Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
the_yellow_dart

New RDX is damn short!

15 posts in this topic

I saw one on the street today, looked funny for an SUV to be that short.

RDX: 1655 mm

Compare this to

Vibe/Matrix: 1580 mm

Equinox/Torrent: 1703 mm

RAV4: 1745 mm

I mean, yes, it's taller than the Vibe/Matrix, but that's not saying much.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a Hon-Duh so there's much more effed up

about it than just weelbase or over all length... :rolleyes:

Edited by Sixty8panther
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not that new...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it only needs to be big enough to hold shopping bags from the mall. as far as the intended clientele.......

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not that new...

Considering how many they've sold... It could be new to him... seeing it on the road. :lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering how many they've sold... It could be new to him... seeing it on the road. :lol:

Actually, yes, this is the first one I've seen in real life.

Is this really that old??

By 'short' I meant height, not length.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A whole thread just because the RDX is 2 inches shorter than the Equinox? Someone must be bored today.......

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been out for about a year (there was one in the showroom at the Acura dealership when I had to go get some paperwork regarding the Solara) but they do sell slowly. Probably because the MDX is better in every way for a few bucks more per month.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, the MDX is the first crossover to beat out the SRX in C&D's comparisons.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, the MDX is the first crossover to beat out the SRX in C&D's comparisons.

And the good thing is SRX still finished second compared to the Germans and others. Not bad for an aging platform and design.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the good thing is SRX still finished second compared to the Germans and others. Not bad for an aging platform and design.

If only the SRX didn't get straight black marks (worst reliability) in all areas from Consume Reports, for 2004-2005 model years.

I want to know what exactly about the SRX caused it to get straight black marks in all categories of reliability.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If only the SRX didn't get straight black marks (worst reliability) in all areas from Consume Reports, for 2004-2005 model years.

I want to know what exactly about the SRX caused it to get straight black marks in all categories of reliability.

probably the BAMR

big ass moon roof

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If only the SRX didn't get straight black marks (worst reliability) in all areas from Consume Reports, for 2004-2005 model years.

I want to know what exactly about the SRX caused it to get straight black marks in all categories of reliability.

Since when were their words a marking on the stone? :scratchchin:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since when were their words a marking on the stone? :scratchchin:

When its convenient like the Fusion being lauded.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0