and grille, special 18-inch wheels with all-terrain tires, an increased approach angle, front tow hooks, and surround-view monitoring.    The 2025 Hyundai Santa Cruz goes on sale this summer. View full article
    • Regarding Tesla - it's either love or hate with these vehicles.  A college friend I'll be seeing when in SoCal next month has 2 of them, and I'll probably be riding in both of them - one is his sleeker S model and I forgot which the other one (that his wife drives) is.  In certain places, people have a lot of disposable income and having a Tesla goes with the landscape. Minimalist(ic) isn't necessarily bad.  We all remember the adage "less is more."  I'll vouch that the workmanship of the interior is good and I can also vouch that the overall look (including the centered everything on one display) is ugly.  I will say that EV motors are supposed to last a long time but the battery replacement is very expensive and the range is currently not that optimal. I did not like the model Y I had for less than 1 day.  Also, its exterior is mostly ugly.  That's my opinion. This isn't a discussion I want to get into.  I would much prefer a more user-friendly EV ... and not just yet. - - - - - What I was randomly going to say: I'm not sure whether I'm in shock or still feeling surreal as to what happened in Baltimore.  At first, I thought a ship just hit something on a bridge.  Then I saw the footage and that's the surreal part ... the domino-like collapse of the entire structure and the size of the ship.  I remember having to figure out the forces of either tension or compression on each member of a truss-like structure when I was in school.   A group of us sat there for about 3 or 4 hours one night - with some Mountain Dew - to work that out. I don't believe I've been on that bridge since it's on the outer beltway, but it's numbered as part of the U.S. interstate system.  From looking at the map, it is the major bridge on the entrance to/exit from Baltimore Harbor.  I hope they find the 6 individuals who were working on it fixing potholes in the middle of the night who fell down with the bridge.  The ship giving a mayday is what allowed them to shut down both approaches to the bridge just in time.   The weird thing is that it happened on March 26.  IIRC, the deliberate (domino-like) implosion of the reinforced concrete Kingdome in Seattle happened on March 26, 2000 (no rain that day) and people were sitting on slopes overlooking downtown to see that happen.  But that's how it is with planned implosions.  I went there that morning and have photos of the Kingdome's last day somewhere. https://www.seahawks.com/video/kingdome-implosion-hd It was indeed March 26, 2000.  I was one of the few who liked the Kingdome.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings