Jump to content
Create New...

Interesting Option...Old School


HarleyEarl

Recommended Posts

Breaker 1-9, breaker 1-9, GM had that too. Not sure about Chrysler, but they prolly did, CBs were a huge fad for a few years.:)

IIRC, it was an option with just about everybody from around '76-80. IIRC, my folks had one as an option in their '79 Lincoln and my Dad put one in our '78 Southwind and '82 Pace Arrow motorhomes. I remember as a kid listening to it in the motorhome and my Dad playing around on it to get traffic info on cross-country vacations.

Edited by moltar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again with the "pillared-hardtop" moniker.

Go F*** Yourself Ford. <_<

Whoever came up with that got an F- in marketing 101.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again with the "pillared-hardtop" moniker.

Go F*** Yourself Ford. <_<

Whoever came up with that got an F- in marketing 101.

Wierd...it was a thread on CBs.. and GM did the same thing..didn't they call theirs 'Collonade hardtops'? (Ford had theirs from '72-79, GM '73-77). They weren't a regular 4dr sedan because of the frameless door glass. I started a thread on this topic a few weeks ago (Subaru trivia)..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Collonades are lame too..... anything safety-nazi-subserviant is dumb.

I hate Ralph Nader. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's GM being innovative, designing and producing one of the most unique and

interesting vehicles ever to come out of the USA in mass production, with unique

styling, amazingly innovative, even though emulating the classic & mighty KdF

Volkswagen, and what does Nader do? Destroys it with half-truths and bullcrap

safety nazi propaganda. "Unsafe at any Speed" is a load of Camel-Turd.

Read it and report back to me... :mellow:

By the time the Corvair went out of production in 1969, it was PROVEN that it was

a n absolutely average car in safety, both crashes & fatalities were NO higher than

an average mid-1960s production car here in the USA.

It's funny how people accuse GM of being complacent, greedy and lazy in decades

past, of perpetuating planned-obsolescence and refusing to be innovative... it's a

typical belief of the "F*** the Big 3, let 'em crash & burn while we bail out banks"

Sheeple, and yet, here in 1960, with already a near-monopoly in the Automotive

marketplace GM was being more innovative and thinking outside the box more so

than anyone else PERIOD.

And they got crucified for it. The Corvair, and its amazingly fresh thinking was a

step in the right direction and yet misinformed people still talk trash of it to this day.

All the more reason why GM SHOULD build hardtops again, and keep BOF giant

trucks in production, give the people what they WANT!!!

Edited by Sixty8panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most recent factory Cb spot:

1979 Cadillac Coupe deVille DIESEL with factory CB/8-track!

In the junkyard, now crushed! :( :( :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most recent factory Cb spot:

1979 Cadillac Coupe deVille DIESEL with factory CB/8-track!

In the junkyard, now crushed! :( :( :(

Sadly, I see a LOT of BOF RWD cars crushed flat and headed for the shredder.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings