Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

surreal1272

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,535

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    46

 Content Type 

Everything posted by surreal1272

  1. surreal1272
    So if I don't think it measures up the same way you say it does (even though neither one of us have driven it), then my thoughts don't matter? Is that what you are saying? I mean if you can't help anyone recognize that (using your words here) then that must mean you somehow think your opinion has more weight than anyone else who disagrees with your assessment. Why the absolute thinking over something that is purely subjective up to this point?
  2. surreal1272
    BTW Suave, I'm not trying to sound like an ass but I just don't think you are seeing the whole picture on some matters and getting things twisted up. Nothing personal.
  3. surreal1272
    I think you are wrong. There reduction in rentals (with the subsequent rise in retail sales) has been because of the desire for more more profits, the same reason Ford did for many years. It was well discussed last year when GM announced such a thing. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-30/gm-pulls-back-on-rental-fleet-sales-in-search-of-better-margins Don't know why you are ignoring that fact. Then maybe you should pay attention to what someone is actually saying instead of what you think they are saying. Also, pay attention to current events more. Again, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-30/gm-pulls-back-on-rental-fleet-sales-in-search-of-better-margins
  4. surreal1272
    That's fair enough but it seems like you are just using your personal opinion of it to shape it's reasons for succeeding when that is not really best indicator of such. There's just a few million or more drivers that have to be convinced of the same thing. Just saying.
  5. surreal1272
    Um, I never said that you did say that it would sell 40,000. I said that surveys mean jack squat. Don't know how you could read that any other way Suave. And that is still not a very convincing argument (only because I have heard this said about multiple Lincolns over the last two decades with opposite results) but we can agree to disagree.
  6. surreal1272
    While it is a clear valid point, a better discussion can be had if one is to explain their thinking and who knows, maybe you will want to change from a down to an up vote based on the debate. Both have their point, I just like to better understand why people are thinking the way they do. My downvote explanations will all be the same though.. -1 "Because you're acting like a douche" I'm not sure how much discussion that will bring..lol I say this with all due respect ccap (because we have talked about this before), but what gives you the right to decide who is "acting like a douche"? What you find as "douchy", some other may see as completely legit. Seems kind of childish in a way and a waste of a legit down vote to me. No offense but that is just my take on it.
  7. surreal1272
    By killing the vote system, you kill in the internet cowards who can no longer hide behind their obvious trolling votes. If they can't understand that, then it is proof that they are part of the problem. The same people who say "it's no big deal" are the same ones who took part in said vote trolling (for example, working with another fellow troll to constantly "up vote" themselves to get themselves out the negative side of the column and make themselves seem like "objective" posters). My point is that if you are going to be allowed to vote down someone, then you should have to post your reason for such. If your down vote is a genuine in nature (with objective reasoning) as opposed to trolling and spiteful in nature, then they will have no problem down voting and explaining why. It's that simple. If that is not going to happen, then do away with the vote system altogether.
  8. surreal1272
    Which is the exact same thing that I have seen of every company yet some here think that Lincoln is the exception because some people (and yes 40,000 in this context is "some people") said that they "might" be interested. It's easy to market and push these meaningless surveys but I have seen very few bear any actual real fruit. Saying that one car will be successful, as a result of these surveys, makes zero sense to me when you understand the nature of these surveys.
  9. surreal1272
    Umm...what? Based off of what information? All we know is that Lincoln has struggled in the sedan market just as much as everyone else (and more so in most cases) yet you think more of the same will make it better? Sorry but changing the name from MKS to Continental does not a barometer of success make so I don't know how can make that assessment Suave (knowing all that).
  10. surreal1272
    Some people don't understand the difference between fleet sales and rental sales and that's okay. They also can't seem to acknowledge the fact that rental sales have increased for Ford while it has decreased for GM. The GM rental sales argument was pointed out (by many Ford fans and GM haters) for years as a weakness for GM but now that the roles have reversed, they are oddly silent on that SAME fact occurring for Ford. The rest of us understand perfectly though.
  11. surreal1272
    Exactly. There was a lot interest in the last CTS too but that has not translated to great sales.
  12. surreal1272
    Let me also state, for the record, that I know Cadillac is not totally ignoring an increase in volume sales. That is evidenced by the new lineup of CUVs coming soon. However, to act like that should be their singular focus in order to increase sales/profits, instead of making sure each product they have is top notch and more capable of pulling higher profit margins per individual sale, is simply short sighted and bordering on ignorance.
  13. surreal1272
    Let me say this one more time for you and others who keep making this stupid volume argument. Cadillac doesn't have to go high volume because GM doesn't need them to be. Thats what they have Chevy and (to a lesser extent) Buick for. It's not that hard to figure except to people like SMK who have to create a phantom argument that casts Cadillac in a bad light while all the other factors that got Cadillac here. By all means though, keep arguing about the one point while ignoring all other points. It's certainly got you all this far.
  14. surreal1272
    Wow Suave. Just wow.
  15. surreal1272
    Really because that is not what they have been saying. They are more focused on profit per unit than per sales volume and that is well known Suave.
  16. surreal1272
