Cory Wolfe

Happy Birthday.

I have such odd tastes... Clicky

I have no idea... It's just a part of that picture. Someone must've felt like comparing them.

Hmm... I'm not sure that I have one, though I generally have an "Oh well" attitude about most things.

Um...? The Tribute is a rebadged Escape. And the Blazer is still worse. Nice try.

ATVs are drift kings.

Hmm... this Formula 5spd is like... affordable. Very affordable. Clicky And a very clean Grand Prix GTP. Clicky. Not to mention a cheap Turbo GP. Clicky

I'll just say that its been snowing like crazy the past few days. Even with nearly bald tires, I haven't yet got stuck. I love RWD and all, but that would be impossible with it. But I think we can all agree that those whose vehicles you most often see stuck or wrecked are the overconfident ones with 4WD/AWD. I've seen my dad get stuck in our own driveway trying to back a trailer into it... without any snow.

Didn't you do that with your Cavalier?

Fair enough. Just don't wreck one... you might die.

I'm sorry, but my professional opinion of S10/Blazers are that they are POS's. End of story.

Looks great, sounds great... No reason it shouldn't do great.

I only know spanish... ¡Feliz cumpleaños!

Hmm... NOSome... You sure that's not a mix of NOS and threesome or whatnot? That's what came to my mind, anyways.

I was talking about the design. Sure, the car itself is special, but I just find the Corvette's design to be so much more interesting. Other than the egg crate grill, it's essentially the same design as any other '55-'57 Ford shrunken down into a two seater. As for the 300... Yes, it's very clean and I can respect that. I more or less meant, for the tail fins, that theyre big, straight lined, and nearly flat. They suddenly start right behind the door. It's like a kink in the design. Then, they tower over the low decklid. It's just not something I like, especially with those huge taillights. The grill on the other hand, it's just shaped so oddly. Its probably by biggest complaint about the 300. Otherwise, you must realise... I'm very picky about '50s cars. Some, I find to be absolutely gorgeous. Some, I find to be completely appalling. While most others, I find to be attractive, but not all that interesting. Probably similar to your opinion of '90s cars.

Well, the Corvette is one of those cars that doesn't need to be mentioned... Ofcourse I like it, though not as much as the C2. The others aren't bad, but I never really liked them. The original Thunderbird is much better later ones for the sole reason of being a true sports car, but there's nothing really special about the design... just a small two seater '50s Ford. The 2nd gen Tbird was horrible compared to it, but I like the 3rd gen's styling more than both of them. The 300 on the other hand... The grill was too much, the tail fins were too much, and the taillights were also too much on the car that is plain for the '50s. Other than the taillights, none of it really relates to size, but more or less the shape and style.

Well, since I have more time, I decided to add a rear view and shade the interior.

Fiero? Hmm... 1988? Go on. GT? Mmm... 5spd? Awesome... T-Tops? Hmm... How much? $13,500? What? Oh hell no. Clicky. Then, there is this one for half as much, minus the T-Tops. Clicky... I'm a Pontiac mood as you can see.

Happy birthday, Sir.

Hmm... GTO + Elcamino. Logical.

Boo. I rushed to finish my interior by tonight. That's atleast why the gauges and steering wheel aren't perfect. Oh well, I'm too lazy to fix it now.

Hmm, that definitely is a concern. That chart was straight from Edmunds, and *ahem* was from a dyno test. All vehicles have less horsepower at the drive wheels than at the flywheel. A duh.

Why? When DCX makes something I actually like, I'll make it known. Since most of their recent products... well... suck, for lack of a better term... they don't give me a chance to. Simple. Well, that's perfect then. I never cared that it was slow, just that it was ugly and the interior was hilariously cheap.