Jump to content
Create New...

balthazar

In Hibernation
  • Posts

    40,855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    583

Everything posted by balthazar

  1. I've only driven wide vehicles for the most part: 72.8 76.9 79.2 79.6 79.0 80.7 and whatever a Silverado measures in at. Never misjudged anything with regards to body dimensions. It's not to accomodate personal width, but the luxury of space is quite pleasant. I hate being pinned in a modern, 72"-ish car with a high console and close wheel, where turning in your seat, never mind trying to reach something in the back, is a hinderance at best. No one bothers to try and build/buy a house that's as narrow/tight/compact as possible, how much energy does it cost to heat & cool those in comparison?
  2. My '59 is one of the widest cars ever (body width, doesn't include sideview mirrors): 80.7". Seats are wonderfully wide.
  3. yea, guess I did. Should've been more specific...
  4. No; I was referring to the cold air induction connection from the air cleaner to the cowl plenum on Camaros. Not sure if it was shipped installed- it was a guess. BTW Sixty8: the 3-piece '70.5 COPO rear spoiler WAS shipped in the trunk.... for dealer installation, but you weren't looking for that. I knew the Firebird RA story- forgot it. Also heard the cross-ram story before, forgot that one, too. Pontiac shipped early ('60) Super Duty cars with SD heads & intake in the trunk, also. Yes: "Ram Air" is a Pontiac moniker.
  5. If the answer is the Firebird, I'm incorrect; Firebirds used hood scoop intakes for RA & I was referring to the Camaro's cowl intake.
  6. Cowl-plenum ram air kit ('67-69)? COPO 3-piece rear spoiler ('70 1/2)?
  7. I've not owned the import Catalog, tho I've also busted up my first edition American '46-75 book due to extensive usage. It's in the American Catalog I've found numerous errors- to the point I've taken to writing correct data in it in pen. One of the individual marque catalogs I've checked out was, by itself; awful.... tho I am trying to recify that. I have a few of the 'encyclopedia' type books- they're great for number of entries but of course they never get into any deep info or specs. Actually, they give such general info that they're probably quite reliable, accuracy-wise.
  8. Well toyota makes 75% of it's global profit in the U.S., so they would probably consider it seriously. As far as anyone else goes,... now you get the idea.
  9. True: the '74.
  10. It went to India if that helps...
  11. Awesome catch! I always though this gen paled next to the C2s, but a buddy has a '68 hardtop and the day I checked it out, I was impressed on many levels with the design. It's stands tall with no apologies. Just last week my brother told me his friend is looking to sell his Corvette Tri-Power set-up, complete, unrestored. Not sure what year it is (it's late '60s), will get his contact info Mon. PM me.
  12. balthazar

    Moved. . .

    Me too: closest town growning up had about 1200. I prefer it, actually. Shoot me a PM if you see stuff older than '65 in that junkyard, esp if it's '40s or '50s or unusual.
  13. balthazar

    NFL time

    I watch the Super Bowl after nosing around a few weeks before to see who's gonna be in it. That's it.
  14. Missed that thread. Your source was incorrect, shame on Cadillac there. I've registered, will add as time allows. Hope it takes off!
  15. Buick: CVT 1948-1964.
  16. Haven't seen it yet (will check...). Is it just a segregation of the auto entries into another domain, ala ebaymotors? Post-check: Is this it??: www.autowikipedia.com Cadillac entry: >>"Founded by Henry Leland? in 1903 {It was 1902}. Aquired by General Motors in 1908 {1909}for $4.5 million. {$5.6 million} I'm confused now (sees 'Flybrian' tagline): Is this connected with wikipedia or no? Is this the post regarding this undertaking, or did I miss explaination elsewhere?
  17. Engines are world's more complex and maleable than transmissions. Short of an infinitly-variable trans, there's no way to achieve more gear ratios without more gears. You think everyone is suddenly just going to stop at 8?? You think mercedes is going to be fine & dandy when hyundais' also have 8-speeds? I strongly doubt it.
  18. Did not Ford, Chevy/GMC & Dodge compete in the pick-up market against each other for decades and decades and decades? Was that not 'competition', either?Solstice is a critical, consumer and physical success story, eating heavily into mazda's corner on the market. It competes extremely well, thanks. It only takes 2 to tango.
  19. On average, cars today have wider & flatter powerbands than ever. They also have --again, on average-- more power. Anything more than 5 speeds... maybe 6.... in a gas engined car is simply not an engineering necessity (I can see 5-6 even 7 gears in diesels, tho). A 1-2% decrease in acceleration times is not discernable without testing equipment, neither is the same gain in fuel economy. Sure, 'every little bit counts', but at what price? And if you have to be told about it (as opposed to experiencing it), is it worth it?"A step ahead"?? This is pure perception, not reality. It's all a game of one-upmanship and there seemingly is no end. Once 2 or 3 makes have 8-speeds, someone will have to go to 9, then 10. Doubt it? We've already gone from 3 to 4 to 5 to 6 to 7 to 8. And it's not progress, it's just 'more'. Why should it stop now? It can't, tho I wish it would.
  20. I have learned not to be surprised when seemingly nice people finally show their scumbag side. This, due to repeated example.
  21. Standard Catalogs are much better than wikipedia of course, tho the SCs are also not without erroneous information. Still: the best general hard data source out there, IMO. As far as making an 'autopedia'.... do you guys know how much information we're talking about??? And if it's all posted from other sources, how do we go about fact-checking it? If it's not more correct that the already-available sources, I don't know if it's worth the mountain of time. Unless we have experts on certain vehicles or multiple sources to cross-reference.
  22. There already is product they have little or no cause to disparage, but backhanded disparaging still continues. And my comment was not a systematic analysis of the piece, merely a singular comment on the ancient mindset of the reviewer. Whether you see it regularly or not, it's also part of the problem and it needs to be corrected, not ignored.
  23. I'm going to hit Hershey on it's weekend instead. May sleep in the truck and make it 2 days, if I can hold out for that many miles of walking....
  24. Over half a million square feet of new facility and only 400 jobs?? yay, toyota.... moving you..... zzzzzzzz Collect a 1 billion dollar business licensing fee for the privaledge to do business in that state & this country. Get it the same way 'Joe Paycheck' 'gets' his: a notice in the mail after everything's done.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search