    Well, you're wrong again. 300K CTSs is not what Cadillac as a brand is going for. As a whole, Cadillac would sit very nicely at 200-250K units annually. 300K of one series is NOT what they're looking for. Cadillac just recently adjusted the CTS pricing/equipment level, and you think raising the price $3K and running the factory 24/7 is the answer. Wow. 320i is wretched. CT6 2.0T is not. Not the same car and choice appeals to luxury buyers. I have no issue with the XTS getting phased out & the CT6 occupying that (general) spot in the catalog. It's a great move forward on many fronts. Glad you responded before I did. This is getting just silly to the point of "why bother" when he just wants to make up new excuses to suit whatever ridiculous argument he is trying to make here.
  17. surreal1272
    That is nowhere even close to comparable to what Balthazaar is talking about and you know it. And your Escalade logic can be easily applied to the fools who continue to buy the fifty year old G-Wagon. I'm sure MB gets a good chuckle on their way to the bank each day, as a result. His original point is how AMG cars depreciate fast, and cost $50,000 or more in depreciation. So let's compare 2 cars using NADA projections. An S550 with a $97,400 MSRP depreciates $64,299, but an E63 with $101,700 depreciates $56,364. So the AMG brand car holds higher % of value and loses less total dollars. That debunks his theory that AMG badges hurt resale value, they help it. An Escalade Platinum 4WD with $91,950 MSRP loses $56,333 in 5 years of depreciation. Loses 61.2% of value over 5 years. Let's compare to the G550, $115,400 MSRP, depreciation of $62,981. Loses 54.6% of value over 5 years. So yes it loses more total dollars, but it costs $24,000 more when new. Throw in a 3rd vehicle, a 2016 GL550 with MSRP of $91,300, virtually the same as the Escalade Platinum. The GL550 loses $49,843 over 5 years, over $6,000 less than an Escalade will lose. Balthazar wanted to say how horrible of a purchase a Mercedes is because it looses a big dollar amount in money, the Escalade is even worse, why not criticize it? That is my counter to the argument, personally I don't think the people spending $100,000 on a vehicle could care at all how it depreciates. These are people that have money to burn, they'll spend 1 million on a house, $50,000 a year on property taxes and not really care. Personally, I also like to buy a used car, after that first 3 years of depreciation has hit. I don't care about when and how your "argument" started. You said, "The Escalade has a 5 year cost to own of $87,000 according to NADA guides. Yet it is Cadillac's number 2 seller and GM's #1 profitable car. Why are people buying Escalades? If depreciation is so bad and driving customers away, they should just stop making the Escalade by that logic. Which of course makes no sense, they will keep building Escalades as long as there are people willing to pay for them. And GM will take their money and laugh all the way to the bank." Which, again, can be applied to the G-Wagon yet you are oddly silent on that and still want to cherry depreciation values while ignoring the fact that the AMG risks further deprecation values because of dilution of the brand. Here's what you need to look at. What was the average depreciation of the AMG brands when there were far fewer choices compared to many choices that exist today and in the future. Look at that if you want to truly understand what is being talked about here. If you don't understand that simple concept, then maybe you just stop trying to argue that particular point. Now, let's see what you pick out next.
  18. surreal1272
    That is nowhere even close to comparable to what Balthazaar is talking about and you know it. And your Escalade logic can be easily applied to the fools who continue to buy the fifty year old G-Wagon. I'm sure MB gets a good chuckle on their way to the bank each day, as a result.
  19. surreal1272
    Not to mention he is constantly trying to compare MBs overall sales numbers with ONE GM company that has a mere fraction of models that MB has on top of the fact that the ONE company is not looking for volume sales (which he has been told at least million times up to this point). More cherry picking by SMK does not change that fact (go ahead and down vote that children).
  20. surreal1272
    Fact. Ford has more models than Chevrolet. They should be outselling them for the same reason that GM beats Ford MoCo. overall. More models.
  21. surreal1272
    Then you haven't been paying attention over the last few years. For years, on two different forum sites, I have read countless posts form Ford fans who dogged on GMs fleet habit and rental sales. All we heard about was "retail profit margins vs. rental and fleet margins" and now that the shoe is on the other foot, they are nowhere to be found (well, one of them with good reason lol). Where were you during all of that (seeing as you were also at both sites)? Seems someone else (not you Suave) glossed over the fact that Ford's rental sales have increased over last year (V6 Mustang anyone?) but that's none of my business. Where is this proof that GM is "practically" surrendering the Fleet market?
  22. surreal1272
    It is a lot no matter how you try to sugarcoat it and it just dilutes the AMG branding.
  23. surreal1272
    Then why is their growth in ATPs double the industry average? Seems like to me they are getting favourable volume in their mix. They're doing record commercial deliveries. Conceivably they could be selling more higher trim F150s to businesses. Who knows. A mystery though how their transactions prices are increasing. Also, a lot of Ford models are older now. The Focus and Fiesta are old, so getting more volume outta them makes sense. But then again, why do we continue to compare Ford's financial performance to GM? It's because for the longest time even as a smaller firm Ford outperformed GM. The General finally getting its act together - I would expect, I WOULD DEMAND GM as a shareholder to beat Ford in retail sales. No $h!. . Because of their upper end trucks. It's right there on the Ford link. Sorry but Bong has a point about the fleet sales and this is well known information at this point.
  24. surreal1272
    What about everything else? C Class? CLK? S? SL? ML? GL? GLK? CLS? And all of the wagon and coupe variations that go with all of those.. have those all only grown 4 inches in 25 years? I would wager good money that isn't the case.. ML/GLE(whatever you want to refer to it as): 1997: 180.6 inches long 2016: 189.1 inches long GLK/GLC 2009(first year it was made): 178.2 inches long 2016: 183.3 inches long Exactly. As I told him, MB has been doing the same thing. They just do it a little differently by creating all these offshoot variations to disguise that very fact. GM is not going to any of the things SMK has brought up and with good reason. Because they know better than him.
  25. surreal1272
    This is just making my head hurt. Is cherry picking the "in" thing these days?
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings