Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Lincoln Aviator Adaptive Suspension Can Read the Road Ahead

      ...smooths out potholes before you hit them...

    The new Lincoln Aviator will be introducing an Adaptive Suspension with Road Preview that uses the forward camera to sense potholes in the road and adjusts the suspension to minimize the impact felt in the cabin.   The system uses 12 sensors to monitor vehicle conditions like vehicle motion, body movement, steering input, acceleration, and braking. The sensors read at 500 times per second and can make adjustments 100 times per second, this totals out to 23,000 inputs per second of data. The system can operate each wheel independently. Lincoln developed the entire system in-house.

    Additionally, in a nod to the air sprung Lincolns of the past, there will be an available Air Glide Suspension which replaces the coil springs with guided air springs, enabling the Aviator to ride at several ride heights.  Over 70 mph, the Aviator lowers to Aero height for the best in efficiency and performance.  

    The Lincoln Aviator arrives in dealerships summer of 2019.

     

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    1 minute ago, dfelt said:

    Very cool, this will be an interesting comparison of Lincolns Air Glide system to Cadillacs Magna Ride system.

    Airglide is meant to be soft and get softer when the road is rough. Magnaride is fairly stiff and gets stiffer when you want it to handle sharp. 

    Two different beasts

    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think that system where it looks ahead and adjust suspension for more comfort was first introduced on the S-class.  I guess pretty neat feature for luxury vehicles. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, ykX said:

    I think that system where it looks ahead and adjust suspension for more comfort was first introduced on the S-class.  I guess pretty neat feature for luxury vehicles. 

    I think you're right, but I think the MB used LIDAR while this uses Camera.  Functionally, no different. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting in rewatching this video, so I wonder if the airbags are like those found on semi-trucks, firestone airbags? Also the fact that the shocks stiffen up tends to make me think Magnaride, so you have both firm ride for spirited driving and minimal body roll and yet airbagged to give a lazy boy comfort of absorbing the road imperfections. 

    Very excited to have this come out and try it. Surprised it is coming out first on the Aviator and not the Navigator.

    Will be interesting to see how Cadillac responds to this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Interesting in rewatching this video, so I wonder if the airbags are like those found on semi-trucks, firestone airbags? Also the fact that the shocks stiffen up tends to make me think Magnaride, so you have both firm ride for spirited driving and minimal body roll and yet airbagged to give a lazy boy comfort of absorbing the road imperfections. 

    Very excited to have this come out and try it. Surprised it is coming out first on the Aviator and not the Navigator.

    Will be interesting to see how Cadillac responds to this.

    They already did.... with a lazy entry into the segment of the XT6

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    They already did.... with a lazy entry into the segment of the XT6

    Guess when I test drove it last friday, the impact was not there as the XT6 rode like any other coil / shock auto. Was not impressive to me of a luxury isolate the world ride. Thanks for the info.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I like that Lincoln is going back to air suspension at least on this vehicle if not others also. One of the things I liked most about my '85 Continental was the air ride. 

    Consider one as a replacement for the Buick?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Consider one as a replacement for the Buick?

    I don't buy new anymore, so there would be at least one interim vehicle before an Aviator.  At the moment, I'm browsing used S-Classes, but like the CT6, I don't know if I can get one in my driveway. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I don't buy new anymore, so there would be at least one interim vehicle before an Aviator.  At the moment, I'm browsing used S-Classes, but like the CT6, I don't know if I can get one in my driveway. 

    Sounds like a fun test drive is coming up. :) 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, dfelt said:

    Sounds like a fun test drive is coming up. :) 

    Na, not yet. Not till my rental property sells. 

    I could go with a CLS though, I'm pretty sure that has a shorter wheelbase 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Na, not yet. Not till my rental property sells. 

    I could go with a CLS though, I'm pretty sure that has a shorter wheelbase 

    Me thinking you sell both properties and buy a new house with your CT6. :P 

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I think you're right, but I think the MB used LIDAR while this uses Camera.  Functionally, no different. 

    The S-class uses a camera also, the LIDAR is for the semi-autonomous drive functions I believe.     

    I think it is smart for Lincoln to go the predictive air suspension route.  Ride comfort should be what Lincoln is chasing.

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Na, not yet. Not till my rental property sells. 

    I could go with a CLS though, I'm pretty sure that has a shorter wheelbase 

    It should be identical to an E-class, I believe they run the same wheelbase, and front and rear track, same wheel lug patterns, etc.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    It should be identical to an E-class, I believe they run the same wheelbase, and front and rear track, same wheel lug patterns, etc.

    Yeah, but I like the CLS better.  The E-Class just looks like airport black-car service to me (since I usually buy in black). 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    While not a fan, I would agree with both @Drew Dowdell and @ccap41 Why would anyone really want a European Taxi in their driveway when they can have a classier looking CLS.

    Because the coupe-like design really cuts down head room by a lot.  Coupe-like sedans are bad; coupe-like crossovers are even worse.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Because the coupe-like design really cuts down head room by a lot.  Coupe-like sedans are bad; coupe-like crossovers are even worse.

    I'd really prefer a coupe, but it's not practical, besides, I have my Toronado for a true coupe. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    While not a fan, I would agree with both @Drew Dowdell and @ccap41 Why would anyone really want a European Taxi in their driveway when they can have a classier looking CLS.

    So somebody who is 6'6" can have their head on their shoulders while they sit in the back. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    CLS is way better looking than the E Class. 

    Gen 1 and 2 are for sure but that current CLS looks ugly, the E53 sedan looks better and the E-class coupe with no B pillar looks best 

    48 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I'd really prefer a coupe, but it's not practical, besides, I have my Toronado for a true coupe. 

    The current e-class coupe is not a C-class chassis like the old one, I think rear seat room is decent in them.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Gen 1 and 2 are for sure but that current CLS looks ugly, the E53 sedan looks better and the E-class coupe with no B pillar looks best 

    The current e-class coupe is not a C-class chassis like the old one, I think rear seat room is decent in them.  

    Getting old, semi-handicapped people into the second row of a true coupe is going to be too difficult. 

    I'd probably aim for a '16 or '17, preferably a CLS550 with Distronic+

    But none of that matters until I get a nice phone call from my real estate broker. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    So somebody who is 6'6" can have their head on their shoulders while they sit in the back. 

    For me it is more like removing my head and holding it in my lap! :P 

    For everyone that is not vertically in the clouds like me, the CLS is a nice looking car and if it fits your desires, go for it. :) 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Getting old, semi-handicapped people into the second row of a true coupe is going to be too difficult. 

    I'd probably aim for a '16 or '17, preferably a CLS550 with Distronic+

    But none of that matters until I get a nice phone call from my real estate broker. 

    The Gen 2 CLS is a slick looking car, and the bi-turbo V8 that they took away from the E-class.  That would be near the front of my shopping list also, but I am thinking of a '17 SL550 in a couple years the post re-fresh looks better than the 2013-2016 and I can't afford a post refresh SL.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • These are attractive little vehicles *for their class*. I'm slowly seeing more and more of them.  Then again, I have no clue if I'm seeing the new Trax or Trailblazers...hahaha. 
    • MECHANICAL PHOTOS The engine bay is neatly arranged as it typically is in GM products, with dipsticks, reservoirs, and an easy to reach battery ... someone would have had to help me find the turbocharger One can see 3 exhaust manifold passages below the engine shroud The engine placard says 1.3 liters and long running OBD II diagnostics - - - - - END OF PHOTOS
    • INTERIOR PHOTOS This is what the driver sees upon entering and the light switches are in their own small panel (set to auto) This is the view from the passenger's door and this provides a good view of the outlets above and buttons below the cubby space at the front of the console The dashboard is very sensibly arranged, easy to learn, and easy on the eyes ... note several push buttons for drive mode, traction, etc. right ahead of the shift lever and various plugs right below the climate control panel.  The touch screen is engaged and the vents above the center stack provide excellent air circulation. This shows typical Chevrolet gauge graphics, a fuel gauge with graphic bars, and an always useful coolant temperature gauge.  Key lights for driving modes (traction, following distance, etc.) are above the graphic display box between the 2 round gauges. This is the typical graphic box in various Chevrolets and, once it has been learned, toggling between trip, vehicle, and eco. becomes easy.  Trip has the most options while eco. rarely needs to be used.  To the left of the odometer is the graphic which shows AWD or 2WD. Cubby hole for phone, outlets for plugs, and push button controls (partial, at the right) sensibly arranged as well as honeycomb hatch to look like it could have been fabric Rear seat legroom appears to be respectable.  The two-tone effect on the fabric is fairly nice and there are map pockets behind both front seats. This shows the rearward view from the driver's seat which would make lane change and parking assists helpful The rear seats follow a "60-40" (long running car jargon) split back, a courtesy lamp, and a groove for the rear cover (which was not present in the vehicle) This gives an idea of the cargo space with the rear seats in their upright position as well as 2 usable storage wells at each side of the rear cargo area
    • EXTERIOR PHOTOS The side view shows the more compact shape and the sheet metal accents, attractive alloy wheels, and a roof rack  The angled rear view shows taillamps which look fairly true-to-form for Chevrolet, but the liftgate is slightly heavy to pull up and push back down ... a person also has to make sure it's fully shut The angled front view shows attractive (LED) lighting
    • Seems Kia will have a faster model above the GT-Line EV9, expected to be over 600 HP and Torque. Kia is presenting a great plan. Kia CEO Investor Day Kia presents 2030 roadmap to become global sustainable mobility leader
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings