Z-06

Nice find. A coupe will be good too.

Boredom is for the people who wish I was in one. You are just sulking over the fact that your pompous English words learned from a rigorous curriculum could not retaliate an American Teenager who has better vocabulary than yours.

No I-4 G6's did not come with a Manual. As for Mazda6 that is what caught my eye. An 06 with low miles can be had at as much as 13k, not bad.

Antonym: MILF

I guess you ran out of your wits end. I accept your defeat Lord Aatbloke. As your Captivator, I shall spare your land from my rule.

Yeah her price range is kinda stifling. Another 4-5K and she would have a plethora of options. Fusion does not seem to be a bad idea. I will ask her to give that a try. Used Accord may be not a bad idea either, although some of the people here will disagree.

She told me that she has some points on her GM card. That may not be a bad option then.

I that is why I said with reservations. I agree with edmunds (a rarity) that TSX is few ponies short. It should have been at least about 230hp, that would have made a good case of buying it against the 328i, or C300. Old TSX was a different animal, when it came it had one of the most powerful engines in the category, but the competition has moved on. This logic of having a fully loaded car at anemic horsepowers will work in Europe, but not here. Why should I chose a 69hp less four banger for a price of a V-6 which almost matches it in equipments? (Mid Size Camcords I mean).

I like the idea of the SAAB and olds. What do you think of the Mazda6? She says she likes it.

You may have started it, but I will end it on My Terms. Unlike other hard headed people I do feel about fellow human beings despite how hopelessly pathetic they are. Hence, you do not have to be thankful for my kind words. I told you earlier you can believe whatever you want to regarding my comment. I will repeat it again since your "high level English" could not comprehend : There is no adjective used to provide specifics of the quantity of those American youngsters (it may be abstract), which means it is generalized. I did not infer, it is what was written by you Lordship.

My friend is looking for a decent vehicle that will weather her through her residency. Her Must Haves: Price: $ 12K Max -> Which means used option. Trans: Manual, though not an absolute must. Drive: Any Size: Preferably Midsized but open to ideas. She would prefer an American Vehicle. Any thoughts??

You know Uncle Bob sometimes gets confused and in turn confuses everybody. I think this vehicle is going to be a hit with smaller displacement vehicles. I wish they keep the weight close to 3500-3600 lbs, not close to the Heavy Iron G8.

Here is the Car and Driver review for TSX. They seem to love it. And so does Edmunds with reservations. I just wished the car had about 30-40 HP more than the outgoing one. The new one has added about 160 lb of girth.

Nice research O.C. You can be an Associate at a Management Consulting firm. My best friend went to school at UCR. He flew from John Wayne Airport often. Subaru 2007 WRX Hatchback Black. Looked nice.

It is your belief. You can believe that Queen Victoria is still alive and that she rules half of the world and that you spanked Aussies 5-0 in Ashes 2007. If you have any concrete reasons or evidence to say so that my remark was directed to you, then only you can make it as a claim. Till that time comes let it be a belief, OK? " " You did not use nay of the adjectives like “few” or “some” or “most” in that quote. This it self in English language means generalization, i.e. you are encompassing everybody who fits the criteria. There are bad fishes everywhere. That does not mean you should generalize them into one category and use your sophisticated berating to show off your petulance. I agree with you that forums are for fun, and it is in lighter vein someone calls a Toyota Box as the way it looks like. For some it may look like $h!boxes, for some POS, and for some not tastefully styled. If you cannot let go these quirks of imperfections of others then you need not be on these boards, as your Lordly blood will reach hyperthermia pressures soon reading those words.

Again you are diggressing Lord Aatbloke. I said "whatever" which did not have comments $h!box or POS on anything. You fumigated the matter by giving a statement which does not even belong to you. It was followed by condescending remarks about maturity. If those can be considered fair according to you, why is not POS - Pile of Soil what is wrong with that? Your mind is in the gutter for thinking something else. As for your thinking about jingoism here, go and read ALL of the posts made here by most of us, not everybody has hatred for Japanese cars as your Lordly perception makes you think. Do not take a piecemeal approach and start bashing people and have a stereotypical assessment.

You grow up matured adult Sire. I have right for my opinion even if it is Wrong in your eyes. Don't force yours on me, I did not do that to you. If I was wrong in your eyes, there are better ways to put your words and explain that to me.

Just to let you know wise(-a$$) man, the comment "Whatever" was made for the "Coupe" which Toyota calls that POS, NOT you. So much for being matured, adult enthusiast.

I think it is a win win situation. 1. More sales from converts 2. Good image in the minds of greenies. 3. 2.0 DI T will actually increase the fuel efficiency compared to 3.6 VVT. Both 3.6 VVT and 3.6 DI have almost same fuel efficiency. 4. It is not anemic like the Iron Block.

Good job cagey.

I like to piss in it.

Whatever

What a rear. I meant of the car.