Jump to content
Create New...

sciguy_0504

Members
  • Posts

    6,321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sciguy_0504

  1. It looks pretty good. Very classy and elegant. I don't think it will "save" Lincoln, though. It will help but Lincoln needs a lot more...like the MKR.
  2. Didn't even know this was being introduced/released at this time. I like the exterior but I can't believe Toyota included that nasty silver plastic in the interior. It's bad enough in the Tundra. Without it, the interior would be great. I really like that brown-orange color. It's different but not in a bad way, IMO.
  3. Not bad. Looks kind of cool.
  4. Doesn't look as "sharp" and "hard" as other recent Caddy designs. I know it's wrapped but it looks slightly melted.
  5. Headlamps are kind of cool, a little bit of overkill. Chocolate brown leather...yum. Interior looks great, though the IP is weird. Edit: Wait a minute...interior doesn't look so great. Having two different types of wood is kind of stupid. The thought of it was good but the application not so. The center stack looks a bit cheap, too, especially the two disc openings.
  6. Blah... I think it looks best in grey but those hood scoops and the bland design don't go well together, IMO. Looks like it's trying too hard.
  7. Looks better than the new Matrix, especially in GT form. Very sporty and eye catching. The interior isn't great but it's not bad. IP looks cool.
  8. The IP is the coolest thing about the car. The gauges look so good. The interior is alright. I'm not fond of the center stack or the color combos. I think the two-tone design looks kind of cheap...a little too crazy, I guess. A simple two-tone with the top of the dashboard and door panels one color and the rest another color would look more sophisticated, IMO. I like the front, I like the sides, I don't like the rear (though the chrome license plate surround is a neat touch).
  9. Besides the interior, not good at all. Is this an MCE? I hope so because it looks like it.
  10. Not bad. The XRS looks pretty sporty. The front end is frumpy, though, and the silver interior treatment looks kind of cheap. The Vibe does look better, though.
  11. sciguy_0504

    IS-F vs. RS4

    On one hand the IS-F makes me laugh. On the other, compared to the IS as a whole, it makes me disappointed.
  12. It looks pretty hot in the first picture. Nice angle.
  13. I think I've seen the rendering before but it was a long time ago. Is it still current? Even if it's not, I like the back end and how it mimics the 9-3 wagon.
  14. I was kind of impressed with up-level models of the Sorento when it first came out but now it's dull. Kia did refresh the US version two years ago, I think. I guess it never made it up north?
  15. Too Audi-ish for me. The interior doesn't look too hot, either.
  16. There are aspects to the car that I like. The front is pretty cool, how the headlights aren't in your face but pushed back into the facia. I also like the tallights, wheels and 3/4 hump/kink. However, I think it's a shame Dodge has to do retro instead of an all-new unique design. I know, I know about the heritage and what not but I don't think Dodge is doing itself any long-term favors with this car. Using heritage cues is one thing (Camaro, Mustang) but basically modernizing an old design is short-term success, long-term waste.
  17. As has already been discussed, GM trucks have had tailgate problems. Some seem to forget so easily.
  18. Jeez...on the first page alone there are people suggesting to can the entire Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep lineup. Jeep: Commander and Compass should go. If the Dakota is going, Jeep should be given a truck. I think it would sell better. Chrysler: Aspen and Crossfire need to go. The Pacifica should definitely stay along with the Sebring. One needs to be updated, the other improved. Drop base 300 models, too. PT Cruiser needs to be dropped and replaced with a nicer, more Chrysler-ish small-to-midsize car. Dodge: Drop the Dakota only if Jeep will get a midsize truck. Keep everything else but base models of the Charger and Magnum. Improve the interiors of everything.
  19. I like it. Bold and stylish but not over the top. Dare I say it looks more expensive than its price tag? At least in that picture. We do need more pics, though.
  20. That red/black combo, while distinctive, is horrible, IMO. It looks like someone painted the dash red himself. The tan/brown interior is much nicer looking.
  21. sciguy_0504

    A Mini SAV?

    Could be very cool if done correctly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings