• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    North Carolina Rejects Tesla's Dealership Application


    • Tesla hits a roadblock in North Carolina and Michigan

    The latest way Tesla has been trying to get around states that ban direct sales (Michigan for example) is to apply for a dealer license. But this plan appears to not be working.

     

    Automotive News reports that North Carolina's Division of Motor Vehicles has rejected Telsa's application to attain a second dealership license and said the automaker must go through a third-party dealership group. The ruling states that Tesla didn't meet the specific requirements to become exempt from a state law prohibiting manufacturers from owning dealers.

     

    Tesla already has one store in North Carolina in Releigh and was hoping open a new store at their service center in Matthews (suburb of Charlotte).

     

    The DMV order signed by signed by Administrative Hearing Officer Larry Greene, said there are “at least three independent dealers” in the market that would be able to own and operate a Tesla dealership “in a manner consistent with the public interest.”

     

    The news gets slightly worse for Tesla. Earlier this month, The Detroit News got their hands on documents between the state of Michigan and Tesla ranging from 2014 to early 2016 detailing the saga of Tesla trying to sell vehicles in the state. The most recent development saw the Secretary of State’s office requesting Tesla to provide proof that it is a franchised dealer. If not, the state will not rule on the applications.

     

    Secretary of State spokesman Fred Woodhams in an email said this it’s “an explicit requirement in state law.” Tesla doesn't see it that way.

     

    “We don’t harm any franchised dealers by selling directly; we have no relationships with any franchised dealers we would be unfairly competing against. Unlike if General Motors opened up their own store-owned dealership across the street from a franchised dealer that they gave rights to,” said Todd Maron, Tesla's general counsel.

     

    We highly recommend checking out The Detroit News piece to get the full picture of this mess.

     

    It is becoming very clear the only way for this to be settled once and for all is for it to go to the courts.

     

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News

    0


      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    What the issue is here is this. 

    GM is not so much against Tesla selling direct as they are opening the door for anyone to sell direct. This is what gets lost in this argument. It is not the cause they are against the effect. 

    I wish i could find it again but it was laid out well in a story a while back. Automakers are not against Tesla but they are against selling direct if they are not able to shed the dealers they have now. 

    GM is a good example. First they generally now have way to many dealers as it is. During Chapter 11 they were not permitted to close the dealers they wanted to close. So while they lost some closing divisions they still have way too many Chevy. Cadillac and Buick dealers. 

     

    Now if you open the door to any new MFG coming into our market and letting them sell direct in a limited number of locations they would be at a distinct advantage over any existing dealer network. Well if it is not China that is scaring them who is? The Chinese MFG's that are just wanting to come into to this county with cut rate prices already and the ability to leverage even more profit selling direct. It is not Tesla's 50K-100K cars when ever they get there but the Cars Chinese MFG can bring in and sell in the millions. 

     

    Think the Chinese can't do that then look at Hyundai and were they were 20 years ago in this country and look now. 

     

    Now if the government would give the ability to let automakers end their franchise deals with the dealers with no penalties and protect them from lawsuits then they would be all in on the selling direct. The problem is there is a snow balls chance the government will permit this so the MFG are willing to force the issue and keep a level playing field with the new incoming MFGs. 

     

    You can call it out dated and past its time but it also is a Pandora's box that was opened decades ago that was much easier to open than close. 

     

    I would love to see selling direct or even on Amazon or what ever but I do not want to see any American Automaker put at a disadvantage to a maker that could come in with the unfair advantage. 

    On top of this you have the dealer associations fighting this as they know they are dead meat if the government gives any automaker the ability to sell direct. There is a lot of money in some of these dealer networks anymore as they are national chains not just some mom and pop store. People like Penske and Hendricks have invested billions and do not plan to lose their cut. 

     

    I just wish more people would look beyond the Elon cheer leading and learn what all is going on here and just what all is at stake for each party and you can better understand why they are fighting this. To think it is all about Tesla is foolish. It is the 8000 pound gorilla on the other side of the Pacific they are more concerned  about not Bonzo in California. 

     

    People are tired of high car prices and the market is ripe for cheap models from China that people will buy because it is all they can afford. Their entrance to our market would be devastating if they could retail from Walmart or even Amazon if all MFG could not participate. 

