Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Sixty8panther

The King of all H2 Hummers

10 posts in this topic

Found on the net in an undisclosed location. Hummer Rice, unbelievable. I actually like it!

Posted Image

Posted Image
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So opening the doors now requires a stepladder. Pure brilliance <_<
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
saw the h2 in truckin's SUV a little while back. i like it, but its not to practical, but then again who with a h2 besides bam margeres actually punishes the thing enough to make it usefull anyways?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LIke ANY H2 is practical. :P
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
68panther i always wanted to ask you what if the 3 of the 5 were, RWD, RWD, and RWD....would you want it then? It could be a slow 3 cylinder like in the old Geo's with a slushbox and RWD would you still consider it a winner? LOL
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody, do we need more height on the Impala... it needs to touch the ceiling!

[post="9913"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


No.... it needs more cowbell....

Posted Image
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

68panther i always wanted to ask you what if the 3 of the 5 were, RWD, RWD, and RWD....would you want it then? It could be a slow 3 cylinder like in the old Geo's with a slushbox and RWD would you still consider it a winner? LOL

[post="13404"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


Good question. I'm known for being a HUGE fan of RWD and I hate most FWD cars. I also dislike Automatics but I can forgive that more easily than FWD.

Look at it this way. A 1982 Camaro Iron Duke (4-cylinder) is as slow as piss but at least it's RWD. It may be as slow as a 3-cylinder Metro in 100% stock form but at least you start off wiht potential.

I can take an old tired Camaro like this and drop in a nice healthy 350 and be running 13s at the track all days long, or perhaps an LS1?, LS6?, or how about the 502 big blockl crate? Screw it might as well shove in the 9.4 liter 572.

See what I mean? all it takes to make an old school rwd car great is a better engine and trans. But on the other hand a FWD 1992 Civic will always be lame even after you spend $20,000 on ground effects, rims, turbos, NOS & paint.

To conert a fast car wiht a transverse mounted engine ad FWD to RWD is posible but a huge waste of money in most cases.

RWD = performance & proper handeling. Except for a few exceptions I consider FWD to be lame, impractical, annoying and a waste of torque. Most true car enthusiasts agree.

Hope that answers things for you. :) Edited by Sixty8panther
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0