• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Don't Expect A Midsize Truck From Ram


    • Ram's Brand Boss Can't Make A Case For A Midsize Ram Truck

    You would think that with the introduction of the Chevrolet Colorado/GMC Terrain and refreshed Toyota Tacoma, the likes of Ford and Ram would be getting in the midsize truck action. But Ram boss Bob Hegbloom can't make it work for the brand. The problem according to Automotive News is the price of higher fuel economy.

    Hegbloom explained that back in the heyday of midsize trucks - the 1980's - consumers bought them because they were considerably smaller, less expensive, and boasted impressive fuel economy. Although midsize trucks had less capability than their full-size compatriots, consumers didn't mind.

    "When you look at those four factors, that's truly what a midsize pickup customer is looking for. I've been able to develop a strategy to come up with three of the four -- and even with what's out there on the market today, I haven't seen anyone who can deliver on all four," said Hegbloom.

    To Hegbloom, a midsize truck from Ram would have to achieve 35 MPG on the highway. The Ram 1500 EcoDiesel can achieve 29 MPG on the highway.

    "If full-size now is pushing 30 [mpg], you're going to expect a midsize to be at least at 35. You're also going to expect it to be significantly less expensive. But to bring the technology in to deliver on 35 mpg, then you're going to raise the price," said Hegbloom.

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    0


      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    It's not just about fuel economy.  Some people just don't want to wheel around a full size truck no matter how great the fuel economy is... it is simply too much vehicle for them to handle. 

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't want/need a midsize truck. I have owned a '95 Chevy S10 and an '80 Dodge D50.  I just need 4 cylinders and a 6 foot bed. For me anything more is overkill.

    3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why RAM hasn't come out with a small pickup based on the FIAT 'Small-Wide' (and its 4x4 derivative (Jeep Renegade)) platform is beyond me. That'd be a perfect base to build a pickup for urban/suburban use, and would likely hit the fuel economy targets that RAM needs. 

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why RAM hasn't come out with a small pickup based on the FIAT 'Small-Wide' (and its 4x4 derivative (Jeep Renegade)) platform is beyond me. That'd be a perfect base to build a pickup for urban/suburban use, and would likely hit the fuel economy targets that RAM needs. 

     

    A Renegade EXT would be killar!

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sucky Photo shop that I am, wish I could figure out how people keep the background and edit the car but this is what I think the standard cab would look like for a Jeep Renegade Truckpost-12-0-24912400-1428437835_thumb.jpg

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    :roflmao: Thanks Ocn for the laugh. I agree it would be wicked if it did happen for a compact pickup that City and Suburban peeps would love with High Gas mileage.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's too bad they haven't built the Wrangler based pickup like the concept from a few years ago..that was cool and stylish.

     

    That may be the biggest single reason Ram won't get one.... they are serious about bringing a Wrangler pickup in the next generation. 

     

    .... all of the BS about fuel economy is just that.... bs.  GM sold over 9,000 of their new pickups in February with no decrease in sales of Silverado or Sierra.... and no decrease in sales of the Tacoma (up 13%)  or Frontier (up 5.4%).  The GM twins came out of no-where and are now outselling the Tundra and Frontier even though both of those models are still posting increasing sales. 

     

    The mid-size truck market is growing and Ram ignores it at their own peril. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think everyone is watching GM still.  There have been small Ram truck mules spotted, but they are still denying it.  GM built such a fantastic midsizer they really raised the bar.  i own 2 3rd gen Dakota regular cabs and find the size perfect for me. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think everyone is watching GM still.  There have been small Ram truck mules spotted, but they are still denying it.  GM built such a fantastic midsizer they really raised the bar.  i own 2 3rd gen Dakota regular cabs and find the size perfect for me. 

     

    I don't know how much longer FCA can sit it out and watch.  Wentzville workers just got their lunch break slashed  just so GM could squeeze out an extra 3,500 trucks a year and adding 1,000 flex workers to get another 2,000 trucks a month. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    the big question is, how big of a market is out there?  I think there are buyers left, but the reason the midsize truck world died in the first place was because of lack of sales.  I do think GM needs to up production BIG TIME, especially when the diesel comes out.  I have driven a new Z71 and it was amazing and IMHO sets a new standard. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The reason the mid-size truck market died is because the products were left to rot on the vine. That's why there were no sales. GM is proving the existence of a market now with worthy products.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Would be cool if FCA were to make a pickup trucklet out of the Renegade... but then GMC would need to dust off the Granite CUV and pickup and put them into production.  Not a bad thing, imo!

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The reason the mid-size truck market died is because the products were left to rot on the vine. That's why there were no sales. GM is proving the existence of a market now with worthy products.

    Not exactly, a lot had to do with price.  At the time the difference between a midsize and fullsize was very small.  that could easily change now since fullsize trucks have gotten ridiculously expensive, that is where they have to be careful.  IMHO, if we see a midsize truck from FCA it will be a Jeep wrangler based truck or a shared platform between ram an Jeep. 

     

    the interesting thing, they can do thise.  underneath the skin the 2WD and 4x4  3rd gen Dakotas were totally different trucks.  they could do the same for a Ram and Jeep truck.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To Hegbloom, a midsize truck from Ram would have to achieve 35 MPG on the highway. The Ram 1500 EcoDiesel can achieve 29 MPG on the highway.

    "If full-size now is pushing 30 [mpg], you're going to expect a midsize to be at least at 35. You're also going to expect it to be significantly less expensive. But to bring the technology in to deliver on 35 mpg, then you're going to raise the price," said Hegbloom.

     

    That is such an incredibly weak excuse, GM's midsize twins are a big win in the truck market. It's clear that a less expensive, smaller, more efficient truck has a solid consumer base. They wont build a midsize truck because it can't match the ecodiesel? Come on. We all know the real reason is that their resources are stretched thin right now. Ram as a brand needs another consumer product.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The reason the mid-size truck market died is because the products were left to rot on the vine. That's why there were no sales. GM is proving the existence of a market now with worthy products.

    Not exactly, a lot had to do with price.  At the time the difference between a midsize and fullsize was very small.  that could easily change now since fullsize trucks have gotten ridiculously expensive, that is where they have to be careful.  IMHO, if we see a midsize truck from FCA it will be a Jeep wrangler based truck or a shared platform between ram an Jeep. 

     

    the interesting thing, they can do thise.  underneath the skin the 2WD and 4x4  3rd gen Dakotas were totally different trucks.  they could do the same for a Ram and Jeep truck.

    I'm not buying (ahem) the pricing argument. Based on what I see up here a loaded Canyon/Colorado up here rings in about the same as a reasonably-equipped half-ton.

    I think the production bottleneck Mopar is now facing as far as its trucks go is also a bit of a factor. Ram production is now maxed out, and I don't know how much flexibility Toledo would have to build a Wrangler-based pickup.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ram would do well to ignore the mid size market and go with compact. The compact market is just waiting to explode with solid high mileage trucks.

     

    Perfect example is the Chevy Luv / Isuzu Pup trucks with diesel and they did outstanding on gas mileage and met most suburban and inner city owners needs.

     

    Not everything needs to be Crewcab size. I truly believe they could rule the compact market by taking the Cherokee platform or the Wrangler and build a compact truck that would be very successful. Ford left their compact ranger to rot and yet still sold a ton of them showing a market for a compact truck does exist.

     

    America could get their butts kicked if China brings in a cheap Compact truck that does what most inner city and suburban people want. bed capacity of 1000lbs, towing of 2000lbs and no more. 

     

    1982 Chevy Luv Diesel was 30 City/ 36 highway. http://www.aboutautomobile.com/Fuel/1982/Chevrolet/LUV

     

    Just think how a compact truck with a modern diesel or CNG engine would rock in the High 30's low 40's or better.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    The reason the mid-size truck market died is because the products were left to rot on the vine. That's why there were no sales. GM is proving the existence of a market now with worthy products.

    Not exactly, a lot had to do with price.  At the time the difference between a midsize and fullsize was very small.  that could easily change now since fullsize trucks have gotten ridiculously expensive, that is where they have to be careful.  IMHO, if we see a midsize truck from FCA it will be a Jeep wrangler based truck or a shared platform between ram an Jeep. 

     

    the interesting thing, they can do thise.  underneath the skin the 2WD and 4x4  3rd gen Dakotas were totally different trucks.  they could do the same for a Ram and Jeep truck.

    I'm not buying (ahem) the pricing argument. Based on what I see up here a loaded Canyon/Colorado up here rings in about the same as a reasonably-equipped half-ton.

    I think the production bottleneck Mopar is now facing as far as its trucks go is also a bit of a factor. Ram production is now maxed out, and I don't know how much flexibility Toledo would have to build a Wrangler-based pickup.

     

    No, I was talking about the last gen Dakota, etc.  The Colorado really is a bargain and I was actually surprised at the amount of equipment the 34k Colorado I drove had.  And yes, prodcution could be the hickup.  Did they ever actually explain that discuised midsize mule spotted a few weeks ago?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The GM trucks aren't selling on price, they are selling on smaller size.  There are plenty of people who would like to have a truck but don't want to wheel around the behemoths the 1/2-ton models have become. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The GM trucks aren't selling on price, they are selling on smaller size.  There are plenty of people who would like to have a truck but don't want to wheel around the behemoths the 1/2-ton models have become. 

    I believe it is selling on both aspects.  If it was a crappy truck, it wouldn't sell despite price and size.  i loved the Z71 I rove and it had basically everything I would want plus some.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The GM trucks aren't selling on price, they are selling on smaller size.  There are plenty of people who would like to have a truck but don't want to wheel around the behemoths the 1/2-ton models have become. 

    I believe it is selling on both aspects.  If it was a crappy truck, it wouldn't sell despite price and size.  i loved the Z71 I rove and it had basically everything I would want plus some.

     

     

    Well... no... I feel that the GM trucks are rather expensive for their size.  As some have pointed out, full-size trucks aren't much more expensive.  The GMers are selling in-spite of their price... not because they are cheap. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    The GM trucks aren't selling on price, they are selling on smaller size.  There are plenty of people who would like to have a truck but don't want to wheel around the behemoths the 1/2-ton models have become. 

    I believe it is selling on both aspects.  If it was a crappy truck, it wouldn't sell despite price and size.  i loved the Z71 I rove and it had basically everything I would want plus some.

     

     

    Well... no... I feel that the GM trucks are rather expensive for their size.  As some have pointed out, full-size trucks aren't much more expensive.  The GMers are selling in-spite of their price... not because they are cheap. 

     

    I still disagree.  The Colorado i drove was an extended cab Z71, it had all the power stuff, my-link, backup camera, tow package, locking rear, a few dealer add-ons (bright exhaust tip, yadded, yadda), and it still was only 34k.  price a silverado out with all this truck had and i would bet you are 10k more in price.  Heck, i have priced out a minimal options regular cab Z71 and sticker was over 40k and it didn't have everything the Colorado had.   I used to think they were overpriced myself, but GM has reall stuffed a LOT of content for the price in these trucks.  Another thing besides price and size is that these are such sublime driving trucks.  Super smooth, excellent ride, beautiful interior, etc, etc.  As I said, they have raised the bar. 

     

    Anyways, back to the topic at hand.  If FCA does a midsize, they have to do the Wrangler based pickup.  There are people just salivating at this thing, especially paired with the Ecodiesel.  they can make a Dakota off the same platform with more traditional styling and higher focus on the on-road portion of things. 

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    Loading...



  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. BowTieFarmer
      BowTieFarmer
      (57 years old)
    2. will75
      will75
      (41 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      It came down to the wire, but a tentative deal between General Motors and Canadian union Unifor was reached before the midnight deadline. 
      “Did we achieve our objective? I would suggest the answer is clearly yes,” said Unifor President Jerry Dias during a press conference this morning.
      “We have found a solution for your facilities. To say this is a difficult set of negotiations is an incredible understatement."
      In a statement released by GM, the tentative agreement will bring wage increases to the 3,860 workers and introduce new investments and products to the Oshawa and St. Catharines plants. Oshawa was a key focus for Unifor as GM didn't have any plans for the plant after 2018. 
      For St. Catharines, GM will move some engine production from Mexico to the plant. A source tells The Detroit News the plant will also continue building the 3.6L V6 and add some transmission work. Oshawa was the big winner as GM will be investing millions into the plant to make it the only GM plant that will build cars and trucks. GM and Unifor aren't saying what the products will be. 
      “It’s a total win for Jerry Dias and Unifor. They got everything they were looking to get going into the talks; every box right now is checked,” said Tony Faria, professor emeritus, office of automotive and vehicle research at the University of Windsor’s Odette School of Business.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News, 2, GM
      Press Release is on Page 2


      General Motors of Canada Media Statement
      OSHAWA, ON, September 20, 2016 — General Motors of Canada and Unifor have reached a tentative new collective agreement, covering approximately 3,860 represented employees at just after midnight on September 20th 2016.  The agreement will enable significant new product, technology and process investments at GM’s Oshawa, St. Catharines and Woodstock facilities, placing those operations at the forefront of advanced manufacturing flexibility, innovation and environmental sustainability.  This agreement is subject to member ratification.  We will be working with government on potential support, and will provide further details on the investment at the appropriate time, while respecting Unifor’s ratification process.

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      It came down to the wire, but a tentative deal between General Motors and Canadian union Unifor was reached before the midnight deadline. 
      “Did we achieve our objective? I would suggest the answer is clearly yes,” said Unifor President Jerry Dias during a press conference this morning.
      “We have found a solution for your facilities. To say this is a difficult set of negotiations is an incredible understatement."
      In a statement released by GM, the tentative agreement will bring wage increases to the 3,860 workers and introduce new investments and products to the Oshawa and St. Catharines plants. Oshawa was a key focus for Unifor as GM didn't have any plans for the plant after 2018. 
      For St. Catharines, GM will move some engine production from Mexico to the plant. A source tells The Detroit News the plant will also continue building the 3.6L V6 and add some transmission work. Oshawa was the big winner as GM will be investing millions into the plant to make it the only GM plant that will build cars and trucks. GM and Unifor aren't saying what the products will be. 
      “It’s a total win for Jerry Dias and Unifor. They got everything they were looking to get going into the talks; every box right now is checked,” said Tony Faria, professor emeritus, office of automotive and vehicle research at the University of Windsor’s Odette School of Business.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News, 2, GM
      Press Release is on Page 2


      General Motors of Canada Media Statement
      OSHAWA, ON, September 20, 2016 — General Motors of Canada and Unifor have reached a tentative new collective agreement, covering approximately 3,860 represented employees at just after midnight on September 20th 2016.  The agreement will enable significant new product, technology and process investments at GM’s Oshawa, St. Catharines and Woodstock facilities, placing those operations at the forefront of advanced manufacturing flexibility, innovation and environmental sustainability.  This agreement is subject to member ratification.  We will be working with government on potential support, and will provide further details on the investment at the appropriate time, while respecting Unifor’s ratification process.
    • By William Maley
      Trying to figure out what is coming down the pipeline at Alfa Romeo is an exercise in frustration. It seems a month doesn't go by without something changing, whether it be a new model or plans being scrapped for another. Automotive News has done their best to figure out what's in and out for Alfa Romeo.
      Let's begin with what has been scrapped. First is the flagship sedan to take on the likes of the BMW 5-Series and Mercedes-Benz E-Class. This sedan would have used an extended version of the Giulia's RWD platform known as Giorgio. Second is a larger roadster that would have shared the platform and powertrains of the Giulia. The roadster being shelved is due to global sales of roadsters declining. 
      So what's left in the pipeline? There is large crossover that will share the underpinnings with the upcoming Stelvio. This model is being primarily aimed for the Chinese and U.S. markets. The other is a Giulia coupe that will take on the BMW 4-Series. Expect a similar engine lineup to the sedan. No date was given for either model.
      One model still up in the air is the possible replacement for the Giulietta compact. Alfa Romeo is running the numbers to see whether it makes sense to go with rear-wheel drive with a shortened Giorgio platform or stick with front-wheel drive.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Trying to figure out what is coming down the pipeline at Alfa Romeo is an exercise in frustration. It seems a month doesn't go by without something changing, whether it be a new model or plans being scrapped for another. Automotive News has done their best to figure out what's in and out for Alfa Romeo.
      Let's begin with what has been scrapped. First is the flagship sedan to take on the likes of the BMW 5-Series and Mercedes-Benz E-Class. This sedan would have used an extended version of the Giulia's RWD platform known as Giorgio. Second is a larger roadster that would have shared the platform and powertrains of the Giulia. The roadster being shelved is due to global sales of roadsters declining. 
      So what's left in the pipeline? There is large crossover that will share the underpinnings with the upcoming Stelvio. This model is being primarily aimed for the Chinese and U.S. markets. The other is a Giulia coupe that will take on the BMW 4-Series. Expect a similar engine lineup to the sedan. No date was given for either model.
      One model still up in the air is the possible replacement for the Giulietta compact. Alfa Romeo is running the numbers to see whether it makes sense to go with rear-wheel drive with a shortened Giorgio platform or stick with front-wheel drive.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      Jaguar has reportedly been given the go-ahead for their electric SUV project. Autocar reports that the vehicle, possibly named E-Pace will be revealed later this year and go into production in 2018.
      Sources at Jaguar said the vehicle was going be a Range Rover, known as the Evoque-e. However, the project was moved over to Jaguar. This little bit of information confirms a part of a rumorpile story from last month talking about Jaguar's future EV plans. The E-Pace will be smaller than the new F-Pace and feature more aggressive styling.
      Power will come two electric motors - one on the front axle with 114 horsepower and one on the rear with 195 horsepower. Total output is said to be around 308 horsepower. The battery size is unknown. Prototypes running around had a 70 kWh battery. But Autocar expects a larger battery to deliver a range of 280 to 300 miles.
      Source: Autocar

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)