     

    This is a deal it has to be everyone or no one and there is no in between. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That argument falls apart though in that there are no independent Tesla dealerships for Tesla Corporate to compete with. I can somewhat see the argument against GM owned stores when there are lots of GM independent dealers out there... But that's not the case with Tesla.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Let Tesla sell direct, the one big issue for me is their using a crappy company, Pet Boys to service their expensive auto's and Pet Boys has terrible service.

     

    Let this force the existing auto companies to step up their game with quality world class service as I want to have my auto taken care of be it my trailblazer AWD SS or any of my Cadillacs in the same high quality manner.

     

    I like dealerships where I can go and view the options, talk to a person and then test drive and either buy or order up my new ride. I see no difference than Tesla having their own stores and needing to service them. I would have liked them to have their own service shop but instead they took the cheap way out of subcontracting it out to  a joke of a auto company.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    what i don't like about GM still, is many of their dealers are still old, and operate in the old ways of business.  Meanwhile, the Euro and Japanese mfrs have really brought out the artillery with nice new push dealerships, polished standardized sales approaches (that are often one price or more customer friendly) and have huge inventories.

     

    I have a Chevy dealer right in my home town and another about 5 miles away.  Both are run by old school empires that are small end or perhaps little arms of bigger ends.  But their sales and service tactics are 1970's still.  Very few Chevy dealers have really customer friendly operations IMO.  I can't buy from the 4 or 5 closest Chevy dealers to home because of their environment and tactics.  not at all modern.

     

    I think this is where Chevy is in a pickle.  Lots of their old guard slowing their ability to change.  Remember the buickmans of the world.

    Edited by regfootball
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Agree, Lately it seems that all Detroit based auto companies have taken up the hated Used Ford Sales approach and really lack any common sense customer service focused sales approach.

     

    GM need to reboot the dealer and if the dealer is not willing to change, invest in updating to be a modern dealership, then they loose their dealership rights and become independent (non auto focused franchise, like a generic used car lot) or close down.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That argument falls apart though in that there are no independent Tesla dealerships for Tesla Corporate to compete with. I can somewhat see the argument against GM owned stores when there are lots of GM independent dealers out there... But that's not the case with Tesla.

     

    See that argument falls apart as Tesla can do like everyone else was forced to do and sell dealer franchises like everyone else. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Agree, Lately it seems that all Detroit based auto companies have taken up the hated Used Ford Sales approach and really lack any common sense customer service focused sales approach.

     

    GM need to reboot the dealer and if the dealer is not willing to change, invest in updating to be a modern dealership, then they loose their dealership rights and become independent (non auto focused franchise, like a generic used car lot) or close down.

     

    You do realize all the tactics that GM employs to try to force and leverage dealers to obey the agreement. 

    The surveys they send out they do not expect good or above average as they want perfect reviews. If a dealer fails these numbers they are cut from dealer hold back programs and discounts. Also saturation programs on what cars go where get directed to high scoring dealers and poor performers get cut back on hot models. 

     

    They have tied to force poor dealers out many other ways too. I have a co worker who worked sales for 25 years at a top performing dealer and he has told so many stories on what GM tries but the dealers tend to know how to counter and often fight back with legal and political threats. It is a constant tug of war. 

     

    Even in the bail out just look a what happened there. They tried to kill so many under producing dealers and poor dealers but yet the dealers cried to DC and made GM a villain for trying to close these bad dealers down. 

     

    Now for the better dealers GM will even pay for the updates to help them. I have a GMC used to be Pontiac dealer locally. They are near a very bad Chevy, Buick dealer. GM would love the GMC dealer to take control of the bad dealer but as of yet not been able to force them out. The GMC dealer is so good that they are making money hand over fist just selling GMC trucks. I have never worked with a dealer that was so good to work with. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I expected this to be about bathrooms. Because NC is a toilet. 

     

    Actually NC is really one of the best places in this country to live. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Agree, Lately it seems that all Detroit based auto companies have taken up the hated Used Ford Sales approach and really lack any common sense customer service focused sales approach.

     

    GM need to reboot the dealer and if the dealer is not willing to change, invest in updating to be a modern dealership, then they loose their dealership rights and become independent (non auto focused franchise, like a generic used car lot) or close down.

     

    You do realize all the tactics that GM employs to try to force and leverage dealers to obey the agreement. 

    The surveys they send out they do not expect good or above average as they want perfect reviews. If a dealer fails these numbers they are cut from dealer hold back programs and discounts. Also saturation programs on what cars go where get directed to high scoring dealers and poor performers get cut back on hot models. 

     

    They have tied to force poor dealers out many other ways too. I have a co worker who worked sales for 25 years at a top performing dealer and he has told so many stories on what GM tries but the dealers tend to know how to counter and often fight back with legal and political threats. It is a constant tug of war. 

     

    Even in the bail out just look a what happened there. They tried to kill so many under producing dealers and poor dealers but yet the dealers cried to DC and made GM a villain for trying to close these bad dealers down. 

     

    Now for the better dealers GM will even pay for the updates to help them. I have a GMC used to be Pontiac dealer locally. They are near a very bad Chevy, Buick dealer. GM would love the GMC dealer to take control of the bad dealer but as of yet not been able to force them out. The GMC dealer is so good that they are making money hand over fist just selling GMC trucks. I have never worked with a dealer that was so good to work with. 

     

    yes the dealer in my hometown here was slated for  closure and they contested it with all their might, and ended up keeping it.  Even with another dealer 5 miles away.  And they have not changed their dealings one bit.  Facility still sucks.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Agree, Lately it seems that all Detroit based auto companies have taken up the hated Used Ford Sales approach and really lack any common sense customer service focused sales approach.

     

    GM need to reboot the dealer and if the dealer is not willing to change, invest in updating to be a modern dealership, then they loose their dealership rights and become independent (non auto focused franchise, like a generic used car lot) or close down.

     

    You do realize all the tactics that GM employs to try to force and leverage dealers to obey the agreement. 

    The surveys they send out they do not expect good or above average as they want perfect reviews. If a dealer fails these numbers they are cut from dealer hold back programs and discounts. Also saturation programs on what cars go where get directed to high scoring dealers and poor performers get cut back on hot models. 

     

    They have tied to force poor dealers out many other ways too. I have a co worker who worked sales for 25 years at a top performing dealer and he has told so many stories on what GM tries but the dealers tend to know how to counter and often fight back with legal and political threats. It is a constant tug of war. 

     

    Even in the bail out just look a what happened there. They tried to kill so many under producing dealers and poor dealers but yet the dealers cried to DC and made GM a villain for trying to close these bad dealers down. 

     

    Now for the better dealers GM will even pay for the updates to help them. I have a GMC used to be Pontiac dealer locally. They are near a very bad Chevy, Buick dealer. GM would love the GMC dealer to take control of the bad dealer but as of yet not been able to force them out. The GMC dealer is so good that they are making money hand over fist just selling GMC trucks. I have never worked with a dealer that was so good to work with. 

     

    yes the dealer in my hometown here was slated for  closure and they contested it with all their might, and ended up keeping it.  Even with another dealer 5 miles away.  And they have not changed their dealings one bit.  Facility still sucks.

     

     

    Yes GM tried and is trying to cut the number of stores but they are stopped with legal actions and government intervention. 

     

    I have a local dealer here that should have been killed years ago. Not only are they small and very low volume but they are the classic rip off dealer with the old bait and switch tactics and other games, 

    Ford has had  similar issues here as one dealer here was making deals to discount cars more if the buyer signed an agreement to take all the dealer work else where. Ford tried to shut them down but could not. Ford even tried to have a dealer here that they owned to sell all their lease turn in cars. It was a loop hole till it was challenged and now it is gone. 

    The fact is Detroit automakers have no love for the dealer system but they also want all automakers on a level playing ground So if they are forced to sell cars with one arm tied behind their backs they want all new comers to have to play by the same rules to if they can not be permitted to close down dealers. 

     

    The only way GM and the others can lose dealers is to buy them out and can you imagine what that would cost. That would take money they just don't have or is needed to be spent on something else. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    That argument falls apart though in that there are no independent Tesla dealerships for Tesla Corporate to compete with. I can somewhat see the argument against GM owned stores when there are lots of GM independent dealers out there... But that's not the case with Tesla.

     

    See that argument falls apart as Tesla can do like everyone else was forced to do and sell dealer franchises like everyone else

     

     

    That horse left the barn over 100 years ago.  It's time to update the rules.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    That argument falls apart though in that there are no independent Tesla dealerships for Tesla Corporate to compete with. I can somewhat see the argument against GM owned stores when there are lots of GM independent dealers out there... But that's not the case with Tesla.

     

    See that argument falls apart as Tesla can do like everyone else was forced to do and sell dealer franchises like everyone else. 

     

    Just because it is the old way of doing things doesn't mean it is the right way or fair way of doing things. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That argument falls apart though in that there are no independent Tesla dealerships for Tesla Corporate to compete with. I can somewhat see the argument against GM owned stores when there are lots of GM independent dealers out there... But that's not the case with Tesla.

     

    See that argument falls apart as Tesla can do like everyone else was forced to do and sell dealer franchises like everyone else.

     

    That horse left the barn over 100 years ago.  It's time to update the rules.

    I fully agree it needs to change but how do you do it and not put any of the MFG that have been forced into this 100 years ago not be left at a disadvantage? How do you yank dealerships some good but low volume 80 year old family businesses away from them?

    To just open the door to new MFG would be unfair to the old ones you forced into this in the first place.

    It would be like going to Indy and telling the teams like Penske and Foyt that you started racing when wings were not legal and you are no longer permitted to use them. But any new team coming in can use all the wings they want to use.

    Now if you chose to run with wings we will take you to court and file a law suit you will not win.

    The fact is this is not just some simple knot you can cut out or untie easily. There are many sides to this and to roll this back to a level field to the satisfaction of all parties is very difficult to next to impossible with out someone losing big here.

    Then you factor in any car company not in the market now that would come in from China or India at much cheaper priced and even lower overhead with no dealers to share cost with. That would finish off most of the standing brands here that are not strong and weakening the strong brands we have left.

    Toss in on this that the media pounds the automakers as the evil empires taking on the poor mom and pop dealers they find to do a story on and no one in Washington will touch this to undo the knot they tied.

    Finally never underestimate the dealer associations. This group is very powerful much like the Teamsters but in their case very wealthy people who own large groups of dealers. Names like Penske, Hendrick Buffet, Spitzer and other large and powerful owners are involved here. They will not let their dealers lose any advantage easily.

    Note too if Elon dropped this tomorrow the fight would still go on till the government levels the field for the MFG. If they do that and let the MFG end all agreements they would take this deal as fast as they could shake on this.

    But the biggest issue is people think you can either just open the door to new MFG and not address the old dealer issues and they miss the repercussions of not addressing it.

    There is a lot of money at risk for the dealers and the MFG do not want to give new coming MFG any more advantages than they themselves can get.

    This is why when we change or make laws we really need to see if there are ways to undo them later if needed. Otherwise you get stuck with them and no easy way out.

    Now do you see DC giving new MFG from China an advantage over the companies they just spent billions on to bail out? As for now Tesla is making the noise but they are not the point of concern just their goal is.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe the dealership network should sell itself to the public and just make going to a dealership a good experience rather than one that people dread. Just be the best they can be as opposed to forcing their system on other companies.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's rather simple.... if McDonalds, Marriott, Apple, etc can have both corporate owned and franchised stores, then so can dealerships.   Car dealerships deserve ZERO special accommodation to protect their businesses from competition.  I can't think of a single other business that has such archaic laws aside from the liquor laws in some states.

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That argument falls apart though in that there are no independent Tesla dealerships for Tesla Corporate to compete with. I can somewhat see the argument against GM owned stores when there are lots of GM independent dealers out there... But that's not the case with Tesla.

     

    See that argument falls apart as Tesla can do like everyone else was forced to do and sell dealer franchises like everyone else.

    Just because it is the old way of doing things doesn't mean it is the right way or fair way of doing things.

    Never said it was right or fair.

    What I am trying to get across is that this is a business situation that many people have a lot of money and power tied up in this and it will be a bloody financial mess to undo it.

    The Dealers and the well financed dealer associations are not going to go quietly.

    The automakers can not afford to buy out dealers but they can fight to keep the rules to where a new incoming MFG can not take advantage of a reform they can not share in.

    And the politicians are not going to want to be seen as aiding Import and Chinese MFG's come in and do damage to Auto MFG they just spent billions bailing out.

    You tell me how you undo this to where the automakers are not hurt, The dealers can not file lawsuits and politicians are not afraid to support and then you have it made. But at this point there is no way without some losing and losing big.

    Keep in mind this is not unlike the Nuclear Proliferations. This would be much better world if everyone got rid of them. But the truth is while they may agree to deals to limits they will never give up all of them or give up what they feel is an advantage. We have had them for 60 plus years now and once the Genie was out of the bottle there is no way to get it back in again.

    To change this to where everyone is in agreement money has to go to the dealers to buy them out but who has the money or is willing to do it? No one. The Automakers can not afford it and the government is not going to do it so you are left with them kicking the can down the road. Note the larger the national dealers become the more power they will hold. Hell even Penske considered buying Saturn at one point. They are not the local mom and pop dealers of old anymore.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How to do it without hurting the manufacturers? Make dealerships worthy of making people want to go to them. Keep their dealership network but make them good. Don't make them hostile, dirty, crummy employees/salespeople. Beat the competition the way they know how(or should know how), great customer service. The best businesses/corporations out there all have one thing in common, great customer service. McDonald's, while employing idiots at times, know how to make a customer happy at the end of the day. Kiss the customer's ass and give them the free crap they feel entitled to(right or wrong) and boom customer leaves happy. Treat a potential 15-100k spending customer like they are about to spend 15-100k not like they're(the salesperson) about to receive a $200 commission check.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The very BEST thing that could happen is that manufacturers start competing with existing dealer networks. 

    Exactly! 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    Loading...



  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. sciguy_0504
      sciguy_0504
      (30 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt
      Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.CheersandGears.com
       
      Tesla / Solarcity merger, Brilliant or Disaster?

      Tesla announced their intent to buy SolarCity and some screamed the sky is falling. Tesla moves forward with offering a complete home solution of Solar panels, battery bank and 220V charging for your Tesla and believes they have the future tied up in a single one stop shopping solution that beats all the other Auto OEMS.

      The merger final vote by Solarcity shareholders is scheduled for Nov 17th 2016. Yet with this deal not done yet, there are many that have divided into two camps, those that think this is brilliant such as reported by Barron's yesterday that ISS one of the largest outside analyst groups that advises shareholders on mergers gave it's blessing to what they believe is an outstanding tie up of two companies that can maximize return on investments. Barron's believes that Tesla has addressed all the concerns that allow for a successful merger of the two companies and a maximizing of complementary products.
      Barron's Story
      One CNBC story feels that this merger might even be a little late. They agree that Solarcity will provide about $1 Billion next year in revenue to the new merged company and add about $500 million in cash to the Tesla corporation over the next 3 years.
      CNBC Story
      Then you have the latest story also from CNBC where a different analyst believes this is nothing but one large mistake and that is due to what he sees as an impossible return on the investment. Yet even with that he also points out to strong supporters such as Ron Baron who ownes 1.5 million shares that see a 30 to 50 times return on the stock due to the merger. 
      CNBC Story 2
      Yet with all this,  “Playing Amish Paradise in my Tesla,” Musk shared with his 5.8 million Twitter followers on Sunday we have the man himself seeing a much simpler life for us all in the new EV world.
       
      So what is your thoughts on this whole merger and the new EV world Musk sees for us all?
       
    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt
      Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.CheersandGears.com
       
      Tesla Ends Free Charging Jan 1st 2017

      Tesla has announced the end of their free supercharging for all new auto's starting January 1st 2017. CNBC has reported that Tesla has informed them that all auto's sold starting Jan 1st 2017 will only come with a free yearly use of 400KWh or equal to about 1000 miles of driving. After this users of their Supercharging stations will have to pay local electrical rate fee's up to a certain point. This is to allow Tesla to grow their north american network from the current 734 stations with 4600 superchargers. Their superchargers charge a 170 mile range in 30 min. Tesla also has stated that the cost to charge can and will fluctuate over time depending on the time of year and regional area due to the costs of electricity in that area. With Tesla planning to product annually 500,000 cars a year starting in 2018, many think this is necessary to grow. Others feel differently and further yet some wonder if they sell their existing Tesla S, does the life time of free charging transfer with the car to the new owner? This in itself could enhance resale of older tesla's built before January 1st 2017. 
      Tesla has stated that more defined details will be released by the end of 2016. At this time, if you want lifetime free charging, buy your Tesla S or X now and take delivery by April 17th 2017.
      CNBC story
    • By ccap41
      "Tesla has created its own glass technology group, CEO Elon Musk announced this week on a conference call, reports Eletrek. Not only will this special glass be used for solar roof tiles, but it will also have automotive applications. In fact, the first car to receive the new glass will be the Model 3, Musk confirmed.
      Last week, Tesla announced it would create actual solar roofs (as opposed to solar panels) that are highly durable and can provide power for homes. In a video posted to Twitter, Tesla showed off the strength of its new solar roof glass tiles. But the ultra-strong glass technology will apparently trickle down to the roof or windshield of the Model 3. The entry-level sedan offers a full-length glass roof spanning from the windshield to the rear window, making it the perfect vehicle for this tech. Then again, the Tesla Model S already features an open, airy panoramic roof, and the Model X has the largest glass panoramic windshield in production.
      Musk took to Twitter to explain the benefits of the special glass.
      Ads by ZINC                                                       The director of Tesla Glass is Mike Pilliod, who was a top materials engineer at Apple. He has patented innovations relating to glass, including glass touchscreens.
      Source: Eletrek, Business Insider "
      http://www.motortrend.com/news/tesla-model-3-use-glass-technology-solar-roofs/
      I just thought this was waaaay too cool not to share!
    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt
      Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.CheersandGears.com
       
      Tesla Reports First Profit after 12 Quarterly Losses!

      Surprise, Surprise, Tesla posts a $22 million profit for it's latest quarter. How did Tesla do this?
      Wall Street Story
      WSJ reports that Tesla reports the following numbers:
      Selling pollution tax credits to other auto makers. Gross profit from the credits soared to $139 million from $39 million a year ago.
      Revenue is up to $2.3 billion from $936.8 million a year earlier.
      Tesla said it generated free cash flow, repaid $600 million in debt and finished September with $3.1 billion in cash, a decline of $162 million from the end of June.  
      Tesla also lowered its forecast for capital spending this year to $1.8 billion from $2.25 billion. About $1 billion of that spending could occur in the fourth quarter, it said.
      Shares were up 5% to $212.05 in after-hours trading on Wednesday.
      WSJ says this has been helped by Tesla's newest Model S version that starts now at $66,000 which contributed greatly to their bottom line as the Q3 was the first full quarter of Entry level Model S sales.
      Barclays auto analysts has stated that Tesla will need $2.5 billion through the end of 2017 for the Model 3 rollout and completion of the battery factory.
      WSJ Web Page Story
    • By William Maley
      Last year, Tesla gave the Los Angeles Police Department two Model S P85Ds to evaluate for possible duty as a police vehicle. It seems the LAPD were impressed that they have decided to equip one of the two models to duty as a patrol vehicle.
      NBC affiliate KNBC in Los Angeles reports that the LAPD is working with Tesla on an agreement to equip one of the Model Ss with the equipment needed for patrol duty - radios, computer, custody cage, and locking shotgun rack.
      "They will have an active role equipping this vehicle," said Vartan Yegiyan, LAPD's assistant commander of the Administrative Services Bureau - the group that oversees the vehicles of the department.
      Once equipped, the Model S will be put to the test with doing patrol work and possibly as a high-speed pursuit vehicle.
      No matter how the Model S fares in this test, it is still an expensive proposition for the department. Depending on the configuration, a Model S can upwards over $130,000 - this is before it is fitted with all the equipment needed for a police vehicle. The LAPD believes it could be about five years before they seriously consider replacing their conventional patrol vehicles with electrics.
      Source: KNBC
      Pic Credit: LAPD HQ on Twitter

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online